Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: <camelot.homes@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:04:31 -0600
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Whither EPIQ? "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C183AC.CB56C700
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
katherine, very interesting! is this saying that cups w/o handles have a =
better return rate than w/handles? isn't this contrary to WON's =
writings? how does your own personal experience relate to this? thank =
you, david
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Katherine Malm=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification
Norm,
See my notes in bold.
In general, he is trying to match the formation to WON's criteria. =
When looking for the C&H pattern, cups had to have handles of at least =
one week to qualify. Handles had to be in upper half, but there were =
some in the study that were marginally in the upper half and included =
anyway. Cups had to be U shaped. No V shapes were included. (Guess he =
doesn't like drinking his coffee from a funnel.) Price has to have risen =
30% before the cup was formed. Cup has to take 7 to 65 weeks to form.=20
Thanks for relaying the interesting Bulkowski info. Mr. B =
definitely is on my coffee table list. I have a 'couple' of questions.
1) "Cups with higher right lips tend to outperform those with a =
higher left lip." Why would this be? Who knows? It's a mystery. But the =
differences were statistically significant.
2) "Failure rate if waited for upside B/O 5%." Is 'upside B/O' when =
it goes above the left side? B/O occurs when it breaks above the high of =
the handle. Does vol play a roll here? He did not include volume as =
criteria for B/O because removing the criteria hurt performance, but =
only slightly. He does give statistics on volume at breakout and after, =
and the volume tends to be very high. Only 5% failure with these is =
surprising. And failure is when the price falls back to the pivot? No, =
failure is when the price falls below the pivot and heads down. A =
pullback to the pivot that subsequently moves on is considered a =
"throwback" or pullback, and is not considered a failure.
This chapter alone is worth the price of the book. The ROI makes =
this investment a big winner.
Katherine
Norm
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification
> Bulkowski (Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns) gives statistics on C&H =
and cups
> w/o handles:
>=20
> C&H:
> Failure rate 26%
> Failure rate if waited for B/O 10% <<<<--------------<<<<<<<<<
> Average rise 38%, most likely 10-20%
> Cups with higher right lips tend to outperform those with a higher =
left lip.
> Avg gain 40% vs 35%.
>=20
> C w/o H (Rounding Bottoms):
> Failure rate 38%
> Failure rate if waited for upside B/O 5% =
<<<<---------------<<<<<<<<<
> Average rise 54%, most likely 20%
>=20
> Nothing on flat bases.
>=20
> Katherine
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tangen, Eric" <tangene@tycoelectronics.com>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:41 PM
> Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification
>=20
>=20
> > The 40% number is an amalgam of a number of anecdotes from a few =
different
> > sources. Its all word of mouth. No names to given protect the =
guilty.
> >
> > You can almost infer such a number from WON himself...I'd bet if =
you asked
> > the big-O-man in a seminar he'd deflect the question to point =
out how much
> > you are ahead having 1 big gain out of 2-5 trades.
> >
> >
> > ERIC TANGEN
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: camelot.homes@charter.net =
[mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:16 PM
> > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification
> >
> >
> > eric, how do you get the 40% reliability of the WON breakout? =
david frank
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tangen, Eric" <tangene@tycoelectronics.com>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:57 PM
> > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification
> >
> >
> > > Of course you are right...risk is the stop value itself...it =
is what you
> > > loose when your stop is triggered. It is what I mean but =
didn't say
> > > correctly.
> > >
> > > This is what happens when I try to communicate math =
verbally...the two
> > don't
> > > mix. :)
> > >
> > > ERIC TANGEN
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Adair [mailto:xjadair@brightok.net]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:48 PM
> > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Erick
> > > If I am reading your post right correctly you would say your =
risk
> > > on a $50
> > > stock with a $5.00 stop would be $50.00 -$5.00 or $45.00. If =
that is
> what
> > > you are saying I would not agree I would say your risk is =
$5.00 if I
> > > understand what Tharp suggests. Tharp then limits your risk to =
the 1%
> is
> > > based on that figure 1% ( 3% for the gunslinger) of your total =
capitol.
> > > John Adair
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tangen, =
Eric
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:19 PM
> > > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com'
> > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification
> > >
> > > The latter....your risk is your buy price less the stop. Rule =
of thumb:
> > that
> > > number should be 1% or less of your total trading capital. So =
if you
> want
> > in
> > > on a more volatile stock, just buy less of it...but don't set =
the stop
> at
> > > 7-8% if the stock has a 10% daily trading range - another =
point HTMMIS
> > > doesn't address.
> > >
> > > Trading any system with a 7-8% risk for each trade is a =
receipe for
> > > disaster. The pros use a 1% limit. If (as in HTMMIS suggest) =
you split
> up
> > > your capital evenly amoung 5-6 stocks and used an arbitrary =
7-8% stop
> > loss,
> > > statistically, it would be very easy to get enough losing =
trades to
> loose
> > > all your money. The unspoken 40% reliability of the WON =
breakouts only
> > makes
> > > this bad situation worse.
