From: "Bill Triffet" <btriffet@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Length of Bases
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 22:11:45 -0800
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Gene Ricci
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Length of Bases esetser
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Length of Bases esetser
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Earl, Thanks for redirecting us to this bit of info. Lately, I've been going bonkers watching for 7 week handles as opposed to the C&H as a whole. I for one have been looking for 7 week handles! - -Bill Triffet - ----- Original Message ----- From: "esetser" <esetser@covad.net> To: <canslim@xmission.com> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 6:26 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Length of Bases > Here is some further data I found on the length of base subject. In > HTMMIS, on page 162, in Search with Cup-with-a-Handle Price Patterns, WON > goes on to define a CUP as a 7 to 65 week pattern. The handle is talked > about later and doesn't seem to bring up the total time, just usually 1 to > 2 weeks or more for the handle. > > However, given the discussion, I decided maybe a quick peak at the 26 > lesson course to see if it is more specific was a good idea. Okay, lesson > #9 discusses patterns, and there is an illustrated cup with handle base > they discuss. Oh-oh, WON states that the base requires at least 7 to 8 > weeks from point A to point E, where E is the breakout point. I guess this > clarifies it better than HTMMIS as it is very specific. <snip> - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Gene Ricci
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Length of Bases esetser
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Length of Bases esetser
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]