From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1459 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, June 8 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1459 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] DJ Utilities Index Re: [CANSLIM] cheapest way to get DGO online Re: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days [CANSLIM] SYY - Sysco RE: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days Re: [CANSLIM] upward wedging hangle.......was DGX Re: [CANSLIM] real-time ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:06:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Kent Norman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DJ Utilities Index It shows that when you ask a question, no one else knows either. As long as we live, we question. Masters just ask deeper questions. Kent - --- Tom Worley wrote: > If I was the master, I wouldn't need to ask . . . > twice! > > Maybe "Ask Bill O'Neill" will have an answer > tomorrow? > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > AIM: TexWorley > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kent Norman > To: > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:38 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DJ Utilities Index > > > When the master asks... no one answers. > > Kent Norman > > --- Tom Worley wrote: > > I am still looking for answers (or even ideas, > > thoughts, theories) on this issue. Today's volume > > was even greater than the past two days, and this > > index was down another 0.8%. > > > > Did manage to close above its low of the day, just > > slightly into the lower half of the day's range. > > > > Tom Worley > > stkguru@netside.net > > AIM: TexWorley > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - > only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your > email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:05:10 -0400 From: yxia@itginc.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] cheapest way to get DGO online Gene, Do you know whether DGO online can allow me to go back to a point in history to do a screen? I really want to do some backtesting of WON's CANSLIM ideas and lots of tweaks that people on this board are using. I personally get stopped out by the 8% rule too often so that I am drifting towards abandoning it altogether. Also, I am starting to doubt the validness of always buy on the CWH break out. First of all, lots of good stocks simply don't have this pattern when going up, secondly, WON did his research on the best 100 big stocks in history, but we are mostly selecting mid micro cap stocks here. I really like the CANSLIM's value part such as looking for earning growth, SMR, etc. I am thinking about getting a good screener, build a portfolio and just hold on. If I buy 5-10 stocks from different industry groups, I should achieve enough diversification so that I don't have to use the cut loss rule and in the same time enjoy the running up of canslim stocks. That's why I really want to find a tool/service that allows me to go back into history to test different screens. Does any of the tools we have been talking about have this ability? Anyone? Thanks a lot. Yang "This message is for the named person's use only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity." - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:06:08 -0500 From: "David Squires" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C0EFFA.41856EA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good info Doug. Did you get this from the seminar? DSquires ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Doug Shannon=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:06 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days The 1% follow thru day has been changed by WON to 2%. Doug -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:17 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days Interesting that Los Angeles is the home of IBD and DG/DGO. But I am = sure they are not monitoring this group :)) Since we use a rule of up 1% or more on "higher" volume to define a = follow thru day, why don't we have to have a similar rule (e.g. down 1% = or more on "higher" volume) to define a distribution day?? I have a = problem counting it as distribution if the close is only a few tenths of = a percent different. Likewise, "higher" volume to me doesn't mean a few = hundred thousand shares on an index trading a billion or more shares. A = single order by a mutual fund or institutional holder could be that much = easily. "Higher" is just too vague. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Norman=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 7:58 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days Tom, et al, Here is the Ask Bill O'Neil question today from investors.com. What exactly is a distribution day in a market index? Is a = distribution day any day the market closes down on more volume than the = day before? Is it always a bad sign? =20 - Submitted from Los Angeles, Calif. =20 Distribution in the stock market refers to the selling of = stock by large institutions. Distribution is indicated by one or more of = the major market indexes closing down on increased volume from the = previous day. Churning in the market indexes is also a sign of = distribution. This occurs when a day's attempted advance stalls (shows = very little change in price) on greater volume than the day before. Our = studies have shown that four or five days of distribution over a two- to = three-week period are often enough to turn a previously advancing market = into decline. Therefore, once you notice these signs of distribution, it = is best to hold off on any further stock purchases, and perhaps even cut = back on some of your positions, especially if you are on margin.=20 norm=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: CANSLIM=20 Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 6:15 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days I am probably over simplifying the issue, but trying to = understand it better, and pay a little more attention. So looking for = some educating and advice from those that understand the topic better. If I essentially ignore completely down days where the volume = was less than ADV, then I find the following since April 1: NASDAQ - distribution 4/3, 4/26, 5/30 - yesterday clearly by any = definition is not distributional as volume failed to beat the prior day, = which was up. And 4/3, and possibly 4/26, seem too old to be meaningful NYSE Composite - 4/24, 4/30, 5/2, 5/22 appear distributional. = Again yesterday was not due lighter volume DOW 30 - 4/11, 6/6 distributional Russell 2000 - 4/3, 5/30 distributional S&P 500 - 4/3, 4/4, 4/30, 5/22, 5/30 distributional The questions I have: Is this approach too simplistic? Can I simply ignore down days = where volume is less than ADV? Is this summary essentially accurate? How far back in time to you have to consider? What restarts the = counting from zero? Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C0EFFA.41856EA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Good info Doug. Did you get this from the=20 seminar?
 
