From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #164 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, March 27 1998 Volume 02 : Number 164 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] AXNT ?Breakout RE: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength Re: [CANSLIM] THNK reversal Re: [CANSLIM] AXNT ?Breakout [CANSLIM] Re: Those Nasty New York Markets [CANSLIM] VIews on IDTI RE: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength [CANSLIM] tmbs RE: [CANSLIM] THNK reversal RE: [CANSLIM] Disclosure - MDLK RE: [CANSLIM] GSMS, PCTH, PHHM Re: [CANSLIM] HDWY (was THNK reversal) Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength Re: [CANSLIM] various (was Disclosure - MDLK) Re: [CANSLIM] THNK reversal [CANSLIM] Market Direction Re: [CANSLIM] VIews on IDTI Re: [CANSLIM] tmbs Re: [CANSLIM] Market Direction Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength [CANSLIM] Futures Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 22:02:13 -0600 From: "Joe Scott" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] AXNT ?Breakout This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_002B_01BD5902.D516F4A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Craig, =20 I believe I like the study of the charts so much because of my = background in Mechanical design, and engineering, used to looking at = plans. This is why I enjoy the CANSLIM approach, because there are guide lines = to follow. I don't feel as though I'm shooting in the dark as I was = before.=20 but still..... don't know a thing joe - ------=_NextPart_000_002B_01BD5902.D516F4A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Craig,

I believe I like the study of the charts so = much=20 because of my background in Mechanical design, and engineering, used to = looking=20 at plans.

This is why I enjoy the CANSLIM approach, = because there=20 are guide lines to follow. I don't feel as though I'm shooting in = the dark=20 as I was before.

but still.....

don't know a = thing
joe

- ------=_NextPart_000_002B_01BD5902.D516F4A0-- - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:32:01 -0500 From: "Surindra Singh" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength Just curious, if canslim group has voice to bargain. We might able to get the same rate as if we get printed vertion. Any volunteers? Surindra |-----Original Message----- |From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com |[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley |Sent: Thursday, March 26, 1998 7:00 PM |To: canslim@lists.xmission.com |Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength | | |Bear in mind that many of the CS criteria as used by WON are |proprietary formulas, and some of the others, such as up/down volume |ratio, are not calculated the same at different sites. | |What will I do when it goes commercial?? Well, first I'll beg a lot |reminding them I've been a diligent beta tester. I am also trying to |get my office to buy it, since we already subcribe to the weekly |printed version, and it wouldn't be that much more money ($99). Then, |if all else fails or I change jobs, I may subscribe to the monthly |NASDAQ book, and add DGO as an extra. | |Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my |employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of |any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. |All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, |especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments |will better inform and educate all investors. |tom w |-----Original Message----- |From: Rolatzi |To: canslim@xmission.com |Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 1:20 PM |Subject: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength | | |>Hi everyone, |> |>What is everyone going to do when Daily Graphs starts charging? |It's |>a lot of money and more and more the data is available elsewhere |>though not all in one place. |> |>For your information IQ Net lists and enables you to plot a relative |>strength rating. They don't give precise details on it but state: |> |>"Relative Strength Ranking (RSR) ranks the performance of the stock |in |>relation to the overall market." |> |>The charts aren't as detailed or versatile as bigcharts but I find |>them easier to read. They also allow you to graph RSI, Stochastics |>and Momentum in addition to volume and daily price range. The |simpler |>format also seems to come up more quickly on my computer. |> |>The URL is: |> |>http://207.95.154.130/chart/ |> |>Ciao, |>Rich |>_________________________________________________________ |>DO YOU YAHOO!? |>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |> |> |>- |> | | | |- | - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 21:34:57 -0800 From: "Daniel Wesson, CCIM, SIOR" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] THNK