Re: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals?

From: "Norman" <theboyd@tisd.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals?
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 19:51:40 -0600

Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals? John Kruger
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals? "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals? "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals? John Kruger
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_00DE_01C187FD.691DC980
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think this is a glitch in the listserv.  This message has already =
arrived once before and was sent on the 16th.

Norm
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Katherine Malm=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 7:26 AM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals?


  Proposed:

  If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate term move in a stock lasts only a =
few weeks, and in good markets, only a few months, why bother selecting =
portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental analysis? Returns in =
this time period are strictly based on price movement and can be =
maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume action alone.

  Thoughts pro/con?

  Katherine


- ------=_NextPart_000_00DE_01C187FD.691DC980
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>I think this is a glitch in the listserv.&nbsp; This message has =
already=20
arrived once before and was sent on the 16th.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Norm</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
  Malm</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December 16, 2001 =
7:26=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Devil's =
Advocate: Why=20
  bother with fundamentals?</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Proposed:<BR></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If a typical CANSLIM/Intermediate =
term move in a=20
  stock lasts only a few weeks, and in good markets, only a few months, =
why=20
  bother selecting portfolio candidates using any sort of fundamental =
analysis?=20
  Returns in this time period are strictly based on price movement and =
can be=20
  maximized based on technical indicators and price/volume action=20
  alone.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thoughts pro/con?</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine</DIV></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_00DE_01C187FD.691DC980--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.