From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #121 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk canslim-digest Wednesday, February 18 1998 Volume 02 : Number 121 In this issue: [CANSLIM] Market Direction [CANSLIM] Real Time quotes [CANSLIM] New browser interface for canslim archives... [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #120 Re: [CANSLIM] New browser interface for canslim archives... RE: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #120 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:57:32 -0500 From: Jeffry White Subject: [CANSLIM] Market Direction Distribution day in the Nasdaq yesterday. In my opinion, it comes in a little more troublesome spot in the chart than the distribution day of 2/6, or thereabouts. Jeffry - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:03:03 -0600 From: "Eric Boller" Subject: [CANSLIM] Real Time quotes This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00E5_01BD3C4C.051CB370 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I could be wrong but I seem to recall seeing somewhere in the trading = instructions for Ameritrade that when you previewed your trade it would = give you the last real quote (not delayed). I usually look at it before = I submit the final trade. You could do a preview of a trade and then = not bother to actually submit the trade to get a free real time quote. = Again I'll have to recheck this because it may have changed. Eric - ------=_NextPart_000_00E5_01BD3C4C.051CB370 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I could be wrong but I seem to recall seeing = somewhere in the=20 trading instructions for Ameritrade that when you previewed your trade = it would=20 give you the last real quote (not delayed).  I usually look at it = before I=20 submit the final trade.  You could do a preview of a trade and then = not=20 bother to actually submit the trade to get a free real time quote.  = Again=20 I'll have to recheck this because it may have changed.
 
