From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #1709 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Friday, October 5 2001 Volume 02 : Number 1709 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 22:04:16 -0400 From: "Dan Forant" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C14DE9.ACC20640 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom You should know not to play where the big dogs eat. Someone more than = likely turned you in. I appreciated what you were doing and the loyalty = to this group. To those from DGO and IBD monitoring this group, I like = TC2000, and your paper is not worth $1.25 on the newsstand, and = certainly not worth the subscription price. DanF ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: DGOnline Customer Service ; CANSLIM=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:57 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data To: Ms. Susan McKnight, President, Daily Graphs Online CANSLIM Discussion Group Members I was served with legal notice this morning that I was in violation of = my agreement with DGO by posting the data on those stocks I had listed = in my DGO List last Saturday. I was warned that not only could my = service be discontinued, but I could be legally prosecuted for = unauthorized use. I will, of course, cease and desist from my well = intended practice. I felt then, and still feel now, that what I did was posting = intellectual property I had developed. I did not post the entire DGO = List, rather only those stocks that I had reviewed and found worthy of = mention. Obviously, Ms. McKnight and her corporate counsel feel = differently. I would also note that despite my frequent and strong support of DGO = in this discussion group, I have never once received a thank you from = DGO. I cooperated with a reporter from IBD, who had sought interviews = from members of this group. I don't know if she ever posted the article = as I never heard back from her once she got her information. I also note = that there have been numerous instances in which an article appeared in = IBD shortly after similar discussions in this group. Not once was this = group credited or acknowledged as providing the topic or idea for the = article. To me that is theft of intellectual property, and used for = commercial purposes to boot. Maybe Jeff Salisbury needs to put a = copyright on this group's discussions, and demand payment when they = steal our ideas. This legal notice I received again confirms to me that this group is = being monitored covertly by DGO, and likely by IBD as well. I guess that = is some kind of back handed compliment, in a way, but I don't like the = sneaky approach. The most upsetting part of this for me is getting this notice in a = morning delivery by Fedex when a simple email would have sufficed. It's = not like they don't have my email address, after all. Granted, it might = not have the same legal standing, but I also don't need to be hit in the = head with a baseball bat. And here I was thinking they had finally = recognized my ability to make good money even in a solid bear market = (BTW, my VR fund is up over 15% in the past six trading days, and = continues to beat every major index, but I'm not giving the list of = stocks to DGO or IBD). Unless Ms. McKnight further objects, I intend to continue reviewing = the entire DGO List, and posting my thoughts and observations. Hopefully = I can at least continue that service to this group. But with this "one = way" policy so directly demonstrated, along with the continued failure = of DGO to provide even minimal screening tools in the latest beta = version, and the continuing limitation of reports to just those stocks = in the DG books rather than all stocks, I will not make further = recommendations to members to buy this service and will look for = alternative means to achieve the same results. Sincerely, Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley - ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C14DE9.ACC20640 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom
 
You should know not to play where the = big dogs eat.=20 Someone more than likely turned you in. I appreciated what you were = doing and=20 the loyalty to this group. To those from DGO and IBD = monitoring this group,=20  I like TC2000, and your paper is not worth $1.25 on the newsstand, = and=20 certainly not worth the subscription price.
 
DanF
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom = Worley=20
To: DGOnline Customer Service = ; CANSLIM
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 = 8:57=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] OT: = Discontinuance of=20 my posting DGO Data

To: Ms. Susan McKnight, = President, Daily=20 Graphs Online
    CANSLIM Discussion Group=20 Members
 
I was served with legal notice this morning that I = was in=20 violation of my agreement with DGO by posting the data on those stocks = I had=20 listed in my DGO List last Saturday. I was warned that not only could = my=20 service be discontinued, but I could be legally prosecuted for = unauthorized=20 use. I will, of course, cease and desist from my well intended=20 practice.
 
I felt then, and still feel now, that what I did = was posting=20 intellectual property I had developed. I did not post the entire DGO = List,=20 rather only those stocks that I had reviewed and found worthy of=20 mention.  Obviously, Ms. McKnight and her corporate counsel feel=20 differently.
 
