FUTURLOGICS a system of prospective thinking:
by james n. hall


COPYRIGHT © 1983 BY
JAMES NORMAN HALL

----------------------------------------------------------------------

No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatever
       without express written permission of the publisher

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Printed in the United States of America

SELF TEACHING PUBLICATIONS
WEST JORDAN, UTAH 84084
USA
   
Previous Next Table of Contents of FUTURLOGICS
   


PART THREE

Application

Chapter X


PREDICTION

ACTIVITIES RELATIVE TO THE FUTURE
PREDICTION, FORETELLING, AND PROPHECY

     Before we get into a discussion of the general theory, terms must
be defined.  Generally speaking, the term prediction can be used for all
the prognostication we do.  We will emphasize certain aspects of the
prognosticating process with a separate and distinct term.  However,
prediction, foretelling and prophecy will generally mean the same
thing (loosely defined), and for most practical purposes they can be
used interchangeably.
     When the term prediction is used, we stress the conscious aspects
of the forecasting process.  Prediction is the mental processes normal
introspection of the forecasting efforts would reveal upon conscious
reflection.  Do not think prediction does not use subconscious
thought, or that intuitive and insightful processes might not be present
and operating.  Prediction is merely a shortened reference to the
conscious aspect of forecasting and prognostication.
     Foretelling might then be used to represent and accentuate the
subconscious factors and operations in the forecasting process.  Although
 prediction and foretelling are essentially the same, when we
mention foretelling as a special prescience, we will be stress a
feature of the forecasting process.  Foretelling, then, is suggestive of
the subconscious means to view the future.  Foretelling, in its special
sense, de-emphasized the conscious and logical processes.
    Prophecy is used to classify that region of mental activity beyond
the normal operations of the mind.  Prophecy suggest that the mind is
assisted by higher or extraordinary powers or perceptions.  The tenor
of most religious principles are present in the prophetic approach.
    With few exceptions, those classifications will be used to allude to
these special features.


PREDICTION WITH A MODE

     The six modes will all produce a future if they are used to the
exclusion of the futurlogical method.  The difference is the distortion
or incompleteness of the future obtained through a specific mode.
This is because by definition the previous knowledge or pattern of
approach will overlay and influence succeeding knowledge.  That is,
the retrospective mode will produce a future that is characteristic of
the absolute future.  Also, the observational mode will produce a
future that is profiled as the natural future, etc.
     The most accurate prediction then would logically be to avoid the
use of only one method of obtaining data.   Before we can avoid using a
particular mode, we have to be conscious of that mode.  We must then
determine the tendency we have to depend on particular patterns of
thinking inherent to particular modes.  When we can think in all the
patterns of approach, then we will get a "feel" for Futurlogics and the
action of DMP in prediction and thinking of the future in general.
     Foretelling might then be used to represent and accentuate the
subconscious factors and operations in the forecasting process.  Although
 prediction and foretelling are essentially the same, when we
mention foretelling as a special prescience, we will be stress a
feature of the forecasting process.  Foretelling, then, is suggestive of
the subconscious means to view the future.  Foretelling, in its special
sense, de-emphasized the conscious and logical processes.
    Prophecy is used to classify that region of mental activity beyond
the normal operations of the mind.  Prophecy suggest that the mind is
assisted by higher or extraordinary powers or perceptions.  The tenor
of most religious principles are present in the prophetic approach.
    With few exceptions, those classifications will be used to allude to
these special features.


PREDICTION WITH A MODE

     The six modes will all produce a future if they are used to the
exclusion of the futurlogical method.  The difference is the distortion
or incompleteness of the future obtained through a specific mode.
This is because by definition the previous knowledge or pattern of
approach will overlay and influence succeeding knowledge.  That is,
the retrospective mode will produce a future that is characteristic of
the absolute future.  Also, the observational mode will produce a
future that is profiled as the natural future, etc.
     The most accurate prediction then would logically be to avoid the
use of only one method of obtaining data.   Before we can avoid using a
particular mode, we have to be conscious of that mode.  We must then
determine the tendency we have to depend on particular patterns of
thinking inherent to particular modes.  When we can think in all the
patterns of approach, then we will get a "feel" for Futurlogics and the
action of DMP in prediction and thinking of the future in general.
     This does not imply that the future produced by the modes is not
partly true.  It is true in some degree history will repeat itself.  And to
a large degree we can direct and create our own future.  Assuming a 
future is a beginning of making the future as we want it to be, we
must be aware of the limitations of each mode and not forget there
may be other ways.