Eric
- ------=_NextPart_000_00E5_01BD3C4C.051CB370-- - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 11:23:01 -0700 From: jeff@scrooge.csd.sdl.usu.edu (Jeff Salisbury) Subject: [CANSLIM] New browser interface for canslim archives... Fellow canslimers, I just installed a brand-new web-page interface for the canslim archives. Check it out and let me know what you think: http://www.xmission.com/~mcjathan/cgi/lwgate.cgi/CANSLIM/archives/ I'm working on a web-page to search the archives. I'll let you know when this page is up and running... Best Regards, Jeff Salisbury - canslim list admin / owner - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 12:52:18 -0600 From: infobelize@kearney.net (Elaine/Robert Urban) Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #120 If the group would indulge me, could I suggest a short term project.Compaq has lead in volume sales for the last 2 wks +/- for that matter every day. Not a CANSLIM type=20 but I have a fascination with some of Connies's comments about tech indicators and have been analysing certain stocks like CPQ. It seems to me that there is an=20 opportunity to study what is happening to compaq given=20 certain factors we can all tend to agree on: market breaking through all time high good company cpq, good numbers good sector with good other leaders (e.g. Dell) huge sustained volume interest more? May I suggest a technical forum for a few days. where we discuss different technical approaches. e.g I have looked at OBV and I interpret volume going in to support an upward short term price move. (as of yesterday) Not to drag this out- how about short term cpq only using technical indicators, which ones, priority what's the interpretation re: what's happening? any leads as to what may happen and how/when do we know? Let's use www.bigcharts.com xxx =20 interactive indicators =20 mf/obv etc for those that want to follow With respect to the CANSLIM forum if this is a waste=20 the group's time ignore. It will not diminish the value of the group to me. Thanx for your consideration. RTUrban =20 At 07:19 AM 2/18/98 -0700, canslim-digest wrote: > >canslim-digest Wednesday, February 18 1998 Volume 02 : Number 120 > > > >In this issue: > > [CANSLIM] World Markets > [CANSLIM] Today's mkt > Re: [CANSLIM] broken three-day protect period? > [CANSLIM] TMBS > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > [CANSLIM] live quotes > Re: [CANSLIM] live quotes > Re: [CANSLIM] live quotes > [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > Re: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > Re: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > [CANSLIM] Economic Calendar, Part I, week of February 16, 1998 > [CANSLIM] World Markets > Re: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > [CANSLIM] TWA > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 08:06:14 -0500 >From: "Tom Worley" >Subject: [CANSLIM] World Markets > >Looks like the US mkt should be opening up 40 or so pts, and I suspect >strengthening from there. The Industrial Production report is due out this >AM, not sure of the expectation, however doubt even a bad report will slow >down the opening action. > >Asia had a decent day, and futures and European mkts have been= strengthening >over the past several hours. > >Remember that Friday is options expiration, so expect increased volatility >this week. > >I am on vacation this week, if on the net can be reached with ICQ chat or >via this group. > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should= do >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >investors. >tom w > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 10:32:39 -0500 >From: "Tom Worley" >Subject: [CANSLIM] Today's mkt > >Looks like a strong opening, and an even stronger mkt. 8400 is already >history, will we see 8500 today for the first time?? > >EPIQ following thru as I had expected (and hoped), new high on two times= adv >only an hour into the day. > >I hate delayed quotes! > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should= do >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >investors. >tom w > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 10:42:33 -0500 >From: "Tom Worley" >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] broken three-day protect period? > >Anthony, have sent out my queries, as you stumped me with your question. So >far, no one has come up with an answer. Looking at the chart and the= current >RS, does not look like a stock where I would want to exercise my warrants. >If they have value, would be more likely to straight sell them, and not >worry about the "broken three day protect period". I have dealt with a >number of warrant plays before, and never heard this term. If your >exercise/sell decision hinges on it, would recommend spending the money and >call the company for an answer. > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should= do >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >investors. >tom w >- -----Original Message----- >From: anthony boone >To: CANSLIM >Date: Monday, February 09, 1998 11:15 PM >Subject: [CANSLIM] broken three-day protect period? > > >>Hi, >> >> >>Can someone explain the meaning of the phase "broken three-day protect >>period"?. >> >>below you will find the context where i encountered it: >>"The Company mailed to Warrantholders notice of the redemption on January >>16, 1998 and set the date fixed for redemption (the "Redemption Date") for >>February 18, 1998, which will give Warrantholders until 5:00 p.m. New York >>Time February 17, 1998 to exercise the Warrants or they will expire and be >>redeemed. The Company has established a broken three-day protect period." >> >>This is an extraction from a Press Release by Deswell Ind.(DSWLF) calling >>the redemption of warrants. >> >>Thanks in advance, >>anthony >> >>- >> > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 08:59:10 -0700 >From: Kirby Benson >Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS > >It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this >morning - this may be the breakout. > >Kirby > >- -- >Visit The Great White Trout Studios: >http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html >=A0 > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 11:20:37 -0500 >From: "Tom Worley" >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > >You've got both price move and volume, looks good. > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should= do >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >investors. >tom w >- -----Original Message----- >From: Kirby Benson >To: CANSLIM >Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 10:56 AM >Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > >>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this >>morning - this may be the breakout. >> >>Kirby >> >>-- >>Visit The Great White Trout Studios: >>http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html >> >> >> >>- >> > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 08:32:37 -0800 >From: Tim Fisher >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > >At 08:59 AM 2/17/98 -0700, you wrote: >>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this >>morning - this may be the breakout. >> >>Kirby >> >I'd be careful about pronouncements just yet. It already broke out once to >the current level of 16-17, and if it does so again it will be a secondary >move from _no_ base. If you aren't already in you will be making a momentum >play. Also, it's currently trading at 17-1/4, well off the 18-1/8 it was at >earlier in the day. > > > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 18:34:57 +0200 >From: "David S. Pinhasik" >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > >I thought that it broke out last week, and bought it then, especially after >Tom put his OK on it. > >David >- -----Original Message----- >From: Kirby Benson >To: CANSLIM >Date: ??? ????? 17 ?????? 