From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest) To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: canslim-digest V2 #2909 Reply-To: canslim Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-Archive: yes canslim-digest Thursday, September 5 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2909 In this issue: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? RE: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? Re: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? Re: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:11:41 -0400 From: "J. Lobatto" Subject: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C254F6.EC13BE00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When I click on Katherine's DGO mark-up links, the chart appears normal = for a split second, and then gets a bit smaller and much fuzzier to the = point where the notes are virtually impossible to read. Does anyone have = a clue as to why? Is it a browser setting I need to modify? Thanks and = my apologies for a somewhat off-topic post. Jon - ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C254F6.EC13BE00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
When I click on Katherine's DGO = mark-up=20 links, the chart appears normal for a split second, and then gets a bit = smaller=20 and much fuzzier to the point where the notes are virtually impossible = to read.=20 Does anyone have a clue as to why? Is it a browser setting I need to = modify?=20 Thanks and my apologies for a somewhat off-topic post.
 
Jon
- ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C254F6.EC13BE00-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:23:20 -1000 From: "Mike Gibbons" Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C254C6.422B7FC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jon, In IE the image is scaled to fit in the browser window after fully loaded. You can see full size by hovering your mouse over the image - you will then see an icon appear with arrows on it. Click the icon and the image will be enlarged. Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of J. Lobatto Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:12 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? When I click on Katherine's DGO mark-up links, the chart appears normal for a split second, and then gets a bit smaller and much fuzzier to the point where the notes are virtually impossible to read. Does anyone have a clue as to why? Is it a browser setting I need to modify? Thanks and my apologies for a somewhat off-topic post. Jon - ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C254C6.422B7FC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jon,
 
In IE=20 the image is scaled to fit in the browser window after fully loaded. You = can see=20 full size by hovering your mouse over the image - you will then see an = icon=20 appear with arrows on it. Click the icon and the image will be=20 enlarged.
 
Aloha,
 
Mike = Gibbons
Proactive = Technologies,=20 LLC
http://www.proactech.com
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of J.=20 Lobatto
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:12 = AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Katherine's = JPG=20 links?

When I click on Katherine's = DGO mark-up=20 links, the chart appears normal for a split second, and then gets a = bit=20 smaller and much fuzzier to the point where the notes are virtually = impossible=20 to read. Does anyone have a clue as to why? Is it a browser setting I = need to=20 modify? Thanks and my apologies for a somewhat off-topic = post.
 
Jon
- ------=_NextPart_000_0090_01C254C6.422B7FC0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 15:57:59 -0500 From: "Katherine Malm" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0191_01C254F5.02097490 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jon, In addition to the feature that Mike pointed out, from within Internet = Explorer, you can also go to Tools:Internet Options:Advanced. Scroll = down to the section entitled "Multimedia" and uncheck the box entitled = "Enable Automatic Image Resizing." This will prevent any images from = automatically resizing to your window when you open them. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mike Gibbons=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:23 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? Jon, In IE the image is scaled to fit in the browser window after fully = loaded. You can see full size by hovering your mouse over the image - = you will then see an icon appear with arrows on it. Click the icon and = the image will be enlarged. Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of J. Lobatto Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:12 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? When I click on Katherine's DGO mark-up links, the chart appears = normal for a split second, and then gets a bit smaller and much fuzzier = to the point where the notes are virtually impossible to read. Does = anyone have a clue as to why? Is it a browser setting I need to modify? = Thanks and my apologies for a somewhat off-topic post. Jon - ------=_NextPart_000_0191_01C254F5.02097490 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Jon,
 
In addition to the feature that  Mike pointed out, from within = Internet Explorer, you can also go to Tools:Internet Options:Advanced. = Scroll=20 down to the section entitled "Multimedia" and uncheck the box entitled = "Enable=20 Automatic Image Resizing." This will prevent any images from = automatically=20 resizing to your window when you open them.
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Mike Gibbons
Sent: Thursday, September 05, = 2002 3:23=20 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = Katherine's JPG=20 links?

