From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2439 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Monday, May 20 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2439 In this issue: Re: [CANSLIM] our stuff Re: [CANSLIM] New using DGO Re: [CANSLIM] New using DGO Re: [CANSLIM] New using DGO Re: [CANSLIM] FVB [CANSLIM] Growth [CANSLIM] DGO [CANSLIM] Acc/Dis Numbers -- Market in correction [CANSLIM] ATPX graph question Re: [CANSLIM] ATPX graph question Re: [CANSLIM] ATPX graph question [CANSLIM] HOTT RE: [CANSLIM] HOTT RE: [CANSLIM] HOTT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 20:26:00 -0400 From: "Winston Little" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] our stuff Industry rating is now rated C- by e-IBD, not D-. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Worley" To: Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] our stuff > interesting, John. I just sent an email to DGO asking why they and IBD at > least don't use the same group classification. > > seems every day more anomalies show up between IBD and DGO > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Lessnau" > To: > Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 10:53 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] our stuff > > > Rolf, > > IBD has HRH in 'Insurance-Prop/Cas/Titl'. It has increase to 86th form 99 > one week ago. > > VV has HRH in 'Insurance-Brokers'. Last week 'Insurance-Brokers' had the 12 > largest increase in relitive timing. Also, Relitive Value and Forecasted > Earnings Growth rate are both top 10 in VV. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "rolf hertenstein" > To: > Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 9:39 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] our stuff > > > > Hi John - HRH looks interesting except for the D+ > > industry rating. > > Others might not like the high institutional > > ownership. > > Do you know in which of the insurance subgroups > > (out of IBD's 197 > > IGs) HRH belongs? Many, like > > Insurance-diversified, are really down. > > > > Thanks! > > Rolf > > > > > > > > Ian, > > > > > > Congrats on RMCI, at what point did you buy it? > > That one was on my CANSLIM > > > watch list and I missed today's breakout. Hard > > to catch a breakout when > > > working and sneaking onto the web now and then > > to check the action. > > > Sometimes I think it might be best for me to buy > > before breakout if the > > > stock is in a good base and hope for the best. > > > > > > Another on my CANSLIM watch is HRH. While it > > does not have a great handle > > > it has some good fundamentals and a nice looking > > cup. I may pick a half > > > position up and the other half on breakout if I > > get lucky. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Ian" > > > To: > > > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:49 PM > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] our stuff > > > > > > > Not in my little CANSLIM universe. I had an > > wonderfully strong week. > > > > > > > > My ticker list even includes some with 'real' > > prices. I'll throw out a few > > > > here for the groups weekend perusal, admitting > > that I haven't checked > > > their > > > > IBD numbers, only their most recent earnings > > reports, outlooks, valuations > > > > and charts: > > > > > > > > 'Real' prices: > > > > > > > > EXAC > > > > GLYN > > > > GRMN > > > > LABS > > > > RMCI > > > > SRT > > > > > > > > 'Almost' prices: > > > > ALU > > > > ANFI > > > > APFC > > > > FBAY > > > > FSTW > > > > ISIG > > > > > > > > > > > > 'Too low' prices: > > > > CTIB > > > > CVU > > > > SMAN > > > > TWH > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to get a feel for how the market > > is rewarding microcaps that > > > > suddenly start to perform, check out the > > monthly charts for CVU, CTIB and > > > > FSTW. They are amazing to watch. > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" > > or > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in > > your email. > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > > "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in > > your email. > > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 17:35:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Dimitri Katsaros Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] New using DGO - --- Tom Worley wrote: > Debt is tricky, you have to consider the industry. > Some, home builders as an example, traditionally > carry very high debt loads. It's normal and ok, > easiest is to look at half a dozen other companies > in the same industry group before concluding debt is > too high. I know... it really does depend... does ibd or dgo show debt in comparison to average debt for that stock's industry group? Thanks Dimitri ===== Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 20:38:24 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] New using DGO not that I know of, certainly never found it at DGO - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dimitri Katsaros" To: Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 8:35 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] New using DGO - --- Tom Worley wrote: > Debt is tricky, you have to consider the industry. > Some, home builders as an example, traditionally > carry very high debt loads. It's normal and ok, > easiest is to look at half a dozen other companies > in the same industry group before concluding debt is > too high. I know... it really does depend... does ibd or dgo show debt in comparison to average debt for that stock's industry group? Thanks Dimitri ===== Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:23:04 -0400 From: John Lessnau Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] New using DGO I can get industry averages at www.smartmoney.com - its a pay site. $50 per year for delayed quotes. I bet it is free somewhere else... jl - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dimitri Katsaros" To: Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 8:35 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] New using DGO > --- Tom Worley wrote: > > Debt is tricky, you have to consider the industry. > > Some, home builders as an example, traditionally > > carry very high debt loads. It's normal and ok, > > easiest is to look at half a dozen other companies > > in the same industry group before concluding debt is > > too high. > > I know... it really does depend... does ibd or dgo > show debt in comparison to average debt for that > stock's industry group? > > Thanks > Dimitri > > ===== > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:32:20 EDT From: Chazmoore@aol.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] FVB - --part1_174.884daef.2a19ac24_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lynn: FVB falls below my horizon because of the projected 12% growth in 2002 and the 7% in 2003. I like to start at about 25%. Charley - --part1_174.884daef.2a19ac24_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lynn: FVB falls below my horizon because of the projected 12% growth in 2002 and the 7% in 2003.  I like to start at about 25%. Charley - --part1_174.884daef.2a19ac24_boundary-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 22:25:02 -0400 From: "lynn" Subject: [CANSLIM] Growth This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00B5_01C1FF84.04D7C4E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Charley, Thanks for your response. I have found your input really = helpful. Lynn - ------=_NextPart_000_00B5_01C1FF84.04D7C4E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Charley,  Thanks for your = response.  I=20 have found your input really helpful.  = Lynn
- ------=_NextPart_000_00B5_01C1FF84.04D7C4E0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 19:59:24 -0700 From: "Marty" Subject: [CANSLIM] DGO This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C1FF6F.AC744BC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks all for the input it really helps. Marty - ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C1FF6F.AC744BC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks all for the input it really=20 helps.
 