reversal I am glad I did not sell today as I had planned. Anyone have any thoughts on where it might go from here? At 07:22 PM 3/26/98 -0500, you wrote: >Anyone lucky enough to catch the sharp reversal in Think New Ideas, an >internet service company?? I saw it happening and didn't recognize it, >though after the sharp runup it has had that it would sell off some >more, after already missing it at the 10 level. Nice easy 20% one day >gainer for those decisive enough!! Rats! > >Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my >employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of >any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. >All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, >especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments >will better inform and educate all investors. >tom w > > >- > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:43:09 EST From: Mulack Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] AXNT ?Breakout I agree with Craigs views. Axnt is too far extended. Good Luck Frank - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 20:45:40 -0800 From: "Patrick Wahl" Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: Those Nasty New York Markets > From: "Tom Cathey" > To: > > Maybe it's just the obvious cultural difference comparing the Mid-West > commodity markets to the NY ones....but I for one have put up with their > crap for many years now and cannot believe it continues in this day and > age. > > Have others experienced these feelings? What do they say when asked about > their persistant flow of bad ticks? No personal experience, but I heard a Larry Connors speech, and he also complained about the NY markets. One further complaint is that if you get delayed quotes, they are 10 minute delayed from Chicago, 30 minute from NY. I asked someone at Signal about this, they said they have requested the 10 minute delay, but no deal, she said the NY markets just think they are better than everyone else. - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:03:09 -0500 From: "James Adams" Subject: [CANSLIM] VIews on IDTI I would like to enter this stock for recommendations, criticisms, etc. Intergrated Device Tech (IDTI) I first found this one while checking Insider Buying information. Since June eight persons purchased the stock, only one sold. That's what interested me. Now on to the CANSLIM stuff: EPS 75; RS 81 (a 53% increase in RS since January 98 ; A/D= B; Market Cap. 1,160.2 Mil # Shares Out. 80.7 Mil Today's Closing Price 14.531 Up 0.156 on 925400 vol. ADV-1,498,909 Earnings Estimates Qtr(3/98) Qtr(6/98) FY(3/98) FY(3/99) Average Estimate $0.04 $0.08 $0.12 $0.64 Number of Analysts 5 2 5 5 Year Ago EPS $0.03 $0.02 $-0.06 $0.12 Growth Rate 40.00% 275.00% 300.00% 436.67% Sales Growth Rate = 21% over the past five years. Zack's Industry: ELEC COMP-SEMI Institutional Ownership 39.10% Beta 1.4 Short Interest Shares 2.9 Mil Chart: Possible C&H with the cup starting on 2/26 and complete on 3/17. It appears that the handle formed and ended on 3/19, at the 50dma. It moved up 1 1/8 after that, but the low vol kept it from a "breakout." Find a chart here for IDTI http://www.bigcharts.com/ie/4.x/frames.cgi?r=chart&onbad=badsymbol&symb=idti &time=7&freq=1&ichart.x=32&ichart.y=22 Financial Highlights (All data for latest 12 months) Sales $580 Mil Income $9 Mil Net Profit Margin 2% Return on Equity 2% Debt/Equity Ratio 0.43 Revenue/Share $7.19 Earnings/Share $0.11 Book Value/Share $6.68 Dividend Rate $0.00 Payout Ratio 0% Earnings Per Share - Quarterly Results FY (3/98) FY (3/97) FY (3/96) 1st Qtr $0.02 $0.11 $0.35 2nd Qtr $0.03 $-0.13 $0.40 3rd Qtr $0.03 $-0.55 $0.42 4th Qtr NA $0.03 $0.25 Total $0.08 $-0.54 $1.42 James Adams......................Maysville, KY USA http://www.cris.com/~jimadams/ Internet Pager 1343361@pager.mirabilis.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 21:04:27 -0800 (PST) From: Rolatzi Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength I wonder if we can bargain for a group rate? - ---Surindra Singh wrote: > > Just curious, if canslim group has voice to bargain. We might able to get > the same rate as if we get printed vertion. Any volunteers? > > Surindra > > |-----Original Message----- > |From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > |[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley > |Sent: Thursday, March 26, 1998 7:00 PM > |To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > |Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength > | > | > |Bear in mind that many of the CS criteria as used by WON are > |proprietary formulas, and some of the others, such as up/down volume > |ratio, are not calculated the same at different sites. > | > |What will I do when it goes commercial?? Well, first I'll beg a lot > |reminding them I've been a diligent beta tester. I