Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?


From: Kent Norman <kent_norman@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:57:51 -0800 (PST)

Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Re. 12/18/01's Investment Corner Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Kent Norman
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Norman"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


How about ANYTHING.COM? (in the past of course!)

Kent

- --- Norman <theboyd@tisd.net> wrote:
> Good question K,
<snip>
 How many companies with poor
> sales/earnings go on 500% tears?  
<snip>


=====
Opportunities always look bigger going than coming.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Re. 12/18/01's Investment Corner Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Kent Norman
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Norman"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.