 
Marty
- ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C1FF6F.AC744BC0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 23:31:53 -0400 From: Robert Subject: [CANSLIM] Acc/Dis Numbers -- Market in correction - ------ =_NextPart_000_01C1FF8D.5C3C1E80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Here are this weeks Acc/Dis Numbers spread sheet version Date,A,B,C,D,E,% of AB/A:E,%E,Market Posture 5/13/02,942,2272,1083,839,303,59%,6%,Market in correction 5/14/02,880,2229,1109,874,325,57%,6%,Market in correction 5/15/02,882,2248,1085,891,325,58%,6%,Market in correction 5/16/02,972,2336,1055,828,250,61%,5%,Market in correction 5/17/02,974,2364,1041,808,253,61%,5%,Market in correction 5/20/02,971,2331,1051,807,266,61%,5%,Market in correction Robert - ------ =_NextPart_000_01C1FF8D.5C3C1E80-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 20:58:18 -0700 From: "Marty" Subject: [CANSLIM] ATPX graph question Scanning some charts and came across this one ATPX, what does the flat 11 days of practically no price change mean? Marty - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:26:41 -0700 From: DanC Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ATPX graph question Somnolent Marty wrote: > Scanning some charts and came across this one ATPX, what does the flat 11 > days of practically no price change mean? > > Marty > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 06:42:07 -0400 From: "Tom Worley" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] ATPX graph question Marty, Key to reading charts is learning certain patterns. A gap up like this, followed by a very tight flat line base, is characteristic of a buyout of some kind, using for cash (thus the price is fixed). That is exactly the case here, General Dynamics is buying them for $33.50 cash per share, thus all that is left in the stock price for appreciation is 11 cents. Where the buyout is for stock, you will see more variation in the stock price as it moves in lock step with the acquiring company. In that case, you have to evaluate the acquiring company, not the one of interest, to decide if you want to own it. If so, then buying the acquired company can mean buying at a small discount. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty" To: Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 11:58 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] ATPX graph question Scanning some charts and came across this one ATPX, what does the flat 11 days of practically no price change mean? Marty - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 10:54:36 -0400 From: "Duke Miller" Subject: [CANSLIM] HOTT This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C1FFEC.BBCD1930 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm warming up to this market, and I'm considering HOTT (No pun intended, Katherine, I promise. This is for real. I'm thinking of buying.) On my own screen this stock merits 29 out of a total 34 points. RS 73 EPS 95 ROE 21% Debt 0 Acc/Dis B+ SMR A IBD Overall A+ I'm seeing that it broke out (weekly chart) of a 52-week base last week and during that time the ratio of up weeks on high volume to down weeks is a healthy 2.2. I got problems with a few things. Institutional ownership: How can it be 99%? I got problems with management ownership: How can it be 4.2% if Institutional is 99%? Their growth (physical, not fiscal) prospects look great: 70 new stores next year. Their target market is growing: Kids of boomers (Need I say more?) Your input will be most valued. Thanks. Duke Everybody should believe in something - I believe I'll have another glass of great wine! - ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C1FFEC.BBCD1930 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
I'm warming up = to this=20 market, and I'm considering HOTT (No pun intended, Katherine, I = promise. =20 This is for real.  I'm thinking of buying.)
 