am also trying to > |get my office to buy it, since we already subcribe to the weekly > |printed version, and it wouldn't be that much more money ($99). Then, > |if all else fails or I change jobs, I may subscribe to the monthly > |NASDAQ book, and add DGO as an extra. > | > |Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > |employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of > |any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. > |All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, > |especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments > |will better inform and educate all investors. > |tom w > |-----Original Message----- > |From: Rolatzi > |To: canslim@xmission.com > |Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 1:20 PM > |Subject: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength > | > | > |>Hi everyone, > |> > |>What is everyone going to do when Daily Graphs starts charging? > |It's > |>a lot of money and more and more the data is available elsewhere > |>though not all in one place. > |> > |>For your information IQ Net lists and enables you to plot a relative > |>strength rating. They don't give precise details on it but state: > |> > |>"Relative Strength Ranking (RSR) ranks the performance of the stock > |in > |>relation to the overall market." > |> > |>The charts aren't as detailed or versatile as bigcharts but I find > |>them easier to read. They also allow you to graph RSI, Stochastics > |>and Momentum in addition to volume and daily price range. The > |simpler > |>format also seems to come up more quickly on my computer. > |> > |>The URL is: > |> > |>http://207.95.154.130/chart/ > |> > |>Ciao, > |>Rich > |>_________________________________________________________ > |>DO YOU YAHOO!? > |>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > |> > |> > |>- > |> > | > | > | > |- > | > > > - > > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 09:43:11 +0200 From: "David S. Pinhasik" Subject: [CANSLIM] tmbs Yesterday was down 7/8 on about 2XADV. This has been a yo-yo for me: in at 16 up to 18 down to 14 3/4 up to almost 18 back down to almost 15. My gut feeling says to wait a few weeks till EPS due. Any comments? my stop is at 14 3/4 - any need to change it? David - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:19:07 -0800 From: Mike Lucero Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] THNK reversal That's weird! It's got almost an identical shape to AXNT, including the old high on 10/22. Mike On Thursday, March 26, 1998 4:23 PM, Tom Worley [SMTP:stkguru@netside.net] wrote: > Anyone lucky enough to catch the sharp reversal in Think New Ideas, an > internet service company?? I saw it happening and didn't recognize it, > though after the sharp runup it has had that it would sell off some > more, after already missing it at the 10 level. Nice easy 20% one day > gainer for those decisive enough!! Rats! > > Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of > any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. > All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, > especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments > will better inform and educate all investors. > tom w > > > - > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:38:40 -0800 From: Mike Lucero Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Disclosure - MDLK Wow, AXNT, MDLK, and THNK make three stocks with similar patterns - the cup started at the end of October, and the handle formed below the level of the cup. I'll have to adjust my QuotesPlus scan to include such a pattern! Thanks, Mike On Thursday, March 26, 1998 3:47 PM, Tom Worley [SMTP:stkguru@netside.net] wrote: > Decided not to get greedy and sold MDLK today at 20.5 after the bid > dropped to 20.25. Nice 23% net profit for a week. I didn't like how > much it was extended with the volume dropping so much yesterday, and > thus far today. Did end closing 20.625 by 20.75, with last trade at > 21. > > Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of > any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. > All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, > especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments > will better inform and educate all investors. > tom w > > > - > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:47:05 -0800 From: Mike Lucero Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] GSMS, PCTH, PHHM I'm in GSMS with you. I bought it 3 weeks ago. Mike NEW YORK, March 25 (Reuters) - Standard & Poor's said on Wednesday it will change its S&P MidCap 400 and S&P SmallCap 600 Indexes after the merger of Gulf South Medical Supply Inc(GSMS - news) and Physician Sales & Service Inc (PSSI - news). The company to be formed by the merger, PSS World Medical Inc. (PSSI - news), will be added to the S&P MidCap 400 Index