From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #111 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk canslim-digest Sunday, February 8 1998 Volume 02 : Number 111 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] Software? [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #110 Re: [CANSLIM] Software? [CANSLIM] LEVL,CHRZ, TSRI [CANSLIM] Stock picks Re: [CANSLIM] LEVL,CHRZ, TSRI [CANSLIM] Circuit Breakers ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 13:22:17 -0800 From: Douglas Motsenbocker Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Software? Thanks for the suggestion on software. I suppose there is someplace where I can find good a critique of software for the stock market, but I don't know where to look. I'll check out Quotes-Plus, however. Thanks. - ---------- > From: Chris > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Cc: CANSLIM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Software? > Date: Wednesday, February 04, 1998 6:04 PM > > Doug, > I'd suggest you look at Quotes-Plus. Powerfull scanning of both > fundimental data and technical analysis, a not bad charting package > built in, and if you want more power, buy metastock. > > Chris Hyde > > Douglas Motsenbocker wrote: > > > > Can anyone recommend some good software for tracking stocks. I have the > > Power Investor from Investor's Alliance, which has served me well. It's > > fair, but their data is > > often in error. And Internet downloading is too slow. I want > > 1. Daily updates on the Internet. > > 2. Screening capabilities for most of the CANSLIM categories (earnings, > > etc.) > > 3. Reasonable price. > > > > What are you currently using, and does it meet your needs? > > > > Doug > > > > =============================================== > > Douglas Motsenbocker > > Porterville, California > > dmots@cheerful.com > > > > - > > - > - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 13:45:29 EST From: RSchulz01@aol.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #110 The last several messages that I've downloaded are a bunch of ASCII characters that don't make much sense when I open them with word or wor pad I'm I doing something wrong? Rod - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 11:59:21 -0700 From: "Jose O. Perez" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Software? Hi Douglas, Go to this site, they have a comprehensive survey of software for the trader.... http://www.traders.com/ They also have abstracts of articles from their magazine. jose' Douglas Motsenbocker wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion on software. I suppose there is someplace where > I can find good a critique of software for the stock market, but I don't > know where to look. I'll check out Quotes-Plus, however. Thanks. > > > > > > - - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 19:22:56 -0500 From: snl1@pipeline.com Subject: [CANSLIM] LEVL,CHRZ, TSRI I have been studying LEVL,CHRZ, and TSRI. Can anyone out there looking at these tell me as of Feb, 7th which they would bank on and why? The charts look good on all three. Many thanks! Steven - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 17:28:04 -0800 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: [CANSLIM] Stock picks Here are a few stock ideas from rummaging around on the internet. All have high EPS ranks, high RS, most near a base, a few might be extended just a bit, depending on how you read the charts. Hon Industries (HONI) EPS 91, RS 85, 30 mil shares, A/D A, sales last few quarters accelerating, avg vol 59K. Express Script (ESRX) EPS 94, RS 90, 8.6 mil shares, AD B, sales up 50%, earnings up 20's %, avg V. 44K Cotelligent (COTL) EPS 95, RS 86, 9.7 mil shares, AD A, sales up in 40's%, Avg Vol 46k. p/e 29. Advance Paradigm (ADVP) this one has a lower EPS rank, but sales are certainly growing at a +90 rate, think earnings just need a quarter or two to catch up, so I think ok here. Mastec (MAST) might be a bit extended QRSI CZT CHRZ IMRS if p/e's over 100 don't worry you this one looks good. Newcourt (NCT) low EPS but interesting chart. Think they took some charges, but sales still growing rapidly. - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 23:20:45 -0800 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] LEVL,CHRZ, TSRI > From: snl1@pipeline.com > Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 19:22:56 -0500 > I have been studying LEVL,CHRZ, and TSRI. LEVL seems to have come up too far too fast, would be good to see it base here, although I might be a bit conservative on my chart reading on this one. TSRI was a buy at 18, it is now too extended. CHRZ I mentioned in a previous message, looks good. - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 10:34:38 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] Circuit Breakers For those that may not have noticed, the big wire houses once again have carried the day. The new proposals to change the current circuit breakers (at 250 points and 350 pts) that temporarily halt, then stop for the day, trading have now been adjusted. NYSE is now proposing that the halt for the day will come about only if the mkt is down 20% after 2PM (before it would have stopped for the day at any 20% decline) and at any time if down 30% (oh joy, a 2400 pt decline will stop panic selling, as if a 1600 pt drop wasn't bad enough!!). Can we all say "useless circuit breakers"??? If not, can we say "free reign by the wirehouses"?? Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - - ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #111 ***************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.