The Online Journal of the Art of Magic

is sponsored by
»The Magic Depot
The Trickery
Hank Lee's »
Thank you for your support!
Looking for more? Check out the Store!

Sign up to receive the
Online-Visions Newsletter!

Sign me up now!
Unsubscribe me.

Kenton Knepper's
"Krystal Visions"

Peter Marucci's
"Bizarre Bazaar"

Craig Browning's
"Cranial Consternations"

Michael Matson's
"My Magic - My Way"

Michael Jay's
"Thoughts on the
Passing Scene"

Rich Tenace's
"Stage Stuff"

Scott Guinn's

Jon Thompson's
"Thinking Allowed"

"One Eye, Inward"

Dan Paulus's
"Real Magic"

"Stages of Illusions"

Andi Gladwin's

Andy Leviss's
"Shared Thoughts"

Tyler Wilson's
"More Than Words"

"At The Shop" Reviews

"In Your Hands" Effects

"Proving the Impossible"

"Other Visions"
Guest Contributors

Free Visions

Visions Store

Visions Links

Contacting Visions

Submitting an Article

Privacy Statement

Administration Info



Shared Thoughts
Andy Leviss

A Fine Prop Position

In the very first article in this column, I discussed the key distinctions between mental magic and mentalism. One of those was the fact that true mentalism doesn’t use any unusual props, while these are often used in mental magic (although some would argue that they’re equally undesirable in either situation). Since that column appeared, I’ve gotten a few e-mails asking what exactly constitutes an “unusual prop” -- in other words, asking, “When is a prop not a prop?”. This month, let’s take a look at that, both in a general sense and with some specific examples.

First, a general explanation: By the strictest definition, any object you use in your show is a prop, so obviously we can’t say that a mentalist doesn’t use any props at all -- that would be silly. What we can say, though, is that if a prop you’re thinking of using seems out of the ordinary to an audience, it’s something you should stay away from. If an audience can look at a prop and doesn’t know what it is, that’s a sign that you might not want to use it. If they can look at it, not know what it is, but immediately think, “that looks like a magician’s prop!”, you definitely shouldn’t use it.

What you can definitely use are pads, notebooks, markers, dry erase boards (the modern equivalent for chalkboards -- a substitution that will easily update many old effects), and other “everyday” objects. Silverware, glassware, and other household objects are fine. What you shouldn’t use are things like Mental Epic boards, bizarre prediction boards, etc.

There are some things that are not quite everyday objects that I feel are acceptable, too. For example, I often use Ted Karmilovich’s “Vision in Black” drawing duplication as part of the closing sequence of my show. In this, a spectator’s drawing is rubber-banded between two opaque plastic panels, which are in turn sealed inside an envelope. These plastic panels aren’t exactly anything you’d come across every day, but they don’t seem too unusual and are perfectly justified in the presentation -- they’re simply two plain black panels that are used to insure that nobody can sneak a peek at the drawing. Because of their simplicity and justification, they are ignored by the audience, written off as unimportant. As with playing cards (discussed in the “Pre-Spring Cleaning” column a few issues back), if the prop is simple, ancillary, and doesn’t arouse suspicion, you should be okay.

One key thing to remember is that there are very few actual effects that can’t be used in a mentalism show -- it’s more specific incarnations of those effects that aren’t suited to mentalism. Let me explain with some examples.

One specific question I was asked in relation to this subject was whether the popular “Mental Epic” effect has a place in a mentalism show. As I mentioned a couple paragraphs ago, my answer is that it doesn’t. What I mean, though, is that the version known as “Mental Epic”, using the gaffed, sectioned blackboard/dry erase board, shouldn’t be used in a mentalism show. The basic effect, and even method, though, is a great piece for a mentalist. All you have to do is ditch the board and do it the old-fashioned way, with folded slips of paper in place of the sections of the board. It’s the classic incarnation of the one-ahead principle, and it works. Why clutter it with a silly little board that looks like nothing anybody other than a magician would use?!

Recently, two methods of bending a nail have appeared on the market. As a note, I haven’t played with the first, so I can’t speak as to method -- I’m talking only from an effect standpoint. One, “Super Nail”, uses a nail with a black rubber sleeve around it. This is a no-no -- why the heck do you need the sleeve? More recently, Menny Lindenfield’s “Carpenter’s Nightmare” came out. This version bends the nail out in the open, with no covering (an earlier method for this effect is Doc Dougherty’s “PSI Flexion”, which is available from Tannen’s). Do you see why this one works for a mentalist where the former won’t?

Now for a bit of a surprising one, ESP cards. At first glance, you might think they’d be a perfectly logical choice for a mentalist, right? WRONG! As Banachek writes in his “Pre-Thoughts” notes (available direct from the source at, nobody’s ever seen them. While playing cards are an everyday object, ESP cards are incredibly unusual, and often will seem gimmicked to an audience since they’re not familiar with them. Again, this doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t do effects that use ESP cards. My suggestion for a way around this is to use blank index cards, and draw the ESP symbols on them. This way you have a completely normal seeming deck made out of everyday objects that are beyond suspicion.

As you can see, it’s not terribly hard to find a way to do an effect you want in a way that seems like real mentalism and not a magic trick. It just takes a little bit of effort...and as with anything in this world, that effort will pay off in the end.

Till next time,


All content ©2003-2007 The Visions Group
All Rights Reserved. Any duplication without expressed written permission is strictly prohibited.

The views expressed are solely those of the contributors and may not necessarily be those of TVG, its clients, sponsors, or affiliates.