after the close of trading on March 26, 1998. On Thursday, March 26, 1998 4:09 PM, Joe Scott [SMTP:joe@2fords.net] wrote: > Can't believe I let MERQ and USNA go buy while I sat and watched, thats not like me. I'm usually to quick to get in. Sitting here in about 30% cash and not doing a thing. > Anybody watching, or in GSMS, bought it 6 days ago on good volume, today it broke again 5X vol. > Can't find any news, but I'm not complaining, it was the only thing held me up today. > Couple others I'm watching PCTH, PHHM, any comments on these would be appreciated. > This one is not CANSLIM but any thoughts on IDC? > > don't know a thing > joe > > > << File: ATT00001.htm >> - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:04:42 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] HDWY (was THNK reversal) So far I'm not being forced to do anything (in at 7.875). Hit a new high on Wednesday when I was out of the office on good volume, no follow thru on Thursday, but did move back up at the close. I think the key is volume, so far not consistent. If I have the time this am, intend to hit BigCharts and run it thru the wringer for some clues. Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - -----Original Message----- From: DCSquires To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 9:06 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] THNK reversal On another note, I think you mentioned you have a >position in HDWY. It has been trading kind of sloppy and seems to have stiff >resistence at 8. Do you have any thoughts on the quality of trade in this one? > >DSquires > >- > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:34:28 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength Count me in, if we could get a group rate of $99 each. With over 800 members in this group, I would think we might command some bargaining power if enough are interested. Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - -----Original Message----- From: Surindra Singh To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 11:32 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength >Just curious, if canslim group has voice to bargain. We might able to get >the same rate as if we get printed vertion. Any volunteers? > >Surindra > >|-----Original Message----- >|From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com >|[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley >|Sent: Thursday, March 26, 1998 7:00 PM >|To: canslim@lists.xmission.com >|Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength >| >| >|Bear in mind that many of the CS criteria as used by WON are >|proprietary formulas, and some of the others, such as up/down volume >|ratio, are not calculated the same at different sites. >| >|What will I do when it goes commercial?? Well, first I'll beg a lot >|reminding them I've been a diligent beta tester. I am also trying to >|get my office to buy it, since we already subcribe to the weekly >|printed version, and it wouldn't be that much more money ($99). Then, >|if all else fails or I change jobs, I may subscribe to the monthly >|NASDAQ book, and add DGO as an extra. >| >|Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my >|employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of >|any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. >|All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, >|especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments >|will better inform and educate all investors. >|tom w >|-----Original Message----- >|From: Rolatzi >|To: canslim@xmission.com >|Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 1:20 PM >|Subject: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength >| >| >|>Hi everyone, >|> >|>What is everyone going to do when Daily Graphs starts charging? >|It's >|>a lot of money and more and more the data is available elsewhere >|>though not all in one place. >|> >|>For your information IQ Net lists and enables you to plot a relative >|>strength rating. They don't give precise details on it but state: >|> >|>"Relative Strength Ranking (RSR) ranks the performance of the stock >|in >|>relation to the overall market." >|> >|>The charts aren't as detailed or versatile as bigcharts but I find >|>them easier to read. They also allow you to graph RSI, Stochastics >|>and Momentum in addition to volume and daily price range. The >|simpler >|>format also seems to come up more quickly on my computer. >|> >|>The URL is: >|> >|>http://207.95.154.130/chart/ >|> >|>Ciao, >|>Rich >|>_________________________________________________________ >|>DO YOU YAHOO!? >|>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com >|> >|> >|>- >|> >| >| >| >|- >| > > >- > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:32:52 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] various (was Disclosure - MDLK) Congrats on