From: <camelot.homes@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:16:27 -0600
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] clarification "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] clarification "Tangen, Eric"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
eric, how do you get the 40% reliability of the WON breakout? david frank - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tangen, Eric" <tangene@tycoelectronics.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:57 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification > Of course you are right...risk is the stop value itself...it is what you > loose when your stop is triggered. It is what I mean but didn't say > correctly. > > This is what happens when I try to communicate math verbally...the two don't > mix. :) > > ERIC TANGEN > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Adair [mailto:xjadair@brightok.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:48 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification > > > Hi Erick > If I am reading your post right correctly you would say your risk > on a $50 > stock with a $5.00 stop would be $50.00 -$5.00 or $45.00. If that is what > you are saying I would not agree I would say your risk is $5.00 if I > understand what Tharp suggests. Tharp then limits your risk to the 1% is > based on that figure 1% ( 3% for the gunslinger) of your total capitol. > John Adair > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tangen, Eric > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:19 PM > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification > > The latter....your risk is your buy price less the stop. Rule of thumb: that > number should be 1% or less of your total trading capital. So if you want in > on a more volatile stock, just buy less of it...but don't set the stop at > 7-8% if the stock has a 10% daily trading range - another point HTMMIS > doesn't address. > > Trading any system with a 7-8% risk for each trade is a receipe for > disaster. The pros use a 1% limit. If (as in HTMMIS suggest) you split up > your capital evenly amoung 5-6 stocks and used an arbitrary 7-8% stop loss, > statistically, it would be very easy to get enough losing trades to loose > all your money. The unspoken 40% reliability of the WON breakouts only makes > this bad situation worse. > > I'm afraid that a quick reading of HTMMIS gives the impression that if you > can identify the perfect C+H setup and all the other CANSLIM criteria are in > place, you can get darn near 100% reliability of a breakout. I have a big > problem with that. > > I'm not down on CANSLIM...just like people to know the reality of the > situation. Your going for home runs here and home run hitters have a lot of > strikeouts. > > > ERIC TANGEN > > -----Original Message----- > From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:02 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification > > > >>If you put 7-8% of your trading capital > > at risk on any one trade > > Now that I've been mulling over your comment, it begs another question. Are > you suggesting the *total* monies invested in a trade are "at risk"? Or the > amount which you've specified in downside stop-loss protection as "at > risk."? > > Katherine > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tangen, Eric" <tangene@tycoelectronics.com> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:46 PM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification > > > > Welcome to the club! Breakouts are a high risk and high reward strategy - > if > > you're batting .500, that's pretty darn good. You should expect 40% > success > > at finding successful breakouts long-term. > > > > I just have to get this off my chest for the new subscribers...WON's 7-8% > > stop below the pivot is a technical stop. It is a rule of thumb based on > > volatility in the handle region before a stock takes off. > > > > It is NOT A MONEY MANAGEMENT STOP!. If you put 7-8% of your trading > capital > > at risk on any one trade, you will eventually pay some really serious Wall > > Street tuition on the path to becoming successful trader. > > > > WON's work has virtually nothing in the area of money management (what he > > does say is just plain outdated...by 5 stocks with 100k...more appropriate > > to an era of high commissions and lower volatility). > > > > Tharp's books are the best (only?) work in this area and should be > required > > reading before you head out to the great casino that is Wall Street. > > > > ERIC TANGEN > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] clarification "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] clarification "Tangen, Eric"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]