Re: [CANSLIM] Thanks for the feedback


From: Jerry Weiss <docdoer@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Thanks for the feedback
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:28:20 -0600

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] low volume breakouts "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] low volume breakouts "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_00CD_01C18165.63D3F600
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank you.
Keep up the good work.

Happy Holidays,

Jerry Weiss

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Tom Worley=20
  To: CANSLIM=20
  Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:42 AM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] Thanks for the feedback


  It would appear I considerably underestimated the interest in my WWW. =
To respond to a few questions and comments expressed, I spend about 5-6 =
hours a week typically in compiling this. The commentary I usually =
accumulate throughout the week a few minutes at a time. Sometimes one =
story (paragraph) is composed of information from a half dozen or more =
stories.  The watchlist wannabes takes the most time, usually about 3 =
hours on the weekend, to review upwards of 250-300 charts. In part, this =
process evolved out of criticism that I was dominating the list with =
non-CANSLIM emails. So now I put all my "soap box" opinions into a =
single post (well, I try anyway).

  For those that do not use the list of stocks, don't feel guilty, as I =
also do not use other's lists normally. This list started out as my =
personal way of monitoring how technically quality CANSLIM stocks were =
shaping up (both RS and EPS of 80 or better and price at or within 5% of =
their high and also in the DG books). Because I am reviewing for "M", I =
disregard my personal biases and look at all stocks. Originally I just =
printed the list and made margin notes. Eventually I started sharing =
those margin notes with the group. Now I guess it's a regular feature, =
and just add them into the WWW already started. But I do not use my own =
list for finding stocks I will buy. For that, I use daily lists reviewed =
throughout the week as stocks hit new highs. My idea in presenting the =
list is just to give some ideas for watching to those members that have =
not yet developed their own source for CANSLIM ideas. I would be happy =
to know that no one has use for this list, it would mean everyone has =
their own method. But I know that is not likely or realistic, there are =
newcomers to CANSLIM every day.

  Several members suggested I boil the list down into a short list of 2 =
to 10 stocks. To do that would require that I do the due diligence. =
Since my stocks of choice are both low priced and usually thinly traded, =
they rarely make it into the DG books by the time I own them. Thus the =
stocks I review rarely produce anything I choose to own. And my review =
is essentially limited to looking at a chart for the prior 6 months. =
Occasionally I will notice something (earnings forecast, for instance) =
that will cause me either to include, or omit, a stock, or add a comment =
(such as low price or volume). But the list is intended to be generic, =
without my personal biases, so that members that choose to use it can =
pick and choose what suits them.

  As for my personal biases being helpful or educational, I don't think =
so. While I have made investments in the past in banks, biotechs, REITs =
and drug companies I won't do so again. This is a simple function of my =
ignorance. I learned that I cannot understand these type companies, =
therefore I cannot intelligently assess their performance and future =
from a fundies perspective. Thus, I avoid them. I like tech stocks, as I =
see them representing the best of entrepreneurial enterprise and growth. =
Where my knowledge may be lacking, I turn to my sons (both computer =
techs) or to my IT staff at work for better understanding. I don't like =
commodities type companies, even tho I did once make good money on =
Bethlehem Steel, bot on CANSLIM basis. Sad to see it in bankruptcy =
today, they produced steel for many great buildings including the Empire =
State Building. I also typically avoid foreign companies, as that would =
introduce more variables (currency rate changes, another economy, =
another politics, etc) altho I will occasionally venture into a few =
(right now my VR fund has TTIL up 57%, bought as a totally non-CANSLIM =
stock at the time, and kept buying while it underperformed). If I do buy =
a foreign stock, it is usually either European, or Israeli based. I =
avoid Canadian stocks, not because there are not good ones there, but =
because their regulators permit too many scams and frauds. Because I am =
buying small companies not closely followed by analysts, I just don't =
have the time to investigate each one and be sure it is legitimate.