a quick play on Medialink. Those are always fun, just be careful you don't get too overconfident, as I tend to do. On HDWY, looks to me like it is continuing a base, with some tentative attempts at a breakout. The tight base encourages me to maintain a tight stop mentally, at least. I am using a 5% downside on this one (any violation of 7.5 and it's likely history for me) as this would be a considerable violation of the base. While I'm impatient with it after some of my recent quick successes, I remind myself I haven't owned it long enough to get antsy just yet. On FTIC, saw the dip and thought about trying it, but this one despite a low PE has been real inconsistent. Looks like the 50dma just under 14 shows some support. I wonder, in the absence of news, if it had the same problem as EFTC, at least there the CEO reassured investors they had no neg earnings surprises coming (the fear there had been after JBIL and several others in the group warned of weak earnings that it would affect them as well). Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - -----Original Message----- From: James Adams To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 10:29 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Disclosure - MDLK >From: Tom Worley >To: CANSLIM >Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 6:56 PM >Subject: [CANSLIM] Disclosure - MDLK > > >>Decided not to get greedy and sold MDLK today at 20.5 after the bid >>dropped to 20.25. Nice 23% net profit for a week. I didn't like how >>much it was extended with the volume dropping so much yesterday, and >>thus far today. Did end closing 20.625 by 20.75, with last trade at >>21. > > >Tom, I bought MDLK last friday and sold it yesterday for $4000 profit. >Thanks for mentioning it. It is appeared on one of my screens and you >mentioned that you had bought it so I jumped on Friday. I had to sell LTBG >to come up with the money, but it worked and LTBG fell below where I sold >it, but it is moving back to the $17-18 range where it had settled down >before the negative earning report. However, my research has led me to >believe that LTBG is a good company offering cutting edge technology in the >wireless world. If their Qtr report is as good as I believe it will be.....I >expect it to see 21-23 within a week after announcing their numbers. > >Also, I bot 1000 shares of HDWY yesterday at 7 15/16 and caught FTIC on a >1.5 dip and bot 1000 at 14 3/8. I hope both of these make me proud, as we >Kentuckians oft say. > >Tom do you have any feelings about HDWY and with the good news the past few >days. Why hasn't it moved better on the news? Also, have you heard anything >about FTIC.. It was down almost 2.00 but recoved some? > >James Adams......................Maysville, KY USA >http://www.cris.com/~jimadams/ >Internet Pager 1343361@pager.mirabilis.com > >A > > > >- > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:37:04 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] THNK reversal It's got a lot of fundamentals going for it right now: internet related, a service co vice a provider, actually profitable and profits and revenues growing rapidly, doing business with a nr of Fortune 100 and 500 corps, etc. If the upcoming qtrly report continues to show the same rapid earnings and revenue growth as the past several, could have a ways to go yet altho certainly extended too much for a fresh buy. Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Wesson, CCIM, SIOR To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 11:39 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] THNK reversal >I am glad I did not sell today as I had planned. Anyone have any thoughts >on where it might go from here? > >At 07:22 PM 3/26/98 -0500, you wrote: >>Anyone lucky enough to catch the sharp reversal in Think New Ideas, an >>internet service company?? I saw it happening and didn't recognize it, >>though after the sharp runup it has had that it would sell off some >>more, after already missing it at the 10 level. Nice easy 20% one day >>gainer for those decisive enough!! Rats! >> >>Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my >>employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of >>any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. >>All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, >>especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments >>will better inform and educate all investors. >>tom w >> >> >>- >> >> > >- > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:45:38 -0500 From: Jeffry White <"postwhit@sover.net"@sover.net> Subject: [CANSLIM] Market Direction Tom wrote: > Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 21:39:07 -0500 > From: "Tom Worley" > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Market Direction > > With NASDAQ, Russell 200, and S&P100 all up for the day, not sure