28 Weeks LaterYear: 2007 Director: Juan Carlos Fresnadillo Written by: Rowan Joffe, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, Jesus Olmo Threat: Infection Weapon of Choice: Rifle Based upon: none Color/B&W/3D: Colour Language: English Country of Origin: UK |
Other movies in this series:
28 Days Later
The tyranist's thoughts
The quality of 28 Days Later was a surprise to me. The latest wave of British horror has been nothing but fantastic, but even knowing that, I wasn't really prepared for a zombie movie quite like that one. Converted, when I heard 28 Weeks Later was coming out, I was looking forward to it. When I saw the trailer, I couldn't wait.
It's been months since the infection first hit the island and not only has the entire thing been contained, but the zombies are all wiped out. Residents are being allowed back in, but only into a carefully controlled section of London. Well, as you can imagine, it all goes pear shaped and soon we have the zombie mayhem that we were looking for when we entered the theatre.
Robert Carlyle sort of stars in this and you can tell. I refuse to say more about it, but you'll understand when you see it. The other characters are well-played, including the 12 year old, who may actually have been played by a 12 year old. The script is well put together and moves forward very well. There are a couple technical issues with it, but nothing that can't be overlooked for the sake of a bit of action. Where in the first one, they were very careful to make the zombies look like infected humans, they didn't try so hard here and there are a couple cases where the zombies are walking around with enough damage that they can't possibly not be the living dead.
The only really distracting thing about the movie was the editing on some of the zombie attack scenes. It was painful to watch. The gore, while excessive, was much easier to look at than the flash edited sequences that left my head hurting and quite a bit of doubt as to what actually happened.
I enjoyed the pace of the movie, though, and the way they ratcheted up the tension. There's some spectacular suspense mixed in with some brutal violence. I can't say this was better than the first movie, but it was enjoyable and a worthy follow-up movie.
Posted: May 14, 2007
Rish Outfield's reviews
So, an unspecified amount of time has passed since the rage virus wiped out a lot of
London (that was a joke, kids), and it's all been taken care of.
Or is it?
I really liked the original, and went to the sequel
with fairly high expectations, even though I knew Danny Boyle didn't direct this one. I
loved the premise, and the setting was a really interesting one. I really don't have a lot
of complaints about the film--the acting was fine, the direction was adequate, the scares
were plentiful, and the ending, while I wasn't thrilled with it, was brave and unique. But
I didn't love 28 Weeks Later. I can't really express what was wrong with it,
if anything, but it wasn't a film I'll watch again and again. Or recommend to as many
people as I did the first one.
One zombie in particular seems to survive all sorts of impossible scenarios, just because
. . . well, I guess so we'll have a specific face to focus on, or because there's an emotional
attachment to that one. But it didn't work, because I kept wondering how it managed
to evade the fires and bullets and explosions and know exactly where our main
characters were going to be. I just don't get it.
Like I said, I'm not able to nail down serious problems with the script or characters or
scenario or filmmaking. The film is quite good, and is definitely worth seeing. It's also
not a whole lot of fun, and then, neither was its predecessor.
And maybe zombie flicks--and horror films in general--shouldn't be fun. I don't know.
But Dawn of the Dead was fun,
from the first time I saw it to today. Does that make me crazy?
Posted: September 14, 2007
Total Skulls: 30
Sequel | ||
Sequel setup | ||
Rips off earlier film | ||
Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie | ||
Future celebrity appears | ||
Former celebrity appears | ||
Bad title | ||
Bad premise | ||
Bad acting | ||
Bad dialogue | ||
Bad execution | ||
MTV Editing | ||
OTS | ||
Girl unnecessarily gets naked | ||
Wanton sex | ||
Death associated with sex | ||
Unfulfilled promise of nudity | ||
Characters forget about threat | ||
Secluded location | ||
Power is cut | ||
Phone lines are cut | ||
Someone investigates a strange noise | ||
Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door | ||
Camera is the killer | ||
Victims cower in front of a window/door | ||
Victim locks self in with killer | ||
Victim running from killer inexplicably falls | ||
Toilet stall scene | ||
Shower/bath scene | ||
Car stalls or won't start | ||
Cat jumps out | ||
Fake scare | ||
Laughable scare | ||
Stupid discovery of corpse | ||
Dream sequence | ||
Hallucination/Vision | ||
No one believes only witness | ||
Crazy, drunk, old man knows the truth | ||
Warning goes unheeded | ||
Music detracts from scene | ||
Death in first five minutes | ||
x years before/later | ||
Flashback sequence | ||
Dark and stormy night | ||
Killer doesn't stay dead | ||
Killer wears a mask | ||
Killer is in closet | ||
Killer is in car with victim | ||
Villain is more sympathetic than heroes | ||
Unscary villain/monster | ||
Beheading | ||
Blood fountain | ||
Blood spatters - camera, wall, etc. | ||
Poor death effect | ||
Excessive gore | ||
No one dies at all | ||
Virgin survives | ||
Geek/Nerd survives | ||
Little kid lamely survives | ||
Dog/Pet miraculously survives | ||
Unresolved subplots | ||
"It was all a dream" ending | ||
Unbelievably happy ending | ||
Unbelievably crappy ending | ||
What the hell? |