1998 18:00 >Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > >>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this >>morning - this may be the breakout. >> >>Kirby >> >>-- >>Visit The Great White Trout Studios: >>http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html >> >> >> >>- >> >> > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 11:52:50 -0500 >From: "Tom Worley" >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > >I supply opinion and information, not "OK". Read my signature block >carefully. However, it does look good today (in delayed quotes format, that >is). > >Looks like volume should beat Friday's total. > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should= do >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >investors. >tom w >- -----Original Message----- >From: David S. Pinhasik >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 11:33 AM >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > >>I thought that it broke out last week, and bought it then, especially= after >>Tom put his OK on it. >> >>David >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Kirby Benson >>To: CANSLIM >>Date: ??? ????? 17 ?????? 1998 18:00 >>Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS >> >> >>>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this >>>morning - this may be the breakout. >>> >>>Kirby >>> >>>-- >>>Visit The Great White Trout Studios: >>>http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html >>> >>> >>> >>>- >>> >>> >> >> >>- >> > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 19:30:13 +0200 >From: "David S. Pinhasik" >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > >:-O Sorry about that Tom, in fact I knew that was a no-no a nanosecond >after pressing "send". I should have added a ;-) after the word "OK" > >David > > >- -----Original Message----- >From: Tom Worley >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >Date: ??? ????? 17 ?????? 1998 18:54 >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > >>I supply opinion and information, not "OK". Read my signature block >>carefully. However, it does look good today (in delayed quotes format,= that >>is). >> >>Looks like volume should beat Friday's total. >> >>Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my= employer. >>My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I= am >>a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should >do >>their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about= on >>the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >>investors. >>tom w >>-----Original Message----- >>From: David S. Pinhasik >>To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >>Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 11:33 AM >>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS >> >> >>>I thought that it broke out last week, and bought it then, especially >after >>>Tom put his OK on it. >>> >>>David >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Kirby Benson >>>To: CANSLIM >>>Date: ??? ????? 17 ?????? 1998 18:00 >>>Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS >>> >>> >>>>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this >>>>morning - this may be the breakout. >>>> >>>>Kirby >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Visit The Great White Trout Studios: >>>>http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>- >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>- >>> >> >> >>- >> >> > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 15:27:11 -0500 >From: "Butch Voce" >Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > >Hi all; > >I have been following this list for a few months now and would like to >thank everyone for making my life more interesting. I have a question. > >I plotted two companies 12 month quotes using a simple line graph. The >companies are NSC and CSX. >The two stock prices range from about $35 to $60 over the year. What >struck this novice was the striking similarities with the rise and fall >of the two companies. The lines almost match. Is this unusual ? >Significant ? > >Tia, > >Butch Voce > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 15:35:34 -0500 (EST) >From: "Surindra J. Singh" >Subject: [CANSLIM] live quotes > >Tom: > >I hope you are having wonderful time off. > >I am sure nobody likes delayed quotes including me. We have little choice >though-just like you thesedays. I was wondering why live quotes are not >widely available, specially with so much advances in technology. Who >controls the display of live quotes, as I am sure a lot of brokerage >houses will be willing to give it to the public and several sites will >able to display these. Is it mm, sec, nasdaq-nyse-ase? > > >Regards and have nice time off, while you have it. > > >Surindra > > > > >On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Tom Worley wrote: > >> Looks like a strong opening, and an even stronger mkt. 8400 is already >> history, will we see 8500 today for the first time?? >>=20 >> EPIQ following thru as I had expected (and hoped), new high on two times adv >> only an hour into the day. >>=20 >> I hate delayed quotes! >>=20 >> Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my= employer. >> My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I= am >> a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do >> their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about= on >> the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >> investors. >> tom w >>=20 >>=20 >> - >>=20 >>=20 > > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 16:16:52 EST >From: CA011667@aol.com >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] live quotes > >I am receiving REAL TIME tic by tic quotes from Smartserv Online. They are >offering a two week free trial. Called on Friday and was up and running in >about two hours.They seem to be acurate qoutes with bid, ask , last , volume , >plus more.Very plain Jane service, but very affordable compared to others >services at 69.00 mo. Chris. > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 16:44:23 -0500 >From: "Tom Worley" >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] live quotes > >Availability of live quotes is apparently restricted by the exchanges >themselves, tho I don't understand why. I do know that each BD must pay a >monthly fee to the exchanges for quotes, so guess it's all monetary. Until >that practice is abolished, unlikely anyone will give live quotes for free, >except as a "loss leader". > >I also suspect the major BDs are not pushing for a change, as they want us >dependent on them to get live quotes. > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should= do >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >investors. >tom w >- -----Original Message----- >From: Surindra J. Singh >To: CANSLIM >Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 3:32 PM >Subject: [CANSLIM] live quotes > > >>Tom: >> >>I hope you are having wonderful time off. >> >>I am sure nobody likes delayed quotes including me. We have little choice >>though-just like you thesedays. I was wondering why live quotes are not >>widely available, specially with so much advances in technology. Who >>controls the display of live quotes, as I am sure a lot of brokerage >>houses will be willing to give it to the public and several sites will >>able to display these. Is it mm, sec, nasdaq-nyse-ase? >> > >>On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Tom Worley wrote: >> >>> >>> I hate delayed quotes! >>> > > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 17:21:53 -0500 >From: Connie Mack Rea >Subject: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > >- --------------B7B37B8D7E141A214244CAB5 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Members-- > >Believe someone told me that SureTrade gives a decent number of free >quotes >when you hold an account with them. > >For those interested, SureTrade advertises trades for $7.95. Don't know >if they play games with shorts and stops. > >Amereitrade has a $30 monthly fee for realtime quotes. > >Connie Mack > >- --------------B7B37B8D7E141A214244CAB5 >Content-Type: text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > >Members-- > >