THE SIX MODES ARE THE RESULT OF SUBCONSCIOUS FORETELLING

     Each of the favorite modes that have been discussed is the
product of subconscious process.  Even though the modes may have
begun as a conscious process, through constant use they become
habits, so that finally an approach which began without any awareness
of the other ways of approaching the future becomes ingrained and
the other ways are discounted.
    Since foretelling in such a limited fashion will not produce a
complete picture of the future, essential to prediction, foretelling, or
prophecy by the futurlogical method, narrow modal approaches must
be brought to consciousness.  From this conscious awareness of the
modes we can then expand to prediction through all the modes
simultaneously.  This is, at first, a conscious effort fraught with
excessive logical thought and conscious manipulation of the modes,
though constant practice will eventually bring the process and system
to the subconscious habit.  When this happens, we set the stage for
subconscious processes using all the modes in a futurlogical means.
Foretelling through Futurlogics when it is an automatic operation
makes DMP contact with the future possible.
     Futurlogics begins as a conscious system of prediction, but as it
becomes habitual it proceeds to a subconscious transition of 
foretelling which is the beginning of DMP.  Once DMP is experienced,
then the only better way of learning of the future is through the
high-altitude method of prophesy.
     Prediction through the futurlogical approach expands perception
and produces a clear discernment of the imaginary and artificial
contents which are the sources of false notions of the future.  Becoming
especially aware of what is imaginary and what is artificially
accepted as a "future" we then can see clearly what is NOT the actual
future.   Prediction or foretelling, if they do not show us the actual
future, are of no practical use, but only mental exercise.


TWO KINDS OF PREDICTION

     Organization and definition might be an additional help to clarify
some general properties of prediction patterns.  The future can be
described and studied without the reference to time and place.  This type of
prediction might be called "general" since no demands are placed
upon the events and conditions that are forecast.  The other type of
prediction pattern is the opposite.  We demand that the time and place
of the event and condition be known, or "specific" information be
given.  Specific prediction is intended to discover and know the time
and location of events, places, and conditions within some future
frame.
     In general prediction, we state the facts and laws of ulterior
reality, i.e. futurity; this is done without mention of specific time or
place.  For example: "All persons will grow, age, and die," or "Life
will be discovered in some solar system of our galaxy."  In each of 
these predictions no time or specific place is mentioned yet they are
statements of the future.  General predictions describe conditions and
elements of futurity.
     Examples of specific prediction are: "It will rain in the downtown
area at ten o'clock tomorrow morning,"  and "By the year 2000, the
governments of the earth will be centralized and headquartered in the
state of Missouri," etc.
     We can see the relationship of general and specific prediction by
the following analogy:  when a sculpture is undertaken, the general
shape of the stone is analyzed.  Then the outline of the form is cut into
the stone.  Once this foundation is formed and hewn out of the stone,
then details are delicately chipped in and the finishing touches are cut
away.  General prediction is the rough stone that outlines the main
structures of the eventual statue.  We cannot sculpt a rock without
making the large cuts that break the stone to the rough form that will
finally be refined by progressive action of chipping and polishing.


IMPROVING WHAT WE CAN ALREADY DO

     We all predict in one way or another.  The fact we know there is a
future proves that we have done some general prediction.  (There are
many subjects in the study of mathematics that concern probabilities
and chance evaluated in a quantitative manner.  We are not going to
reiterate these as many fine books have been written on this technique
of evaluating the future.)  Our purpose is to reinforce the idea that we
all predict in one fashion or another, and sometimes these predictions
are perfected to the degree of a science.  Indeed, the scientific method
is designed to certify the cause-effect relationship of natural phenomena
so that when a given condition is encountered, the effect can be
anticipated.
     Our present abilities can be improved.  Prescience and foreknowledge
can and must be thought of as a possible goal.  However, the
existing bank of knowledge always seems to be accompanied by its
own survival instincts.  It tries to maintain the status quo.  We fight
against change almost as instinctively.  Learning new things means
change, therefore improving or present abilities to look ahead and
forecast will be similarly blocked.  But now we should be able to learn
new patterns of thought.  The modes we have discussed are the
examples of old ways that will prevent or distort new views.
     Before we can improve we must know where we are now.  If in
doubt, start somewhere and call it the beginning.  It is suggested to
then write our beliefs of the future.   this can be written in one sitting,
or from notes accumulated over period.  The main thing is to begin,
for it is difficult to operate from a vacuum basis.  After general
statements concerning the future are made, we can make specific
references to events we know will happen.  At this point, we are not
too concerned with the validity of the predictions.  We are simply
beginning the game and "getting the ball rolling."  Reserving our
negative thought should keep us from becoming mired in doubts.
     Now that we have something to work with, we can put things into
the true and false categories.  Obviously, some things will feel "farout"
and others will be self-evidently true, but getting too wrapped up
in judgments of truth will hamper the freeflow of thought.  We will
pursue this effect when we discuss other techniques.


