Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:07:31 -0600
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C181BE.AE9EDA20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David,
I see what you're getting at. A stock like EPIQ really had other things =
going on that created failure. It wasn't the 123 effect in and of =
itself. On a pure technical basis, EPIQ flagged a sell before it would =
have ever reached a 7% loss. I saw 4 tails in short order after the B/O. =
Very bad pattern and reason enough to sell. Even if you waited until the =
huge drop on the 21st, the 2 low volume bounce days after that spelled =
"S-E-L-L."
I'd agree with you that there is seemingly a higher risk of B/O failures =
right now. But in truth, when there's a good strong uptrend, these =
things sort themselves out. I agree with statements made by WON and the =
IBD lately that in people's haste to "get in" they are often not doing =
their fundamental homework, buying into faulty (riskier) technical =
patterns, buying extended stocks, or failing to account for group =
action. Given that "M" is so unclear right now, I can understand why =
you'd want to take a few percentage points and run for cover. Over the =
long run, however, I'd argue that it's not the most profitable =
intermediate term/CANSLIM strategy.
Katherine
----- Original Message -----=20
From: camelot.homes@charter.net=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
katherine, my point is, stocks now-with the 123 effect-go through =
their b/o with maybe a 10% increase-then they fall below their pivot =
point and one might take their WON loss of 7-8%. it seems to me its =
better to take that 5-10% profit instead of taking a 8% loss but hoping =
that maybe 1 out of 10 of your stocks might increase 50-300%. david
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Katherine Malm=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
David,
The number of stocks suggested depends on the amount of money you =
have in your CANSLIM account. I think WON has some guidelines on this, =
but I don't remember them off the top of my head. On the surface, it =
would seem to make sense to concentrate a big portion of the total money =
in a few stocks, each of which might get you 50-200%. But why not just =
buy *one* stock then? The main reason for keeping a certain number of =
stocks is to minimize the risk of loss on any one entry as a percent of =
your total portfolio. Say for example, you have 10 stocks. That means =
the maximum risk to your total portfolio on entry is 10%*(-8%) =3D 0.8%. =
Less than 1% of your total portfolio. Another thing to remember is that =
not every entry is a winning trade. You can stack the odds in your =
favor, but there is still always a risk of loss. In fact, it's common to =
have a series of very small losses, but the big winners over time far =
outweigh them in total profits. Its all about probabilities.
Katherine
----- Original Message -----=20
From: camelot.homes@charter.net=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
katherine, of course as long as the 123 effect is in place the =
profits will probably be small. also, it seems like if a stock returns =
50-200% it seems like to me one should own 2-5 stocks at anytime instead =
of 6-10 stocks. david
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Katherine Malm=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
David,
I think it depends on your investment strategy. If you are =
intentionally playing a short term trend, small profits 5-20% might be =
ok. On the other hand, the goal of moving into the intermediate time =
frame is to find the right combination of fundamentals and technicals so =
the ride can be far greater. A good ride in a good market could easily =
get you far more than 5-20%. It's not uncommon to get nice 50-60% =
returns in a few months. That's why you want to really understand =
price/volume action so that you can determine if the stock remains =
healthy in its upward intermediate term advance. Small pullbacks here =
and there mean little over this time frame. It's repeated high volume =
pull backs (distribution) that are problematic. One of the things that =
always stuck with me from Nicholas Darvas' book "How I made $2 million =
in the Stock Market" was the simple phrase "I have no reason to sell a =
stock that's rising." In other words, skipping town too early could very =
well lower your overall investment return.
If your strategy is a swing strategy of 1-10 days or so, a =
consistent 5-10% return on each position would certainly garner a high =
return overall. But the entries are based on pricing patterns and the =
candidates mined from stocks with enough volatility to move swiftly in a =
few days. Very different strategy than CANSLIM.
Katherine
----- Original Message -----=20
From: camelot.homes@charter.net=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
katherine and chris, sorry i have been away. i always wonder =
if the most likely breakout will rise 5 to 20%-is it better to take =
those small profits on alot of stocks, then wait longer for possible =
bigger profits? david
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Katherine Malm=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
Chris,
Just a clarification. The 75% return rate is a pullback =
within the first 12 days (this is the average for the study). Bulkowski =
states that none take longer than 30 days. After that, it goes beyond =
throwback and falls into "normal price action" territory.
With regard to the WON 20% rule and profit taking. Bulkowski =
gives some statistics that I think throw some light. He says that 47% of =
stocks reach a high after breakout in less than 3 months. 35% take =
longer than 6 months. Most likely rise? 10-20%. Average rise? 38%. His =
frequency distribution shows that the longer it takes to reach the peak, =
the larger the average gain.