Believe someone told me that SureTrade gives a decent number of free >quotes >
when you hold an account with them. > >

For those interested, SureTrade advertises trades for $7.95.  >Don't know if they play games with shorts and stops. > >

Amereitrade has a $30 monthly fee for realtime quotes. > >

Connie Mack > >- --------------B7B37B8D7E141A214244CAB5-- > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 98 16:36:21 -0500 >From: "Robert Gammon" >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > >Datek doesn't charge for real-time quotes, and you can get >them for merely opening an account. No funds need to be >deposited to get the quotes, $2000 minimum equity required >to begin trading. Check writing against your account is >starting up this month. > > >*----------------------------------------------------------------------* >Robert Gammon My opinions are my own. In no way do >rgammon@micro.ti.com I represent the views of my employer >Using OS/2 Warp 4.0, and a user of every version of OS/2 since v1.0 >*----------------------------------------------------------------------* > > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 17:03:11 -0700 >From: carolreynolds@juno.com >Subject: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > >Scottsdale Securities provides 50 (I think that is the number) free >quotes with each trade. They charge $7.00 for trades on the net and >$12.00 for touch tone trades. It is $5.00 more for limit orders. > >_____________________________________________________________________ >You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. >Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com >Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 06:27:22 -0500 >From: "Tom Worley" >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > >Simply put, they are both in the same industry group (Transportation - >Rail), have similar RS, EPS and Growth rate. Even tho GRS only 16, they are >both responding to a growing and healthy economy. > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should= do >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >investors. >tom w >- -----Original Message----- >From: Butch Voce >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 3:26 PM >Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > > >>Hi all; >> >>I have been following this list for a few months now and would like to >>thank everyone for making my life more interesting. I have a question. >> >>I plotted two companies 12 month quotes using a simple line graph. The >>companies are NSC and CSX. >>The two stock prices range from about $35 to $60 over the year. What >>struck this novice was the striking similarities with the rise and fall >>of the two companies. The lines almost match. Is this unusual ? >>Significant ? >> >>Tia, >> >>Butch Voce >> >> >>- >> > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 07:06:55 -0500 >From: "Tom Worley" >Subject: [CANSLIM] Economic Calendar, Part I, week of February 16, 1998 > >TUESDAY >Industrial Production, last was up 0.4%, expected was up 0.2%, and actual >was unchanged > >Capacity Utilization, last was 83.3%, estimate for unchanged > >WEDNESDAY >Producer Price Index, last was down 0.2% and estimate for unchanged > >NOTE: I am using some different sources this week, hopefully will have my >usual source later today and post the entire calendar. > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should= do >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >investors. >tom w > > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 07:10:43 -0500 >From: "Tom Worley" >Subject: [CANSLIM] World Markets > >Looks like Asia generally had a positive day, and Europe so far responding >the same. After the tech stock profit taking yesterday, I am expecting the >US mkts to open up, altho may only be 20 pts or so initially. If the= selloff >on tech is done, then maybe today NASDAQ can participate all the way to the >close. I did note yesterday that the Russell 2000 once again did better >(down less) than NASDAQ. However, yesterday was quite clearly another "big >cap" day, with the rest of the "safe money" once again going to the bond >mkt. > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should= do >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all >investors. >tom w > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 07:53:42 -0500 (EST) >From: "Surindra J. Singh" >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > >thomson and fox provide 50 live quotes per day for free. I have tried >thomson in the past, but sometimes hard to log on. i think the url is: > >http://www.thomsonrtq.com > >thanks for the information > >surindra > > > > >On Tue, 17 Feb 1998 carolreynolds@juno.com wrote: > >> Scottsdale Securities provides 50 (I think that is the number) free >> quotes with each trade. They charge $7.00 for trades on the net and >> $12.00 for touch tone trades. It is $5.00 more for limit orders. > > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:18:21 -0500 >From: Connie Mack Rea >Subject: [CANSLIM] TWA > >- --------------8B8F1AA5E23083AE9A4B76CB >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Members-- > >Believe I saw some comment about the airlines earlier. Don't recall if >it was good or bad. However, the only stock that I kicked out this >morning [that had not been kicked out on earlier runs] was TWA. > >The OBV looks good. The MF is marginal at best. However, several other >indicators are positive, and the SAR gave a buy yesterday. I will try >to buy an initial position in TWA this morning and perhaps a second this >afternoon if it acts well. > >I have bought a few shares of TAVI and have decided to hold my SYBS for >a few more days. > >I alluded to a stock that re-appeared on my scan this morning. That >stock is CVTI. I owned the stock and have since sold it; it is an >OBV/MF candidate and looks sound. > >I am still uneasy with the market and will have only about 20 percent of >capital invested, assuming that I get TWA. > >Connie Mack > >- --------------8B8F1AA5E23083AE9A4B76CB >Content-Type: text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > >Members-- > >

Believe I saw some comment about the airlines earlier.  Don't >recall if it was good or bad.  However, the only stock that I kicked >out this morning [that had not been kicked out on earlier runs] was TWA. > >

The OBV looks good.  The MF is marginal at best.  However, >several other indicators are positive, and the SAR gave a buy yesterday.  >I will try to buy an initial position in TWA this morning and perhaps a >second this afternoon if it acts well. > >

I have bought a few shares of TAVI and have decided to hold my SYBS >for a few more days. > >

I alluded to a stock that re-appeared on my scan this morning.  >That stock is CVTI.  I owned the stock and have since sold it; it >is an OBV/MF candidate and looks sound. > >

I am still uneasy with the market and will have only about 20 percent >of capital invested, assuming that I get TWA. > >

