Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Tim Fisher" <tim@orerockon.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] QP2 vs DGO
Date: 4 Jul 2001 17:47:23 -0700
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Biggest Winner "Tim Fisher"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Stock Screeners Jwpowers1@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
I agree Tom, That's why my list goes down to 70/70/70. I give 10 pts leeway and then throw out ugly charts; that sems to leave a healthy number of stocks for my watch list... At 06:11 PM 7/4/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Hi Group, > >I decided to do a little side by side comparison of these two systems. I >used Tim's list posted on Monday (presumably using Friday's closing data) >and today's DGO (so Tuesday's data) so it was not an exact comparison. > >It appears that QP2 has EPS and RS very close to DGO, with one exception. >Where the difference comes in, and significantly changes ERG, is with >their number for GRS. I expected that this was due to different group >classification, but that was mostly not the case (I added DGO's for >comparison). It appears that anyone using HGS, and relying on ERG as a >primary sorting or screening tool, should go about 10 points beyond their >normal cutoff point to prevent missing stocks they want to see. > >The magnitude of difference in group ranking cannot be explained away in >two days of light trading. > >Tom Worley ><mailto:stkguru@netside.net>stkguru@netside.net >AIM: TexWorley Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Pacific Fishery Biologists Information mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Biggest Winner "Tim Fisher"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Stock Screeners Jwpowers1@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]