  Hope this answers everyone,

  Tom Worley
  stkguru@netside.net
  AIM: TexWorley


- ------=_NextPart_000_00CD_01C18165.63D3F600
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Thank you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Keep up the good work.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Happy Holidays,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Jerry Weiss</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dstkguru@netside.net href=3D"mailto:stkguru@netside.net">Tom =
Worley</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">CANSLIM</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 10, 2001 =
3:42=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Thanks for =
the=20
  feedback</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>It would appear I considerably underestimated the =
interest=20
  in my WWW. To respond to a few questions and comments expressed, I =
spend about=20
  5-6 hours a week typically in compiling this. The commentary I usually =

  accumulate throughout the week a few minutes at a time. Sometimes one =
story=20
  (paragraph) is composed of information from a half dozen or more=20
  stories.&nbsp; The watchlist wannabes takes the most time, usually =
about 3=20
  hours on the weekend, to review upwards of 250-300 charts. In part, =
this=20
  process evolved out of criticism that I was dominating the list with=20
  non-CANSLIM emails. So now I put all my "soap box" opinions into a =
single post=20
  (well, I try anyway).</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>For those that do not use the list of stocks, =
don't feel=20
  guilty, as I also do not use other's lists normally. This list started =
out as=20
  my personal way of monitoring how technically quality CANSLIM stocks =
were=20
  shaping up (both RS and EPS of 80 or better and price at or within 5% =
of their=20
  high and also in the DG books). Because I am reviewing for "M", I =
disregard my=20
  personal biases and look at all stocks. Originally I just printed the =
list and=20
  made margin notes. Eventually I started sharing those margin notes =
with the=20
  group. Now I guess it's a regular feature, and just add them into the =
WWW=20
  already started. But I do not use my own list for finding stocks I =
will buy.=20
  For that, I use daily lists reviewed throughout the week as stocks hit =
new=20
  highs. My idea in presenting the list is just to give some ideas for =
watching=20
  to those members that have not yet developed their own source for =
CANSLIM=20
  ideas. I would be happy to know that no one has use for this list, it =
would=20
  mean everyone has their own method. But I know that is not likely or=20
  realistic, there are newcomers to CANSLIM every day.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Several members suggested I boil the list down =
into a short=20
  list of 2 to 10 stocks. To do that would require that I do the due =
diligence.=20
  Since my stocks of choice are both low priced and usually thinly =
traded, they=20
  rarely make it into the DG books by the time I own them. Thus the =
stocks I=20
  review rarely produce anything I choose to own. And my review is =
essentially=20
  limited to looking at a chart for the prior 6 months. Occasionally I =
will=20
  notice something (earnings forecast, for instance) that will cause me =
either=20
  to include, or omit, a stock, or add a comment (such as low price or =
volume).=20
  But the list is intended to be generic, without my personal biases, so =
that=20
  members that choose to use it can pick and choose what suits=20
them.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>As for my personal biases being helpful or =
educational, I=20
  don't think so. While I have made investments in the past in banks, =
biotechs,=20
  REITs and drug companies I won't do so again. This is a simple =
function of my=20
  ignorance. I learned that I cannot understand these type companies, =
therefore=20
  I cannot intelligently assess their performance and future from a =
fundies=20
  perspective. Thus, I avoid them. I like tech stocks, as I see them=20
  representing the best of entrepreneurial enterprise and growth. Where =
my=20
  knowledge may be lacking, I turn to my sons (both computer techs) or =
to my IT=20
  staff at work for better understanding. I don't like commodities type=20
  companies, even tho I did once make good money on Bethlehem Steel, bot =
on=20
  CANSLIM basis. Sad to see it in bankruptcy today, they produced steel =
for many=20
  great buildings including the Empire State Building. I also typically =
avoid=20
  foreign companies, as that would introduce more variables (currency =
rate=20
  changes, another economy, another politics, etc) altho I will =
occasionally=20
  venture into a few (right now my VR fund has TTIL up 57%, bought as a =
totally=20
  non-CANSLIM stock at the time, and kept buying while it =
underperformed). If I=20
  do buy a foreign stock, it is usually either European, or Israeli =
based. I=20
  avoid Canadian stocks, not because there are not good ones there, but =
because=20
  their regulators permit too many scams and frauds. Because I am buying =
small=20
  companies not closely followed by analysts, I just don't have the time =
to=20
  investigate each one and be sure it is legitimate.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Hope this answers everyone,</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Tom Worley<BR><A=20
  href=3D"mailto:stkguru@netside.net">stkguru@netside.net</A><BR>AIM:=20
  TexWorley<BR></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_00CD_01C18165.63D3F600--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] low volume breakouts "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] low volume breakouts "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.