Connie Mack > >- --------------8B8F1AA5E23083AE9A4B76CB-- > > >- - > >------------------------------ > >End of canslim-digest V2 #120 >***************************** > > To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to= "majordomo@xmission.com" > with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. > For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send > "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message. > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 10:56:09 -0800 From: "Robert Venchiarutti" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] New browser interface for canslim archives... Looks real good. Look forward to the search function. Thanks. - -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Salisbury To: canslim@xmission.com Date: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 10:27 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] New browser interface for canslim archives... >Fellow canslimers, > >I just installed a brand-new web-page interface for the canslim archives. > Check it out and let me know what you think: > > http://www.xmission.com/~mcjathan/cgi/lwgate.cgi/CANSLIM/archives/ > >I'm working on a web-page to search the archives. I'll let you know when this >page is up and running... > >Best Regards, > >Jeff Salisbury - canslim list admin / owner > >- > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 11:54:13 -0800 From: Brian Nash Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #120 For the very short term, Dell's earnings and the tone of the conference call after the close today will probably have a lot to do with how CPQ behaves. > -----Original Message----- > From: infobelize@kearney.net [SMTP:infobelize@kearney.net] > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 1:52 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Cc: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com > Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #120 > > If the group would indulge me, could I suggest a short > term project.Compaq has lead in volume sales for the last > 2 wks +/- for that matter every day. Not a CANSLIM type > but I have a fascination with some of Connies's > comments about tech indicators and have been analysing > certain stocks like CPQ. It seems to me that there is an > opportunity to study what is happening to compaq given > certain factors we can all tend to agree on: > > market breaking through all time high > good company cpq, good numbers > good sector with good other leaders (e.g. Dell) > huge sustained volume interest > more? > > May I suggest a technical forum for a few days. > where we discuss different technical approaches. e.g > I have looked at OBV and I interpret volume going in > to support an upward short term price move. (as of yesterday) > > Not to drag this out- how about > > short term cpq only > using technical indicators, which ones, priority > what's the interpretation re: what's happening? > any leads as to what may happen and how/when > do we know? > Let's use www.bigcharts.com > xxx > interactive > indicators > mf/obv etc for those that want to follow > With respect to the CANSLIM forum if this is a waste > the group's time ignore. It will not diminish the value > of the group to me. Thanx for your consideration. RTUrban > > At 07:19 AM 2/18/98 -0700, canslim-digest wrote: > > > >canslim-digest Wednesday, February 18 1998 Volume 02 : Number > 120 > > > > > > > >In this issue: > > > > [CANSLIM] World Markets > > [CANSLIM] Today's mkt > > Re: [CANSLIM] broken three-day protect period? > > [CANSLIM] TMBS > > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > > [CANSLIM] live quotes > > Re: [CANSLIM] live quotes > > Re: [CANSLIM] live quotes > > [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > > Re: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > > [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > > Re: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > > [CANSLIM] Economic Calendar, Part I, week of February 16, 1998 > > [CANSLIM] World Markets > > Re: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > > [CANSLIM] TWA > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 08:06:14 -0500 > >From: "Tom Worley" > >Subject: [CANSLIM] World Markets > > > >Looks like the US mkt should be opening up 40 or so pts, and I suspect > >strengthening from there. The Industrial Production report is due out > this > >AM, not sure of the expectation, however doubt even a bad report will > slow > >down the opening action. > > > >Asia had a decent day, and futures and European mkts have been > strengthening > >over the past several hours. > > > >Remember that Friday is options expiration, so expect increased > volatility > >this week. > > > >I am on vacation this week, if on the net can be reached with ICQ chat or > >via this group. > > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should > do > >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >investors. > >tom w > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 10:32:39 -0500 > >From: "Tom Worley" > >Subject: [CANSLIM] Today's mkt > > > >Looks like a strong opening, and an even stronger mkt. 8400 is already > >history, will we see 8500 today for the first time?? > > > >EPIQ following thru as I had expected (and hoped), new high on two times > adv > >only an hour into the day. > > > >I hate delayed quotes! > > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should > do > >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >investors. > >tom w > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 10:42:33 -0500 > >From: "Tom Worley" > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] broken three-day protect period? > > > >Anthony, have sent out my queries, as you stumped me with your question. > So > >far, no one has come up with an answer. Looking at the chart and the > current > >RS, does not look like a stock where I would want to exercise my > warrants. > >If they have value, would be more likely to straight sell them, and not > >worry about the "broken three day protect period". I have dealt