From: rkhenry@naxs.com (Robert Henry)
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Why I like CANSLIM
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 22:08:59 -0400
Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Daily Graphs/Quotes Plus "Louis H. Gipson, RN"
Previous Article (by Date): re: [CANSLIM] SFDS Jim Knock
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
I haven't actually tried out CANSLIM yet. About the time I decided to = look into it the "M" part went soft. Still, assuming it works like Mr. = O'Neil (and others) say it does, I'm excited. I feel a little like the = kid who gets a new sled for Christmas and Christmas morning the sky is = clear blue and the temperature is 70 degrees (yeah, been there) or the = kid who just got a new kite but it's raining outside. I can't wait to = try out CANSLIM. And I don't intend to paper-trade either (but start = with a very small position.). I've tried it and paper-trading is just = nothing like the real thing. When you're actually trading you never = quite know what prices you're going to get when you place that order. = Then of course the emotional stress of actually having real money on the = table alters your perception. Any "fool" can make "paper" money by = paper-trading, especially if you're permitted to delude yourself into = making all sorts of assumptions that have nothing to do with the real = world. You can't learn to fly with your feet on the ground, you can't = learn to swim without getting wet, and I don't think you can learn to = trade stocks with Monopoly money. Then of course there's another = consideration: you can't spend "paper" profits.=20 One thing I like about CANSLIM is that it permits "stock picking" to = enter into the equation. So many strategies I've seen seem to assert = that you can make money trading anything as long as you follow charts or = numbers or moon phases or some other such thing. Most of the indicators = seem to be dedicated to following the performance of the Dow Industrials = or some other index. If you're going to do that you might as well just = buy an index fund. I've seen that even in a raging bull market you can = easily buy stocks that go down while everything else is going up. (Even = stocks that don't seem to have anything wrong with them except that the = market doesn't like them.) Other strategies do focus on stock picking, worrying over such elements = as PE, sales, debt, book value, and rarely, earnings growth. These = strategies seem to assert that all you have to do is pick a good company = with good prospects, buy in and wait. Even if the market doesn't like = the company right now, maybe because it or its industry isn't = fashionable, just wait and eventually the market will come to it's = senses and realize the value of what you've been holding. Sometimes it = can take quite a time, but eventually your foresightedness will be = rewarded. Actually, I've used this strategy and it does work, = eventually, if you have the patience (and if the company doesn't = self-destruct in the meantime). =20 CANSLIM tries to deal with all of these elements. It's a complete = strategy that helps you decide WHICH stocks to buy and tells WHEN to buy = them to achieve optimum return. If you bought no other book than Mr. = O'Neil's "How to Make Money in Stocks" you could still proceed--assuming = it actually works. I'm hoping to find that out as soon as the market = gets through screwing around. It seems to me that if you follow his = rules carefully, no cheating, that there shouldn't be too much risk of = getting hurt and even then not getting hurt badly. It makes sense, it = seems reasonable, and it seems to be a complete strategy that was = arrived at scientifically by looking at the performance of actual = stocks. Science Rules! And because it is scientific, with the rules = clearly spelled out, it means that any idiot can apply it successfully, = not just people who were blessed with ESP or years of experience "on the = street." Or have I completely misinterpreted things? - -- Bob Henry
Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Daily Graphs/Quotes Plus "Louis H. Gipson, RN"
Previous Article (by Date): re: [CANSLIM] SFDS Jim Knock
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]