So think about what that means in terms of WON sell =
guidelines.=20
(1) If the stock rises 20% in less than 8 weeks, suggests =
you hold on through the first correction
(2) Once it reaches 25% (and I'm assuming he then means, if =
it takes longer than 8 weeks to do that), THEN suggests taking some =
profits.
But I also look for accumulation/distribution during these =
rises to assess whether the uptrend is persistent enough to carry the =
stock further than the 25%.
In that context, makes a lot more sense!
Katherine
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chris Dempsey=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
Katherine, David, and All others interested
I remember reading that WON says 40% of breakouts return =
to the base. I believe it is more than that. I'm not sure that it is =
75%, but it might be. For that reason WON states in his book you must =
take some profits when they hit 20%. On one of the IBD tapes they state =
to profits in 1/2 of positions reaching 25%. These are because of the =
high rate of pull backs. If you don't do this then you are forced to use =
the rule, don't let a winner turn into a loser.=20
SCUR appears to be an example of a stock returning/nearly =
returning to the base.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com =
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of =
camelot.homes@charter.net
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:49 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] low volume breakouts
hi katherine , thank you so much for this very good =
information! when bulkowski states that stocks retrace back to the b/o =
piont 75% of the time is he talking about high or low volume breakouts? =
and where is the best place to get a copy of his book? david
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Katherine Malm=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:10 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] low volume breakouts
Hi David,
The question you ask is a good one. Demanding =
controlled study proof of a guideline like this is important, as it =
makes an underlying assumption about technical patterns which may or may =
not trigger a buy. I pulled out my "Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns" by =
Thomas Bulkowski to answer this question. In this book, the author does =
statistical studies on chart formation and there is an entire chapter =
devoted to the C&H. (pp.135-152).
Before I state the author's conclusions, a general =
overview of WON's theory as to why volume should be high on the =
breakout. That is, you are looking for the point at which demand so =
outweighs supply that the price moves up and onward. In my own personal =
experience, low volume breakouts seem to fall back more often than not. =
But these are "odds" not specifics. SONC is a good example from recent =
discussions on the list. Take a look at the daily chart from 10/3 to =
now. You can see that SONC tried very hard on several days to break out =
of its consolidation, but fell back and eventually gapped down. The low =
volume B/O's don't always mean the stock will fail, just that it's not =
yet ready to move on. I like to have the odds in my favor, so I'm always =
willing to wait until there's proof of the pudding.
Back to Bulkowski. In the C&H formation, the failure =
rate is 26%. If you wait for an upside breakout, the failure rate falls =
to 10%. Stocks retrace back to the B/O point 75% of the time (average =
time 12 days). Waiting for the throwback increases the success rate =
another 1%. Typical B/O volume is 180% above the prior day and stays =
high for the following week. Interestingly, he says removing the high =
volume B/O criteria does hurt performance, but only minimally. This is =
an excellent chapter on C&H and, based on the statistical evidence, the =
author makes other conclusions that lead to particular trading tactics. =
There are several additional criteria that WON would require of a stock =
forming a C&H and then breaking out, such as rising RS, high group RS, =
underlying fundamental characteristics, etc. that are not included in =
the author's study. My own conclusions, anecdotally, are that if these =
other criteria are met AND you get a high volume B/O, the odds are in =
your favor. (No statistical studies to back that up, however!)
Katherine
----- Original Message -----=20
From: camelot.homes@charter.net=20
To: canslim@xmission.com=20
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 5:44 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] low volume breakouts
how often does a low volume breakout succeed past =
the pivot point versus a high volume breakout past the pivot point? =
david
- ------=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C181BE.AE9EDA20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>David,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I see what you're getting at. A stock =
like EPIQ=20
really had other things going on that created failure. It wasn't the 123 =
effect=20
in and of itself. On a pure technical basis, EPIQ flagged a sell before =
it would=20
have ever reached a 7% loss. I saw 4 tails in short order after the B/O. =
Very=20
bad pattern and reason enough to sell. Even if you waited until the huge =
drop on=20
the 21st, the 2 low volume bounce days after that spelled=20
"S-E-L-L."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'd agree with you that there is =
seemingly a higher=20
risk of B/O failures right now. But in truth, when there's a good strong =
uptrend, these things sort themselves out. I agree with statements made =
by WON=20
and the IBD lately that in people's haste to "get in" they are often not =
doing=20
their fundamental homework, buying into faulty (riskier) technical =
patterns,=20
buying extended stocks, or failing to account for group action. Given =
that "M"=20
is so unclear right now, I can understand why you'd want to take a few=20
percentage points and run for cover. Over the long run, however, I'd =
argue that=20
it's not the most profitable intermediate term/CANSLIM =
strategy.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dcamelot.homes@charter.net=20
=
href=3D"mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net">camelot.homes@charter.net</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 10, 2001 =
8:51=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
breakouts - return=20
to base</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>katherine, my point is, stocks =
now-with the 123=20
effect-go through their b/o with maybe a 10% increase-then they fall =
