Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?

From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 14:55:05 -0600

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Gene Ricci
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Spencer48@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_01CA_01C18641.A5DFFA40
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That would mean any selection criteria that depended on something other =
than price/volume/volatility technical indicators.

Katherine
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Gene Ricci=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 3:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?


  Please define "any sort of fundamental analysis"...=20

  Thanks,
  Gene

    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Katherine Malm=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 10:12 AM
    Subject: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?


    Proposed:

    If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate term move in a stock lasts only a =
few weeks, and in good markets, only a few months, why bother selecting =
portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental analysis? Returns in =
this time period are strictly based on price movement and can be =
maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume action alone.

    Thoughts pro/con?

    Katherine

- ------=_NextPart_000_01CA_01C18641.A5DFFA40
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>That would mean any selection criteria =
that=20
depended on something other than price/volume/volatility technical=20
indicators.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dgenr@swbell.net href=3D"mailto:genr@swbell.net">Gene =
Ricci</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 16, 2001 =
3:14=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Point of =
View: Why=20
  bother with fundamentals?</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Please define "any sort of =
fundamental=20
  analysis"... </FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Gene</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
    Malm</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 16, =
2001 10:12=20
    AM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Point of =
View: Why=20
    bother with fundamentals?</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Proposed:</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;</DIV></FONT>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate =
term move in=20
    a stock lasts only a few weeks, and in good markets, only a few =
months, why=20
    bother selecting portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental=20
    analysis? Returns in this time period are strictly based on price =
movement=20
    and can be maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume =
action=20
    alone.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thoughts pro/con?</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>Katherine</DIV></FONT></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></B=
ODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_01CA_01C18641.A5DFFA40--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.