Jon,
 
In=20 IE the image is scaled to fit in the browser window after fully = loaded. You=20 can see full size by hovering your mouse over the image - you will = then see an=20 icon appear with arrows on it. Click the icon and the image will be=20 enlarged.
 
Aloha,
 
Mike = Gibbons
Proactive = Technologies,=20 LLC
http://www.proactech.com
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of J.=20 Lobatto
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:12 = AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Katherine's = JPG=20 links?

When I click on Katherine's = DGO mark-up=20 links, the chart appears normal for a split second, and then gets a = bit=20 smaller and much fuzzier to the point where the notes are virtually=20 impossible to read. Does anyone have a clue as to why? Is it a = browser=20 setting I need to modify? Thanks and my apologies for a somewhat = off-topic=20 post.
 
Jon
- ------=_NextPart_000_0191_01C254F5.02097490-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:46:44 -0400 From: "J. Lobatto" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C2550C.94A4EC00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Mike & Katherine... that solved it. Jon ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mike Gibbons=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 4:23 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? Jon, In IE the image is scaled to fit in the browser window after fully = loaded. You can see full size by hovering your mouse over the image - = you will then see an icon appear with arrows on it. Click the icon and = the image will be enlarged. Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com = [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of J. Lobatto Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:12 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] Katherine's JPG links? When I click on Katherine's DGO mark-up links, the chart appears = normal for a split second, and then gets a bit smaller and much fuzzier = to the point where the notes are virtually impossible to read. Does = anyone have a clue as to why? Is it a browser setting I need to modify? = Thanks and my apologies for a somewhat off-topic post. Jon - ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C2550C.94A4EC00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Mike & Katherine... = that solved=20 it.
 
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Mike Gibbons
Sent: Thursday, September 05, = 2002 4:23=20 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = Katherine's JPG=20 links?

Jon,
 
In=20 IE the image is scaled to fit in the browser window after fully = loaded. You=20 can see full size by hovering your mouse over the image - you will = then see an=20 icon appear with arrows on it. Click the icon and the image will be=20 enlarged.
 
Aloha,
 
Mike = Gibbons
Proactive = Technologies,=20 LLC
http://www.proactech.com
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of J.=20 Lobatto
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:12 = AM
To:=20 canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Katherine's = JPG=20 links?

When I click on Katherine's = DGO mark-up=20 links, the chart appears normal for a split second, and then gets a = bit=20 smaller and much fuzzier to the point where the notes are virtually=20 impossible to read. Does anyone have a clue as to why? Is it a = browser=20 setting I need to modify? Thanks and my apologies for a somewhat = off-topic=20 post.
 
Jon
- ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C2550C.94A4EC00-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:57:10 -0500 From: "david frank" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_010C_01C25505.A878ED50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Katherine, I believe these are the most confusing statements, I have = read from IBD. One thing of interest is before The "Tacoma Narrows" is a = fairly nice flat base, of around 7 weeks, which came out of the breakout = of PNRA's CwH 2nd handle. This flat base didn't breakout and failed on = May 30th, and a double bottom started on June 4th from this failure. = david ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Katherine Malm=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:22 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion Good grief, David. I read that and went "news to me!".....not sure = I've ever heard WON describe something quite this way, so will have to = read it a few times to absorb the point of view. I look at that = "short-term correction" area very differently. That is, I see it as an = invalid base from which I would have avoided chasing any sort of = breakout. See my read on things at: http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/PNRA090502.jpg Maybe "short term correction" is just a fancy term for "invalid base." = Oh well, live and learn. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: david frank=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:06 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion I found something very interesting in the ASK BILL section of = today's IBD. It talks about PNRA and its fourth stage base. The = interesting part of the answer is that the previous CwH base, although 9 = weeks long, did not really count as a base, because it was shorter in = duration and shallower; didn't dip closer to to its 200-day moving = average, than the other 3 bases. Also, spent lesser time under its = 50-day moving average before climbing again. Thus, they don't count this = as a base. Read this, and look at both the daily and weekly charts of = PNRA. Am I missing something here? David - ------=_NextPart_000_010C_01C25505.A878ED50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Katherine, I believe these are the most = confusing=20 statements, I have read from IBD. One thing of interest is before The = "Tacoma=20 Narrows" is a fairly nice flat base, of around 7 weeks, which came out = of the=20 breakout of PNRA's CwH 2nd handle. This flat base didn't breakout and = failed on=20 May 30th, and a double bottom started on June 4th from this failure.=20 david
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Katherine=20 Malm
Sent: Thursday, September 05, = 2002 2:22=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA = base=20 criterion

