From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1359 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Saturday, May 12 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1359 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] RS question ... Re: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... WRONG! (was Re: [CANSLIM] Tom's pick ATPX trying to B/O) Re: [CANSLIM] CATT is setting up HTF? Re: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... Re: [CANSLIM] IGT Re: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... [CANSLIM] Re: WRONG! Ok, pick was a poor word. The memo was titled [CANSLIM] Interactivebrokers.com Re: [CANSLIM] Re: WRONG! Ok, pick was a poor word. The memo was titled [CANSLIM] DGO List - Part One Re: [CANSLIM] Interactivebrokers.com [CANSLIM] junk mail Re: [CANSLIM] junk mail [CANSLIM] daily vs weekly charts [CANSLIM] virus Re: [CANSLIM] DGO List - Part One ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 20:43:24 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] RS question ... O'Neil's RS, like EPS, is a two step calculation. In both cases, the second step is a percentile ranking of the results of the first step against all other stocks. You are completely correct that the first step of calculating RS is more heavily weighed on the most recent three months (and remember this is a daily calculation, so a price spike 88 days ago can affect noticeably the RS a few days in the future). It is a simple calculation of the percentage price change, with the latest three months getting a 40% weight, and the other three qtrs getting 20% weight each. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: Fanus To: Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 6:24 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] RS question ... I think RS is based on a weighted calculation with more weight given to the last couple of months. As you can see ACLNF didn't do terribly good over the last 3 months (except for the last couple of days), which is reflected in the 71 RS ranking. It is little oversimplifying to judge a bull/bear market by relative strength. If a stock go down less than other stocks, it still can have a good RS ranking. This is what the "R" is for. It is a relative measurement. - - Fanus "Ian" wrote: I see that ACLNF has a RS of 71 now. 1 year ago it was at $18, and was at $28.20 yesterday. That is a 56% increase in the last year. Does an ACLNF RS of 71 mean that 29% of all publicly traded companies are up 56% or more over the last year? If so, it sure doesn't sound like a terrible bear market to me - perhaps the energy/financials/retailers/homebuilders make up 30% of the market?. Is my interpretation correct? Thanks, Ian - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. _________________________________________________________________ ___ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 21:36:06 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... Ian, I'll add a few additional thoughts to all the comments tonight. First, I would be very concerned (unless they reported today) that they still have not released Q1 data for 2001. Deadline for the normal 45 days allowed by the SEC is Tuesday, and a company that goes to the deadline, or needs to file an extension, suggests one not well managing its finances and cash flow. Add to that its cash flow reported by DGO is only $1.62 compared to last year's earnings of $2.97 would force me to expend a far greater amount of time and research in studying at least a year's worth of financial reports at the SEC site to figure out where their money is going. The low trailing PE of 10 (only 0.4X S&P 500 average) suggests a low expectation. The lack of at least three analysts may be creating this low expectation, but the bottom line remains what will cause the expectations to rise? They have been reporting extremely high double digit growth in both earnings and sales, yet expectations are so low? Are they inflating their accounting? Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: Ian To: Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:29 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... I have been wrong on ACLNF before, so take this with a grain of salt, but ... It seems to me that there is a breakout building here (check the chart over the past 14 days - green on 12 of them on strong volume). There is a beautiful cup and handle here, with the trigger around $29.40. If it takes this out today, I don't see much resistance until last summers highs ($35.40). They announced 1st quarter shipping volume (up 122% over last year), but haven't announced financials yet. EPS will definitely NOT be up 122%, as margins are down a bit, and costs are up. THe nice thing is that they are set to earn $4+ this year on strong 60%+ growth, so the valuation on a P/E and P/S basis is still reasonable, IMHO. The RS has been absolutely screaming up over the past 6-7 days - from 48 early last week to 72 yesterday. There is TONS of resistance at $29 - so it should run nicely if that is taken out. We'll see. Ian - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 21:47:18 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: WRONG! (was Re: [CANSLIM] Tom's pick ATPX trying to B/O) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_009A_01C0DA63.F4059D40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable First off, this Tom doesn't post his picks to this group because he = deviates far too much from CANSLIM, at least on price and liquidity. Second, even if this appeared on one of my DGO List posts, that doesn't = make it a "pick", just something who's chart made it interesting one = week. Finally, I took a look at the chart to see why it was not on my watch = list at least, and note very stagnant sales both year to year and = sequentially. I also note that two of the past four quarters, including = the most recent, showed Y2Y earnings declines. I also noted the lack of = analyst's forecasts, as well as any reason to expect a change in these = fundies. Remember, when I post the DGO List, I am only reviewing the recent chart = of those stocks already screened by DGO. I am not doing any due = diligence, I expect you to do that before putting it on a watch list. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net ----- Original Message -----=20 From: SACADS@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:43 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom's pick ATPX trying to B/O 15x +/- volume. Up about 8 %=20 not completly CANSLIM, low float, share price under $12=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_009A_01C0DA63.F4059D40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
First off, this Tom doesn't post his picks to this = group=20 because he deviates far too much from CANSLIM, at least on price and=20 liquidity.
 