UPDATING AND REVISING

     This working future of prototype nature can be looked upon as a
starting place.  Prediction in this sense takes on the form of updating
and revision.  We take this future and change it and add to it until we
have the ideal mode of Futurlogics.  This process brings us to the best
level of foreknowledge we can have.
     The principle of updating and revision is that of adding to our
real future and discovering our artificial future; mapping out the
imaginary future; learning to distinguish the absolute, natural, and
the synthetic futures.  In short, it focuses the vague notions we have
into hard, workable designs.
     Updating comes from the new things we learn that add to our
present foreknowledge.  As we grow in the are of Futurlogics, updating
should be expected on a regular basis.  Updating does not correct past
assumptions, but it emphasis is upon expanding and enlarging.
     Revision suggest the result of a discovered error.  Many times
when we find wrong information we then revise our plan or change
our mode of operation to fit the new look.  This means that it is a
change of "future" which cause our realization of error or inconsistencies.
Therefore, revision differs from updating in that it does more
than add--it correct false percepts.  In the words of the modes, it
separates the real from the unreal.


MODES, FUTURLOGICS, AND PREDICTION

     The "futures" work in varying degrees in all of us.  By deciding
which of these futures come from predominant modes we can get a 
better understanding of ourselves and the frame of reference we use to
foretell and predict.   Our theories of the future simply will be like a
frame to our study.  The modes limit and channel our inquiries.
Futurlogics is the ability to freefloat these modes so that we do not
settle on one or two narrow perspectives, thus making diverse foretelling
or prediction possible.  The varieties and hues possible through 
combinations of the modes is easily seen as we become more detached
from any one mode and think in the futurlogics mode, which points us
toward the true future.
     Whatever our position, we will interpret data to support our
primary view.  When we set out to learn the workings of the universe
we relate it to our lives or we describe it in the parameters of our
selves.  To ourselves, we are the most important  things in the universe;
therefore, we pay attention in terms of ourselves.  It is most difficult to
express the phenomena of nature directly.  We use language and
terminology with which we are already familiar to describe the previously
unknown.  DMP and Futurlogics puts us in the most direct contact so
we will think of the future in terms of the future.


CHANGING GENERAL PREDICTION TO SPECIFIC PREDICTION

     General prediction is prescience without reference to time or
place.  Specific prediction uses both time and place as their main
emphasis.  The future is infinite.  There are no limits to time and space.
It staggers the mind to look at all time and place and future at once.
If the future has no natural demarcations and topology, then we must
make them in order to apply our thought process to it.
     Time and place have natural cycles and locations.  Days, years,
months, etc. are time periods that come from describing the phenomena
of nature.  Place is located because we are confined to the earth
and this solar system at the present (except for the rare excursions of
our astronauts).  These circumstances are inherent to the physical 
environment.  These natural demarcations point our mind to the future of
the planet Earth and some particular time span, like a year, or a 
century.
     The future of the planet, or even a continent on the planet, may
not be specific enough for the average person to utilize in his daily life.
Therefore, we assign limits of convenient time and place.  Anyone
using a map must find landmarks and reference points to correlate
with the map.  We first find out where we are, then where we are 
going, and finally the best route to get there.  Prediction is the same;
we must realize where we are, then to what time frame we have
reference, and then we work to discover where we will see the event
occurring.
     The more advanced our civilization is, the greater is our need for
time measurement and place measurement.  Everyone carries a watch.
Also, everyone has an address from which to base operations.  Even if
home is the entire city there is an address for communication
purposes.
     How specific our predictions must become is the test of how
much the predictions will fit in to our daily routine.  But some general
predictions can also influence daily activity.  The point is that the
future can be broken up to provide us with an analytical approach.
Subconscious foretelling, however, will be hampered by exact time
and place, as subconscious processes often work independently of
reality.  But the zone of attention can be channeled, and therefore our
subconscious will be directed through this means.  (Incidentally, there
are certain biologically-timed events that influence our subconscious
and finally our conscious moods, that will add to the possible selection
of prediction periods.)  When we restrict conscious prediction, we also
affect the zone of subconscious foretelling.
     Before a concentrated attempt at specific prediction, it is advised
that we obtain groundwork in the general form of foretelling and
prediction.  This is not a strict rule, but a suggestion.  A bank of
general foreknowledge from which to judge specific prediction is
desirable.
     Each person must find the technique that fits individual personality
and needs.  What works well for one person may confuse another. 
This is especially true when we consider that each of us may favor a
certain mode and a particular style that is personal to the individual.


