Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?


From: "Al French" <alfrench@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 12:07:57 -0500

Next Article (by Author): AW: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Andreas Himmelreich
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Norman"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C1862A.4C6ACA60
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Why not go for twofers -- buy stocks with strong fundamentals in =
anticipation of short term moves and, once you are "in the money" and =
have a risk free trade, assess whether they are keepers.

Al French

- ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Katherine Malm=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 11:12 AM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals?


  Proposed:

  If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate term move in a stock lasts only a =
few weeks, and in good markets, only a few months, why bother selecting =
portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental analysis? Returns in =
this time period are strictly based on price movement and can be =
maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume action alone.

  Thoughts pro/con?

  Katherine

- ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C1862A.4C6ACA60
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.100" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Why not go for twofers -- buy stocks =
with strong=20
fundamentals in anticipation of short term moves and, once you are "in =
the=20
money" and have a risk free trade, assess whether they are =
keepers.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Al French</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
  Malm</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 16, 2001 =
11:12=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Point of =
View: Why=20
  bother with fundamentals?</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Proposed:</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;</DIV></FONT>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate =
term move in a=20
  stock lasts only a few weeks, and in good markets, only a few months, =
why=20
  bother selecting portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental =
analysis?=20
  Returns in this time period are strictly based on price movement and =
can be=20
  maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume action=20
  alone.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thoughts pro/con?</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>Katherine</DIV></FONT></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C1862A.4C6ACA60--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): AW: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? Andreas Himmelreich
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Norman"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.