Second, even if this appeared on one of my DGO List = posts,=20 that doesn't make it a "pick", just something who's chart made it = interesting=20 one week.
 
Finally, I took a look at the chart to see why it = was not on=20 my watch list at least, and note very stagnant sales both year to year = and=20 sequentially. I also note that two of the past four quarters, including = the most=20 recent, showed Y2Y earnings declines. I also noted the lack of analyst's = forecasts, as well as any reason to expect a change in these=20 fundies.
 
Remember, when I post the DGO List, I am only = reviewing the=20 recent chart of those stocks already screened by DGO. I am not doing any = due=20 diligence, I expect you to do that before putting it on a watch=20 list.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 SACADS@aol.com
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 = 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom's = pick ATPX=20 trying to B/O

15x +/- = volume.=20  Up about 8 %

not completly CANSLIM, low float, share = price under=20 $12 - ------=_NextPart_000_009A_01C0DA63.F4059D40-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 22:01:01 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CATT is setting up HTF? The violence of the selloff on the left side of the cup would scare me. That was selling, and lack of support by the MMers, with a vengeance, especially considering the runup prior. Two weeks from 38.81 to 15.31, whew!! Glad I hadn't stumbled across this one before that! The way above average trailing and projected PE, along with the very high (over 11) mkt cap to sales ratio would make me avoid this one, despite what looks like a nice handle forming. I would also be concerned about the deep depth of the cup, probably exasperated by the severity of the left side of the cup. I would be less concerned about the failure of the double bottom to create a second, lower, bottom due to the severity of the original selloff in the left side. I don't see this latest action as a HTF, mostly because the spike on 5/2 failed to clear the immediately prior high, even on extreme volume. And of course it still was even further below the high set on the left side of the rim of the cup. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:52 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] CATT is setting up HTF? Trading range is has been very tight for the last few days, volume has dropped. Anna - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 19:27:04 -0700 From: "Ian" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... Have a look at the comparative balance sheets: http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/010306/0558.html The shareholders equity went from $76 million to $126 million over the year - and the substantial % increase went straight into cash and retained earnings. I cannot find any other company save a few oil & gas plays that have shown this kind of real-not-CSCO-shenanigans-cashflow. (I should point out that their AR dropped $20 million between Dec 31 2000 and their last cc in Februrary - it's lumpiness is related to how they account for ships in transit). The bottom line is that their actual cash position increased by $3/share for the year. I am beginning to suspect that one of the reasons they are lagging so much is that the web 'information' sites appear to have inaccurate data on them. Your '$1.62 cash flow' data appears to be the second example today! However, I won't under-estimate the effect that this poor web data has. It will keep potential investors/traders away. The company clearly needs to shore up their IR/PR. Ian - ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Worley To: Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 6:36 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... > Ian, I'll add a few additional thoughts to all the comments > tonight. > > First, I would be very concerned (unless they reported today) > that they still have not released Q1 data for 2001. Deadline for > the normal 45 days allowed by the SEC is Tuesday, and a company > that goes to the deadline, or needs to file an extension, > suggests one not well managing its finances and cash flow. > > Add to that its cash flow reported by DGO is only $1.62 compared > to last year's earnings of $2.97 would force me to expend a far > greater amount of time and research in studying at least a year's > worth of financial reports at the SEC site to figure out where > their money is going. > > The low trailing PE of 10 (only 0.4X S&P 500 average) suggests a > low expectation. The lack of at least three analysts may be > creating this low expectation, but the bottom line remains what > will cause the expectations to rise? They have been reporting > extremely high double digit growth in both earnings and sales, > yet expectations are so low? Are they inflating their accounting? > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ian > To: > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:29 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... > > > I have been wrong on ACLNF before, so take this with a grain of > salt, but > ... > > It seems to me that there is a breakout building here (check the > chart over > the past 14 days - green on 12 of them on strong volume). There > is a > beautiful cup and handle here, with the trigger around $29.40. If > it takes > this out today, I don't see much resistance until last summers > highs > ($35.40). They announced 1st quarter shipping volume (up 122% > over last > year), but haven't announced financials yet. EPS will definitely > NOT be up > 122%, as margins are down a bit, and costs are up. > > THe nice thing is that they