From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #130 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk canslim-digest Saturday, February 28 1998 Volume 02 : Number 130 In this issue: [CANSLIM] EFTC & NORT T ech Analysis Help [CANSLIM] INTRO: Jim Acker Re: [CANSLIM] EFTC & NORT T ech Analysis Help Re: [CANSLIM] EPIQ Re: [CANSLIM] Breakouts AADV IMP OFG [CANSLIM] Earlier personal message RE: [CANSLIM] Breakouts AADV IMP OFG [CANSLIM] Elder's Triple Screen Re: [CANSLIM] OPEC Increased Production (was Results of Iraq survey) Re: [CANSLIM] OPEC Increased Production -- 2/28 Re: [CANSLIM] OPEC Increased Production -- 2/28 Re: [CANSLIM] Elder's Triple Screen Re: [CANSLIM] Earlier personal message [CANSLIM] Intro Ron Mulkey [CANSLIM] QuotesPlus version 2 BETA functions ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:08:43 -0500 From: "James Adams" Subject: [CANSLIM] EFTC & NORT T ech Analysis Help Yesterday, I believe it was, EFTC was up only a fraction on 247k vol with adv of 87k. Today, NORT did 237k w/193k ADV and didn't move a bit. The latter wasn't nearly as huge volume increase as EFTC, nevertheless, what interpretation is given when a stock as a much greater than average vol but no price movement? Is this what is known as churning? FWIW, Tom, I wish I had followed my hunch after you mentioned PURW. Did you buy it? If so congratulations. James Adams......................Maysville, KY USA http://www.cris.com/~jimadams/ Internet Pager 1343361@pager.mirabilis.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:44:46 -0600 From: Jim Acker Subject: [CANSLIM] INTRO: Jim Acker Hello all, I have been investing for only a year.The 8% loss limit is my weak spot. I am currently dividing my investing dollars 15% that I manage on-line and 85% with a full service broker.As I gain more experience I hope to tilt that percentage considerably more in my favor. I have a 3 stocks that I would like to put out for comment. peoplesoft inc psft eps=99 rs=94 acc=A funds=34% Time=A Avg Vol=3,157,900 cambridge tech. catp 98 89 B 33% B 670,700 prepaid legal serv. ppd 95 96 A 12% A 182,800 Thanks, Jim Acker - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:45:35 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] EFTC & NORT T ech Analysis Help I've had EFTC on my watch list for some time now, but will probably drop it this weekend. It seems to have trouble doing a clean breakout. While it's lows have been gradually inching higher, it's highs when it does attempt a breakout are decreasing. I'm not sure where this wedge formation may eventually take it, but not impressed so far. NORT is not CANSLIM. It's price ($1.13), RS (74) and EPS (47) would all take it out of the CS arena. Add to that the chart shows a clear declining trend, and I wouldn't even consider it to be a speculative trade. Maybe, at some point like PAA, it may be worth a trade, but you would still have to keep in mind you are speculating, not investing. I own PURW at 7.125, bot several months ago when it looked to me like it was starting to break out of a short base. I held on (mistake) and was nearly shook out at 5.5 (would have been an even bigger mistake) but since I give thinly traded microcaps more room to roam, I was barely within my limits and hung on. Only a few days later it firmed up and moved back into the 6 range, and has only gone north since then. So, instead of settling for nearly a $1000 loss, I am now sitting on a $1000 gain on paper. Now up 28%, I hope to exit the stock next week sometime. I considered, but lacked the capital, to buy more when it firmed up at the 6 level. I would not consider buying it here, the train has already left the station and you have to start looking for the next one. Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - -----Original Message----- From: James Adams To: Canslim Date: Friday, February 27, 1998 7:11 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] EFTC & NORT T ech Analysis Help >Yesterday, I believe it was, EFTC was up only a fraction on 247k vol with >adv of 87k. >Today, NORT did 237k w/193k ADV and didn't move a bit. The latter wasn't >nearly as huge volume increase as EFTC, nevertheless, what interpretation is >given when a stock as a much greater than average vol but no price movement? >Is this what is known as churning? > >FWIW, Tom, I wish I had followed my hunch after you mentioned PURW. Did you >buy it? >If so congratulations. > >James Adams......................Maysville, KY USA >http://www.cris.com/~jimadams/ >Internet Pager 1343361@pager.mirabilis.com > > >- > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:59:39 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] EPIQ I wouldn't go so far as to say that the past two days profit taking on EPIQ has "taken it out of play from a CANSLIM standpoint". Fundamentally, it still exhibits strong CS elements (99, 99, A, A). However, one of the key elements, and