From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest)
To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com
Subject: canslim-digest V2 #110
Reply-To: canslim
Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com
Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk


canslim-digest       Saturday, February 7 1998       Volume 02 : Number 110



In this issue:

       [CANSLIM] CINF
       Re: [CANSLIM] DSWLF warrants
       [CANSLIM] THQI
       Re: [CANSLIM] QCOM aftermarket
       Re: [CANSLIM] QCOM aftermarket
       Re: [CANSLIM] OMQP
       [CANSLIM] "M" and OMQP

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 00:31:19 -0800
From: Mike Lucero <mikelu@foxinternet.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] CINF

Doesn't CINF look ready to pop? They just released last quarter's EPS, up 16%

EPS 80 RS 95

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 07:32:08 -0500
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DSWLF warrants

Like options, as expiration approaches warrants will trade closer to their
"in the money" value. If they are out of the money, then they will trade
purely on speculation that the co will extend the expiration, which often
does happen if the company needs money, as warrant exercise is a cheap way
for a co to raise cash.

Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer.
My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am
a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do
their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on
the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all
investors.
tom w
- -----Original Message-----
From: anthony boone <boonean@nwga.com>
To: CANSLIM <canslim@mail.xmission.com>
Date: Thursday, February 05, 1998 11:49 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] DSWLF warrants


>I am sorry is this is off topic.
>
>Anybody,
>
>Should I expect that DSWLF price to go lower as the  DSWWF warrant
>expiration date (2/18/98) draws near?
>
>Anybody hear follow Warrants.
>
>
>thanks in advance
>
>anthony
>
>
>
>
>-
>


- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:16:20 -0500
From: "Antista, Anthony" <anthony.antista@attws.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] THQI

Hey group,

I would like some input on this grouping. They came out of my
I've been following THQI for a while and it seems that the rise this week 
was because of the error made by First Call that earnings were going to 
come out on 2/4/98. Earnings will be released during the 3rd week of 
February, per Invester Relations, and expect a similar rise preceeding that 
as estimates are lower than what it will report. Estimates are for about 50 
cents for the 4th qtr,which have been upgraded from 38 cents, and about 98 
cents for the year. If you need more details on THQI go to the following 
web site:

http://home.earthlink.net/~tr8rvic/

Tony



YOU WROTE:

Zacks canslim search. The Group #'s are not the greatest but
they all meet the criteria.

Tick  / EPS/RS/ud
thqi /65/98/1.4
nbty/82/98/3.3
mdc/91/95/5.9
cbr/99/92/2.1
cacoa/79/98/0.9
air/91/89/1.8
nct/90/94/1.7

They all had breakouts from a 9 day base yesterday.

Thanks for any suggestions given,

Jose'