are set to earn $4+ this year on > strong 60%+ > growth, so the valuation on a P/E and P/S basis is still > reasonable, IMHO. > > The RS has been absolutely screaming up over the past 6-7 days - > from 48 > early last week to 72 yesterday. > > There is TONS of resistance at $29 - so it should run nicely if > that is > taken out. We'll see. > > Ian > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 22:17:05 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT I don't recall what I may have said previously about this one, but looking at the chart tonight, I see a three week downtrend. I think Tim mentioned that he saw it as a broken LLUR, I would agree with that overall. But I also note that the volume presently as it approaches the 50 DMA is dropping sharply. Probably worth watching for those able to watch it during the market hours, and maybe catching a quick spike up if they can catch it on volume still close to the 50 DMA. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 4:36 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IGT Patrick and Doug, Today in IBD in "New Buys of Top-Rated Mutual Funds", IGT is listed as having been bought by 17 A+, A, or A- funds that have invested $215 Million in it. Now, as I understand the table, these are the funds that have either bought or increased their position in the most recent period. I recall Tom saying he liked the looks and temper of IGT. Apparently, he is in good company. jans In a message dated 5/11/2001 4:18:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dzc@qwest.net writes: << It does look better than it did three weeks ago when it first appeared it was going to prematurely breakout. Seems like a long handle...three weeks if you start from that failed breakout. The base from left peak to the first b/o attempt is less than 7 weeks. If the 4/26 peak of 57.74 is the start of the handle then it's two weeks old. From that point to today it's decreased 7 % which isnt bad for a handle. Depth of the cup is about 19%. The handle is dipping ever so close to the 50dma. I'm hoping it finally breaks out next week. I'm getting impatient. At 01:14 PM 5/11/01 -0600, you wrote: >This one was being discussed here a couple weeks ago, so maybe >someone has an opinion on it. It now looks like the previous >breakout was premature, and it is now forming a handle, and could >be ripe for another breakout from a more completely formed cup >and handle. Any comments? > >> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 22:22:34 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... I'll try to spend a little time on the finances this weekend, Ian, but bottom line for me remains that they are waiting until the last moment, or later, to report earnings, and my experience is that is never a good sign, even for my favorite "babies" who don't have a full in house staff of bean counters. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: Ian To: Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 10:27 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... Have a look at the comparative balance sheets: http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/010306/0558.html The shareholders equity went from $76 million to $126 million over the year - and the substantial % increase went straight into cash and retained earnings. I cannot find any other company save a few oil & gas plays that have shown this kind of real-not-CSCO-shenanigans-cashflow. (I should point out that their AR dropped $20 million between Dec 31 2000 and their last cc in Februrary - it's lumpiness is related to how they account for ships in transit). The bottom line is that their actual cash position increased by $3/share for the year. I am beginning to suspect that one of the reasons they are lagging so much is that the web 'information' sites appear to have inaccurate data on them. Your '$1.62 cash flow' data appears to be the second example today! However, I won't under-estimate the effect that this poor web data has. It will keep potential investors/traders away. The company clearly needs to shore up their IR/PR. Ian - ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Worley To: Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 6:36 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... > Ian, I'll add a few additional thoughts to all the comments > tonight. > > First, I would be very concerned (unless they reported today) > that they still have not released Q1 data for 2001. Deadline for > the normal 45 days allowed by the SEC is Tuesday, and a company > that goes to the deadline, or needs to file an extension, > suggests one not well managing its finances and cash flow. > > Add to that its cash flow reported by DGO is only $1.62 compared > to last year's earnings of $2.97 would force me to expend a far > greater amount of time and research in studying at least a year's > worth of financial reports at the SEC site to figure out where > their money is going. > > The low trailing PE of 10 (only 0.4X S&P 500 average) suggests a > low expectation. The lack of at least three analysts may be > creating this low expectation, but the bottom line remains what > will cause the expectations to rise? They have been reporting > extremely high double digit growth in both earnings and sales, > yet expectations are so low? Are they inflating their accounting? > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ian > To: > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:29 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] I believe that ACLNF is about to break out ... > > > I have been wrong on ACLNF before, so take this with a grain of > salt, but > ... > > It seems to me that there is a