SUGGESTIONS THAT MAY IMPROVE YOUR PREDICTIVE ABILITIES

     We cannot improve what we do not try.  Exercising the methods
we use now will be a beginning.  It might be best to take notes, 
however, to compare the gain objectivity in the technique and thus discern
the mode that dominates our concept of the future.
     1.  Spare moments offer a chance to scan ahead of current events
and to orient ourselves to the time necessary to predict.  This is also a
time when the subconscious mind is free to problem-solving and can
be more easily tapped and used.  Prediction should be done in a 
relaxed state.
     2.  Learn the words that express future tense so that notes can be
described correctly.
     3.  Watch how people refer to future events, and how they express
themselves to gain a "feeling" for oncoming events.
     4.  Periodically guess at things where no risk is involved to keep
the mind active in prospective thought.  One needn't broadcast these
guesses so as to attract ridicule from others.  Many a guess has led to
sure foreknowledge as subsequent events proved intuitive insights.
     5.  Try to free the predictions from specifics and get the most
general meaning and description.  This prevents the prediction from
becoming a self-sustaining mode.  Use similes and metaphors to
express the prediction.  The literature of the Bible is at its most
powerful when parallel thought is used to express meaning.  The
greatest effort of prospective thought is found in the Bible, and it
should not surprise us that there are verbal arts involved in these
exercises that generalize our thoughts.
     6.  Use the techniques of brainstorming to break up rigid patterns
of thought that block clear thinking.  Start with the wildest flights of
fancy, then work toward the concrete and practical.  Brainstorming
can bring to consciousness many subconscious ideas which facilitate
the art of foretelling, particularly of an artificial future.  Reserve
criticism to a specified time and place.
     7.  Trace the origin of your thoughts to see if the ideas come from
within or without.  ESP and DMP may be found to be real factors in
your insights, and if so, being able to discern where the idea began
may be a valuable clue to "contact" with futurity.  Remember  that no
one has yet disproved these awareness'.  To those who know of the
reality of such things, trying to explain them to one who denies their
existence is like describing color to a blind man.
     8.  Wait for different moods to balance the effect that emotions
play in prediction.  Moods are important, because they influence the
content of our thoughts.
     9.  Assume a different role in society. Our self-concept has much
to do with the direction our thoughts take.  Identification with strong
religious or political figure will influence our interests in special
aspects of the future, which, if we identify with a condemned murderer,
for instance, we may never consider.  We change our opinions
of ourselves with each new mood.  Therefore, self-image is another
dimension of DMP.
    10.  Do not let immediate circumstances overpower you to see
things in terms of the moment.  During times of prosperity people tend
to see the future as prosperous.  During difficult times people tend to
see the doom of days to come and are pessimistic.  Try to break from
these overwhelming inputs of environment.  Keep your head above
water so you can see which way you are swimming.  Don't let yourself
drown in the momentary.
    11.  Respect others so that it will be easy to accept the self you will
become.  If you are tolerant with others then you will be tolerant with
your potential self.  We hope to be able to admire the person we will
become.  Be good to yourself and do things now to make it easier for
you in the future.  Procrastination will alienate you from your 
potential self.  Sacrificing now can make things easier for you later.
    12.  Study the source and origin of all information that you come
across to be able to validate your predictions.
    13.  Believe in yourself.  If we have doubts we set up internal
blocks that will "verify" the doubts.  Belief deliberates our mental
capacities.  We find that using our bodies is easy as we learn to walk
and function in the physical surroundings.  It only takes a few years.
It may take the rest or our lives to learn to use the greater percentage
of our mental capacity.