I would also note that despite my frequent and = strong=20 support of DGO in this discussion group, I have never once received a = thank=20 you from DGO. I cooperated with a reporter from IBD, who had sought = interviews=20 from members of this group. I don't know if she ever posted the = article as I=20 never heard back from her once she got her information. I also = note that=20 there have been numerous instances in which an article appeared in IBD = shortly=20 after similar discussions in this group. Not once was this group = credited or=20 acknowledged as providing the topic or idea for the article. To me = that is=20 theft of intellectual property, and used for commercial purposes to = boot.=20 Maybe Jeff Salisbury needs to put a copyright on this group's = discussions, and=20 demand payment when they steal our ideas.
 
This legal notice I received again confirms to me = that this=20 group is being monitored covertly by DGO, and likely by IBD as well. I = guess=20 that is some kind of back handed compliment, in a way, but I don't = like the=20 sneaky approach.
 
The most upsetting part of this for me is getting = this=20 notice in a morning delivery by Fedex when a simple email would have = sufficed.=20 It's not like they don't have my email address, after all. Granted, it = might=20 not have the same legal standing, but I also don't need to be hit in = the head=20 with a baseball bat. And here I was thinking they had finally = recognized my=20 ability to make good money even in a solid bear market (BTW, my VR = fund is up=20 over 15% in the past six trading days, and continues to beat every = major=20 index, but I'm not giving the list of stocks to DGO or = IBD).
 
Unless Ms. McKnight further objects, I intend to = continue=20 reviewing the entire DGO List, and posting my thoughts and = observations.=20 Hopefully I can at least continue that service to this group. But with = this=20 "one way" policy so directly demonstrated, along with the continued = failure of=20 DGO to provide even minimal screening tools in the latest beta = version, and=20 the continuing limitation of reports to just those stocks in the DG = books=20 rather than all stocks, I will not make further recommendations to = members to=20 buy this service and will look for alternative means to achieve the = same=20 results.
 
Sincerely,
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
- ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C14DE9.ACC20640-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 22:50:40 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00D6_01C14DF0.28D7B6C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ann, I usually look at the closing numbers rather than the intraday highs. On = that basis, the change is only 2.3%, to me that is insignificant. Since most services use closing numbers for their historic data, I find = that this smoothes out the intraday volatility and spikes. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ann=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:00 PM Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV I see a handle starting on 9/28 (26.88 high) and going to today (high = 27.90). Or is that difference not enough to qualify as sloping upward? Ann ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:53 PM Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV Hi Ann, I don't see an "upward sloping" handle, but I do see a high handle = forming over the past week. This market has been so beaten down in the = past 18 or so months that a lot of rules will be broken now that we have = not one, but two, very strong FT days. It will be very difficult to find = buyable bases for some time, I suspect. While a high handle is more prone to failure, it doesn't mean it = can't work out profitably. More risk, but the rewards can still be = there, especially when the fundies are so strong. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ann=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:39 PM Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV Isn't CYTC forming an upward sloping handle, and isn't that = undesirable? I've been watching it, too. Ann ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: CANSLIM=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:20 PM Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV Hi Stephanie, One member previously suggested the problem is the image is = minimized. Try maximizing it and see if that will display the ADV. I had = a similar problem with DGO, and found I had to change the pixel settings = in order to see all of the detail. Don't know if you noticed, but ILUM has a merger offer on the = table. CYTC looks interesting. Has a strong earnings forecast for the = year (up 39%), and thru the first six months was well ahead of achieving = the target earnings for the year. Revenues growing faster than is = showing in the earnings, so they could be on track to beat a healthy = earnings growth. And volume is drying up right now. KG also looks interesting, but not as strong as CYTC. On FHRX, there's never anything wrong with some healthy fear. = Better that than to be confident, cocky and complacent. It is trading at = very rich premiums, trailing PE of 89 and despite the 139% earnings = growth forecast for this year even the projected PE is very high at 69. = And the market cap to sales ratio is over 13. But might still be worth = watching for a second entry. And, of course, there's never anything = wrong in taking a profit, especially in this market. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stephanie Chicko=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:58 AM Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV Hey Ann, I never see the ADV on the ibd screen. It appears when I = print the chart. Go Figure? My watches are few at the time: Missed ILUM (Boo) = and MDCI Watching CYTC, KG(which isn't close yet but like the numbers) = Bought FHRX but got scared(What can I say) and sold it with a little = profit. Oh yeah also traded CSCO(Non-canslim) We needed money to go to Las = Vegas :) Planning on doing some serious research this weekend. Steff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ann" To: Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:55 PM Subject: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV > Jans, Norman, > Thanks for the feedback. I'll contact ibd. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:52 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV > > > : Ann: > : > : I just called up CPRT on IBD's page, and it shows the = ADV (avergage > : daily volume) where you said it should- at the top right = of the chart. > I'm > : not certain what you mean by your last sentence concerning = "9/11". > : jans > : > : > : > : > : In a message dated 10/4/2001 8:46:38 PM Eastern Daylight = Time, > : annholly@mediaone.net writes: > : > : << Does anyone know why ibd no longer has the ADV in the = upper right > corner of > : the daily charts? Has it been since 9/11? >> >=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_00D6_01C14DF0.28D7B6C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ann,
 
