UndeadYear: 2003 Director: Michael Spierig, Peter Spierig Written by: Michael Spierig, Peter Spierig Threat: Infection/Undead Weapon of Choice: Shotgun Based upon: none |
|
Other movies in this series:
None
Rish Outfield's reviews
We've not reviewed a lot of Australian horror films. I'm not really aware of that
many. Undead is probably one of the better ones, and it certainly was
ambitious.
A small town is besieged by a meteor shower that seems to have the unusual side effect
of reanimating the dead, turning them into murderous zombie flesh-eaters. A rapidly-shrinking
group of survivors tries to board themselves into a farmhouse to keep away from the
attackers, but soon finds that even more strangeness is going on . . . in the form of
extraterrestrial invaders.
My Irish friend was a big supporter of this film, really excited about it and constantly
quoting the character who says, "In my day, we respected our elders. We didn't eat
them!" I miss my Irish friend.*
This was a very unusual flick, even for the zombie subgenre. The special effects were
amazing, really top-notch (especially for a non-Hollywood production). The gore was
cool. The premise was very interesting. Ultimately, though, I didn't enjoy the movie
all that much. Partly because I didn't care about the characters, but mostly because I
saw a great deal of stuff going on, but was unsatisfied by most of it.
Undead throws so many horror movie cliches up in rapid succession that, at
least for a while, it becomes something wholly original. Unfortunately, there's way too
much being thrown up in the air, and when things start to come down, it all falls apart.
I was baffled by the film. At one point, we reached the part in the story where everything
was about to be explained, and then it wasn't. The whole situation, middle, flashbacks,
and ending only became clear when tyranist and I talked about it afterward. And even
then, what we agreed on was that certain things will never become clear. Stuff like
that frustrates me. I know there are some who would say movies are cool when there
are unanswered questions, gaps that the viewer needs to fill in himself. There are
those who say it's a lot scarier when there's no motive. I mean, did Norman Bates have
a motive? Did we ever find out why Hannibal Lecter liked to eat people?
But I'm not one of those guys.
*Eaten by underage cannibal islanders, ironically enough.
Posted: January 24, 2006
The tyranist's thoughts
I like zombie movies. For the most part I like Australian horror movies (the most
notable exception being Howling 3 that
film was execrable). So what isn't there to like about an Australian zombie movie?
For about three quarters of this movie, I was enjoying it even if I was a little confused.
The zombies were vicious and unrelenting, the situation dire, the actors were
convincing, and the dialogue mostly witty. Then the movie took a flying leap off
the deep end. I was no longer confused, but my respect for the movie plummeted.
I understood what the film was doing and suddenly, I didn't care for it. All of the things
that had gone before and had pleased me were suddenly sidelined by the massive
plot twist that the movie leans a little too heavily on. It was like I had been dropped
in an M. Night Shyamalan movie without being warned and I didn't like it.
Don't get me wrong, I like M. Night Shyamalan movies. I just want to know that's
what I'm getting when I start the movie.
Anyway, there's some stuff here worth seeing and some that isn't worth it. By the
time it ended, I sort of didn't care. If you like zombie movies, it may be one to see.
If you are a fan of Australian horror, that could be another reason to see it. I really
don't care what you do.
Posted:
Total Skulls: 26
| Sequel | ||
| Sequel setup | ||
| Rips off earlier film | ||
| Horror film showing on TV/in theater in movie | ||
| Future celebrity appears | ||
| Former celebrity appears | ||
| Bad title | ||
| Bad premise | ||
| Bad acting | ||
| Bad dialogue | ||
| Bad execution | ||
| MTV Editing | ||
| OTS | ||
| Girl unnecessarily gets naked | ||
| Wanton sex | ||
| Death associated with sex | ||
| Unfulfilled promise of nudity | ||
| Characters forget about threat | ||
| Secluded location | ||
| Power is cut | ||
| Phone lines are cut | ||
| Someone investigates a strange noise | ||
| Someone runs up stairs instead of going out front door | ||
| Camera is the killer | ||
| Victims cower in front of a window/door | ||
| Victim locks self in with killer | ||
| Victim running from killer inexplicably falls | ||
| Toilet stall scene | ||
| Shower/bath scene | ||
| Car stalls or won't start | ||
| Cat jumps out | ||
| Fake scare | ||
| Laughable scare | ||
| Stupid discovery of corpse | ||
| Dream sequence | ||
| Hallucination/Vision | ||
| No one believes only witness | ||
| Crazy, drunk, old man knows the truth | ||
| Warning goes unheeded | ||
| Music detracts from scene | ||
| Death in first five minutes | ||
| x years before/later | ||
| Flashback sequence | ||
| Dark and stormy night | ||
| Killer doesn't stay dead | ||
| Killer wears a mask | ||
| Killer is in closet | ||
| Killer is in car with victim | ||
| Villain is more sympathetic than heroes | ||
| Unscary villain/monster | ||
| Beheading | ||
| Blood fountain | ||
| Blood spatters - camera, wall, etc. | ||
| Poor death effect | ||
| Excessive gore | ||
| No one dies at all | ||
| Virgin survives | ||
| Geek/Nerd survives | ||
| Little kid lamely survives | ||
| Dog/Pet miraculously survives | ||
| Unresolved subplots | ||
| "It was all a dream" ending | ||
| Unbelievably happy ending | ||
| Unbelievably crappy ending | ||
| What the hell? |