Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base


From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:29:25 EST

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Leader's List "Tim Fisher"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals? "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Kent:

     This is just my opinion, and perhaps I should just let it go, but it 
really seems an unfair demand that you ask from Katherine. 

    I believe Katherine has already made her MANY analyses "meaningful".  In 
my opinion, if you have a specific query (rather than relying on the 
all-encompassing "meaningful") then you should ask it.

jans


In a message dated 12/10/2001 2:48:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
kent_norman@yahoo.com writes:

<< Thanks Katherine 
 You are putting some flesh on the bones. Makes it more
 meaningful >>

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Leader's List "Tim Fisher"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals? "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.