I usually look at the closing numbers rather than = the intraday=20 highs. On that basis, the change is only 2.3%, to me that is=20 insignificant.
 
Since most services use closing numbers for their = historic=20 data, I find that this smoothes out the intraday volatility and=20 spikes.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ann=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 = 10:00=20 PM
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: = [CANSLIM] ibd=20 ADV

I see a handle starting on 9/28 (26.88 high) and = going to=20 today  (high 27.90). Or is that difference not enough to qualify = as=20 sloping upward?
Ann
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Friday, October 05, = 2001 9:53=20 PM
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 ibd ADV

Hi Ann,
 
I don't see an "upward sloping" handle, but I do = see a=20 high handle forming over the past week. This market has been so = beaten down=20 in the past 18 or so months that a lot of rules will be broken now = that we=20 have not one, but two, very strong FT days. It will be very = difficult to=20 find buyable bases for some time, I suspect.
 
While a high handle is more prone to failure, it = doesn't=20 mean it can't work out profitably. More risk, but the rewards can = still be=20 there, especially when the fundies are so strong.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Ann=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =
Sent: Friday, October 05, = 2001 9:39=20 PM
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 ibd ADV

Isn't CYTC forming an upward sloping handle, = and isn't=20 that undesirable? I've been watching it, too.
 
Ann
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Tom=20 Worley
To: CANSLIM
Sent: Friday, October 05, = 2001 9:20=20 PM
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC = Re:=20 [CANSLIM] ibd ADV

Hi Stephanie,
 
One member previously suggested the problem = is the=20 image is minimized. Try maximizing it and see if that will = display the=20 ADV. I had a similar problem with DGO, and found I had to change = the=20 pixel settings in order to see all of the detail.
 
Don't know if you noticed, but ILUM has a = merger offer=20 on the table.
 
CYTC looks interesting. Has a strong = earnings forecast=20 for the year (up 39%), and thru the first six months was well = ahead of=20 achieving the target earnings for the year. Revenues growing = faster than=20 is showing in the earnings, so they could be on track to beat a = healthy=20 earnings growth. And volume is drying up right now.
 
KG also looks interesting, but not as strong = as=20 CYTC.
 
On FHRX, there's never anything wrong with = some=20 healthy fear. Better that than to be confident, cocky and = complacent. It=20 is trading at very rich premiums, trailing PE of 89 and despite = the 139%=20 earnings growth forecast for this year even the projected PE is = very=20 high at 69. And the market cap to sales ratio is over 13. But = might=20 still be worth watching for a second entry. And, of course, = there's=20 never anything wrong in taking a profit, especially in this=20 market.
 
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM:=20 TexWorley
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Stephanie=20 Chicko
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Sent: Friday, October = 05, 2001=20 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC = Re:=20 [CANSLIM] ibd ADV

Hey Ann,
I never see the ADV on the ibd=20 screen.  It appears when I print the chart.
Go = Figure? =20 My watches are few at the time: Missed ILUM (Boo) and = MDCI
Watching=20 CYTC, KG(which isn't close yet but like the numbers) Bought=20 FHRX
but got scared(What can I say) and sold it with a = little=20 profit. Oh yeah
also traded CSCO(Non-canslim) We needed = money to go=20 to Las Vegas :)
Planning on doing some serious research = this=20 weekend.
Steff

----- Original Message -----
From: = "Ann"=20 <annholly@mediaone.net>
To= :=20 <canslim@lists.xmission.com= >
Sent:=20 Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:55 PM
Subject: OFF TOPIC Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 ibd ADV