one often overlooked or ignored, with CANSLIM is buying the stock correctly (selecting a valid entry or pivot point). For once, I did that with EPIQ buying it at 9.5 (incidentally benefiting from the new Order Display rules which enabled me to buy at the low end of the spread then). When it pulled back to 9, I wasn't stopped out, and since enjoyed a nice ride (and the profits). Right now, there is no base, and support at the 14 level is even questionable. Thus this is certainly not a CANSLIM "buy" stock at this time. On the other hand, it is a good one to put on a watch list and see if it stabilizes and can form a decent base. It's got most of the elements, just needs the chart formation, and future breakout volume. Patience pays off, it did here and it did with PURW. Stocks under $12, as well as non-liquid thinly traded microcaps, are far more difficult to read than higher priced liquid stocks which attract interest from mutual funds and other institutional investors. You have to take far greater risk, and you can't apply the CANSLIM rules as tightly as you might wish. When they work, they can be most rewarding, when they go against you (witness I am still holding my original positions in SOCR and MSON altho have made some nice short term money trading addl shares) they can be most costly. Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - -----Original Message----- From: Craig Griffin To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Date: Friday, February 27, 1998 11:56 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] EPIQ >Joe, > >At 09:20 AM 2/27/98 -0700, you wrote: >>I trust that the trashing of EPIQ on Thursday on the largest volume day >>yet and the down day so far on Friday (11 EST) pretty much takes this >>out of play from a CANSLIM standpoint as either a potential buy for >>those not in it and a sell signal for those already in it? >> > >Yes. It is known as a climax top. Note the huge volume over the last >several trading days. This volume is not coming as it breaks out of a base, >but as it accelerates at the top of a run (blowoff activity). Notice that >yesterday the stock started up but shortly turned down AND it had the >highest volume of any day since the move began. This was the climactic day. >Also notice that it had advanced 60% from a short base in 3 weeks! This >alone is climactic activity. > >The stock had gone from $3 to $20 in a year. Now it is badly bruised and >typically one can expect these to retrace 50% of the move. So $20 - $3 = >$17. $17/2 = $8.50. $20 - $8.50 = $11.50. So a retracement to $11.50 is >not out of the question. Also note that the 200dma is at about $7.50, and >you have a danger signal once the stock is more than double the 200dma. So >from $15 on up, the warning light was flashing red. > >Congratulations to Tom on picking an excellent exit point! It is hard to >sell when a stock goes up every day because it feels so good to just sit on >your hands and watch the pile of money grow. And then when it does pullback >like yesterday, it is easy to say, "oh, it deserves a rest here, I'll give >it a week or two". But climax runs usually don't turn out so benignly >(although occasionally they do - anything is possible). The pain grows and >grows as your profits slip away and the stock works its way down. The day >you are "forced" to sell because you cannot stand the pain any more, >frequently calls the bottom (or at least a short term one). Better to exit >a stock that is acting like this, preferably on a day like 02/25 or 02/26 >when distribution becomes apparent. > >PS. This stuff is not hard and fast - nothing in the market is after all. >There could be some monster news that would make this stock turn on a dime >and go higher than $20 in the next few days or weeks, but the odds against >it are about 99.99% IMO. Odds are that it will not pass $20 again for >months, although I would not rule out a snap back rally after the initial >sellers are exhausted. And if it bases here in a tight range (20-30%) for 8 >or 12 weeks and then breaks out, I would probably want to own it then. > >PPS. Yesterday would have been a good day to short this stock (the one >exception I have to not shorting anything above the 50dma. Today is too >late though IMO. > > >- > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 22:13:11 -0600 From: Dave Cameron Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Breakouts AADV IMP OFG Peter Christiansen wrote: > > As part of my scan, I look for the following: > On the breakout day, a volume increase of 50% over the 30 day average volume. If a stock is averaging 10,000 shares a day, I have no problem trading it. These three stocks met this criteria. That said, OFG was the only one to follow through today. > > I have started using Office 97 for my e-mail, and can't figure out how easily attach tag lines. Bummer. You also stopped using the key in your postings.... very