DSquires
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Doug=20 Shannon
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 = 9:06 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = Distribution=20 Days

The=20 1% follow thru day has been changed by WON to 2%.
 
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom=20 Worley
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:17 = PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Subject:=20 Re: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days

Interesting that Los Angeles is the home of IBD = and=20 DG/DGO. But I am sure they are not monitoring this group = :))
 
Since we use a rule of up 1% or more on "higher" = volume to=20 define a follow thru day, why don't we have to have a similar rule = (e.g.=20 down 1% or more on "higher" volume) to define a distribution day?? I = have a=20 problem counting it as distribution if the close is only a few = tenths of a=20 percent different. Likewise, "higher" volume to me doesn't mean a = few=20 hundred thousand shares on an index trading a billion or more = shares. =20 A single order by a mutual fund or institutional holder could be = that much=20 easily. "Higher" is just too vague.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Norman
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Thursday, June 07, = 2001 7:58=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Distribution=20 Days

Tom, et al,
 
Here is the Ask Bill O'Neil question today from = investors.com.
 
What exactly is=20 a distribution day in a market index? Is a distribution day = any day=20 the market closes down on more volume than the day before? = Is it=20 always a bad sign?    
- Submitted from
Los=20 Angeles, Calif. 		 

Distribution in the = stock market=20 refers to the selling of stock by large institutions. = Distribution=20 is indicated by one or more of the major market indexes = closing down=20 on increased volume from the previous day. Churning in the = market=20 indexes is also a sign of distribution. This occurs when a = day's=20 attempted advance stalls (shows very little change in price) = on=20 greater volume than the day before. Our studies have shown = that four=20 or five days of distribution over a two- to three-week = period are=20 often enough to turn a previously advancing market into = decline.=20 Therefore, once you notice these signs of distribution, it = is best=20 to hold off on any further stock purchases, and perhaps even = cut=20 back on some of your positions, especially if you are on = margin.=20
 
 
 
norm
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: CANSLIM
Sent: Thursday, June 07, = 2001 6:15=20 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = Distribution=20 Days

I am probably over simplifying the issue, = but trying=20 to understand it better, and pay a little more attention. So = looking for=20 some educating and advice from those that understand the topic=20 better.
 
If I essentially ignore completely down days = where the=20 volume was less than ADV, then I find the following since April=20 1:
 
NASDAQ - distribution 4/3, 4/26, 5/30 - = yesterday=20 clearly by any definition is not distributional as volume failed = to beat=20 the prior day, which was up. And 4/3, and possibly 4/26, seem = too old to=20 be meaningful
 
NYSE Composite - 4/24, 4/30, 5/2, 5/22 = appear=20 distributional. Again yesterday was not due lighter = volume
 
DOW 30 - 4/11, 6/6 = distributional
 
Russell 2000 - 4/3, 5/30 = distributional
 
S&P 500 - 4/3, 4/4, 4/30, 5/22, 5/30=20 distributional
 
The questions I have:
 
Is this approach too simplistic? Can I = simply ignore=20 down days where volume is less than ADV?
 
Is this summary essentially = accurate?
 