breakout building here (check the > chart over > the past 14 days - green on 12 of them on strong volume). There > is a > beautiful cup and handle here, with the trigger around $29.40. If > it takes > this out today, I don't see much resistance until last summers > highs > ($35.40). They announced 1st quarter shipping volume (up 122% > over last > year), but haven't announced financials yet. EPS will definitely > NOT be up > 122%, as margins are down a bit, and costs are up. > > THe nice thing is that they are set to earn $4+ this year on > strong 60%+ > growth, so the valuation on a P/E and P/S basis is still > reasonable, IMHO. > > The RS has been absolutely screaming up over the past 6-7 days - > from 48 > early last week to 72 yesterday. > > There is TONS of resistance at $29 - so it should run nicely if > that is > taken out. We'll see. > > Ian > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 22:23:46 EDT From: SACADS@aol.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: WRONG! Ok, pick was a poor word. The memo was titled My small/micro cap watch list. It was dated 4/08/01 and I printed a copy of it. Tom this is twice that you've "disclaimed" making reference to a stock on this list. Since it's titled your "watch list" I assume you were and are continuing to watch them. Now apparently you aren't. I can't figure it out. I generally keep a watch list for longer than a month. The stocks numbers EPS/RS are good as is D. Company has some relatively good N and from looking closely at the last weeks action I suspect a growing institutional position. M is shaky at best. Low float, little volume. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 23:15:00 -0700 From: Dan Subject: [CANSLIM] Interactivebrokers.com Anyone using Interactivebrokers.com? Negatives? Satisfied? Dan - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 05:46:03 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: WRONG! Ok, pick was a poor word. The memo was titled Sorry, forgot I had given in to some requests and posted my watch list as a one time thing. I thought you were referring to the DGO List I post, but don't keep track of after that. I comment on far too many stocks to remember every one. A stock that does make my watch list may last for less than a week, or stay for several months. I try to only have about 20 on "watch", so when I find a new one it may bump off a weaker one. I normally evaluate the list every weekend and delete any that no longer meet my requirements (which includes those that may have already broken out without me on board). I dropped this one several weeks ago, primarily for the reasons I gave, stagnant growth. I noted the 33 cents earned in Q4, and looked ahead and saw they would have to do much better in the future if they were to show double digit growth as they were done with easy quarterly comparisons. As it turned out, they did worse in the Q1 and showed a 16% decline Y2Y. That would have dropped it from my list immediately if it had still been there. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 10:23 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: WRONG! Ok, pick was a poor word. The memo was titled My small/micro cap watch list. It was dated 4/08/01 and I printed a copy of it. Tom this is twice that you've "disclaimed" making reference to a stock on this list. Since it's titled your "watch list" I assume you were and are continuing to watch them. Now apparently you aren't. I can't figure it out. I generally keep a watch list for longer than a month. The stocks numbers EPS/RS are good as is D. Company has some relatively good N and from looking closely at the last weeks action I suspect a growing institutional position. M is shaky at best. Low float, little volume. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 07:15:58 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] DGO List - Part One This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C0DAB3.64E36840 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This week's list totals 253, down slightly from 264, but still improving = from the prior totals of 245 and 195. It consists of those stocks in the Daily Graphs books (roughly 2,800) = that as of Friday had both RS and EPS of 80 or better. Additionally, = they must have been at or within 5% of the 12 month high during the = prior week. In my review of this overall list, I am only focusing on the = recent chart patterns.=20 This review of the overall list is solely intended to identify stocks = with good CANSLIM qualities, using authentic WON sourced data, that are = showing some kind of constructive chart formation. The idea is to = present some candidates for member's watch list, not to suggest they are = presently a "buy" candidate. No due diligence has been done. My own = personal bias against certain industries is largely ignored in the = review. =20 As always, my shorthand notation is Bx where "B" means a "B"ase of "x" = weeks, IMO. LLUR =3D Lower Left Upper Right MTON - B2 NVR - LLUR TARO - looks to be resuming LLUR CHIC - B2 USLB - B4 NYCB - B2 HOV - nice funnel recovery to higher than when the incorrect info was = released LEN - B3 USPH - HTF?, volume down ICTG - B2 GPI - B3 FCFS - B2 RJR - B2, flat c&h?, just under pivot UCBH - B2 on a c&h AGM - 4 straight days of above avg vol sustaining the b/o from the short = handle at 27 SJT - B4 CSGS - B2 PNM - B2 COLM - B2 DME - LLUR MINI - B2 STRA - B2+ PLB - saucer, B2 EFDS - LLUR Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C0DAB3.64E36840 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This week's list totals 253, down slightly from 264, = but still=20 improving from the prior totals of 245 and 195.
 
