From: "Norman" <theboyd@tisd.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:41:43 -0600
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] ebay "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Kent Norman
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C18732.DB439B00
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have had the same problem for a few days at least.
Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
norm
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Jerry Weiss=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?
Hi, Folks:
For some reason I'm only receiving "some" of the e-mail through the =
list-serve. Is there some problem? If so, can I be of help in dealing =
with it?
Jerry Weiss
docdoer@swbell.net
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Katherine Malm=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 10:12 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?
Proposed:
If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate term move in a stock lasts only a =
few weeks, and in good markets, only a few months, why bother selecting =
portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental analysis? Returns in =
this time period are strictly based on price movement and can be =
maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume action alone.
Thoughts pro/con?
Katherine
- ------=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C18732.DB439B00
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>I have had the same problem for a few days at least.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get=20
you.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>norm</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Ddocdoer@swbell.net href=3D"mailto:docdoer@swbell.net">Jerry =
Weiss</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 17, 2001 =
4:35=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Point of =
View: Why=20
bother with fundamentals?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Hi, Folks:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>For some reason I'm only receiving =
"some" of the=20
e-mail through the list-serve. Is there some problem? If =
so, can I=20
be of help in dealing with it?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Jerry Weiss</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4><A=20
href=3D"mailto:docdoer@swbell.net">docdoer@swbell.net</A></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
Malm</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 16, =
2001 10:12=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Point of =
View: Why=20
bother with fundamentals?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Proposed:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> </DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate =
term move in=20
a stock lasts only a few weeks, and in good markets, only a few =
months, why=20
bother selecting portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental=20
analysis? Returns in this time period are strictly based on price =
movement=20
and can be maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume =
action=20
alone.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thoughts pro/con?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>Katherine</DIV></FONT></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></B=
ODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C18732.DB439B00--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] ebay "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Kent Norman
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]