begin 600 WINMAIL.DAT
M>)\^(B4.`0:0" `$```````!``$``0>0!@`(````Y 0```````#H``$(@ <`
M& ```$E032Y-:6-R;W-O9G0@36%I;"Y.;W1E`#$(`06 `P`.````S@<"``8`
M"0`0`!0`!0`/`0$@@ ,`#@```,X'`@`&``D`$0`C``4`'P$!"8 !`"$````W
M135"039$0SDR.41$,3$Q.4,T,C P.# U1C$U,C!#-0`5!P$-@ 0``@````(`
M`@`!!( !``4```!42%%)`#8!`0.0!@"X!@``&0````,`!A!\$$T\`P`'$ ,#
M```>``@0`0```&4```!(15E'4D]54"Q)5T]53$1,24M%4T]-14E.4%543TY4
M2$E31U)/55!)3D=42$590T%-14]55$]&35E)5D5"145.1D],3$]724Y'5$A1
M249/4D%72$E,14%.1$E44T5%35-42$%4``````,`$! ``````P`1$ $````"
M`0D0`0```- #``#,`P``P04``$Q:1G6IG'Y _P`*`0\"%0*D`^0%ZP*#`% 3
M`U0"`&-H"L!S973N,@8`!L,"@S(#Q@<3`H,R,Q,/9C0#Q0(`<')"<1(B<W1E
M;0*#-;L/?Q"$?0J ",\)V3L93W@R-34"@ J!#;$+8&[P9S$P,Q0@"PH4(@'0
M8"!(97D@"< (8'!&+ J%"H5)('<(8&P`9"!L:6ME('-G`W @( N <'4%0 (@
M(!QT: 0`'B0+@&<N(.14:!X!8V$@80A@(-&09B!M>1\&)W8@(.IB">$@`A!L
M&. #\!Q0N2(`2%$?< (0!<!A'X#=(3!L(" `<!_0:05 $?#W%H $("$@805 
M(2 @( 40JQ'P(11W">!K'X!A!"#[) `B8'4G@2+Q)R($D -@GP7 `, -L"/P
M'A!&:1'@W05 0P= `R FTV4*P ,`+QQ0)^(94!X@;R2R=&\/(E @4B*S`Z R
M+S0O]#DX(?!%*W<#$ ,@) "=)U!E)= H8 F (&0(<3LL<B<Q,PL@)_0B\49E
M"&)R=0K >2P@<+L$D!]@;B/0%F$%P%(O,#4F\&D"(',QH"8"97C=,<!C!4 E
M@ "0;0,0"L'O)V,5\ 60">!D+^0F\2AA_S(Q!W F\ >1"L @("2!,=%_)M$#
MH"6@)O$F02ZC&5!POQCQ+?$V*R5#!N @P34=T%\U$ (P!" E0B<B-"$@(+!Q
M='(L):$1L" 1P'\CUAY@"< I\1_0`U(P4#C?.I0S)#H4+= ZG7DK82'PRDDC
M`'D(8"!N-2$C$/\%L" @#; !D ,0!" @\23SWRQ +)(G(B18* !B- $6< HZ
M'IQH`D!P.B\O.F@@42XK82$@'_!N:R(N00!T+WX[T#ARZG8\("\>G%0"(",V
M2*\!"K)93U4@5U)/U%1%1&U:`-!K!" B8'\`@!_P/< 1\ K $; A\R B1QY"
M(",G-I1N;^\G! G!-F(%0&(@P J%)R'_'A JT@> $@`G$P4!,E$',$XN1XT\
M("@P("\N`%!(4R]24T!U9$^G<1)I4O V-2W!+S$N`C0*A6YB='DO.",MD%2Q
M,RXS"H5M9!E'8#DQ+<!4D#4N.6T*A6,Q0"W .2W +9 R#"XQ5Z8`T&]A+S=[
M6&%4P#!7APMP6#%7(#B[6&!4X#A5%C/ +< P+<#[+;!4X#='C5 F$< ?T#% 
MO2M@:R*Q.N$]HB6 .2^@^F$>$&(O84 A,D)?H5&^'S=A3!$E0TB (#!U9V=7
M-A(R\1X@:2/0;AZ-2OIO$? G"H\+D1+R'<%D_[,+D1;R,3<>]AAQ`&D`'@!P
M``$````%````5$A120`````"`7$``0```!8````!O3,+-5+88>&6GLX1T;3>
M`&",ALP8``! `#D`3@3PRPDSO0$#`/$_"00```,`)@```````P`V```````"
M`4<``0```"\```!C/553.V$](#MP/4%45#ML/4Y%4BU-4T<P-BTY.# R,#8Q
M-#$V,C!:+3$P,#DQ```"`?D_`0```$T`````````W*= R,!"$!JTN0@`*R_A
M@@$`````````+T\]0514+T]5/5=)4D5,15-3+4Y%4B]#3CU214-)4$E%3E13
M+T-./4%!3E1)4U1!`````!X`^#\!````$0```$%N=&ES=&$L($%N=&AO;GD`
M`````@'[/P$```!-`````````-RG0,C 0A :M+D(`"LOX8(!`````````"]/
M/4%45"]/53U725)%3$534RU.15(O0TX]4D5#25!)14Y44R]#3CU!04Y425-4
M00`````>`/H_`0```!$```!!;G1I<W1A+"!!;G1H;VYY`````$ `!S!.!/#+
M"3.]`4 `"#!FDIKX"3.]`0,`#33]/P```@$4- $````0````5)2AP"E_$!NE
MAP@`*RHE%QX`/0`!`````0`````````+`"D```````L`(P```````@%_``$`
M``!+````/&,]55,E83U?)7 ]0514)6P]3D52+4U31S V+3DX,#(P-C$T,38R
G,%HM,3 P.3% ;F5R+6US9S Q+FYE87-T+FUC8V%W+F-O;3X``/;2
`
end

- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 14:43:48 GMT
From: musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant)
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] QCOM aftermarket

On Thu, 5 Feb 1998 23:28:46 -0800, you wrote:

:> From:          musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant)
:> To:            canslim@lists.xmission.com
:
:> Saw a documentary recently on the San Diego economy in general and
:> Qualcomm featured prominently. They have taken over the niche of
:> General Dynamics (I think that's the name of the company) which used
:> to be the biggest employer in San Diego by a large margin. When GD
:> went down, the economy of the region suffered greatly. Qualcomm has
:> filled that niche rather poorly in comparison, and has relied heavily
:> on temporary personnel. I'm not surprised to hear of troubles for the
:> company. Much of the technical work in the region is farmed out over
:> the border where the labor is El Cheapo.
:
:Not so sure of that, QCOM is always hiring like crazy here in San=20
:Diego.  Their financial problems are because something like 40 or 50%=20
:of their revenue comes from S. Korea.