> Jans, Norman,
> Thanks for the = feedback.=20 I'll contact ibd.
> ----- Original Message -----
> = From:=20 <Spencer48@aol.com>
> To:=20 <canslim@lists.xmission.com= >
>=20 Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:52 PM
> Subject: Re:=20 [CANSLIM] ibd ADV
>
>
> : Ann:
> = :
>=20 :      I just called up CPRT on IBD's = page,=20 and it shows the ADV (avergage
> : daily volume) where = you said=20 it should- at the top right of the chart.
> I'm
> = : not=20 certain what you mean by your last sentence concerning = "9/11".
>=20 = :            =             &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;  =20 jans
> :
> :
> :
> :
> : In a = message=20 dated 10/4/2001 8:46:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> : annholly@mediaone.net=20 writes:
> :
> : << Does anyone know why ibd = no=20 longer has the ADV in the upper right
> corner = of
>=20 :  the daily charts? Has it been since 9/11? = >>
>=20 =
<= /HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_00D6_01C14DF0.28D7B6C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 20:03:55 -0700 (PDT) From: John Kruger Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data It has always irritated me that "services" put restrictions on the use of "their" data. We all know where the data comes from -- traders buying and selling stocks, public financial statements, and well know mathematical algorithms. However, the law is the law. My suggestion is that posters stop saying where they get their data, and I certainly would not recommend a source of data that has a bad attitude. John © John Kruger, all rights reserved :<) - --- Tom Worley wrote: > To: Ms. Susan McKnight, President, Daily Graphs Online > CANSLIM Discussion Group Members > > I was served with legal notice this morning that I was in violation > of my agreement with DGO by posting the data on those stocks I had > listed in my DGO List last Saturday. I was warned that not only could > my service be discontinued, but I could be legally prosecuted for > unauthorized use. I will, of course, cease and desist from my well > intended practice. > > I felt then, and still feel now, that what I did was posting > intellectual property I had developed. I did not post the entire DGO > List, rather only those stocks that I had reviewed and found worthy > of mention. Obviously, Ms. McKnight and her corporate counsel feel > differently. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 21:34:30 -0600 From: esetser Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV My take on CYTC is that it MAY be forming a "high handle" just slightly above the previous 52 week high. I'm still watching it to see tho. At 09:39 PM 10/5/01 -0400, you wrote: > Isn't CYTC forming an upward sloping handle, and isn't that >undesirable? I've been watching it, too. Ann ----- Original Message >----- From: Tom Worley To: CANSLIM Sent: Friday, October 05, >2001 9:20 PM Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV > Hi Stephanie, One member previously suggested the problem is the >image is minimized. Try maximizing it and see if that will display the >ADV. I had a similar problem with DGO, and found I had to change the >pixel settings in order to see all of the detail. Don't know if >you noticed, but ILUM has a merger offer on the table. CYTC looks >interesting. Has a strong earnings forecast for the year (up 39%), and >thru the first six months was well ahead of achieving the target >earnings for the year. Revenues growing faster than is showing in the >earnings, so they could be on track to beat a healthy earnings growth. And > volume is drying up right now. KG also looks interesting, but not >as strong as CYTC. On FHRX, there's never anything wrong with some >healthy fear. Better that than to be confident, cocky and complacent. It >is trading at very rich premiums, trailing PE of 89 and despite the 139% >earnings growth forecast for this year even the projected PE is very >high at 69. And the market cap to sales ratio is over 13. But might >still be worth watching for a second entry. And, of course, there's >never anything wrong in taking a profit, especially in this market. > Tom Worley >stkguru@netside.net >AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- From: Stephanie Chicko > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 >8:58 AM Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV >Hey Ann, > It appears when I print the chart. > My watches are few at the time: Missed ILUM (Boo) and MDCI >Watching CYTC, KG(which isn't close yet but like the numbers) Bought FHRX >but got scared(What can I say) and sold it with a little profit. Oh yeah >also traded CSCO(Non-canslim) We needed money to go to Las Vegas :) >Planning on doing some serious research this weekend. >Steff > >----- Original Message ----- > > >Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:55 PM >Subject: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV > > >> Jans, Norman, >> Thanks for the feedback. I'll contact ibd. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV >> >> >> : Ann: >> : >> I just called up CPRT on IBD's page, and it shows the ADV (avergage >> : daily volume) where you said it should- at the top right of the chart. >> I'm >> : not certain what you mean by your last sentence concerning "9/11". >> jans >> : >> : >> : >> : >> : In a message dated 10/4/2001 8:46:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, >> : annholly@mediaone.net writes: >> : >><< Does anyone know why ibd no longer has the ADV in the upper right >> corner of >> >> >> > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 21:35:53 -0600 From: esetser Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV Well, I guess we agree on this chart Tom, I just posted a similar interpretation before reading yours. I guess I could have just replied and said "Ditto". MAt 09:53 PM 10/5/01 -0400, you wrote: > Hi Ann, I don't see an "upward sloping" handle, but I do see a high >handle forming over the past week. This market has been so beaten down in >the past 18 or so months that a lot of rules will be broken now that we >have not one, but two, very strong FT days. It will be very difficult to >find buyable bases for some time, I suspect. While a high handle is more >prone to failure, it doesn't mean it can't work out profitably. More risk, >but the rewards can still be there, especially when the fundies are so >strong. Tom Worley >stkguru@netside.net >AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- From: Ann To: >canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:39 PM >Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV > Isn't CYTC forming an upward sloping handle, and isn't