It consists of those = stocks in the=20 Daily Graphs books (roughly 2,800) that as of Friday had both RS and EPS = of 80=20 or better.  Additionally, they must have been at or within 5% of = the 12=20 month high during the prior week. In my review of this overall list, I = am only=20 focusing on the recent chart patterns.=20
 
This review of the overall list is solely intended = to identify=20 stocks with good CANSLIM qualities, using authentic WON sourced data, = that are=20 showing some kind of constructive chart formation. The idea is to = present=20 some candidates for member's watch list, not to suggest they are = presently a=20 "buy" candidate. No due diligence has been done. My own personal bias = against=20 certain industries is largely ignored in the=20 review.
 
As always, my shorthand notation is = Bx where "B"=20 means a "B"ase of "x" weeks, IMO. LLUR =3D Lower Left Upper=20 Right
 
MTON - B2
NVR - LLUR
TARO - looks to be resuming LLUR
CHIC -  B2
USLB - B4
NYCB - B2
HOV - nice funnel recovery to higher than when the = incorrect=20 info was released
LEN - B3
USPH - HTF?, volume down
ICTG - B2
GPI - B3
FCFS - B2
RJR - B2, flat c&h?, just under = pivot
UCBH - B2 on a c&h
AGM - 4 straight days of above avg vol sustaining = the b/o from=20 the short handle at 27
SJT - B4
CSGS - B2
PNM - B2
COLM - B2
DME - LLUR
MINI - B2
STRA - B2+
PLB - saucer, B2
EFDS - LLUR
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C0DAB3.64E36840-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 06:55:17 -0500 From: "Norman" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Interactivebrokers.com I have looked at their site but not used their service. It has been recommended to me by a couple of very active trader friends. It's one of those many things on my list of things to check out :-( Norman Boyd - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan" To: Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 1:15 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Interactivebrokers.com > Anyone using Interactivebrokers.com? > > Negatives? > > Satisfied? > > Dan > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 09:05:39 -0400 From: "Ann Hollingworth" Subject: [CANSLIM] junk mail Is anyone else getting junk mail the last few days? Ann - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 08:10:37 -0500 From: "Donna Boyd" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] junk mail Nothing out of the ordinary or that I could attribute to this listserv. Norman - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ann Hollingworth" To: "CANSLIM Listserv" Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 8:05 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] junk mail > Is anyone else getting junk mail the last few days? > Ann > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 08:09:03 -0700 From: "Jay Oken" Subject: [CANSLIM] daily vs weekly charts This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C0DABA.CED1C4C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Excuse the fundamental question on charts but I would like to understand = how to use the weekly charts to identify bullish CANSLIM patterns. I = understand the daily views, looking for B/O and volume, etc., but don't = understand how I can use the weekly charts. Am I looking for a general = uptrend?=20 Thanks, Tracie - ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C0DABA.CED1C4C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Excuse the fundamental question on = charts but I=20 would like to understand how to use the weekly charts to identify = bullish=20 CANSLIM patterns.  I understand the daily views, looking for B/O = and=20 volume, etc., but don't understand how I can use the weekly = charts.  Am I=20 looking for a general uptrend? 
 