below=20
their pivot point and one might take their WON loss of 7-8%. it seems =
to me=20
its better to take that 5-10% profit instead of taking a 8% loss but =
hoping=20
that maybe 1 out of 10 of your stocks might increase 50-300%.=20
david</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
Malm</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 10, =
2001 8:06=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
breakouts -=20
return to base</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>David,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The number of stocks suggested =
depends on the=20
amount of money you have in your CANSLIM account. I think WON has =
some=20
guidelines on this, but I don't remember them off the top of my =
head. On the=20
surface, it would seem to make sense to concentrate a big portion of =
the=20
total money in a few stocks, each of which might get you 50-200%. =
But why=20
not just buy *one* stock then? The main reason for keeping a =
certain=20
number of stocks is to minimize the risk of loss on any one entry as =
a=20
percent of your total portfolio. Say for example, you have 10 =
stocks. That=20
means the maximum risk to your total portfolio on entry is 10%*(-8%) =
=3D 0.8%.=20
Less than 1% of your total portfolio. Another thing to remember is =
that not=20
every entry is a winning trade. You can stack the odds in your =
favor, but=20
there is still always a risk of loss. In fact, it's common to have a =
series=20
of very small losses, but the big winners over time far outweigh =
them in=20
total profits. Its all about probabilities.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dcamelot.homes@charter.net=20
=
href=3D"mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net">camelot.homes@charter.net</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 10, =
2001 8:02=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
breakouts -=20
return to base</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>katherine, of course as long as =
the 123=20
effect is in place the profits will probably be small. also, it =
seems like=20
if a stock returns 50-200% it seems like to me one should own 2-5 =
stocks=20
at anytime instead of 6-10 stocks. david</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
Malm</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December =
10, 2001=20
7:00 PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
breakouts -=20
return to base</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>David,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I think it depends on your =
investment=20
strategy. If you are intentionally playing a short term trend, =
small=20
profits 5-20% might be ok. On the other hand, the goal of moving =
into=20
the intermediate time frame is to find the right combination of=20
fundamentals and technicals so the ride can be far greater. A =
good ride=20
in a good market could easily get you far more than 5-20%. It's =
not=20
uncommon to get nice 50-60% returns in a few months. That's why =
you want=20
to really understand price/volume action so that you can =
determine if=20
the stock remains healthy in its upward intermediate term =
advance. Small=20
pullbacks here and there mean little over this time frame. It's =
repeated=20
high volume pull backs (distribution) that are problematic. One =
of the=20
things that always stuck with me from Nicholas Darvas' book "How =
I made=20
$2 million in the Stock Market" was the simple phrase "I have no =
reason=20
to sell a stock that's rising." In other words, skipping town =
too early=20
could very well lower your overall investment =
return.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If your strategy is a swing =
strategy of=20
1-10 days or so, a consistent 5-10% return on each position =
would=20
certainly garner a high return overall. But the entries are =
based on=20
pricing patterns and the candidates mined from stocks with =
enough=20
volatility to move swiftly in a few days. Very different =
strategy than=20
CANSLIM.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dcamelot.homes@charter.net=20
=
href=3D"mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net">camelot.homes@charter.net</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December =
10, 2001=20
6:24 PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
breakouts=20
- return to base</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>katherine and chris, sorry i =
have been=20
away. i always wonder if the most likely breakout will rise 5 =
to=20
20%-is it better to take those small profits on alot of =
stocks,=20
then wait longer for possible bigger profits? =
david</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net=20
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine Malm</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, =
December 10, 2001=20
12:40 PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: =
[CANSLIM]=20
breakouts - return to base</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Chris,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Just a clarification. The =
75% return=20
rate is a pullback within the first 12 days (this is the =
average for=20
the study). Bulkowski states that none take longer =
than 30=20
days. After that, it goes beyond throwback and falls into =
"normal=20
price action" territory.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>With regard to the WON 20% =
rule and=20
profit taking. Bulkowski gives some statistics that I think =
throw=20
some light. He says that 47% of stocks reach a high after =
breakout=20
in less than 3 months. 35% take longer than 6 months. Most =
likely=20
rise? 10-20%. Average rise? 38%. His frequency distribution =
shows=20
that the longer it takes to reach the peak, the larger the =
average=20
gain.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>So think about what that =
means in terms=20
of WON sell guidelines. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>(1) If the stock rises 20% =
in less than=20
8 weeks, suggests you hold on through the first=20
correction</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>(2) Once it reaches 25% =
(and I'm=20
assuming he then means, if it takes longer than 8 weeks to =
do that),=20
THEN suggests taking some profits.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>But I also look for=20
accumulation/distribution during these rises to assess =
whether the=20
uptrend is persistent enough to carry the stock further than =
the=20
