From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 16:28:43 EST
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Gene Ricci
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Katherine:
Interesting question. I've asked myself that also. Here's my answer:
We've only a limited amount of resources; stock picking (not to mention
all econcomics) is the allocation of scarce resources. One wants to
apportion one's money so that probabilities are with the stocks you choose.
So, one chooses the stocks with the greatest earnings in each quarter, and
those with a high SMR (because you want companies that have good margins,
sales, and ROE percent. Out of that constellation, you pick your rising star
based on technical analysis and charts.
I partially agree with your last sentence: In the short term returns are
based on price movements-but the price movements are most likely based on
good fundamentals. Not only that, technical indicators and price/volume
action are reflections of what has happened in the market, not necessarily
what will happen. However, tech indications and price/volume will more
LIKELY predict what will happen if fundamentals are high (ie. Canslimish).
jans
In a message dated 12/16/2001 4:15:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
genr@swbell.net writes:
<< If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate term move in a stock lasts only a few
weeks, and in good markets, only a few months, why bother selecting portfolio
candidates using any sort of fundamental analysis? Returns in this time
period are strictly based on price movement and can be maximized based on
technical indicators and price/volume action alone.
Thoughts pro/con?
Katherine
>>
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Gene Ricci
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]