tough for me to read (first paragraph). Dave Cameron > > Peter Christiansen > Chiang Mai, Thailand > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Worley [SMTP:stkguru@netside.net] > Sent: Friday, February 27, 1998 8:37 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Breakouts AADV IMP OFG > > Sorry, Peter, but none got me excited (then again I have an acknowledged > bias against banks and financial stocks). Two are very thinly traded, and > none looked like a decent breakout on meaningful volume. > > Besides, where's your usual quip at the end of your post? That's one of the > reasons I always read your items to the very end!!! > > Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. > My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am > a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do > their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on > the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all > investors. > tom w > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Christiansen > To: CANSLIM (E-mail) > Date: Thursday, February 26, 1998 9:17 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] Breakouts AADV IMP OFG > > >Ran across these breakouts from yesterday. I have looked at the numbers > only briefly, but they looked decent. The charts are nice. > > > >Advantage Bancorp (AADV) > >Imperial Bancorp (IMP) > >Oriental Financial Group (OFG) > > > >Peter Christiansen > >Chiang Mai, Thailand > > > > > >- > > > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Part 1.2 Type: application/ms-tnef > Encoding: base64 - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 22:31:13 -0600 From: Dave Cameron Subject: [CANSLIM] Earlier personal message Connie : Did you get my earlier message from Wednesday? I wonder, because I asked you a few questions and you generally respond quickly. Thanks, Dave Cameron - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 11:17:58 +0700 From: Peter Christiansen Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Breakouts AADV IMP OFG Is this better? I had the mail app set to mime encoding. Now it is set to UUencode, which should work better. Please let me know if this message is formatted properly for your mail reader. Thanks. Peter Christiansen Chiang Mai, Thailand - -----Original Message----- From: Dave Cameron [SMTP:dfcameron@ameritech.net] Sent: Saturday, February 28, 1998 11:13 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Breakouts AADV IMP OFG Peter Christiansen wrote: > > As part of my scan, I look for the following: > On the breakout day, a volume increase of 50% over the 30 day average volume. If a stock is averaging 10,000 shares a day, I have no problem trading it. These three stocks met this criteria. That said, OFG was the only one to follow through today. > > I have started using Office 97 for my e-mail, and can't figure out how easily attach tag lines. Bummer. You also stopped using the key in your postings.... very tough for me to read (first paragraph). Dave Cameron begin 600 WINMAIL.DAT M>)\^(@($`0:0" `$```````!``$``0>0!@`(````Y 0```````#H``$(@ <` M& ```$E032Y-:6-R;W-O9G0@36%I;"Y.;W1E`#$(`0V ! `"`````@`"``$$ MD 8`U $```$````0`````P``, ,````+``\.``````(!_P\!````4P`````` M``"!*Q^DOJ,0&9UN`-T!#U0"`````&-A;G-L:6U ;&ES=',N>&UI``$P`0```!T````G8V%N&UI`' ``0```"4```!213H@6T-!3E-,24U=($)R M96%K;W5T# $````%````4TU44 `````>`!\,`0```!4` M``!P971E!<]QA9QIP&3$"$'(`P!F!DQHP$\!O< 20;'DB0GP@>0AA&H0) M("3Q`Q `< LQ)8,3$S&&-B5H"S!L:3,V`4"K M(O$9D&,%0"TL,D\%$/YG"X '0 70(;0L,R5F*\0/*Y$+$RO$`@!I+3$TQC0! M0"M0,3@P`4 ,T%$OTV(@1@-A.@R#8I$0H$1A=AIP0V$'@ ,#8 .@6U--5% Z M=F00(#)40#)2'- %D&CT+FX0@%TE93$`!F ",(LQ9P80= AP9&%Y'B!@1F5B M0;V,?0!DQYTNT'#$W8# L,& 0H!Z@_PK !Y%) M(#93&?(R$2#@(N+Y`F!E;1D`2^ <(AS!),/_!Y :(#[!'C @(!I#`B C40(@WU'!&W!&M%'2"&!G'H ; M8'\V425<0YU/E2>01,$BP76[`) HL4\!( W@&G Y)M!_(X)%,2UP&I))`2F0 M.7(G^P5 +Z!G"'!*(4BA$I 'X/\@$0,02Y$"0 #05O$AX"!0=PN !Y <84)) M<#)A)5M9\PA@&M!L1 M%_ E0/=C\4DP!)!Y)60;8%;26R/W5=,D8AG0*"^@$& %0 JQXR'@2^!P:"DE M6S'Z)6H%%($`:> #`! 0``````,`$1 ``````P" $/____] ```"6 "" &``````# ````````1@````!4 MA0```0````0````X+C ``P`F@ @@!@``````P ```````$8``````84````` M```+`"^ "" &``````# ````````1@`````.A0````````,`,( (( 8````` M`, ```````!&`````!&%`````````P`R@ @@!@``````P ```````$8````` M&(4````````>`$& "" &``````# ````````1@`````VA0```0````$````` M````'@!"@ @@!@``````P ```````$8`````-X4```$````!`````````!X` M0X (( 8``````, ```````!&`````#B%```!