Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 07:10:42 -0600
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Performance "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C183A5.47090320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Norm, See my notes in bold. In general, he is trying to match the formation to WON's criteria. = When looking for the C&H pattern, cups had to have handles of at least = one week to qualify. Handles had to be in upper half, but there were = some in the study that were marginally in the upper half and included = anyway. Cups had to be U shaped. No V shapes were included. (Guess he = doesn't like drinking his coffee from a funnel.) Price has to have risen = 30% before the cup was formed. Cup has to take 7 to 65 weeks to form.=20 Thanks for relaying the interesting Bulkowski info. Mr. B definitely = is on my coffee table list. I have a 'couple' of questions. 1) "Cups with higher right lips tend to outperform those with a higher = left lip." Why would this be? Who knows? It's a mystery. But the = differences were statistically significant. 2) "Failure rate if waited for upside B/O 5%." Is 'upside B/O' when = it goes above the left side? B/O occurs when it breaks above the high of = the handle. Does vol play a roll here? He did not include volume as = criteria for B/O because removing the criteria hurt performance, but = only slightly. He does give statistics on volume at breakout and after, = and the volume tends to be very high. Only 5% failure with these is = surprising. And failure is when the price falls back to the pivot? No, = failure is when the price falls below the pivot and heads down. A = pullback to the pivot that subsequently moves on is considered a = "throwback" or pullback, and is not considered a failure. This chapter alone is worth the price of the book. The ROI makes this = investment a big winner. Katherine Norm ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:18 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification > Bulkowski (Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns) gives statistics on C&H = and cups > w/o handles: >=20 > C&H: > Failure rate 26% > Failure rate if waited for B/O 10% <<<<--------------<<<<<<<<< > Average rise 38%, most likely 10-20% > Cups with higher right lips tend to outperform those with a higher = left lip. > Avg gain 40% vs 35%. >=20 > C w/o H (Rounding Bottoms): > Failure rate 38% > Failure rate if waited for upside B/O 5% = <<<<---------------<<<<<<<<< > Average rise 54%, most likely 20% >=20 > Nothing on flat bases. >=20 > Katherine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tangen, Eric" <tangene@tycoelectronics.com> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:41 PM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification >=20 >=20 > > The 40% number is an amalgam of a number of anecdotes from a few = different > > sources. Its all word of mouth. No names to given protect the = guilty. > > > > You can almost infer such a number from WON himself...I'd bet if = you asked > > the big-O-man in a seminar he'd deflect the question to point out = how much > > you are ahead having 1 big gain out of 2-5 trades. > > > > > > ERIC TANGEN > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: camelot.homes@charter.net [mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:16 PM > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification > > > > > > eric, how do you get the 40% reliability of the WON breakout? = david frank > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tangen, Eric" <tangene@tycoelectronics.com> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:57 PM > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification > > > > > > > Of course you are right...risk is the stop value itself...it is = what you > > > loose when your stop is triggered. It is what I mean but didn't = say > > > correctly. > > > > > > This is what happens when I try to communicate math = verbally...the two > > don't > > > mix. :) > > > > > > ERIC TANGEN > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: John Adair [mailto:xjadair@brightok.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:48 PM > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification > > > > > > > > > Hi Erick > > > If I am reading your post right correctly you would say your = risk > > > on a $50 > > > stock with a $5.00 stop would be $50.00 -$5.00 or $45.00. If = that is > what > > > you are saying I would not agree I would say your risk is $5.00 = if I > > > understand what Tharp suggests. Tharp then limits your risk to = the 1% > is > > > based on that figure 1% ( 3% for the gunslinger) of your total = capitol. > > > John Adair > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tangen, = Eric > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:19 PM > > > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification > > > > > > The latter....your risk is your buy price less the stop. Rule of = thumb: > > that > > > number should be 1% or less of your total trading capital. So if = you > want > > in > > > on a more volatile stock, just buy less of it...but don't set = the stop > at > > > 7-8% if the stock has a 10% daily trading range - another point = HTMMIS > > > doesn't address. > > > > > > Trading any system with a 7-8% risk for each