with a > >number of warrant plays before, and never heard this term. If your > >exercise/sell decision hinges on it, would recommend spending the money > and > >call the company for an answer. > > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should > do > >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >investors. > >tom w > >- -----Original Message----- > >From: anthony boone > >To: CANSLIM > >Date: Monday, February 09, 1998 11:15 PM > >Subject: [CANSLIM] broken three-day protect period? > > > > > >>Hi, > >> > >> > >>Can someone explain the meaning of the phase "broken three-day protect > >>period"?. > >> > >>below you will find the context where i encountered it: > >>"The Company mailed to Warrantholders notice of the redemption on > January > >>16, 1998 and set the date fixed for redemption (the "Redemption Date") > for > >>February 18, 1998, which will give Warrantholders until 5:00 p.m. New > York > >>Time February 17, 1998 to exercise the Warrants or they will expire and > be > >>redeemed. The Company has established a broken three-day protect > period." > >> > >>This is an extraction from a Press Release by Deswell Ind.(DSWLF) > calling > >>the redemption of warrants. > >> > >>Thanks in advance, > >>anthony > >> > >>- > >> > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 08:59:10 -0700 > >From: Kirby Benson > >Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > >It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this > >morning - this may be the breakout. > > > >Kirby > > > >- -- > >Visit The Great White Trout Studios: > >http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html > >  > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 11:20:37 -0500 > >From: "Tom Worley" > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > >You've got both price move and volume, looks good. > > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should > do > >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >investors. > >tom w > >- -----Original Message----- > >From: Kirby Benson > >To: CANSLIM > >Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 10:56 AM > >Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > > > >>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this > >>morning - this may be the breakout. > >> > >>Kirby > >> > >>-- > >>Visit The Great White Trout Studios: > >>http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html > >> > >> > >> > >>- > >> > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 08:32:37 -0800 > >From: Tim Fisher > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > >At 08:59 AM 2/17/98 -0700, you wrote: > >>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this > >>morning - this may be the breakout. > >> > >>Kirby > >> > >I'd be careful about pronouncements just yet. It already broke out once > to > >the current level of 16-17, and if it does so again it will be a > secondary > >move from _no_ base. If you aren't already in you will be making a > momentum > >play. Also, it's currently trading at 17-1/4, well off the 18-1/8 it was > at > >earlier in the day. > > > > > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 18:34:57 +0200 > >From: "David S. Pinhasik" > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > >I thought that it broke out last week, and bought it then, especially > after > >Tom put his OK on it. > > > >David > >- -----Original Message----- > >From: Kirby Benson > >To: CANSLIM > >Date: ??? ????? 17 ?????? 1998 18:00 > >Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > > > >>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this > >>morning - this may be the breakout. > >> > >>Kirby > >> > >>-- > >>Visit The Great White Trout Studios: > >>http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html > >> > >> > >> > >>- > >> > >> > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 11:52:50 -0500 > >From: "Tom Worley" > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > >I supply opinion and information, not "OK". Read my signature block > >carefully. However, it does look good today (in delayed quotes format, > that > >is). > > > >Looks like volume should beat Friday's total. > > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should > do > >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >investors. > >tom w > >- -----Original Message----- > >From: David S. Pinhasik > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 11:33 AM > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > > > >>I thought that it broke out last week, and bought it then, especially > after > >>Tom put his OK on it. > >> > >>David > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Kirby Benson > >>To: CANSLIM > >>Date: ??? ????? 17 ?????? 1998 18:00 > >>Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS > >> > >> > >>>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this > >>>morning - this may be the breakout. > >>> > >>>Kirby > >>> > >>>-- > >>>Visit The Great White Trout Studios: > >>>http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>- > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >>- > >> > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 19:30:13 +0200 > >From: "David S. Pinhasik" > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > >:-O Sorry about that Tom, in fact I knew that was a no-no a nanosecond > >after pressing "send". I should have added a ;-) after the word "OK" > > > >David > > > > > >- -----Original Message----- > >From: Tom Worley > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >Date: ??? ????? 17 ?????? 