Re: [CANSLIM] Filter Criteria


From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Filter Criteria
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 21:15:18 -0700

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM]"Rubberband Sell Rule" "Bill Triffet"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Leader's List "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Personally, I think the single most important thing (besides a good market, but that's 
not a stock thing) is to see strong sales and earnings growth.  I nearly always ignore 
something with sales and earnings growth less than 25%, and better yet is 
something in the 50's or greater.  Also something to factor in is to make sure that 
good earnings growth is not already heavily discounted.  A stock with a growth rate 
of 30% and P/E of 60 may not have much room to go up.


 On 11 Dec 2001 at 17:33, Dave wrote:  

> Out of all the WON selection criteria what do you all use as "hard" criteria (hurdles the stock must meet to make your list) versus "soft" criteria (hurdles that the stock hasn't made but you can rationalize).  I need some consistent method to keep my list at reasonable levels and am looking to 
the experts as to what they use.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your advice
> 



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM]"Rubberband Sell Rule" "Bill Triffet"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Leader's List "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.