A Name For EvilYear: 1973 Director: Bernard Girard Written by: Bernard Girard Threat: House Weapon of Choice: Window Based upon: none Color/B&W/3D: Colour Language: English Country of Origin: USA |
Other movies in this series:
None
Rish's Reviews
Whoa, Nellie.
This movie made crap like the When
A Stranger Calls remake look like Hitchcock at his best.
When the movie first started, and I moaned that it looked to be TV movie quality, tyranist
said, "Come on, I know you love Robert Culp."
Well, I didn't know how to respond to that.
True, everyone from my generation loved "The Greatest American Hero," and people
in my parents' generation might have loved "I, Spy," but I don't really have any Culp-centric
feelings one way or another.
And this movie sure sucked, regardless of Robert Culp.*
Apparently living in a 1973 filled with robots, computers, and a fully mechanized life,
fantasy-prone Robert Culp and his fridgid wife decide to move out to the country, to the
big old house owned by his ancestor, who was apparently such an evil dude, he rode a
horse at night! As they're trying to fix the house up, some strange happenings occur,
including a hippie musical number. So, is the house haunted? Is Culp insane? Does
his wife have a split personality? Is he cursed to relive his twisted family history? Or
is he actually possessed?
We may never know.
This is probably, no exaggeration, the worst film tyranist and I have watched together
in the 21st century. Sometimes it's hard to adequately sum up a film without profanity
or references to diaper pails and septic tanks. Maybe I shouldn't even try, since I doubt
Chaucer could do A Name For Evil justice.
The film makes less than no sense. Bewildering, confusing, vexing, confusing, and
perplexing, I might need a thesaurus to accurately describe it.
In case tyranist doesn't mention it in his review, there was a scene that began, talking
about something that hadn't yet happened in the story, went on to the next scene, then
continued twenty minutes or so later. Tyranist suspected a reel was out of place. I
suspected the movie was just so bad they didn't care or think anyone would notice.
I'd Recommend It To: What? Haven't you been listening? The movie was horrible!
*In fact, it could've starred Harrison Ford, Tom Hanks, Gregory Peck, Haley Joel Osment,
Abbott & Costello, Wendy Jo Sperber, Charlie Chaplin, Michael J. Fox, Ian McKellan,
Samuel L. Jackson, Curtis Armstrong, and Grace Kelly, and it still would've sucked.
Posted: November 21, 2006
The tyranist's thoughts
It's amazing what the TIVO finds when you ask for horror. This showed up with a whole
bunch of others right around Halloween. All of them were better than this. Nearly anything
would have been though.
I was really getting into the sci-fi stuff. I love '70s sci-fi. It wasn't until then that they really started
thinking about how life would not just be more convenient in the future, but in some important
ways completely alien. Well, not completely. '70s sci-fi still looked an awful lot like the '70s,
but at least it looked like a '70s that wasn't quite so comfortable as the real thing.
I might have liked that movie if they had kept making it.
But they didn't. Instead, they jumped tracks completely for a haunted house flick. They went
from something intriguing to possibly the most difficult to pull off horror theme there is.
The movie seems moody and disorienting, both of which I think they meant, but it also comes
up baffling quite often and never seems to resolve into something coherent enough to
appreciate. Things were so choppy that I'd swear they accidentally got a reel out of order
and either no one noticed or no one cared.
And the hippie musical number really was something to behold.
You ought not to see this one. It was crap. And if the TIVO tells you its horror, don't buy
it.
Posted: November 21, 2006
Total Skulls: 25
| Sequel | ||
| Sequel setup | ||
| Rips off earlier film | ||
| Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie | ||
| Future celebrity appears | ||
| Former celebrity appears | ||
| Bad title | ||
| Bad premise | ||
| Bad acting | ||
| Bad dialogue | ||
| Bad execution | ||
| MTV Editing | ||
| OTS | ||
| Girl unnecessarily gets naked | ||
| Wanton sex | ||
| Death associated with sex | ||
| Unfulfilled promise of nudity | ||
| Characters forget about threat | ||
| Secluded location | ||
| Power is cut | ||
| Phone lines are cut | ||
| Someone investigates a strange noise | ||
| Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door | ||
| Camera is the killer | ||
| Victims cower in front of a window/door | ||
| Victim locks self in with killer | ||
| Victim running from killer inexplicably falls | ||
| Toilet stall scene | ||
| Shower/bath scene | ||
| Car stalls or won't start | ||
| Cat jumps out | ||
| Fake scare | ||
| Laughable scare | ||
| Stupid discovery of corpse | ||
| Dream sequence | ||
| Hallucination/Vision | ||
| No one believes only witness | ||
| Crazy, drunk, old man knows the truth | ||
| Warning goes unheeded | ||
| Music detracts from scene | ||
| Death in first five minutes | ||
| x years before/later | ||
| Flashback sequence | ||
| Dark and stormy night | ||
| Killer doesn't stay dead | ||
| Killer wears a mask | ||
| Killer is in closet | ||
| Killer is in car with victim | ||
| Villain is more sympathetic than heroes | ||
| Unscary villain/monster | ||
| Beheading | ||
| Blood fountain | ||
| Blood spatters - camera, wall, etc. | ||
| Poor death effect | ||
| Excessive gore | ||
| No one dies at all | ||
| Virgin survives | ||
| Geek/Nerd survives | ||
| Little kid lamely survives | ||
| Dog/Pet miraculously survives | ||
| Unresolved subplots | ||
| "It was all a dream" ending | ||
| Unbelievably happy ending | ||
| Unbelievably crappy ending | ||
| What the hell? |