On my own = screen this stock=20 merits 29 out of a total 34 points.
 
RS = 73
EPS = 95
ROE = 21%
Debt = 0
Acc/Dis=20 B+
SMR = A
IBD Overall=20 A+
 
I'm seeing that = it broke=20 out (weekly chart) of a 52-week base last week and during that = time the=20 ratio of up weeks on high volume to down weeks is a healthy=20 2.2.
 
I got problems = with a few=20 things.  Institutional ownership:  How can it be 99%? I =  got=20 problems with management ownership: How can it be 4.2% if Institutional = is=20 99%?
 
Their growth = (physical, not=20 fiscal) prospects look great:  70 new stores next year.  = Their=20 target market is growing: Kids of boomers (Need I say = more?)
 
Your input will = be most=20 valued.
 
Thanks.
 
Duke
 
Everybody should believe in something - I believe = I'll have=20 another glass of great wine!
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C1FFEC.BBCD1930-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 10:16:33 -0500 From: "Hill, Ernie" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HOTT This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C20011.533BB0A0 Content-Type: text/plain Duke, I strongly believe that we are precariously close to a short term high in this market. After today's pullback there is probably only a few more days left to the upside. Some stocks will certainly fight the trend, and I believe the dominant trend is still down. By no means am I trying to tell you what you should do. I am only suggesting that you exercise extreme caution at this point in the short term market cycle. E - -----Original Message----- From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:55 AM To: CANSLIM Subject: [CANSLIM] HOTT I'm warming up to this market, and I'm considering HOTT (No pun intended, Katherine, I promise. This is for real. I'm thinking of buying.) On my own screen this stock merits 29 out of a total 34 points. RS 73 EPS 95 ROE 21% Debt 0 Acc/Dis B+ SMR A IBD Overall A+ I'm seeing that it broke out (weekly chart) of a 52-week base last week and during that time the ratio of up weeks on high volume to down weeks is a healthy 2.2. I got problems with a few things. Institutional ownership: How can it be 99%? I got problems with management ownership: How can it be 4.2% if Institutional is 99%? Their growth (physical, not fiscal) prospects look great: 70 new stores next year. Their target market is growing: Kids of boomers (Need I say more?) Your input will be most valued. Thanks. Duke Everybody should believe in something - I believe I'll have another glass of great wine! ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. ****************************************************************** - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C20011.533BB0A0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Duke= , I strongly believe that we are precariously close to a short term high in this market. After today’s pullback there is probably only a few more days= left to the upside. Some stocks will certainly fight the trend, and I believe the d= ominant trend is still down. By no means am  I trying to tell you what you should do. I am only sugges= ting that you exercise extreme caution at this point in the short term market cy= cle.

 

E

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Duke Miller [mailto:dukemill@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9= :55 AM
To: CANSLIM
Subject: [CANSLIM] HOTT

 <= /o:p>

I'm warming up to this market, and I'm considering HOTT (No pun intended, Katherine, I promise.  This is for real.  I'm thinking of buying.= )

 = ;

On my own screen this stock merits 29 out of a total 34 points.