Thanks,  Tracie
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C0DABA.CED1C4C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 11:12:38 -0400 From: "Ann Hollingworth" Subject: [CANSLIM] virus Just got a virus, after receiving several pieces of junk mail. The virus was something about Snow White, put something entitled sexy virgin.scr in my TEMP folder. I seem to have solved it, thanks to Norton/Symantec. Watch out. I hope I didn't inadvertently send it out to list. (scanned before mailing this) Ann - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 11:29:06 -0400 From: "John Hobbs" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DGO List - Part One This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0DAD6.C1272B00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just for the heck of it, well maybe it's helpful for your own analysis, = i took Tom's list and added the top 5 companies in each industry ranked = according to IBD. ACRT,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Credit Services ACS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Information Technology Service AEOS,RETAIL - Apparel Stores AGM,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Credit Services APOL,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services ATR,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Packaging & Containers AYE,UTILITIES - Electric Utilities BANR,BANKING - Savings & Loans BKH,UTILITIES - Electric Utilities BMS,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Packaging & Containers BOKF,BANKING - Regional - Southwest Banks BPFH,BANKING - Regional - Northeast Banks BWE,BANKING - Regional - Pacific Banks BZH,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction CACI,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Technical Services CBH,BANKING - Regional - Northeast Banks CECO,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services CHBS,RETAIL - Apparel Stores CHIC,RETAIL - Apparel Stores CHS,RETAIL - Apparel Stores COCO,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services COF,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Credit Services COLM,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing CPRT,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & Services CRT,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Diversified Investments CSGS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & Services DCOM,BANKING - Savings & Loans DME,BANKING - Savings & Loans DOM,ENERGY - Independent Oil & Gas DORL,REAL ESTATE - Mortgage Investment DVA,HEALTH SERVICES - Specialized Health Services EFDS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & Services ESI,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services EWBC,BANKING - Regional - Pacific Banks FCFS,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Specialty Retail, Other FED,BANKING - Savings & Loans FRE,REAL ESTATE - Mortgage Investment GOSHA,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing GPI,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Auto Dealerships HIBB,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Sporting Goods Stores HOTT,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing HOV,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction HRB,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Personal Services HRBT,BANKING - Savings & Loans ICTG,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Business/Management Services ILUM,TELECOMMUNICATIONS - Diversified Communication Serv IRWN,BANKING - Regional - Midwest Banks IVX,DRUGS - Drugs - Generic JHF,INSURANCE - Life Insurance JJSF,FOOD & BEVERAGE - Processed & Packaged Goods JNY,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing KRB,BANKING - Regional - Mid-Atlantic Banks LAD,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Specialty Retail, Other LANC,CONSUMER DURABLES - Housewares & Accessories LEN,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction LNCR,HEALTH SERVICES - Specialized Health Services MAGI,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing MARPS,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Diversified Investments MDU,UTILITIES - Diversified Utilities MINI,MANUFACTURING - Metal Fabrication MKC,FOOD & BEVERAGE - Processed & Packaged Goods MO,TOBACCO - Cigarettes MTH,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction MTON,TELECOMMUNICATIONS - Diversified Communication Serv MYL,DRUGS - Drugs - Generic NAP,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & Services NDE,BANKING - Savings & Loans NIS,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Business/Management Services NVR,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction NYCB,BANKING - Savings & Loans OAT,FOOD & BEVERAGE - Food - Major Diversified OPTN,HEALTH SERVICES - Home Health Care PLB,FOOD & BEVERAGE - Processed & Packaged Goods PNM,UTILITIES - Diversified Utilities PPL,UTILITIES - Electric Utilities PRX,DRUGS - Drugs - Generic PTV,CONGLOMERATES - Conglomerates PWR,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - General Contractors QCBC,BANKING - Savings & Loans RCBK,BANKING - Savings & Loans RGIS,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Personal Services RHB,HEALTH SERVICES - Hospitals RJR,TOBACCO - Cigarettes RYL,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction SBR,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Diversified Investments SDS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & Services SIB,BANKING - Regional - Midwest Banks SJT,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Diversified Investments SON,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Paper & Paper Products STRA,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services STW,TOBACCO - Tobacco Products, Other TARO,DRUGS - Drug Manufacturers - Other TEVA,DRUGS - Drug Manufacturers - Other TSS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & Services UAG,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Auto Dealerships UCBH,BANKING - Regional - Pacific Banks URS,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Technical Services USLB,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Research Services USPH,HEALTH SERVICES - Specialized Health Services UST,TOBACCO - Tobacco Products, Other UVV,TOBACCO - Tobacco Products, Other VZ,TELECOMMUNICATIONS - Telecom Services - Domestic WBB,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction WSTC,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Business/Management Services ZQK,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: CANSLIM=20 Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:15 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] DGO List - Part One This week's list totals 253, down slightly from 264, but still = improving from the prior totals of 245 and 195. It consists of those stocks in the Daily Graphs books (roughly 2,800) = that as of Friday had both RS and EPS of 80 or better. Additionally, = they must have been at or within 5% of the 12 month high during the = prior week. In my review of this overall list, I am only focusing on the = recent chart patterns.=20 This review of the overall list is solely intended to identify stocks = with good CANSLIM qualities, using authentic WON sourced data, that are = showing some kind of constructive chart formation. The idea is to = present some candidates for member's watch list, not to suggest they are = presently a "buy" candidate. No due diligence has been done. My own = personal bias against certain industries is largely ignored in the = review. As always, my shorthand notation is Bx where "B" means a "B"ase of "x" = weeks, IMO. LLUR =3D Lower Left Upper Right MTON - B2 NVR - LLUR TARO - looks to be resuming LLUR CHIC - B2 USLB - B4 NYCB - B2 HOV - nice funnel recovery to higher than when the incorrect info was = released LEN - B3 USPH - HTF?, volume down ICTG - B2 GPI - B3 FCFS - B2 RJR - B2, flat c&h?, just under pivot UCBH - B2 on a c&h AGM - 4 straight days of above avg vol sustaining the b/o from the = short handle at 27 SJT - B4 CSGS - B2 PNM - B2 COLM - B2 DME - LLUR MINI - B2 STRA - B2+ PLB - saucer, B2 EFDS - LLUR Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net - ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0DAD6.C1272B00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just for the heck of it, well maybe = it's helpful=20 for your own analysis, i took Tom's list and added the top 5 = companies in=20 each industry ranked according to IBD.
 