    Essential here is that if we can learn to believe in out abilities;
that, in itself, frees latent abilities within that are inherent but 
undeveloped.  Any growth of hidden talent must first begin with belief.
    Every belief has its negative side: doubt.  If you believe you will
succeed, then at the same time, you doubt that you will fail.  Belief and 
doubt are two sides of the same coin.  In this operation of belief-doubt, 
we should be aware which side of the coin we seem always to call.
Pessimism, skepticism, and negativism form attitudes that will stultify
the natural operations of the mind.  We must approach prediction
with a positive attitude for maximum results.
     The future is an abstraction.  The only contact we have with it
until it happens is mental.  It has no physical basis that we can
experience in the usual ways.  The future is experienced in the same
manner in which an abstraction is experienced, and that is within the
mind.  The acronym DMP is the "contact" we want to finally achieve.
DMP, through Futurlogics, is the ideal experience mode for the
future, and it is the best predictive technique.  But we have to grow
into this thought process.  As with other thought processes, it takes
time to learn.  It will take the whole heart and mind of man to search
ahead and to come to terms with futurity.
     Imagination is useful to DMP as it is the most natural avenue to
the conscious mind of the strange, unusual, atypical or anomalous
ideas.  Logic and reason are based on present circumstances and
observations.  The future is often irrelevant to immediate surroundings.
By imagination the unexpected or the unthinkable can be envisioned.
The imaginative processes can extend beyond the routine and
mundane influences to five new perspectives.  Although we cannot
experience the future as we commonly know experience, we can
simulate it by the imaginative process.  Imagination is the screen upon
which we can, with DMP, view the future.  Creative imagination will
be essential to a study of the future and its ulterior reality.
     The believing mind will naturally have a more flexible imagination.
Imaginative creativity is strong stimulus to future thinking.  It is
a breath of fresh air.  To be skeptical and to regiment the imagination.
is to thwart progressive growth and learning.  Modes and mental
blocks, which, if they do not prevent free thought will certainly
modify it, are the extreme examples of the inhibitions of mental
attitude upon learning.


THE PARADIGM MODEL VS. THE PARADIGM MODE

     The paradigm mode is exceptional because it can also become a
model from which knowledge of the future patterns subsequent
knowledge.  As we successfully obtain information of the future
through Futurlogics and DMP the knowledge gained helps us discern
and further foreknowledge.  This is the model effect of this mode and
its more perfect than the others.  A greater amount of knowledge of
the future can be obtained.  The only time the paradigm approach is a 
mode is when there is very little knowledge, or when that knowledge is
highly specialized, as when knowledge of the extreme distant future is
used to determine the immediate or the known future is used to
determine the far distant future.
     The more we know for certain the more we can know.  Foreknowledge
is the yeast in the bread dough.  Foreknowledge is certain
knowledge, and it will serve as a basis upon which we will collect
insights and mind-expanding DMP experiences.  DMP uses existing
knowledge to absorb and collect new knowledge in a form that builds
forethought.  This is to be see as a tool that builds a forward-looking
mind.  Simply thinking about the future may not be enough.  We must
grasp on to new things because they will expand our minds and cause
the above law to operate: the more we know, the more we can know.
     

PITFALLS AND BLOCKS

     The past has greater inertia and it will tend to make the new
become old and familiar very quickly.  It seems impossible to view
everything new as a child who has little past to draw upon, but we
must learn to do this so that the future is not described overpoweringly
in terms of the past.  Children do not worry about the future, following
the admonition naturally that we should "take no thought for the morrow,
for the morrow will take thought for itself."  We should be
childlike, looking positively ahead.  The attitude of prediction must be
positive to prevent depression which blocks the freeflow of thought.
Because of their unbiased attitudes, children learn more in the first
few years of life than they will throughout their adult lives.
     Man is not only aware of his life before death, but can contemplate
many things beyond his life span.  It is common for grandparents
to plan for the futures of their grandchildren.  We all consider and
predict things beyond our lifespan, because most of us do not know
the exact date of our death.  One mind-expanding technique in
thinking of the future is to come to positive terms with death.  We
must think beyond mere selfish survival.  Thinking of a future far
distant to our own survival will expand and enrich everything we do
now.  Thinking only within the limits of our life span will restrict
clear-headed prediction.
     The mind of man contains all things because it holds simultaneously
the past, present, and future.  Life can be ten thousand years
long if we can add this dimension through a vivid foretaste of the
future.  Instead of ignoring the future because it may hold unpleasantness,
look beyond to better days.  It would be no surprise to find out
that the optimist thinks further into the future than the pessimist.  The
future should be motivating, not depressing.  Besides, being prepared
makes life safer.