25%.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>In that context, makes a =
lot more=20
sense!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; =
font-color: black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dcdempsey@houston.oilfield.slb.com=20
href=3D"mailto:cdempsey@houston.oilfield.slb.com">Chris =
Dempsey</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, =
December 10,=20
2001 12:22 PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: =
[CANSLIM]=20
breakouts - return to base</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D619121018-10122001>Katherine, David, and All =
others=20
interested</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D619121018-10122001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D619121018-10122001>I remember reading that WON =
says 40% of=20
breakouts return to the base. I believe it is more than =
that. I'm=20
not sure that it is 75%, but it might be. For that reason =
WON=20
states in his book you must take some profits when they =
hit 20%.=20
On one of the IBD tapes they state to profits in 1/2 of =
positions=20
reaching 25%. These are because of the high rate of pull =
backs. If=20
you don't do this then you are forced to use the rule, =
don't let a=20
winner turn into a loser. </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D619121018-10122001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D619121018-10122001>SCUR appears to be an example =
of a stock=20
returning/nearly returning to the =
base.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr =
align=3Dleft><FONT=20
face=3DTahoma size=3D2>-----Original =
Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]<B>On Behalf Of =
</B>camelot.homes@charter.net<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, =
December=20
10, 2001 9:49 AM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: =
[CANSLIM] low=20
volume breakouts<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>hi katherine , thank =
you so much=20
for this very good information! when bulkowski states =
that=20
stocks retrace back to the b/o piont 75% of the time is =
he=20
talking about high or low volume breakouts? and where is =
the=20
best place to get a copy of his book? david</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; =
MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message =
- -----=20
</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; =
font-color: black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net=20
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine Malm</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, =
December=20
10, 2001 5:10 AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: =
[CANSLIM]=20
low volume breakouts</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi =
David,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The question you ask =
is a good=20
one. Demanding controlled study proof of a guideline =
like this=20
is important, as it makes an underlying assumption =
about=20
technical patterns which may or may not trigger a buy. =
I=20
pulled out my "Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns" by =
Thomas=20
Bulkowski to answer this question. In this book, the =
author=20
does statistical studies on chart formation and there =
is an=20
entire chapter devoted to the C&H.=20
(pp.135-152).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Before I state the =
author's=20
conclusions, a general overview of WON's theory as to =
why=20
volume should be high on the breakout. That is, you =
are=20
looking for the point at which demand so outweighs =
supply that=20
the price moves up and onward. In my own personal =
experience,=20
low volume breakouts seem to fall back more often than =
not.=20
But these are "odds" not specifics. SONC is a =
good=20
example from recent discussions on the list. Take a =
look at=20
the daily chart from 10/3 to now. You can see that =
SONC tried=20
very hard on several days to break out of its =
consolidation,=20
but fell back and eventually gapped down. The low =
volume B/O's=20
don't always mean the stock will fail, just that it's =
not yet=20
ready to move on. I like to have the odds in my favor, =
so I'm=20
always willing to wait until there's proof of the=20
pudding.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Back to Bulkowski. In =
the C&H=20
formation, the failure rate is 26%. If you wait for an =
upside=20
breakout, the failure rate falls to 10%. Stocks =
retrace back=20
to the B/O point 75% of the time (average time 12 =
days).=20
Waiting for the throwback increases the success rate =
another=20
1%. Typical B/O volume is 180% above the prior day and =
stays=20
high for the following week. Interestingly, he says =
removing=20
the high volume B/O criteria does hurt performance, =
but only=20
minimally. This is an excellent chapter on C&H =
and, based=20
on the statistical evidence, the author makes =
other=20
conclusions that lead to particular trading tactics. =
There are=20
several additional criteria that WON would require of =
a stock=20
forming a C&H and then breaking out, such as =
rising RS,=20
high group RS, underlying fundamental characteristics, =
etc.=20
that are not included in the author's study. My own=20
conclusions, anecdotally, are that if these other =
criteria are=20
met AND you get a high volume B/O, the odds are in =
your favor.=20
(No statistical studies to back that up,=20
however!)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>Katherine</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; =
MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; =
font-color: black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dcamelot.homes@charter.net=20
=
href=3D"mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net">camelot.homes@charter.net</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Dcanslim@xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@xmission.com">canslim@xmission.com</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, =
December=20
09, 2001 5:44 PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> =
[CANSLIM] low=20
volume breakouts</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>how often does a =
low volume=20
breakout succeed past the pivot point =
versus a=20
high volume breakout past the pivot point?=20
=
david</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></B=
LOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOT=
E></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C181BE.AE9EDA20--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]