ACRT,FINANCIAL SERVICES = - - Credit=20 Services

ACS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Information Technology = Service

AEOS,RETAIL - Apparel Stores

AGM,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Credit Services

APOL,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services

ATR,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Packaging & Containers

AYE,UTILITIES - Electric Utilities

BANR,BANKING - Savings & Loans

BKH,UTILITIES - Electric Utilities

BMS,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Packaging & Containers

BOKF,BANKING - Regional - Southwest Banks

BPFH,BANKING - Regional - Northeast Banks

BWE,BANKING - Regional - Pacific Banks

BZH,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction

CACI,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Technical Services

CBH,BANKING - Regional - Northeast Banks

CECO,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services

CHBS,RETAIL - Apparel Stores

CHIC,RETAIL - Apparel Stores

CHS,RETAIL - Apparel Stores

COCO,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services

COF,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Credit Services

COLM,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing

CPRT,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & = Services

CRT,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Diversified Investments

CSGS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & = Services

DCOM,BANKING - Savings & Loans

DME,BANKING - Savings & Loans

DOM,ENERGY - Independent Oil & Gas

DORL,REAL ESTATE - Mortgage Investment

DVA,HEALTH SERVICES - Specialized Health Services

EFDS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & = Services

ESI,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services

EWBC,BANKING - Regional - Pacific Banks

FCFS,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Specialty Retail, Other

FED,BANKING - Savings & Loans

FRE,REAL ESTATE - Mortgage Investment

GOSHA,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing

GPI,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Auto Dealerships

HIBB,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Sporting Goods Stores

HOTT,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing

HOV,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction

HRB,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Personal Services

HRBT,BANKING - Savings & Loans

ICTG,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Business/Management Services

ILUM,TELECOMMUNICATIONS - Diversified Communication Serv

IRWN,BANKING - Regional - Midwest Banks

IVX,DRUGS - Drugs - Generic

JHF,INSURANCE - Life Insurance

JJSF,FOOD & BEVERAGE - Processed & Packaged Goods

JNY,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing

KRB,BANKING - Regional - Mid-Atlantic Banks

LAD,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Specialty Retail, Other

LANC,CONSUMER DURABLES - Housewares & Accessories

LEN,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction

LNCR,HEALTH SERVICES - Specialized Health Services

MAGI,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel Clothing

MARPS,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Diversified Investments