 = ;

RS 73

EPS 95

ROE 21%

Debt 0

Acc/Dis B+

SMR A

IBD Overall A+

 = ;

I'm seeing that it broke out (weekly chart) of a 52-week base last week and dur= ing that time the ratio of up weeks on high volume to down weeks is a healthy 2.2.

 = ;

I got problems with a few things.  Institutional ownership:  How can it= be 99%? I  got problems with management ownership: How can it be 4.2% if Institutional is 99%?

 = ;

Their growth (physical, not fiscal) prospects look great:  70 new stores next year.  Their target market is growing: Kids of boomers (Need I say more?)

 = ;

Your input will be most valued.

 = ;

Thanks.

 = ;

Duke

 = ;

Every= body should believe in something - I believe I'll have another glass of great wi= ne!

 = ;



******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************
 - ------_=_NextPart_001_01C20011.533BB0A0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 11:21:01 -0700 From: "Mona Guarino" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] HOTT This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C1FFF0.6C624CE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MessageDuke, I, too, am starting to warm and considering dipping back into the market more. Couple things: 1. where do your numbers come from. DGO shows funds at 37, banks at 10, and mgmt at 5%. Where did your 99% come from? 2. earnings due in a couple days. Any hint of what they're likely to report? Personally. I'd rather buy after and not right before earnings come out. Not exactly a WON rule, but bad experience makes me cautious. - -- Mona -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:55 AM To: CANSLIM Subject: [CANSLIM] HOTT I'm warming up to this market, and I'm considering HOTT (No pun intended, Katherine, I promise. This is for real. I'm thinking of buying.) On my own screen this stock merits 29 out of a total 34 points. RS 73 EPS 95 ROE 21% Debt 0 Acc/Dis B+ SMR A IBD Overall A+ I'm seeing that it broke out (weekly chart) of a 52-week base last week and during that time the ratio of up weeks on high volume to down weeks is a healthy 2.2. I got problems with a few things. Institutional ownership: How can it be 99%? I got problems with management ownership: How can it be 4.2% if Institutional is 99%? Their growth (physical, not fiscal) prospects look great: 70 new stores next year. Their target market is growing: Kids of boomers (Need I say more?) Your input will be most valued. Thanks. Duke Everybody should believe in something - I believe I'll have another glass of great wine! - ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C1FFF0.6C624CE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Duke,=20 I, too, am starting to warm and considering dipping back into the market = more.=20 Couple things:
1.=20 where do your numbers come from. DGO shows funds at 37, banks at 10, and = mgmt at=20 5%. Where did your 99% come from?
2.=20 earnings due in a couple days. Any hint of what they're likely to = report?=20 Personally. I'd rather buy after and not right before earnings come out. = Not=20 exactly a WON rule, but bad experience makes me = cautious.
 
--=20 Mona
 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke=20 Miller
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:55 AM
To:=20 CANSLIM
Subject: [CANSLIM] HOTT

I'm warming = up to this=20 market, and I'm considering HOTT (No pun intended, Katherine, I = promise. =20 This is for real.  I'm thinking of buying.)
 
On my own = screen this=20 stock merits 29 out of a total 34 points.
 
RS = 73
EPS=20 95
ROE=20 21%
Debt=20 0
Acc/Dis=20 B+
SMR = A
IBD Overall=20 A+
 
I'm seeing = that it broke=20 out (weekly chart) of a 52-week base last week and during that = time the=20 ratio of up weeks on high volume to down weeks is a healthy=20 2.2.
 
I got = problems with a few=20 things.  Institutional ownership:  How can it be 99%? I =  got=20 problems with management ownership: How can it be 4.2% if = Institutional is=20 99%?
 
Their growth = (physical,=20 not fiscal) prospects look great:  70 new stores next = year. =20 Their target market is growing: Kids of boomers (Need I say=20 more?)
 
Your input = will be most=20 valued.
 
Thanks.
 
Duke
 
Everybody should believe in something - I believe = I'll have=20 another glass of great wine!
 
- ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C1FFF0.6C624CE0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2439 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.