that >undesirable? I've been watching it, too. Ann ----- Original >Message ----- From: Tom Worley To: CANSLIM Sent: >Friday, October 05, 2001 9:20 PM Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: >[CANSLIM] ibd ADV > Hi Stephanie, One member previously suggested the problem is >the image is minimized. Try maximizing it and see if that will display >the ADV. I had a similar problem with DGO, and found I had to change >the pixel settings in order to see all of the detail. Don't >know if you noticed, but ILUM has a merger offer on the table. > CYTC looks interesting. Has a strong earnings forecast for the year >(up 39%), and thru the first six months was well ahead of achieving >the target earnings for the year. Revenues growing faster than is showing >in the earnings, so they could be on track to beat a healthy earnings >growth. And volume is drying up right now. KG also looks >interesting, but not as strong as CYTC. On FHRX, there's >never anything wrong with some healthy fear. Better that than to be >confident, cocky and complacent. It is trading at very rich premiums, >trailing PE of 89 and despite the 139% earnings growth forecast for >this year even the projected PE is very high at 69. And the market cap >to sales ratio is over 13. But might still be worth watching for a >second entry. And, of course, there's never anything wrong in taking a >profit, especially in this market. Tom Worley >stkguru@netside.net >AIM: TexWorley > ----- Original Message ----- From: Stephanie > Chicko To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Friday, October >05, 2001 8:58 AM Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] >ibd ADV >Hey Ann, > It appears when I print the chart. > My watches are few at the time: Missed ILUM (Boo) and MDCI >Watching CYTC, KG(which isn't close yet but like the numbers) Bought >FHRX >but got scared(What can I say) and sold it with a little profit. Oh yeah >also traded CSCO(Non-canslim) We needed money to go to Las Vegas :) >Planning on doing some serious research this weekend. >Steff > >----- Original Message ----- > > >Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:55 PM >Subject: OFF TOPIC Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV > > >> Jans, Norman, >> Thanks for the feedback. I'll contact ibd. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ibd ADV >> >> >> : Ann: >> : >> I just called up CPRT on IBD's page, and it shows the ADV >(avergage >> : daily volume) where you said it should- at the top right of the >chart. >> I'm >> : not certain what you mean by your last sentence concerning "9/11". >> jans >> : >> : >> : >> : >> : In a message dated 10/4/2001 8:46:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, >> : annholly@mediaone.net writes: >> : >><< Does anyone know why ibd no longer has the ADV in the upper right >> corner of >> >> >> > > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 20:43:11 -0700 From: Joe Maguire Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] OT: Discontinuance of my posting DGO Data - --------------701DDA04C9745DD214C691FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Wow Tom .pretty heavy of the dgo [no caps on purpose] folks >>What happened to free speech ...some other service might have the same info? Keep up the good work. Best , Joe M. San Diego Tom Worley wrote: > To: Ms. Susan McKnight, President, Daily Graphs Online CANSLIM > Discussion Group Members I was served with legal notice this morning > that I was in violation of my agreement with DGO by posting the data > on those stocks I had listed in my DGO List last Saturday. I was > warned that not only could my service be discontinued, but I could be > legally prosecuted for unauthorized use. I will, of course, cease and > desist from my well intended practice. I felt then, and still feel > now, that what I did was posting intellectual property I had > developed. I did not post the entire DGO List, rather only those > stocks that I had reviewed and found worthy of mention. Obviously, > Ms. McKnight and her corporate counsel feel differently. I would also > note that despite my frequent and strong support of DGO in this > discussion group, I have never once received a thank you from DGO. I > cooperated with a reporter from IBD, who had sought interviews from > members of this group. I don't know if she ever posted the article as > I never heard back from her once she got her information. I also note > that there have been numerous instances in which an article appeared > in IBD shortly after similar discussions in this group. Not once was > this group credited or acknowledged as providing the topic or idea for > the article. To me that is theft of intellectual property, and used > for commercial purposes to boot. Maybe Jeff Salisbury needs to put a > copyright on this group's discussions, and demand payment when they > steal our ideas. This legal notice I received again confirms to me > that this group is being monitored covertly by DGO, and likely by IBD > as well. I guess that is some kind of back handed compliment, in a > way, but I don't like the sneaky approach. The most upsetting part of > this for me is getting this notice in a morning delivery by Fedex when > a simple email would have sufficed. It's not like they don't have my > email address, after all. Granted, it might not have the same legal > standing, but I also don't need to be hit in the head with a baseball > bat. And here I was thinking they had finally recognized my ability to > make good money even in a solid bear market (BTW, my VR fund is up > over 15% in the past six trading days, and continues to beat every > major index, but I'm not giving the list of stocks to DGO or > IBD). Unless Ms. McKnight further objects, I intend to continue > reviewing the entire DGO List, and posting my thoughts and > observations. Hopefully I can at least continue that service to this > group. But with this "one way" policy so directly demonstrated, along > with the continued failure of DGO to provide even minimal screening > tools in the latest beta version, and the continuing limitation of > reports to just those stocks in the DG books rather than all stocks, I > will not make further recommendations to members to buy this service > and will look for alternative means to achieve the same > results. Sincerely, Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > AIM: TexWorley - --------------701DDA04C9745DD214C691FC Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit  Wow Tom .pretty heavy of the dgo  [no caps on purpose] folks >>What happened to free speech   ...some other service might have the same info?  Keep up the good work. Best , Joe M. San Diego