`````0`````````>`#T``0`` 7``4```!213H@``````,`#33]-P``3,"% ` end - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 06:03:31 -0500 From: Jeffry White <"postwhit@sover.net"@sover.net> Subject: [CANSLIM] Elder's Triple Screen Zoran, you wrote: > > Joe J. wrote: > > > portion of the book, I can see Elder's basic premise is to enter the > > trade at "quiet" times and exit during the mad rush times. Really quite > > opposite of WON. > > I have read the book, and I will recommend it (again) to the group. > I too prefer entering a trade at quiet times, especially close > to an important (as shown by past precedents in price behavior) > moving average or support/resistance level. One of my most > comfortable (and profitable) entry strategies has been entering > at bottoms of short-term retracements after a high-volume breakout > run on a strong RS stock. > I like that scenario because of the high information content > yielded by the set-up: Quite often it is prefectly obvious from the > daily-intraday volume behavior that the big block buyers who entered > at the break-out are still holding on to their positions during the > trickle-down volume retracements and are only waiting for the proper > time to enter again. I have found these situations to be one of the > most predictable ones. In addition, these entry points are almost > always very close to the "something's wrong" point so losses can > be minimized, especially when confirmed with "wrong" volume behavior. > > Zoran > > > This is precisely how I learned to enter most CANSLIM trades. Because I almost always miss the breakout on huge volume, I used to sit and wait for volume to dry up and price to edge down to the base or breakout point. Sometimes I was right, sometimes I was wrong. But my efforts now incorporate Connie Mack's slow stochastics and 3/7/10 EMA crossovers in that type of entry point. Those indicators provide good, solid confirmation that you have actually reasched a point in the correction where the likelihood of a resumption is higher than the failure. Entry points using these indicators make 8% stop loss points easy. Not perfect, but it certainly has improved my trading. February 98 will be a month to remember for me due largely to use of these indicators to enhance my entry point. THQI is on my watch list for this type of entry point, along with several others. The only thing I don't like about THQI is that it broke out on news (which to me is automatically a cautionary signal). I would also mention that these indicators work extremely well on LLUR stocks, such as WFMI, but not as well on stocks that are still in the "handle", such as OMQP (but TWLB suggests it's not to be totally ignored). Thanks for you thoughts about entry point, which, next to the "M", is the most critical and most difficult point of the game, in my opinion. Jeffry - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 14:58:22 GMT From: musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OPEC Increased Production (was Results of Iraq survey) I don't know if the story posted below is substantive or smoke, but it appears to contradict the notion that OPEC will increase output in reaction to falling oil prices. I promptly purchased some Key Energy Group (KEG) and saw it close up sharply. It eased off Friday, though the sector did not do badly. PBS Business news reported no such reason for the surge in oils on Thursday, but attributed the move to Halliburton's acquisition/merger with Dresser to form an 8 Billion $$ oil sector powerhouse -- thought to be a good sign for the sector, where similar mergers are thought to be expected in the near future (partly in reaction to the low price of oil). Dan - ------------------------------------------------------ NEW YORK, Feb 26 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks looked headed for a mixed to weaker opening on Thursday with the focus firmly on the oil sector after a new merger, talk of OPEC production cuts and renewed worries about the U.N.-brokered deal with Iraq. ``This is a group left unattended in the rally phase and there is some catch-up there in oil services and oils,'' said Joseph Barthel, chief investment strategist at Fahnestock & Co. The S&P March futures were off 1.40 points in pre-open trade on Globex, trimming some earlier losses. The benchmark 30-year Treasury bond was down 15/32 yielding 5.95 percent. Benchmark April Brent was up 39 cents at $14.30 a barrel after a call by OPEC President and Indonesian Oil Minister Ida Bagus Sudjana for an emergency meeting to combat a slump in oil prices. Oilfield service company Dresser Industries Inc (DI - news) rose in pre-opening trade on Thursday on news rival Halliburton Co (HAL - news) would buy it in a $7.7 billion deal. Barthel said as more details emerged of the U.N.-brokered deal with Iraq on weapons inspections, there was growing anxiety the terms may not be acceptable to Washington which could also push crude and oil stocks higher.