From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Industry Analysis (was:[CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 12:10:01 -0600
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? John Kruger
Previous Article (by Subject): AW: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Andreas Himmelreich
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
John, The issue you bring up is extremely valid. Backtesting through many market cycles with different biases is critical in testing a hypothesis such as this one. I *can* tell you, however, that I use a similar approach to Andreas'. However, I am looking at industry rotation based on shorter cycles and look for strong players to move off the bottom of this rotation. I use it in reverse when looking for tops. I have used it extensively during the Bear and have backtested it to data that I have to about '95, which would have been considered "late Bull" territory. I know that this is not nearly thorough enough, as it would carry more weight if I could at least run it through a couple of complete cycles. Maybe from about 1940 or so. If only those databases didn't cost $15,000, I would! Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Kruger" <jokguger@yahoo.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:24 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? > > But my Industry Analysis that I am doing right know (its a hell of a > > work > > to backtest, so it will take some weeks until I have statistical > > significance) > > Andreas, > > Thank you for sharing your efforts. One of the risks that you must > guard against in such studies, is to make sure that the period that you > use for your back-test is similar to the period during which you will > use the results. > > In particular, be wary of doing back-tests of the long bull market, and > then useing those results in the current transtional (my opinion) > market. > > The long bull market had both a strong upward bias and slower group > rotation. > > Just my opinion. > > John > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of > your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com > or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? John Kruger
Previous Article (by Subject): AW: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Andreas Himmelreich
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]