Yeah, they hire a lot in SD, but the temp level is very high. They
don't hire nearly as much as GD did either when they were the
bellweather of the region. Unless I was *misinformed*... I saw the
documentary on PBS a couple of weeks ago.




- -

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 18:40:53 -0500
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] QCOM aftermarket

As an aside to their local economic contribution, part of their news was
that they were laying off a number (700 sticks in my mind) of temporary
workers. Sounds a little like the UPS strike, where the losers ended up
being all the temp workers, who were not immediately rehired following the
settlement, because mkt share had declined as a result of the strike.

Of course, the savings to a co with high percent of temp workers is that
often the cost of benefits is substantially less (and a temp worker can
still work something like 30 or 35 hours a week regularly, and still be
"temp"). But employee relations (and loyalty) tends to suffer with this kind
of treatment, as does the experience level, product quality, etc. with the
consequent long term effects.

Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer.
My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am
a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do
their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on
the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all
investors.
tom w
- -----Original Message-----
From: Dan Musicant <musicant@autobahn.org>
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Date: Friday, February 06, 1998 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] QCOM aftermarket


On Thu, 5 Feb 1998 23:28:46 -0800, you wrote:

:> From:          musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant)
:> To:            canslim@lists.xmission.com
:
:> Saw a documentary recently on the San Diego economy in general and
:> Qualcomm featured prominently. They have taken over the niche of
:> General Dynamics (I think that's the name of the company) which used
:> to be the biggest employer in San Diego by a large margin. When GD
:> went down, the economy of the region suffered greatly. Qualcomm has
:> filled that niche rather poorly in comparison, and has relied heavily
:> on temporary personnel. I'm not surprised to hear of troubles for the
:
:Not so sure of that, QCOM is always hiring like crazy here in San
:Diego.  Their financial problems are because something like 40 or 50%
:of their revenue comes from S. Korea.

Yeah, they hire a lot in SD, but the temp level is very high. They


- -



- -

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 03:40:22 GMT
From: musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant)
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OMQP

On Thu, 5 Feb 1998 23:28:46 -0800, you wrote:

:> From:          "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
:> To:            <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
:
:> My major problem with Omniquip would be the lack of a base.
:
:Isn't that big thing from July to January a C&H?  (I know you think=20
:we see too many of these things, but this one sure seems to fit the=20
:description.)  Left side formed in July, underwent a 25% correction=20
:through the fall, climbed back to the old highs of July in January,=20
:had a little decline in last 8 or 10 days of January (Handle), and=20
:seemed to break out last few days.
:
:These things are clearer on the charts at
:
:  http://www.tscn.com/wsc/corporate_Snapshot.html/
:
:than they are on the DG charts. =20
:
I was thinking the same thing. To me it looks just as clear at DG
Online...and the RS, 50 day and 200 day averages are all trending well
up lately.



- -

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 18:29:18 -0500
From: Jeffry White <"postwhit@sover.net"@sover.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] "M" and OMQP

Distribution day in the Nasdaq and SP today.  Comes at a point where one
would expect only a temporary rest and not a significant turning point.

OMQP - Dave, the "base" is really a long cup and handle "type" formation
with a little 2 week "curl" for a handle, don't you think?  I understand
your point, however.  Typically, too short a pause to foster much
confidence.

Here's why I risked it anyway.  With the "M" coming on strong, and with
the way this issue rushed up to form the right side of the cup, dried
out the volume to just 20% ADV on Friday, it looked worth a shot just
after the open at 23 1/4. I wouldn't typically feel comfortable with
such a move since it violates entry point rules, but Connie Mack's
lesson seemed to offer some confirmation we usually lack.

With Connie Mack's slow stoch cross and 3/6/9 EMA ready to follow on
Monday, it looked worthy of a low risk entry.  Granted the volume after
it passed the pivot point (24 to 24 1/2) was big enough to scare one
away if you were considering or in fact made a traditional buy after it
crossed the pivot.  However, at 23 1/4, it was as low risk as you can
get.  I bought it right there.  We'll see how it goes, it's experimental
for me.  But so far, using the slow stoch and 3/6/9 EMA is keeping me
out of trouble and has me into a substantial gain for this young year.

Jeffry


- -

------------------------------

End of canslim-digest V2 #110
*****************************

 To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
 with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message.
 For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
 "help" to the same address.  Do not use quotes in your message.