How far back in time to you have to = consider? What=20 restarts the counting from zero?
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 = TexWorley
- ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C0EFFA.41856EA0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:23:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve F Subject: [CANSLIM] SYY - Sysco Good Morning Group, This is one my core holdings and one of my favorite stocks. I mention it now because it has worked its way into CANSLIM parameters. Saucer formation? - since January. Fundamentals are excellent. Looks ready to break out of the resistance at 30. I have recently retired from the food service industry and this company is 'THE' dominant player. I had a strong working relationship with this corporation and feel confident about its future. It's sales are triple its nearest competitor and it is eating up many of the smaller players. It is the dominant food distributor in every single marketing area of the United States. It is an incredibly focused and well run company. You are not likely to see a short term 20% pop in the price but there is not any great downside risk and barring any missteps, which I don't see happening, I picture this one in my portfolio for many years. Slow steady growth, the basis of my core holdings. Again, note the disclamimer that I own this one. Steve __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:26:27 -0400 From: "Doug Shannon" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C0F005.79F6BD10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit yes, WON talked about for about 5-10 minutes. It was also mentioned in "The Big Picture" a couple of weeks ago. I believe it was the 1st day they drew the cup with handle picture on the charts. Doug -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of David Squires Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:06 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days Good info Doug. Did you get this from the seminar? DSquires ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Shannon To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:06 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days The 1% follow thru day has been changed by WON to 2%. Doug -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:17 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days Interesting that Los Angeles is the home of IBD and DG/DGO. But I am sure they are not monitoring this group :)) Since we use a rule of up 1% or more on "higher" volume to define a follow thru day, why don't we have to have a similar rule (e.g. down 1% or more on "higher" volume) to define a distribution day?? I have a problem counting it as distribution if the close is only a few tenths of a percent different. Likewise, "higher" volume to me doesn't mean a few hundred thousand shares on an index trading a billion or more shares. A single order by a mutual fund or institutional holder could be that much easily. "Higher" is just too vague. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message ----- From: Norman To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 7:58 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days Tom, et al, Here is the Ask Bill O'Neil question today from investors.com. What exactly is a distribution day in a market index? Is a distribution day any day the market closes down on more volume than the day before? Is it always a bad sign? - Submitted from Los Angeles, Calif. Distribution in the stock market refers to the selling of stock by large institutions. Distribution is indicated by one or more of the major market indexes closing down on increased volume from the previous day. Churning in the market indexes is also a sign of distribution. This occurs when a day's attempted advance stalls (shows very little change in price) on greater volume than the day before. Our studies have shown that four or five days of distribution over a two- to three-week period are often enough to turn a previously advancing market into decline. Therefore, once you notice these signs of distribution, it is best to hold off on any further stock purchases, and perhaps even cut back on some of your positions, especially if you are on margin. norm ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Worley To: CANSLIM Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 6:15 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days I am probably over simplifying the issue, but trying to understand it better, and pay a little more attention. So looking for some educating and advice from those that understand the topic better. If I essentially ignore completely down days where the volume was less than ADV, then I find the following since April 1: NASDAQ - distribution 4/3, 4/26, 5/30 - yesterday clearly by any definition is not distributional as volume failed to beat the prior day, which was up. And 4/3, and possibly 4/26, seem too old to be meaningful NYSE Composite - 4/24, 4/30, 5/2, 5/22 appear distributional. Again yesterday was not due lighter volume DOW 30 - 4/11, 6/6 distributional Russell 2000 - 4/3, 5/30 distributional S&P 500 - 4/3, 4/4, 4/30, 5/22, 5/30 distributional The questions I have: Is this approach too simplistic? Can I simply ignore down days where volume is less than ADV? Is this summary essentially accurate? How far back in time to you have to consider? What restarts the counting from zero? Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C0F005.79F6BD10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
yes,=20 WON talked about for about 5-10 minutes.   It was also = mentioned=20 in "The Big Picture" a couple of weeks ago.  I believe it was the = 1st day=20 they drew the cup with handle picture on the charts.
 
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of David=20 Squires
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:06 AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Distribution=20 Days

Good info Doug. Did you get this from the=20 seminar?
 
DSquires
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Doug=20 Shannon
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 = 9:06=20 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = Distribution=20 Days

The 1% follow thru day has been changed by WON to=20 2%.
 
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom=20 Worley
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:17 = PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=
Subject:=20 Re: [CANSLIM] Distribution Days

Interesting that Los Angeles is the home of = IBD and=20 DG/DGO. But I am sure they are not monitoring this group = :))
 
Since we use a rule of up 1% or more on = "higher" volume=20 to define a follow thru day, why don't we have to have a similar = rule=20 (e.g. down 1% or more on "higher" volume) to define a distribution = day?? I=20 have a problem counting it as distribution if the close is only a = few=20 tenths of a percent different. Likewise, "higher" volume to me = doesn't=20 mean a few hundred thousand shares on an index trading a billion = or more=20 shares.  A single order by a mutual fund or institutional = holder=20 could be that much easily. "Higher" is just too = vague.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Norman=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com= =20
Sent: Thursday, June 07, = 2001 7:58=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Distribution=20 Days

Tom, et al,
 
Here is the Ask Bill O'Neil question today from=20 investors.com.
 