Good grief, David. I read that and went "news to me!".....not = sure I've=20 ever heard WON describe something quite this way, so will have to read = it a=20 few times to absorb the point of view. I look at that "short-term = correction"=20 area very differently. That is, I see it as an invalid base from which = I would=20 have avoided chasing any sort of breakout.  See my read on things = at:
 
http://WallStre= et-LLC.com/canslim/PNRA090502.jpg
 
Maybe "short term correction" is just a fancy term for "invalid = base." Oh=20 well, live and learn.
 
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 david frank
Sent: Thursday, September 05, = 2002 2:06=20 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] PNRA base=20 criterion

I found something very interesting = in the ASK=20 BILL section of today's IBD. It talks about PNRA and its fourth = stage base.=20 The interesting part of the answer is that the previous CwH base, = although 9=20 weeks long, did not really count as a base, because it was shorter = in=20 duration and shallower; didn't dip closer to to its 200-day = moving=20 average, than the other 3 bases. Also, spent lesser time under its = 50-day=20 moving average before climbing again. Thus, they don't count this as = a base.=20 Read this, and look at both the daily and weekly charts of PNRA. Am = I=20 missing something here?=20 David
- ------=_NextPart_000_010C_01C25505.A878ED50-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:26:46 -0700 (PDT) From: James Bond Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis - --0-358102799-1031268406=:84596 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii John, I use stocckcharts.com to view charts. I always look at three charts for each stock: a 3 year weekly chart, a 6 month daily chart, and a 20 day hourly chart. Stockcharts.com allows one to view intraday charts for up to 1 month. Volume actions are always meaningful, even when it is market makers moving the stock. In the case of PIXR, the shakeout the day before the breakout, when the market makers cleared out all the stop orders, was a clear signal that the stock was ready to move and one could have used it as a clue for placing buy orders and stop orders. That kind of clue was crucial for people like me who cannot monitor the stock during the day. One day later the stock was already over 46 and out of the buy range. - --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes - --0-358102799-1031268406=:84596 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

John,

I use stocckcharts.com  to view charts. I always look  at three charts for each stock: a 3 year weekly chart, a 6 month  daily chart, and a 20 day  hourly chart. Stockcharts.com allows one to  view intraday charts for up  to 1 month.

Volume actions are always meaningful, even when it is market makers moving the stock. In the case  of PIXR, the shakeout the day before the breakout, when the market makers cleared out all the stop orders, was a clear signal that the stock was ready to move and one could  have used it as a clue for placing  buy orders and  stop orders. That kind of clue was crucial for people like me who cannot monitor the stock during the day. One day later the stock was already over 46 and  out of the buy range.


Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes - --0-358102799-1031268406=:84596-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:19:25 -0700 From: "NANCY POLCARO" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion - ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C25500.625FC640 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank You Katherine for the charts you put up with explanations of how yo= u are reading them. This has helped me more then anything else to try to= learn chart reading. If anyone else would consider doing this it would = be great for us that are new to reading the charts. I guess I shouldn't = speak for the others but as for me' it is really helpful. Thanks in adva= nce to you. Nancy =20 - ----- Original Message ----- From: david frank Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:48 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion =20 Katherine, I believe these are the most confusing statements, I have read= from IBD. One thing of interest is before The "Tacoma Narrows" is a fair= ly nice flat base, of around 7 weeks, which came out of the breakout of P= NRA's CwH 2nd handle. This flat base didn't breakout and failed on May 30= th, and a double bottom started on June 4th from this failure. david - ----- Original Message ----- =20 From: Katherine Malm =20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =20 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:22 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion Good grief, David. I read that and went "news to me!".....not sure I've e= ver heard WON describe something quite this way, so will have to read it = a few times to absorb the point of view. I look at that "short-term corre= ction" area very differently. That is, I see it as an invalid base from w= hich I would have avoided chasing any sort of breakout. See my read on t= hings at: =20 http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/PNRA090502.jpg =20 Maybe "short term correction" is just a fancy term for "invalid base." Oh= well, live and learn. =20 Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- =20 From: david frank =20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =20 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:06 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion I found something very interesting in the ASK BILL section of today's IBD= . It talks about PNRA and its fourth stage base. The interesting part of = the answer is that the previous CwH base, although 9 weeks long, did not = really count as a base, because it was shorter in duration and shallower;= didn't dip closer to to its 200-day moving average, than the other 3 bas= es. Also, spent lesser time under its 50-day moving average before climbi= ng again. Thus, they don't count this as a base. Read this, and look at b= oth the daily and weekly charts of PNRA. Am I missing something here? Dav= id - ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C25500.625FC640 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank You Katherine for the charts you pu= t up with explanations of how you are reading them.  This has helped= me more then anything else to try to learn chart reading.  If anyon= e else would consider doing this it would be great for us that are new to= reading the charts.  I guess I shouldn't speak for the others but&n= bsp;as for me' it is really helpful.  Thanks in advance to= you.  Nancy
 
----- Original = Message -----
From: david frank
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:48 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion
 
Katherine, I be= lieve these are the most confusing statements, I have read from IBD. One = thing of interest is before The "Tacoma Narrows" is a fairly nice flat ba= se, of around 7 weeks, which came out of the breakout of PNRA's CwH 2nd h= andle. This flat base didn't breakout and failed on May 30th, and a doubl= e bottom started on June 4th from this failure. david
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion

Good grief, David. I read that and went "news to me!".....not sur= e I've ever heard WON describe something quite this way, so will have to = read it a few times to absorb the point of view. I look at that "short-te= rm correction" area very differently. That is, I see it as an invalid bas= e from which I would have avoided chasing any sort of breakout.  See= my read on things at:
 
 
Maybe "short term correc= tion" is just a fancy term for "invalid base." Oh well, live and learn.
 
Katherine
----= - - Original Message -----
=
Sent: Thursday, Se= ptember 05, 2002 2:06 PM
Subject= : [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion

I found something very interesting in the ASK BILL sect= ion of today's IBD. It talks about PNRA and its fourth stage base. The in= teresting part of the answer is that the previous CwH base, although 9 we= eks long, did not really count as a base, because it was shorter in durat= ion and shallower; didn't dip closer to to its 200-day moving averag= e, than the other 3 bases. Also, spent lesser time under its 50-day movin= g average before climbing again. Thus, they don't count this as a base. R= ead this, and look at both the daily and weekly charts of PNRA. Am I miss= ing something here? David
- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C25500.625FC640-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 19:28:47 -0500 From: "david frank" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_011B_01C25512.74F12C10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable James, so why didn't you buy PIXR on the breakout day? Although until = that time not many breakouts to talk about. dave ----- Original Message -----=20 From: James Bond=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 6:26 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis John, I use stocckcharts.com to view charts. I always look at three charts = for each stock: a 3 year weekly chart, a 6 month daily chart, and a 20 = day hourly chart. Stockcharts.com allows one to view intraday charts = for up to 1 month. Volume actions are always meaningful, even when it is market makers = moving the stock. In the case of PIXR, the shakeout the day before the = breakout, when the market makers cleared out all the stop orders, was a = clear signal that the stock was ready to move and one could have used = it as a clue for placing buy orders and stop orders. That kind of clue = was crucial for people like me who cannot monitor the stock during the = day. One day later the stock was already over 46 and out of the buy = range. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - ----- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes - ------=_NextPart_000_011B_01C25512.74F12C10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
James, so why didn't you buy PIXR on = the breakout=20 day? Although until that time not many breakouts to talk about.=20 dave
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 James=20 Bond
Sent: Thursday, September 05, = 2002 6:26=20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH = Failed=20 breakouts Post Analysis