> > >
> > > I'm afraid that a quick reading of HTMMIS gives the impression =
that if
> you
> > > can identify the perfect C+H setup and all the other CANSLIM =
criteria
> are
> > in
> > > place, you can get darn near 100% reliability of a breakout. I =
have a
> big
> > > problem with that.
> > >
> > > I'm not down on CANSLIM...just like people to know the reality =
of the
> > > situation. Your going for home runs here and home run hitters =
have a lot
> > of
> > > strikeouts.
> > >
> > >
> > > ERIC TANGEN
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:02 PM
> > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification
> > >
> > >
> > > >>If you put 7-8% of your trading capital
> > > > at risk on any one trade
> > >
> > > Now that I've been mulling over your comment, it begs another =
question.
> > Are
> > > you suggesting the *total* monies invested in a trade are "at =
risk"? Or
> > the
> > > amount which you've specified in downside stop-loss protection =
as "at
> > > risk."?
> > >
> > > Katherine
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tangen, Eric" <tangene@tycoelectronics.com>
> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:46 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification
> > >
> > >
> > > > Welcome to the club! Breakouts are a high risk and high =
reward
> > strategy -
> > > if
> > > > you're batting .500, that's pretty darn good. You should =
expect 40%
> > > success
> > > > at finding successful breakouts long-term.
> > > >
> > > > I just have to get this off my chest for the new =
subscribers...WON's
> > 7-8%
> > > > stop below the pivot is a technical stop. It is a rule of =
thumb based
> on
> > > > volatility in the handle region before a stock takes off.
> > > >
> > > > It is NOT A MONEY MANAGEMENT STOP!. If you put 7-8% of your =
trading
> > > capital
> > > > at risk on any one trade, you will eventually pay some =
really serious
> > Wall
> > > > Street tuition on the path to becoming successful trader.
> > > >
> > > > WON's work has virtually nothing in the area of money =
management (what
> > he
> > > > does say is just plain outdated...by 5 stocks with =
100k...more
> > appropriate
> > > > to an era of high commissions and lower volatility).
> > > >
> > > > Tharp's books are the best (only?) work in this area and =
should be
> > > required
> > > > reading before you head out to the great casino that is Wall =
Street.
> > > >
> > > > ERIC TANGEN
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
>=20
>=20
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
>=20
>=20
>=20
- ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C183AC.CB56C700
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>katherine, very interesting! is this =
saying that=20
cups w/o handles have a better return rate than w/handles? isn't this =
contrary=20
to WON's writings? how does your own personal experience relate to =
this?=20
thank you, david</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
Malm</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, December 13, =
2001 7:10=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM]=20
clarification</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG>Norm,</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG>See my notes in =
bold.</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG>In general, he is trying to =
match the=20
formation to WON's criteria. When looking for the C&H pattern, =
cups had=20
to have handles of at least one week to qualify. Handles had to be =
in upper=20
half, but there were some in the study that were marginally in the =
upper=20
half and included anyway. Cups had to be U shaped. No V shapes =
were=20
included. (Guess he doesn't like drinking his coffee from a funnel.) =
Price=20
has to have risen 30% before the cup was formed. Cup has to =
take 7 to=20
65 weeks to form.</STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks for relaying the interesting Bulkowski info. Mr. B =
definitely is on my coffee table list. I have a =
'couple' of=20
questions.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1) "<FONT color=3D#0000ff>Cups with higher right lips tend to =
outperform=20
those with a higher left lip." </FONT>Why would this be? =
<STRONG>Who=20
knows? It's a mystery. But the differences were statistically=20
significant.</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV>2) "<FONT color=3D#0000ff>Failure rate if waited for upside B/O =
5%." </FONT>Is 'upside B/O' when it goes above the left side?=20
<STRONG>B/O occurs when it breaks above the high of the=20
handle.</STRONG> Does vol play a roll here? <STRONG>He did not =
include=20
volume as criteria for B/O because removing the =
criteria hurt=20
performance, but only slightly.</STRONG> <STRONG>He =
does give=20
statistics on volume at breakout and after, and the volume tends to =
be very=20
high.</STRONG> Only 5% failure with these is surprising. And =
failure=20
is when the price falls back to the pivot? <STRONG>No, failure is =
when the=20
price falls below the pivot and heads down. A pullback to the pivot =
that=20
subsequently moves on is considered a "throwback" or pullback, and =
is not=20
considered a failure.</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>This chapter alone is worth the price of the book. The =
ROI=20