Tom Worley wrote:

To: Ms. Susan McKnight, President, Daily Graphs Online    CANSLIM Discussion Group Members I was served with legal notice this morning that I was in violation of my agreement with DGO by posting the data on those stocks I had listed in my DGO List last Saturday. I was warned that not only could my service be discontinued, but I could be legally prosecuted for unauthorized use. I will, of course, cease and desist from my well intended practice. I felt then, and still feel now, that what I did was posting intellectual property I had developed. I did not post the entire DGO List, rather only those stocks that I had reviewed and found worthy of mention.  Obviously, Ms. McKnight and her corporate counsel feel differently. I would also note that despite my frequent and strong support of DGO in this discussion group, I have never once received a thank you from DGO. I cooperated with a reporter from IBD, who had sought interviews from members of this group. I don't know if she ever posted the article as I never heard back from her once she got her information. I also note that there have been numerous instances in which an article appeared in IBD shortly after similar discussions in this group. Not once was this group credited or acknowledged as providing the topic or idea for the article. To me that is theft of intellectual property, and used for commercial purposes to boot. Maybe Jeff Salisbury needs to put a copyright on this group's discussions, and demand payment when they steal our ideas. This legal notice I received again confirms to me that this group is being monitored covertly by DGO, and likely by IBD as well. I guess that is some kind of back handed compliment, in a way, but I don't like the sneaky approach. The most upsetting part of this for me is getting this notice in a morning delivery by Fedex when a simple email would have sufficed. It's not like they don't have my email address, after all. Granted, it might not have the same legal standing, but I also don't need to be hit in the head with a baseball bat. And here I was thinking they had finally recognized my ability to make good money even in a solid bear market (BTW, my VR fund is up over 15% in the past six trading days, and continues to beat every major index, but I'm not giving the list of stocks to DGO or IBD). Unless Ms. McKnight further objects, I intend to continue reviewing the entire DGO List, and posting my thoughts and observations. Hopefully I can at least continue that service to this group. But with this "one way" policy so directly demonstrated, along with the continued failure of DGO to provide even minimal screening tools in the latest beta version, and the continuing limitation of reports to just those stocks in the DG books rather than all stocks, I will not make further recommendations to members to buy this service and will look for alternative means to achieve the same results. Sincerely, Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM: TexWorley
- --------------701DDA04C9745DD214C691FC-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #1709 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.