John,

I use stocckcharts.com  to view charts. I always look  at = three=20 charts for each stock: a 3 year weekly chart, a 6 month  daily = chart, and=20 a 20 day  hourly chart. Stockcharts.com allows one to  view = intraday=20 charts for up  to 1 month.

Volume actions are always meaningful, even when it is market makers = moving=20 the stock. In the case  of PIXR, the shakeout the day before the=20 breakout, when the market makers cleared out all the stop orders, = was a=20 clear signal that the stock was ready to move and one could  have = used it=20 as a clue for placing  buy orders and  stop orders. That = kind of=20 clue was crucial for people like me who cannot monitor the stock = during the=20 day. One day later the stock was already over 46 and  out of the = buy=20 range.


Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo!=20 Finance - Get real-time stock quotes - ------=_NextPart_000_011B_01C25512.74F12C10-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:27:11 -0700 From: "NANCY POLCARO" Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis - ------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C25501.77A18EC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How can you tell that this was the market makers clearing out all the sto= p orders and not the stock failing?? In the first part of 2001 the stock= looks like it was close to 46.00 and has a similar move then continued = down?? Thanks nancy =20 =20 - ----- Original Message ----- From: James Bond Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:12 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis =20 John, I use stocckcharts.com to view charts. I always look at three charts fo= r each stock: a 3 year weekly chart, a 6 month daily chart, and a 20 day= hourly chart. Stockcharts.com allows one to view intraday charts for u= p to 1 month. Volume actions are always meaningful, even when it is market makers movin= g the stock. In the case of PIXR, the shakeout the day before the breako= ut, when the market makers cleared out all the stop orders, was a clear s= ignal that the stock was ready to move and one could have used it as a c= lue for placing buy orders and stop orders. That kind of clue was cruci= al for people like me who cannot monitor the stock during the day. One da= y later the stock was already over 46 and out of the buy range. Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes - ------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C25501.77A18EC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
How can you te= ll that this was the market makers clearing out all the stop orders and n= ot the stock failing??  In the first part of 2001 the stock looks li= ke it was close to 46.00 and  has a similar move then cont= inued down?? Thanks nancy 
 
-= - ---- Original Message -----
From: James Bond
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:12 PM
=
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH= Failed breakouts Post Analysis
 

John,

I= use stocckcharts.com  to view charts. I always look  at three = charts for each stock: a 3 year weekly chart, a 6 month  daily chart= , and a 20 day  hourly chart. Stockcharts.com allows one to  vi= ew intraday charts for up  to 1 month.

Volume actions are alw= ays meaningful, even when it is market makers moving the stock. In the ca= se  of PIXR, the shakeout the day before the breakout, when the mark= et makers cleared out all the stop orders, was a clear signal that t= he stock was ready to move and one could  have used it as a clue for= placing  buy orders and  stop orders. That kind of clue was cr= ucial for people like me who cannot monitor the stock during the day. One= day later the stock was already over 46 and  out of the buy range.<= /P>


Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
- ------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C25501.77A18EC0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. ------------------------------ End of canslim-digest V2 #2909 ****************************** To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.