=20 - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 15:39:48 GMT From: musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OPEC Increased Production -- 2/28 I don't know if the story posted below is substantive or smoke, but it appears to contradict the notion that OPEC will increase output in reaction to falling oil prices. I promptly purchased some Key Energy Group (KEG) and saw it close up sharply. It eased off Friday, though the sector did not do badly. PBS Business news reported no such reason for the surge in oils on Thursday, but attributed the move to Halliburton's acquisition/merger with Dresser to form an 8 Billion $$ oil sector powerhouse -- thought to be a good sign for the sector, where similar mergers are thought to be expected in the near future (partly in reaction to the low price of oil). Dan - ------------------------------------------------------ NEW YORK, Feb 26 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks looked headed for a mixed to weaker opening on Thursday with the focus firmly on the oil sector after a new merger, talk of OPEC production cuts and renewed worries about the U.N.-brokered deal with Iraq. ``This is a group left unattended in the rally phase and there is some catch-up there in oil services and oils,'' said Joseph Barthel, chief investment strategist at Fahnestock & Co. The S&P March futures were off 1.40 points in pre-open trade on Globex, trimming some earlier losses. The benchmark 30-year Treasury bond was down 15/32 yielding 5.95 percent. Benchmark April Brent was up 39 cents at $14.30 a barrel after a call by OPEC President and Indonesian Oil Minister Ida Bagus Sudjana for an emergency meeting to combat a slump in oil prices. Oilfield service company Dresser Industries Inc (DI - news) rose in pre-opening trade on Thursday on news rival Halliburton Co (HAL - news) would buy it in a $7.7 billion deal. Barthel said as more details emerged of the U.N.-brokered deal with Iraq on weapons inspections, there was growing anxiety the terms may not be acceptable to Washington which could also push crude and oil stocks higher.=20 - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 15:45:38 GMT From: musicant@autobahn.org (Dan Musicant) Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OPEC Increased Production -- 2/28 Aha! Looking at this Reuters article more closely I see that the merger was reported. What caught my eye was the news that OPEC was moving to reduce oil production. Dan - -- :NEW YORK, Feb 26 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks looked headed for a mixed to :weaker opening on Thursday with the focus firmly on the oil sector :after a new merger, talk of OPEC production cuts and renewed worries :about the U.N.-brokered deal with Iraq. : :``This is a group left unattended in the rally phase and there is some :catch-up there in oil services and oils,'' said Joseph Barthel, chief :investment strategist at Fahnestock & Co. : :The S&P March futures were off 1.40 points in pre-open trade on :Globex, trimming some earlier losses. The benchmark 30-year Treasury :bond was down 15/32 yielding 5.95 percent. : :Benchmark April Brent was up 39 cents at $14.30 a barrel after a call :by OPEC President and Indonesian Oil Minister Ida Bagus Sudjana for an :emergency meeting to combat a slump in oil prices. : :Oilfield service company Dresser Industries Inc (DI - news) rose in :pre-opening trade on Thursday on news rival Halliburton Co (HAL - :news) would buy it in a $7.7 billion deal. : :Barthel said as more details emerged of the U.N.-brokered deal with :Iraq on weapons inspections, there was growing anxiety the terms may :not be acceptable to Washington which could also push crude and oil :stocks higher.=20 : : : :- - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 09:40:13 -0700 From: Tim Fisher Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Elder's Triple Screen At 06:03 AM 2/28/98 -0500, you wrote: > >THQI is on my watch list for this type of entry point, along with >several others. The only thing I don't like about THQI is that it broke >out on news (which to me is automatically a cautionary signal). > Why would an incredible earnings report be a cautionary signal? That _was_ the news AFAIK. Tim Fisher, 1995 President, Pacific Fishery Biologists Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site PFB Information tfish@spiritone.com WWW http://www.spiritone.com/~tfish -- See naked fish and rocks! - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 13:19:25 -0500 From: Connie Mack Rea Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Earlier personal message - --------------DA8385A1D105794CD2646875 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Morning Dave-- Have been busier than Clinton's silver zipper. Am getting between 25-35 pieces of mail a day. Probably half require answers. And, of these, three to four are from members. My answers to your questions, I'll answer privately [as you suggest] because they would seem of little interest to other members. Sorry for the delay. Connie Mack Dave Cameron wrote: > Connie : > > Did you get my earlier message from Wednesday? I wonder, because > I asked you a few questions and you generally respond quickly. > > Thanks, > > Dave Cameron > > - - --------------DA8385A1D105794CD2646875 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Morning Dave--

