From: Jerry Weiss <docdoer@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:35:15 -0600
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Gene Ricci
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? John Kruger
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0076_01C18718.CE66E820 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Folks: For some reason I'm only receiving "some" of the e-mail through the = list-serve. Is there some problem? If so, can I be of help in dealing = with it? Jerry Weiss docdoer@swbell.net ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Katherine Malm=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 10:12 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Proposed: If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate term move in a stock lasts only a = few weeks, and in good markets, only a few months, why bother selecting = portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental analysis? Returns in = this time period are strictly based on price movement and can be = maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume action alone. Thoughts pro/con? Katherine - ------=_NextPart_000_0076_01C18718.CE66E820 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Hi, Folks:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>For some reason I'm only receiving = "some" of the=20 e-mail through the list-serve. Is there some problem? If so, = can I=20 be of help in dealing with it?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Jerry Weiss</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>docdoer@swbell.net</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net = href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20 Malm</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 16, 2001 = 10:12=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Point of = View: Why=20 bother with fundamentals?</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Proposed:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> </DIV></FONT> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate = term move in a=20 stock lasts only a few weeks, and in good markets, only a few months, = why=20 bother selecting portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental = analysis?=20 Returns in this time period are strictly based on price movement and = can be=20 maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume action=20 alone.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thoughts pro/con?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20 size=3D2>Katherine</DIV></FONT></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0076_01C18718.CE66E820-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Gene Ricci
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? John Kruger
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]