MDU,UTILITIES - Diversified Utilities

MINI,MANUFACTURING - Metal Fabrication

MKC,FOOD & BEVERAGE - Processed & Packaged Goods

MO,TOBACCO - Cigarettes

MTH,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction

MTON,TELECOMMUNICATIONS - Diversified Communication Serv

MYL,DRUGS - Drugs - Generic

NAP,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & = Services

NDE,BANKING - Savings & Loans

NIS,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Business/Management Services

NVR,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction

NYCB,BANKING - Savings & Loans

OAT,FOOD & BEVERAGE - Food - Major Diversified

OPTN,HEALTH SERVICES - Home Health Care

PLB,FOOD & BEVERAGE - Processed & Packaged Goods

PNM,UTILITIES - Diversified Utilities

PPL,UTILITIES - Electric Utilities

PRX,DRUGS - Drugs - Generic

PTV,CONGLOMERATES - Conglomerates

PWR,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - General Contractors

QCBC,BANKING - Savings & Loans

RCBK,BANKING - Savings & Loans

RGIS,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Personal Services

RHB,HEALTH SERVICES - Hospitals

RJR,TOBACCO - Cigarettes

RYL,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction

SBR,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Diversified Investments

SDS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & = Services

SIB,BANKING - Regional - Midwest Banks

SJT,FINANCIAL SERVICES - Diversified Investments

SON,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Paper & Paper Products

STRA,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Education & Training Services

STW,TOBACCO - Tobacco Products, Other

TARO,DRUGS - Drug Manufacturers - Other

TEVA,DRUGS - Drug Manufacturers - Other

TSS,COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICES - Business Software & = Services

UAG,SPECIALTY RETAIL - Auto Dealerships

UCBH,BANKING - Regional - Pacific Banks

URS,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Technical Services

USLB,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Research Services

USPH,HEALTH SERVICES - Specialized Health Services

UST,TOBACCO - Tobacco Products, Other

UVV,TOBACCO - Tobacco Products, Other

VZ,TELECOMMUNICATIONS - Telecom Services - Domestic

WBB,MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION - Residential Construction

WSTC,DIVERSIFIED SERVICES - Business/Management Services

ZQK,CONSUMER NON-DURABLES - Textile - Apparel=20 Clothing

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom = Worley=20
To: CANSLIM
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 = 7:15=20 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] DGO List - = Part=20 One

This week's list totals 253, down slightly from = 264, but=20 still improving from the prior totals of 245 and 195.
 
It consists of those = stocks in the=20 Daily Graphs books (roughly 2,800) that as of Friday had both RS and = EPS of 80=20 or better.  Additionally, they must have been at or within 5% of = the 12=20 month high during the prior week. In my review of this overall list, I = am only=20 focusing on the recent chart patterns.=20
 
This review of the overall list is solely intended = to=20 identify stocks with good CANSLIM qualities, using authentic WON = sourced data,=20 that are showing some kind of constructive chart formation. The = idea is=20 to present some candidates for member's watch list, not to suggest = they are=20 presently a "buy" candidate. No due diligence has been done. My own = personal=20 bias against certain industries is largely ignored in = the=20 review.
 
As always, my shorthand notation is = Bx where=20 "B" means a "B"ase of "x" weeks, IMO. LLUR =3D Lower Left Upper=20 Right
 
MTON - B2
NVR - LLUR
TARO - looks to be resuming LLUR
CHIC -  B2
USLB - B4
NYCB - B2
HOV - nice funnel recovery to higher than when the = incorrect=20 info was released
LEN - B3
USPH - HTF?, volume down
ICTG - B2
GPI - B3
FCFS - B2
RJR - B2, flat c&h?, just under = pivot
UCBH - B2 on a c&h
AGM - 4 straight days of above avg vol sustaining = the b/o=20 from the short handle at 27
SJT - B4
CSGS - B2
PNM - B2
COLM - B2
DME - LLUR
MINI - B2
STRA - B2+
PLB - saucer, B2
EFDS - LLUR
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
 
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0DAD6.C1272B00-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1359 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.