Have been busier than Clinton's silver zipper.  Am getting between 25-35 pieces of mail a day.  Probably half require answers.  And, of these, three to four are from members.

My answers to your questions, I'll answer privately [as you suggest] because they would seem of little interest to other members.

Sorry for the delay.

Connie Mack
 
 
 
 
 

Dave Cameron wrote:

Connie :

Did you get my earlier message from Wednesday?   I wonder, because
I asked you a few questions and you generally respond quickly.

Thanks,

Dave Cameron

-

   - --------------DA8385A1D105794CD2646875-- - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 16:16:11 -0600 From: "Ronald A. Mulkey" Subject: [CANSLIM] Intro Ron Mulkey This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01BD4464.2F21BB00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, My name is Ron Mulkey. I am a Captain in the Army and am = teaching Army ROTC at Washington University. I am taking MS/IS 480, a = graduate management information systems class. As part of the mid-term = exam, I had to join a discussion group, send a message to the group and = print any response received. Truthfully, I waited a few days, before = sending this message so that I could read a little bit about Canslim. I = had never heard of it before, but am interested. Where can I get a copy = of the book? Ron Mulkey - ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01BD4464.2F21BB00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello, My name is Ron Mulkey.  = I am a=20 Captain in the Army and am teaching Army ROTC at Washington = University.  I=20 am taking MS/IS 480, a graduate management information systems = class.  As=20 part of the mid-term exam, I had to join a discussion group, send a = message to=20 the group and print any response received.  Truthfully, I waited a = few=20 days, before sending this message so that I could read a little bit = about=20 Canslim.  I had never heard of it before, but am interested.  = Where=20 can I get a copy of the book?
 
Ron = Mulkey
- ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01BD4464.2F21BB00-- - - ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 16:23:57 -0800 From: Mike Lucero Subject: [CANSLIM] QuotesPlus version 2 BETA functions Here are the functions in the version 2 BETA version of QuotesPlus that would be of interest for CANSLIM scanning. They expect to be shipping in about a month. Mike Bookvalue EPS EPS1GROWTH EPS3GROWTH EPS5GROWTH HasOptions() InstHold MarketCap Operatingearnings PE PrtoSales QRS() QTRREV(qtr) QTREPS Revspershare Rev1growth Rev3growth Rev5 growth Sharesfloat SharesOut Shortint - - ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #130 ***************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.