Re: [CANSLIM] SOME FEEDBACK NEEDED!

From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SOME FEEDBACK NEEDED!
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:36:13 EST

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] SOME FEEDBACK NEEDED! Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] SOME FEEDBACK NEEDED! Kent Norman
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SOME FEEDBACK NEEDED! "Rich W"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SOME FEEDBACK NEEDED! Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Tom:

     I do read your economic commentary and enjoy it because it is both 
interesting-and most important when dealing with economic data-succinct, 
ie.there is not a lot of "filler".  

     However, I don't understand:  What about WWW is to be said, except, 
perhaps, from my perspective: I do read them-and appreciate your time and 
effort in compiling the data, analyzing the formations, judging their 
significance and sending them to the forum.  As far as RAT and CAT are 
concerned, it's hard to assess either pattern until enough time has passed to 
evaluate their reliability.  

jans   

     



In a message dated 12/9/2001 5:27:58 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
stkguru@netside.net writes:

<< Every weekend I complete and post my Worley's Weekend Weeview, including a 
review of many CANSLIM quality stocks. I try to keep the commentary 
interesting for those not as obsessed as me in reading everything happening 
about stock markets globally.....  Both the commentary, and the review of 
charts, begs a response, yet I get none.  This weekend, I also throw out the 
concept of two new chart patterns I called CATs and RATs, and not a single 
comment, challenge, question, etc. >>

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.