makes this investment a big winner.</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>Katherine</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>Norm<BR></DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message -----=20
<DIV>From: "Katherine Malm" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">kmalm@earthlink.net</A>></DIV>
<DIV>To: <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
></DIV>
<DIV>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:18 PM</DIV>
<DIV>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>> Bulkowski (Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns) gives =
statistics on C&H and cups<BR>> w/o handles:<BR>> <BR>> =
C&H:<BR>> Failure rate 26%<BR>> Failure rate if waited for =
B/O 10%=20
=
<<<<--------------<<<<<<<<<<BR>>=
;=20
Average rise 38%, most likely 10-20%<BR>> Cups with higher right =
lips=20
tend to outperform those with a higher left lip.<BR>> Avg gain =
40% vs=20
35%.<BR>> <BR>> C w/o H (Rounding Bottoms):<BR>> Failure =
rate=20
38%<BR>> Failure rate if waited for upside B/O 5%=20
=
<<<<---------------<<<<<<<<<<BR>&g=
t;=20
Average rise 54%, most likely 20%<BR>> <BR>> Nothing on flat=20
bases.<BR>> <BR>> Katherine<BR>> ----- Original Message=20
-----<BR>> From: "Tangen, Eric" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:tangene@tycoelectronics.com">tangene@tycoelectronics.com</=
A>><BR>>=20
To: <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
><BR>>=20
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:41 PM<BR>> Subject: RE: =
[CANSLIM]=20
clarification<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> > The 40% number is an =
amalgam of=20
a number of anecdotes from a few different<BR>> > sources. Its =
all=20
word of mouth. No names to given protect the guilty.<BR>> =
><BR>>=20
> You can almost infer such a number from WON himself...I'd bet =
if you=20
asked<BR>> > the big-O-man in a seminar he'd deflect the =
question to=20
point out how much<BR>> > you are ahead having 1 big gain out =
of 2-5=20
trades.<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > ERIC TANGEN<BR>>=20
><BR>> > -----Original Message-----<BR>> > From: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net">camelot.homes@charter.net</A>=20
[mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net]<BR>> > Sent: Wednesday, =
December=20
12, 2001 9:16 PM<BR>> > To: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
<BR>>=20
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> ><BR>> =
><BR>>=20
> eric, how do you get the 40% reliability of the WON breakout? =
david=20
frank<BR>> > ----- Original Message -----<BR>> > From: =
"Tangen,=20
Eric" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:tangene@tycoelectronics.com">tangene@tycoelectronics.com</=
A>><BR>>=20
> To: <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
><BR>>=20
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:57 PM<BR>> > =
Subject: RE:=20
[CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > > =
Of=20
course you are right...risk is the stop value itself...it is what=20
you<BR>> > > loose when your stop is triggered. It is what =
I mean=20
but didn't say<BR>> > > correctly.<BR>> > =
><BR>> >=20
> This is what happens when I try to communicate math =
verbally...the=20
two<BR>> > don't<BR>> > > mix. :)<BR>> > =
><BR>>=20
> > ERIC TANGEN<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> =
>=20
><BR>> > > -----Original Message-----<BR>> > > =
From:=20
John Adair [mailto:xjadair@brightok.net]<BR>> > > Sent: =
Wednesday,=20
December 12, 2001 8:48 PM<BR>> > > To: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
<BR>>=20
> > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> > =
><BR>>=20
> ><BR>> > > Hi Erick<BR>> > > If I am =
reading your=20
post right correctly you would say your risk<BR>> > > =
on a=20
$50<BR>> > > stock with a $5.00 stop would be $50.00 =
- -$5.00=20
or $45.00. If that is<BR>> what<BR>> > > you are =
saying I=20
would not agree I would say your risk is $5.00 if I<BR>> =
> >=20
understand what Tharp suggests. Tharp then limits your risk to =
the=20
1%<BR>> is<BR>> > > based on that figure 1% ( 3% for the =
gunslinger) of your total capitol.<BR>> > > John=20
Adair<BR>> > ><BR>> > > -----Original =
Message-----<BR>>=20
> > From: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner-canslim@lists.xmis=
sion.com</A><BR>>=20
> > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of =
Tangen,=20
Eric<BR>> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:19 =
PM<BR>>=20
> > To: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:'canslim@lists.xmission.com'">'canslim@lists.xmission.com'=
</A><BR>>=20
> > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> > =
><BR>>=20
> > The latter....your risk is your buy price less the stop. =
Rule of=20
thumb:<BR>> > that<BR>> > > number should be 1% or =
less of=20
your total trading capital. So if you<BR>> want<BR>> > =
in<BR>>=20
> > on a more volatile stock, just buy less of it...but don't =
set the=20
stop<BR>> at<BR>> > > 7-8% if the stock has a 10% daily =
trading=20
range - another point HTMMIS<BR>> > > doesn't =
address.<BR>> >=20
><BR>> > > Trading any system with a 7-8% risk for each =
trade is=20
a receipe for<BR>> > > disaster. The pros use a 1% limit. =
If (as in=20
HTMMIS suggest) you split<BR>> up<BR>> > > your capital =
evenly=20
amoung 5-6 stocks and used an arbitrary 7-8% stop<BR>> > =
loss,<BR>>=20
> > statistically, it would be very easy to get enough losing =
trades=20