1998 18:54 > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > > > > > >>I supply opinion and information, not "OK". Read my signature block > >>carefully. However, it does look good today (in delayed quotes format, > that > >>is). > >> > >>Looks like volume should beat Friday's total. > >> > >>Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >>My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >>a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors > should > >do > >>their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >>the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >>investors. > >>tom w > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: David S. Pinhasik > >>To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >>Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 11:33 AM > >>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TMBS > >> > >> > >>>I thought that it broke out last week, and bought it then, especially > >after > >>>Tom put his OK on it. > >>> > >>>David > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Kirby Benson > >>>To: CANSLIM > >>>Date: ??? ????? 17 ?????? 1998 18:00 > >>>Subject: [CANSLIM] TMBS > >>> > >>> > >>>>It looks like Timberline Software is up 1 pt on heavy volumn this > >>>>morning - this may be the breakout. > >>>> > >>>>Kirby > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>Visit The Great White Trout Studios: > >>>>http://www.zianet.com/kbenson/trout.html > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>- > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>>- > >>> > >> > >> > >>- > >> > >> > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 15:27:11 -0500 > >From: "Butch Voce" > >Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > > > >Hi all; > > > >I have been following this list for a few months now and would like to > >thank everyone for making my life more interesting. I have a question. > > > >I plotted two companies 12 month quotes using a simple line graph. The > >companies are NSC and CSX. > >The two stock prices range from about $35 to $60 over the year. What > >struck this novice was the striking similarities with the rise and fall > >of the two companies. The lines almost match. Is this unusual ? > >Significant ? > > > >Tia, > > > >Butch Voce > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 15:35:34 -0500 (EST) > >From: "Surindra J. Singh" > >Subject: [CANSLIM] live quotes > > > >Tom: > > > >I hope you are having wonderful time off. > > > >I am sure nobody likes delayed quotes including me. We have little choice > >though-just like you thesedays. I was wondering why live quotes are not > >widely available, specially with so much advances in technology. Who > >controls the display of live quotes, as I am sure a lot of brokerage > >houses will be willing to give it to the public and several sites will > >able to display these. Is it mm, sec, nasdaq-nyse-ase? > > > > > >Regards and have nice time off, while you have it. > > > > > >Surindra > > > > > > > > > >On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Tom Worley wrote: > > > >> Looks like a strong opening, and an even stronger mkt. 8400 is already > >> history, will we see 8500 today for the first time?? > >> > >> EPIQ following thru as I had expected (and hoped), new high on two > times > adv > >> only an hour into the day. > >> > >> I hate delayed quotes! > >> > >> Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >> My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. > I am > >> a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors > should do > >> their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned > about on > >> the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >> investors. > >> tom w > >> > >> > >> - > >> > >> > > > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 16:16:52 EST > >From: CA011667@aol.com > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] live quotes > > > >I am receiving REAL TIME tic by tic quotes from Smartserv Online. They > are > >offering a two week free trial. Called on Friday and was up and running > in > >about two hours.They seem to be acurate qoutes with bid, ask , last , > volume , > >plus more.Very plain Jane service, but very affordable compared to others > >services at 69.00 mo. Chris. > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 16:44:23 -0500 > >From: "Tom Worley" > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] live quotes > > > >Availability of live quotes is apparently restricted by the exchanges > >themselves, tho I don't understand why. I do know that each BD must pay a > >monthly fee to the exchanges for quotes, so guess it's all monetary. > Until > >that practice is abolished, unlikely anyone will give live quotes for > free, > >except as a "loss leader". > > > >I also suspect the major BDs are not pushing for a change, as they want > us > >dependent on them to get live quotes. > > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should > do > >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >investors. > >tom w > >- -----Original Message----- > >From: Surindra J. Singh > >To: CANSLIM > >Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 3:32 PM > >Subject: [CANSLIM] live quotes > > > > > >>Tom: > >> > >>I hope you are having wonderful time off. > >> > >>I am sure nobody likes delayed quotes including me. We have little > choice > >>though-just like you thesedays. I was wondering why live quotes are not > >>widely available, specially with so much advances in technology. Who > >>controls the display of live quotes, as I am sure a lot of brokerage > >>houses will be willing to give it to the public and several sites will > >>able to display these. Is it mm, sec, nasdaq-nyse-ase? > >> > > > >>On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Tom Worley wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I hate delayed quotes! > >>> > > > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 17:21:53 -0500 > >From: Connie Mack Rea > >Subject: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > > > >- --------------B7B37B8D7E141A214244CAB5 > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > >Members-- > > > >Believe someone told me that SureTrade gives a decent number of free > >quotes > >when you hold an account with them. > > > >For those interested, SureTrade advertises trades for $7.95. Don't know > >if they play games with shorts and stops. > > > >Amereitrade has a $30 monthly fee for realtime quotes. > > > >Connie Mack > > > >- --------------B7B37B8D7E141A214244CAB5 > >Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > > >Members-- > > > >