trade is a receipe = for > > > disaster. The pros use a 1% limit. If (as in HTMMIS suggest) you = split > up > > > your capital evenly amoung 5-6 stocks and used an arbitrary 7-8% = stop > > loss, > > > statistically, it would be very easy to get enough losing trades = to > loose > > > all your money. The unspoken 40% reliability of the WON = breakouts only > > makes > > > this bad situation worse. > > > > > > I'm afraid that a quick reading of HTMMIS gives the impression = that if > you > > > can identify the perfect C+H setup and all the other CANSLIM = criteria > are > > in > > > place, you can get darn near 100% reliability of a breakout. I = have a > big > > > problem with that. > > > > > > I'm not down on CANSLIM...just like people to know the reality = of the > > > situation. Your going for home runs here and home run hitters = have a lot > > of > > > strikeouts. > > > > > > > > > ERIC TANGEN > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:02 PM > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification > > > > > > > > > >>If you put 7-8% of your trading capital > > > > at risk on any one trade > > > > > > Now that I've been mulling over your comment, it begs another = question. > > Are > > > you suggesting the *total* monies invested in a trade are "at = risk"? Or > > the > > > amount which you've specified in downside stop-loss protection = as "at > > > risk."? > > > > > > Katherine > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Tangen, Eric" <tangene@tycoelectronics.com> > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:46 PM > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification > > > > > > > > > > Welcome to the club! Breakouts are a high risk and high reward > > strategy - > > > if > > > > you're batting .500, that's pretty darn good. You should = expect 40% > > > success > > > > at finding successful breakouts long-term. > > > > > > > > I just have to get this off my chest for the new = subscribers...WON's > > 7-8% > > > > stop below the pivot is a technical stop. It is a rule of = thumb based > on > > > > volatility in the handle region before a stock takes off. > > > > > > > > It is NOT A MONEY MANAGEMENT STOP!. If you put 7-8% of your = trading > > > capital > > > > at risk on any one trade, you will eventually pay some really = serious > > Wall > > > > Street tuition on the path to becoming successful trader. > > > > > > > > WON's work has virtually nothing in the area of money = management (what > > he > > > > does say is just plain outdated...by 5 stocks with 100k...more > > appropriate > > > > to an era of high commissions and lower volatility). > > > > > > > > Tharp's books are the best (only?) work in this area and = should be > > > required > > > > reading before you head out to the great casino that is Wall = Street. > > > > > > > > ERIC TANGEN > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. >=20 >=20 > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. >=20 >=20 >=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C183A5.47090320 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG>Norm,</STRONG></DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG>See my notes in = bold.</STRONG></DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG>In general, he is trying to = match the=20 formation to WON's criteria. When looking for the C&H pattern, = cups had to=20 have handles of at least one week to qualify. Handles had to be in = upper half,=20 but there were some in the study that were marginally in the upper=20 half and included anyway. Cups had to be U shaped. No V shapes = were=20 included. (Guess he doesn't like drinking his coffee from a funnel.) = Price has=20 to have risen 30% before the cup was formed. Cup has to take 7 to = 65=20 weeks to form.</STRONG> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"> </DIV> <DIV>Thanks for relaying the interesting Bulkowski info. Mr. B=20 definitely is on my coffee table list. I have a = 'couple' of=20 questions.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>1) "<FONT color=3D#0000ff>Cups with higher right lips tend to = outperform=20 those with a higher left lip." </FONT>Why would this be? = <STRONG>Who=20 knows? It's a mystery. But the differences were statistically=20 significant.</STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV>2) "<FONT color=3D#0000ff>Failure rate if waited for upside B/O = 5%." =20 </FONT>Is 'upside B/O' when it goes above the left side? <STRONG>B/O = occurs=20 when it breaks above the high of the handle.</STRONG> Does vol = play a=20 roll here? <STRONG>He did not include volume as = criteria for B/O=20 because removing the criteria hurt = performance, but only=20 slightly.</STRONG> <STRONG>He does give statistics on volume at = breakout=20 and after, and the volume tends to be very high.</STRONG> Only 5% = failure with=20 these is surprising. And failure is when the price falls back to = the=20 pivot? <STRONG>No, failure is when the price falls below the pivot and = heads=20 down. A pullback to the pivot that subsequently moves on is considered = a=20 "throwback" or pullback, and is not considered a = failure.</STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG>This chapter alone is worth the price of the book. The = ROI makes=20 this investment a big winner.</STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG>Katherine</STRONG></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV>Norm<BR></DIV> <DIV>----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV>From: "Katherine Malm" <<A=20 href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">kmalm@earthlink.net</A>></DIV> <DIV>To: <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ></DIV> <DIV>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:18 PM</DIV> <DIV>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>> Bulkowski (Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns) gives=20 statistics on C&H and cups<BR>> w/o handles:<BR>> <BR>>=20 C&H:<BR>> Failure rate 26%<BR>> Failure rate if waited for = B/O 10%=20 = <<<<--------------<<<<<<<<<<BR>>= ;=20 Average rise 38%, most likely 10-20%<BR>> Cups with higher right = lips tend=20 to outperform those with a higher left lip.<BR>> Avg gain 40% vs=20 35%.<BR>> <BR>> C w/o H (Rounding Bottoms):<BR>> Failure rate = 38%<BR>> Failure rate if waited for upside B/O 5%=20 = <<<<---------------<<<<<<<<<<BR>&g= t;=20 Average rise 54%, most likely 20%<BR>> <BR>> Nothing on flat=20 bases.<BR>> <BR>> Katherine<BR>> ----- Original Message = - -----<BR>>=20 From: "Tangen, Eric" <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:tangene@tycoelectronics.com">tangene@tycoelectronics.com</= A>><BR>>=20 To: <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ><BR>>=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:41 PM<BR>> Subject: RE: = [CANSLIM]=20 clarification<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> > The 40% number is an = amalgam of a=20 number of anecdotes from a few different<BR>> > sources. Its all = word of=20 mouth. No names to given protect the guilty.<BR>> ><BR>> > = You can=20 almost infer such a number from WON himself...I'd bet if you = asked<BR>>=20 > the big-O-man in a seminar he'd deflect the question to point out = how=20 much<BR>> > you are ahead having 1 big gain out of 2-5 = trades.<BR>>=20 ><BR>> ><BR>> > ERIC TANGEN<BR>> ><BR>> >=20 -----Original Message-----<BR>> > From: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net">camelot.homes@charter.net</A>=20 [mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net]<BR>> > Sent: Wednesday, = December 12,=20 2001 9:16 PM<BR>> > To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= <BR>>=20 > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> ><BR>> = ><BR>>=20 > eric, how do you get the 40% reliability of the WON breakout? = david=20 frank<BR>> > ----- Original Message -----<BR>> > From: = "Tangen,=20 Eric" <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:tangene@tycoelectronics.com">tangene@tycoelectronics.com</= A>><BR>>=20 > To: <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ><BR>>=20 > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:57 PM<BR>> > Subject: = RE:=20 [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > > Of = course=20 you are right...risk is the stop value itself...it is what you<BR>> = >=20 > loose when your stop is triggered. It is what I mean but didn't=20 say<BR>> > > correctly.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > = This is=20 what happens when I try to communicate math verbally...the two<BR>> = >=20 don't<BR>> > > mix. :)<BR>> > ><BR>> > > = ERIC=20 TANGEN<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> = > >=20 -----Original Message-----<BR>> > > From: John Adair=20 [mailto:xjadair@brightok.net]<BR>> > > Sent: Wednesday, = December 12,=20 2001 8:48 PM<BR>> > > To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= <BR>>=20 > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> > = ><BR>> >=20 ><BR>> > > Hi Erick<BR>> > > If I am reading your = post=20 right correctly you would say your risk<BR>> > > on a=20 $50<BR>> > > stock with a $5.00 stop would be $50.00 = - -$5.00 or=20 $45.00. If that is<BR>> what<BR>> > > you are saying = I would=20 not agree I would say your risk is $5.00 if I<BR>> > >=20 understand what Tharp suggests. Tharp then limits your risk to = the=20 1%<BR>> is<BR>> > > based on that figure 1% ( 3% for the=20 gunslinger) of your total capitol.<BR>> > > John = Adair<BR>>=20 > ><BR>> > > -----Original Message-----<BR>> > = > From:=20 <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com</A><BR>>=20 > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of = Tangen,=20 Eric<BR>> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:19 = PM<BR>> >=20 > To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:'canslim@lists.xmission.com'">'canslim@lists.xmission.com'= </A><BR>>=20 > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> > = ><BR>> >=20 > The latter....your risk is your buy price less the stop. Rule of=20 thumb:<BR>> > that<BR>> > > number should be 1% or less = of your=20 total trading capital. So if you<BR>> want<BR>> > in<BR>> = >=20 > on a more volatile stock, just buy less of it...but don't set the = stop<BR>> at<BR>> > > 7-8% if the stock has a 10% daily = trading=20 range - another point HTMMIS<BR>> > > doesn't = address.<BR>> >=20 ><BR>> > > Trading any system with a 7-8% risk for each = trade is a=20 receipe for<BR>> > > disaster. The pros use a 1% limit. If = (as in=20 HTMMIS suggest) you split<BR>> up<BR>> > > your capital = evenly=20 amoung 5-6 stocks and used an arbitrary 7-8% stop<BR>> > = loss,<BR>>=20 > > statistically, it would be very easy to get enough losing = trades=20 to<BR>> loose<BR>> > > all your money. The unspoken 40%=20 reliability of the WON breakouts only<BR>> > makes<BR>> > = >=20 this bad situation worse.