FORWARD THINKING

     The forward-thinking mind should be the goal of all persons who
wish to develop their entire mind.  As paradoxical as it is, the conscious,
logical process is a block to prediction unless the system of 
Futurlogics is used.  Since the future is often a new and different thing,
the best way to face it is through the intuitive faculties we possess.  In
ancient times, the prophets were students of dreams and visions.  The
dream is know to reflect the operations of the subconscious mind.
Yet conscious logical thought is also a product of the subconscious mind.
But no one knows how the mind works; therefore, ALL mental processes
are below conscious investigation.  We are aware of only a fraction
of what the minds is doing, thus, the major obstacle to thinking
about the future is lack of knowledge of how we think.
     Regardless of how ignorant we are of things, this is no excuse for
doing nothing.  On the contrary, it should be an incentive to learn at a
pace that will fill this void of knowledge.  We have to go ahead, even
with inadequate knowledge.  In this respect, the artificial future is
better than no future at all; we then can view our assumptions of the
future as an EXPERIMENT AND A LEARNING TECHNIQUE.  Standing still is no
way to use the mind.  It is better to begin than to wait.
     We all make assumptions concerning the future.  We cannot avoid
it.  Most of our assumptions come from foretelling, therefore understanding
our assumptions gives us a good idea of the nature of foretelling and
its subconscious workings.  We are reminded again of the man who
exclaimed that he bet handled the problems of the future by "just not
thinking of it."  He doesn't consciously consider the future and 
considers it illogical to do so because of its intangible nature.
     This does not mean that we can't consciously consider the future,
but that we must be aware of side effects and built-in obstacles.  We
can operate all day long on the unconscious presciencing and not
notice excessive doubt or perplexity.  But subject our behavior to
conscious thought and the demands of objective certainty and we will
experience the limits of certainty.  We may not think of the future in
order to remain "certain," as action requires distinct accuracy.  Much
like the ostrich hides his head thinking he is hid.
     The sun will shine; the earth will continue to orbit; the planet will
still support normal life; these and other predictions are stock foretelling.
They are taken for granted.  They are assumed to continue to occur.
There is no way we can prove absolutely that the sun will shine
tomorrow if we accept that the rules of certainty will apply and what
worked in the past will also work for the future.  As long as we don't
consciously think of the unconscious prescience, they are as good as
absolute certainties--because we never DOUBT them.  In other words,
"what you don't know won't hurt you."
     Here is the reason some persons refuse to study or think of the
future: as long as their prescience is not consciously thought, they are
secure and certain however false their security is.  Conscious analysis
of the assumptions and unconscious prescience of the future throws
them into a spin of doubt and hesitation that will stultify action.
     Be believing or develop a new kind of logic, or proof.  Learning
how to prove the occurrence of events of the future is a problem that
should be dealt with.  We are raised in a past-oriented culture.  We have
to use prospective thought process instead of the retrospective forms
which surround us.
     Most foretelling is done on the unconscious level of thought.  We
take for granted and do not realize it is prediction.  We do not
recognize a conscious effort to make statements about the future.  We
are accustomed to the fact that we live in a temporal environment and
we don not see our prescience.  Yet or plans and preparations are based
on a few conscious predictions and many subconscious assumptions.
     When we consciously predict it is often just the making ourselves
aware of our unconscious prescience, and we experience anxiety in
prediction.  Part of this is due to our need for certainty, distinction,
security, and safety.  The other reason is the subconscious nature of
the origin of ideas.
     We cannot see our subconscious processes but we can, by inference,
recognize that some assumptions and foretelling have taken place.
Actions and plans are based upon a premise arrived at through
mental processes we don't understand, but the really are expectations
of things derived from the subconscious assumptions, or foretelling.
     The system of Futurlogics guides our subconscious foretelling
and makes it modal free.  Therefore, the accuracy of our predictions
increases.  DMP can be thought of as the subconscious thought processes
perfected by the futurlogical system of modal free intuitive thought.
Futurlogics is the means to control our subconscious foretelling
in a simple way.  The obstacles in dealing with the subconscious are
taken care of automatically, and DMP is the final result.