why > you characterice it as distributional. Granted, have not done my usual > review as on vacation today, but the basic nrs I looked at so far > don't look terrible. > > Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my > employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of > any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. > All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, > especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments > will better inform and educate all investors. > tom w > - -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffry White <"postwhit@sover.net"@sover.net> > To: canslim@mail.xmission.com > Date: Wednesday, March 25, 1998 6:17 PM > Subject: [CANSLIM] Market Direction > > > >Rather sizeable distribution day in all indices. Just call me > shorty.;) > > > >Jeffry > > > >- > > > > > > - - > Distribution is what I see when the Dow, SP 500, Russel, NYSE close unchanged to lower after making an higher high on increased volume. Nasdaq is little trickier, but still distribution because it closed in the lower half of the days range. Not sure why you would find Wednesday's action to be anything but distribution. - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:44:45 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] VIews on IDTI Not my cup of tea for several reasons. First, GRS only 10, also needs 2 cents in Q4 to match full year estimates, but needs 3 cents to match Q4 last year. Also revenues for past 4 qtrs nearly flat. The time period you cite is too short for a reliable c&h, however it does appear to have attempted one going back to early Nov thru mid Feb, however the subsequent handle trending down too much and suggests a failed breakout to me. I also don't like the high trailing PE of 132, which goes to 145 if they only meet full year forecast. Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - -----Original Message----- From: James Adams To: Canslim Date: Thursday, March 26, 1998 11:48 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] VIews on IDTI >I would like to enter this stock for recommendations, criticisms, etc. > >Intergrated Device Tech (IDTI) >I first found this one while checking Insider Buying information. Since June >eight persons purchased the stock, only one sold. That's what interested me. >Now on to the CANSLIM >stuff: > >EPS 75; RS 81 (a 53% increase in RS since January 98 ; A/D= B; >Market Cap. 1,160.2 Mil # Shares Out. 80.7 Mil >Today's Closing Price 14.531 Up 0.156 on 925400 vol. ADV-1,498,909 > >Earnings Estimates Qtr(3/98) Qtr(6/98) FY(3/98) FY(3/99) >Average Estimate $0.04 $0.08 $0.12 >$0.64 >Number of Analysts 5 2 5 >5 >Year Ago EPS $0.03 $0.02 $-0.06 $0.12 >Growth Rate 40.00% 275.00% 300.00% 436.67% >Sales Growth Rate = 21% over the past five years. >Zack's Industry: ELEC COMP-SEMI >Institutional Ownership 39.10% >Beta 1.4 >Short Interest Shares 2.9 Mil > >Chart: Possible C&H with the cup starting on 2/26 and complete on 3/17. It >appears that the handle formed and ended on 3/19, at the 50dma. It moved up >1 1/8 after that, but the low vol kept it from a "breakout." >Find a chart here for IDTI > >http://www.bigcharts.com/ie/4.x/frames.cgi?r=chart&onbad=badsymbol&sy mb=idti >&time=7&freq=1&ichart.x=32&ichart.y=22 > >Financial Highlights (All data for latest 12 months) >Sales $580 Mil >Income $9 Mil >Net Profit Margin 2% >Return on Equity 2% >Debt/Equity Ratio 0.43 >Revenue/Share $7.19 >Earnings/Share $0.11 >Book Value/Share $6.68 >Dividend Rate $0.00 >Payout Ratio 0% > >Earnings Per Share - Quarterly Results > FY (3/98) FY (3/97) FY (3/96) >1st Qtr $0.02 $0.11 $0.35 >2nd Qtr $0.03 $-0.13 $0.40 >3rd Qtr $0.03 $-0.55 $0.42 >4th Qtr NA $0.03 $0.25 >Total $0.08 $-0.54 $1.42 > >James Adams......................Maysville, KY USA >http://www.cris.com/~jimadams/ >Internet Pager 1343361@pager.mirabilis.com > > >- > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:49:53 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] tmbs GRS remains very strong at 94, u/d good at 2.0. It's not in the top 5 of its group (led by my old favorite still - EPIQ) but it has tracked the 50dma quite well, and that's where it's at right now. Looks to me like an unsuccessful attempt at a breakout, it's high on my list to buy now that I have some cash. I suspect consolidation, as until yesterday the volume was light as it trended down, so maybe this was the blowoff to get the stock out of weak hands. Here's hoping. Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - -----Original Message----- From: David S. Pinhasik To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Date: Friday, March 27, 1998 1:44 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] tmbs >Yesterday was down 7/8 on about 2XADV. This has been a yo-yo for me: in at >16 up to 18 down to 14 3/4 up to almost 18 back down to almost 15. My gut >feeling says to wait a few weeks till EPS due. >Any comments? my stop is at 14 3/4 - any need to change it? > >David > > >- > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:55:02 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Market Direction Cuz NASDAQ, Russell 2000, and S&P100 were all up. Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - -----Original Message----- From: Jeffry White <"postwhit@sover.net"@sover.net> To: canslim@mail.xmission.com Date: Friday, March 27, 1998 6:44 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Market Direction >Tom wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 21:39:07 -0500 >> From: "Tom Worley" >> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Market Direction >> >> With NASDAQ, Russell 200, and S&P100 all up for the day, not sure why >> you characterice it as distributional. Granted, have not done my usual >> review as on vacation today, but the basic nrs I looked at so far >> don't look terrible. >> >> Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my >> employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of >> any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. >> All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, >> especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments >> will better inform and educate all investors. >> tom w >> - -----Original Message----- >> From: Jeffry White <"postwhit@sover.net"@sover.net> >> To: canslim@mail.xmission.com >> Date: Wednesday, March 25, 1998 6:17 PM >> Subject: [CANSLIM] Market Direction >> >> >> >Rather sizeable distribution day in all indices. Just call me >> shorty.;) >> > >Distribution is what I see when the Dow, SP 500, Russel, NYSE close >unchanged to lower after making an higher high on increased volume. >Nasdaq is little trickier, but still distribution because it closed in >the lower half of the days range. > >Not sure why you would find Wednesday's action to be anything but >distribution. > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 08:14:00 -0500 From: Ari Lawson Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength Tom,I'm new to this group but i'm in. I don't know what i'd do without Dailygraphs. - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 08:35:01 -0500 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: [CANSLIM] Futures Futures have been strengthening last night as so far this morning, and for once S&P500 appears in step with NASDAQ. I expect a positive opening, and maybe even a decent, and consistent, day throughout. Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all investors. tom w - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 08:45:07 -0500 (EST) From: "Surindra J. Singh" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength Any suggestions how to negotiate for this kind of bargain? On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Tom Worley wrote: > Count me in, if we could get a group rate of $99 each. With over 800 > members in this group, I would think we might command some bargaining > power if enough are interested. > > - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 08:04:29 -0600 From: "Joe Scott" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01BD5956.F7BF2280 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm all for a bargain, but I haven't heard anything as to when the beta = ends, has anyone?=20 What about this $99.00 deal your speaking of, I understood it would = cost $75.00 per month after the beta. As to any savings we be may able to get as a group, what could we do? don't know a thing joe - ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01BD5956.F7BF2280 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm all for a bargain, but I haven't heard = anything as=20 to when the beta ends, has anyone?

What about this $99.00 deal your speaking of, I understood it = would=20 cost $75.00 per month after the beta.

As to any savings we be may able to get as a group, what could we = do?

don't know a = thing
joe

- ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01BD5956.F7BF2280-- - - ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 09:19:35 -0500 From: Joan Sherman Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Stock Charts and Relative Strength > I'm all for a bargain, but I haven't heard anything as to when the >beta ends, has anyone? What about this $99.00 deal your speaking of, I >understood it would cost $75.00 per month after the beta. As to any >savings we be may able to get as a group, what could we do? don't know a >thingjoe Let's also put a vote in there for a MAC compatible version. Joan Sherman /\~~~/\ /\~~~/\ /\~~~/\ /\~/\ /\~/\ and the gang ** ** ** ** ** Support Animal Rescue - - ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #164 ***************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.