What exactly=20 is a distribution day in a market index? Is a distribution = day any=20 day the market closes down on more volume than the day = before? Is=20 it always a bad sign?    
- Submitted = from
Los=20 Angeles, Calif. 		 

Distribution in = the stock=20 market refers to the selling of stock by large = institutions.=20 Distribution is indicated by one or more of the major = market=20 indexes closing down on increased volume from the previous = day.=20 Churning in the market indexes is also a sign of = distribution.=20 This occurs when a day's attempted advance stalls (shows = very=20 little change in price) on greater volume than the day = before. Our=20 studies have shown that four or five days of distribution = over a=20 two- to three-week period are often enough to turn a = previously=20 advancing market into decline. Therefore, once you notice = these=20 signs of distribution, it is best to hold off on any = further stock=20 purchases, and perhaps even cut back on some of your = positions,=20 especially if you are on margin.
 
 
 
norm
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: CANSLIM
Sent: Thursday, June = 07, 2001=20 6:15 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] = Distribution=20 Days

I am probably over simplifying the issue, = but trying=20 to understand it better, and pay a little more attention. So = looking=20 for some educating and advice from those that understand the = topic=20 better.
 
If I essentially ignore completely down = days where=20 the volume was less than ADV, then I find the following since = April=20 1:
 
NASDAQ - distribution 4/3, 4/26, 5/30 - = yesterday=20 clearly by any definition is not distributional as volume = failed to=20 beat the prior day, which was up. And 4/3, and possibly 4/26, = seem too=20 old to be meaningful
 
NYSE Composite - 4/24, 4/30, 5/2, 5/22 = appear=20 distributional. Again yesterday was not due lighter=20 volume
 
DOW 30 - 4/11, 6/6 = distributional
 
Russell 2000 - 4/3, 5/30 = distributional
 
S&P 500 - 4/3, 4/4, 4/30, 5/22, 5/30=20 distributional
 
The questions I have:
 
Is this approach too simplistic? Can I = simply ignore=20 down days where volume is less than ADV?
 
Is this summary essentially = accurate?
 
How far back in time to you have to = consider? What=20 restarts the counting from zero?
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 = TexWorley
- ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C0F005.79F6BD10-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 07:46:11 -0700 From: Dan Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] upward wedging hangle.......was DGX I missed it! Thanks David Squires wrote: > Dan, > > I already did. This is not the best example but it does show what an upward > wedging handle looks like. > > Here's the link again. > > ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/users/m/mcjathan/canslim/expd.gif > > DSquires > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan" > To: > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 9:46 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] upward wedging hangle.......was DGX > > > Can someone post a picture of one? A thousand words is worth a picture! > > > > Norman wrote: > > > > > Here's what WON wrote about the wedging handle (HTMMIS, p. 164). > > > > > > "Additionally, handles that consistently drift upwards along their price > > > lows have a higher probability of failing when they break out into new > > > highs. This wedging-upward characteristic along low points in the > handle > > > does not allow the stock to undergo the needed correction or shakeout > after > > > having advanced from the low of the base into the upper half of the > pattern. > > > This high-risk characteristic tends to occur in either third- or > > > fourth-stage bases, laggard stock bases, or very active market leaders > that > > > become too widely followed and obvious." > > > > > > DGX sure looks like a breakout that has pulled back and would have > almost an > > > triggered the 8% s/l (assuming a purchase at 62.88) on 5/30/01. I > wouldn't > > > call it failed, yet. I don't see the "wedging-upward" handle. > > > > > > Norm > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:48:39 -0400 From: "Shelley Lowenstein" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] real-time This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0186_01C0F008.9382C780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I found this site http://finance.lycos.com/home/livecharts/default.asp ----- Original Message -----=20 From: BIKEAR@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:55 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] real-time besides datek where can I find free real time jan=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0186_01C0F008.9382C780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I found this site
 
http://fina= nce.lycos.com/home/livecharts/default.asp
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 BIKEAR@aol.com
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 = 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = real-time

besides = datek where can=20 I find free real time jan
- ------=_NextPart_000_0186_01C0F008.9382C780-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1459 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.