to<BR>> loose<BR>> > > all your money. The unspoken 40%=20
reliability of the WON breakouts only<BR>> > makes<BR>> =
> >=20
this bad situation worse.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > I'm =
afraid=20
that a quick reading of HTMMIS gives the impression that if<BR>>=20
you<BR>> > > can identify the perfect C+H setup and all the =
other=20
CANSLIM criteria<BR>> are<BR>> > in<BR>> > > =
place, you=20
can get darn near 100% reliability of a breakout. I have a<BR>>=20
big<BR>> > > problem with that.<BR>> > ><BR>> =
> >=20
I'm not down on CANSLIM...just like people to know the reality of=20
the<BR>> > > situation. Your going for home runs here and =
home run=20
hitters have a lot<BR>> > of<BR>> > > =
strikeouts.<BR>>=20
> ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > ERIC TANGEN<BR>> =
>=20
><BR>> > > -----Original Message-----<BR>> > > =
From:=20
Katherine Malm [mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net]<BR>> > > Sent:=20
Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:02 PM<BR>> > > To: <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
<BR>>=20
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> > =
><BR>>=20
> ><BR>> > > >>If you put 7-8% of your trading=20
capital<BR>> > > > at risk on any one trade<BR>> > =
><BR>> > > Now that I've been mulling over your comment, =
it begs=20
another question.<BR>> > Are<BR>> > > you suggesting =
the=20
*total* monies invested in a trade are "at risk"? Or<BR>> >=20
the<BR>> > > amount which you've specified in downside =
stop-loss=20
protection as "at<BR>> > > risk."?<BR>> > =
><BR>> >=20
> Katherine<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > =
- -----=20
Original Message -----<BR>> > > From: "Tangen, Eric" <<A =
=
href=3D"mailto:tangene@tycoelectronics.com">tangene@tycoelectronics.com</=
A>><BR>>=20
> > To: <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
><BR>>=20
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:46 PM<BR>> > =
>=20
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] clarification<BR>> > ><BR>> >=20
><BR>> > > > Welcome to the club! Breakouts are a =
high risk=20
and high reward<BR>> > strategy -<BR>> > > if<BR>> =
>=20
> > you're batting .500, that's pretty darn good. You should =
expect=20
40%<BR>> > > success<BR>> > > > at finding =
successful=20
breakouts long-term.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > I =
just=20
have to get this off my chest for the new =
subscribers...WON's<BR>> >=20
7-8%<BR>> > > > stop below the pivot is a technical =
stop. It is=20
a rule of thumb based<BR>> on<BR>> > > > volatility =
in the=20
handle region before a stock takes off.<BR>> > > =
><BR>> >=20
> > It is NOT A MONEY MANAGEMENT STOP!. If you put 7-8% of =
your=20
trading<BR>> > > capital<BR>> > > > at risk on =
any one=20
trade, you will eventually pay some really serious<BR>> > =
Wall<BR>>=20
> > > Street tuition on the path to becoming successful=20
trader.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > WON's work has =
virtually nothing in the area of money management (what<BR>> > =
he<BR>> > > > does say is just plain outdated...by 5 =
stocks with=20
100k...more<BR>> > appropriate<BR>> > > > to an =
era of=20
high commissions and lower volatility).<BR>> > > =
><BR>> >=20
> > Tharp's books are the best (only?) work in this area and =
should=20
be<BR>> > > required<BR>> > > > reading before =
you head=20
out to the great casino that is Wall Street.<BR>> > > =
><BR>>=20
> > > ERIC TANGEN<BR>> > ><BR>> > =
><BR>> >=20
><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To =
subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20
"<A =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> =
> >=20
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your =
email.<BR>> >=20
><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To =
subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20
"<A =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> =
> >=20
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your =
email.<BR>> >=20
><BR>> > ><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To=20
subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> =
> >=20
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your =
email.<BR>> >=20
><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To =
subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20
"<A =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> =
> >=20
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your =
email.<BR>>=20
><BR>> ><BR>> > -<BR>> > -To =
subscribe/unsubscribe,=20
email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> >=20
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your =
email.<BR>>=20
><BR>> > -<BR>> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email =
"<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
;=20
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> >=20
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your =
email.<BR>>=20
<BR>> <BR>> -<BR>> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=
; -In=20
the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> -"unsubscribe=20
canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> <BR>> =
<BR>>=20
</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C183AC.CB56C700--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Whither EPIQ? "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]