Believe someone told me that SureTrade gives a decent number of > free > >quotes > >
when you hold an account with them. > > > >

For those interested, SureTrade advertises trades for $7.95.  > >Don't know if they play games with shorts and stops. > > > >

Amereitrade has a $30 monthly fee for realtime quotes. > > > >

Connie Mack > > > >- --------------B7B37B8D7E141A214244CAB5-- > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 98 16:36:21 -0500 > >From: "Robert Gammon" > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > > > >Datek doesn't charge for real-time quotes, and you can get > >them for merely opening an account. No funds need to be > >deposited to get the quotes, $2000 minimum equity required > >to begin trading. Check writing against your account is > >starting up this month. > > > > > >*----------------------------------------------------------------------* > >Robert Gammon My opinions are my own. In no way do > >rgammon@micro.ti.com I represent the views of my employer > >Using OS/2 Warp 4.0, and a user of every version of OS/2 since v1.0 > >*----------------------------------------------------------------------* > > > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 17:03:11 -0700 > >From: carolreynolds@juno.com > >Subject: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > > > >Scottsdale Securities provides 50 (I think that is the number) free > >quotes with each trade. They charge $7.00 for trades on the net and > >$12.00 for touch tone trades. It is $5.00 more for limit orders. > > > >_____________________________________________________________________ > >You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. > >Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com > >Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 06:27:22 -0500 > >From: "Tom Worley" > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > > > >Simply put, they are both in the same industry group (Transportation - > >Rail), have similar RS, EPS and Growth rate. Even tho GRS only 16, they > are > >both responding to a growing and healthy economy. > > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should > do > >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >investors. > >tom w > >- -----Original Message----- > >From: Butch Voce > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 3:26 PM > >Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #118 > > > > > >>Hi all; > >> > >>I have been following this list for a few months now and would like to > >>thank everyone for making my life more interesting. I have a question. > >> > >>I plotted two companies 12 month quotes using a simple line graph. The > >>companies are NSC and CSX. > >>The two stock prices range from about $35 to $60 over the year. What > >>struck this novice was the striking similarities with the rise and fall > >>of the two companies. The lines almost match. Is this unusual ? > >>Significant ? > >> > >>Tia, > >> > >>Butch Voce > >> > >> > >>- > >> > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 07:06:55 -0500 > >From: "Tom Worley" > >Subject: [CANSLIM] Economic Calendar, Part I, week of February 16, 1998 > > > >TUESDAY > >Industrial Production, last was up 0.4%, expected was up 0.2%, and actual > >was unchanged > > > >Capacity Utilization, last was 83.3%, estimate for unchanged > > > >WEDNESDAY > >Producer Price Index, last was down 0.2% and estimate for unchanged > > > >NOTE: I am using some different sources this week, hopefully will have my > >usual source later today and post the entire calendar. > > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should > do > >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >investors. > >tom w > > > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 07:10:43 -0500 > >From: "Tom Worley" > >Subject: [CANSLIM] World Markets > > > >Looks like Asia generally had a positive day, and Europe so far > responding > >the same. After the tech stock profit taking yesterday, I am expecting > the > >US mkts to open up, altho may only be 20 pts or so initially. If the > selloff > >on tech is done, then maybe today NASDAQ can participate all the way to > the > >close. I did note yesterday that the Russell 2000 once again did better > >(down less) than NASDAQ. However, yesterday was quite clearly another > "big > >cap" day, with the rest of the "safe money" once again going to the bond > >mkt. > > > > > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. > >My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I > am > >a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should > do > >their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about > on > >the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > >investors. > >tom w > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 07:53:42 -0500 (EST) > >From: "Surindra J. Singh" > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Real time quotes. > > > >thomson and fox provide 50 live quotes per day for free. I have tried > >thomson in the past, but sometimes hard to log on. i think the url is: > > > >http://www.thomsonrtq.com > > > >thanks for the information > > > >surindra > > > > > > > > > >On Tue, 17 Feb 1998 carolreynolds@juno.com wrote: > > > >> Scottsdale Securities provides 50 (I think that is the number) free > >> quotes with each trade. They charge $7.00 for trades on the net and > >> $12.00 for touch tone trades. It is $5.00 more for limit orders. > > > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:18:21 -0500 > >From: Connie Mack Rea > >Subject: [CANSLIM] TWA > > > >- --------------8B8F1AA5E23083AE9A4B76CB > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > >Members-- > > > >Believe I saw some comment about the airlines earlier. Don't recall if > >it was good or bad. However, the only stock that I kicked out this > >morning [that had not been kicked out on earlier runs] was TWA. > > > >The OBV looks good. The MF is marginal at best. However, several other > >indicators are positive, and the SAR gave a buy yesterday. I will try > >to buy an initial position in TWA this morning and perhaps a second this > >afternoon if it acts well. > > > >I have bought a few shares of TAVI and have decided to hold my SYBS for > >a few more days. > > > >I alluded to a stock that re-appeared on my scan this morning. That > >stock is CVTI. I owned the stock and have since sold it; it is an > >OBV/MF candidate and looks sound. > > > >I am still uneasy with the market and will have only about 20 percent of > >capital invested, assuming that I get TWA. > > > >Connie Mack > > > >- --------------8B8F1AA5E23083AE9A4B76CB > >Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > > >Members-- > > > >

Believe I saw some comment about the airlines earlier.  Don't > >recall if it was good or bad.  However, the only stock that I kicked > >out this morning [that had not been kicked out on earlier runs] was > TWA. > > > >

The OBV looks good.  The MF is marginal at best.  > However, > >several other indicators are positive, and the SAR gave a buy > yesterday.  > >I will try to buy an initial position in TWA this morning and perhaps a > >second this afternoon if it acts well. > > > >

I have bought a few shares of TAVI and have decided to hold my SYBS > >for a few more days. > > > >

I alluded to a stock that re-appeared on my scan this > morning.  > >That stock is CVTI.  I owned the stock and have since sold it; it > >is an OBV/MF candidate and looks sound. > > > >

I am still uneasy with the market and will have only about 20 > percent > >of capital invested, assuming that I get TWA. > > > >

Connie Mack > > > >- --------------8B8F1AA5E23083AE9A4B76CB-- > > > > > >- - > > > >------------------------------ > > > >End of canslim-digest V2 #120 > >***************************** > > > > To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. > > For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send > > "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message. > > > > - - - ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #121 ***************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.