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > I'm = afraid that=20 a quick reading of HTMMIS gives the impression that if<BR>> = you<BR>>=20 > > can identify the perfect C+H setup and all the other CANSLIM = criteria<BR>> are<BR>> > in<BR>> > > place, you can = get darn=20 near 100% reliability of a breakout. I have a<BR>> big<BR>> > = >=20 problem with that.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > I'm not down on = CANSLIM...just like people to know the reality of the<BR>> > = >=20 situation. Your going for home runs here and home run hitters have a=20 lot<BR>> > of<BR>> > > strikeouts.<BR>> > = ><BR>>=20 > ><BR>> > > ERIC TANGEN<BR>> > ><BR>> > = >=20 -----Original Message-----<BR>> > > From: Katherine Malm=20 [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]<BR>> > > Sent: Wednesday, = December 12,=20 2001 2:02 PM<BR>> > > To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= <BR>>=20 > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> > = ><BR>> >=20 ><BR>> > > >>If you put 7-8% of your trading = capital<BR>>=20 > > > at risk on any one trade<BR>> > ><BR>> > = >=20 Now that I've been mulling over your comment, it begs another=20 question.<BR>> > Are<BR>> > > you suggesting the = *total* monies=20 invested in a trade are "at risk"? Or<BR>> > the<BR>> > = >=20 amount which you've specified in downside stop-loss protection as = "at<BR>>=20 > > risk."?<BR>> > ><BR>> > > = Katherine<BR>> >=20 ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > ----- Original Message = - -----<BR>>=20 > > From: "Tangen, Eric" <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:tangene@tycoelectronics.com">tangene@tycoelectronics.com</= A>><BR>>=20 > > To: <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ><BR>>=20 > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:46 PM<BR>> > > = Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> > ><BR>> >=20 ><BR>> > > > Welcome to the club! Breakouts are a high = risk and=20 high reward<BR>> > strategy -<BR>> > > if<BR>> > = >=20 > you're batting .500, that's pretty darn good. You should expect=20 40%<BR>> > > success<BR>> > > > at finding = successful=20 breakouts long-term.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > I = just have=20 to get this off my chest for the new subscribers...WON's<BR>> >=20 7-8%<BR>> > > > stop below the pivot is a technical stop. = It is a=20 rule of thumb based<BR>> on<BR>> > > > volatility in = the handle=20 region before a stock takes off.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > = > >=20 It is NOT A MONEY MANAGEMENT STOP!. If you put 7-8% of your = trading<BR>>=20 > > capital<BR>> > > > at risk on any one trade, you = will=20 eventually pay some really serious<BR>> > Wall<BR>> > > = >=20 Street tuition on the path to becoming successful trader.<BR>> > = >=20 ><BR>> > > > WON's work has virtually nothing in the = area of=20 money management (what<BR>> > he<BR>> > > > does say = is just=20 plain outdated...by 5 stocks with 100k...more<BR>> > = appropriate<BR>>=20 > > > to an era of high commissions and lower = volatility).<BR>>=20 > > ><BR>> > > > Tharp's books are the best = (only?) work=20 in this area and should be<BR>> > > required<BR>> > = > >=20 reading before you head out to the great casino that is Wall = Street.<BR>>=20 > > ><BR>> > > > ERIC TANGEN<BR>> > = ><BR>>=20 > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; >=20 > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> > = >=20 -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> = >=20 ><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, = email=20 "<A = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ;=20 > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> = > >=20 -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> = >=20 ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; >=20 > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> > = >=20 -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> = >=20 ><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, = email=20 "<A = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ;=20 > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> = > >=20 -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> = ><BR>> ><BR>> > -<BR>> > -To = subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20 "<A = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ;=20 > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> >=20 -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> = ><BR>> > -<BR>> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; >=20 -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> > = - -"unsubscribe=20 canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> <BR>> = <BR>>=20 -<BR>> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; -In=20 the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> -"unsubscribe=20 canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> <BR>> = <BR>>=20 </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_00E2_01C183A5.47090320-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Performance "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]