From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals?
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:40:20 -0600
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Whither EPIQ? "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Good points, jans. I suppose in a market where everyone is worried that the rally will end at any moment, the fear and greed cycle gets compressed. And yes, I believe fund managers add to the cycles, they are, afterall, human and they are driven by performance review objectives if they are to generate their year-end bonuses. Too bad it'll only be $2million this year instead of the usual $10million. Sniff, sniff, get me a Kleenex, will you? Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: <Spencer48@aol.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Devil's Advocate: Why bother with fundamentals? > Katherine: > > You put it in a nutshell: Technicals are a proxy for human psychology. > Overbought/Oversold indicators imply that. But then, one can wonder: why do > OB/OS work one time but not another. Because , I believe, human action is > based, at least in the stock market, on two things: Greed and Fear. So, why > the parabolic going up: Because stock pickers are greedy. And why the > parabolic going down: Because no one wants to be left holding the bag. > > Thus when INVN made it's explosive parabolic assault to the top, it was > logical: Pickers didn't want to be left lingering on the ground (even those > who don't know what "tomography technology" is). They were greedy, thus, the > rise. As a matter of fact, Tom's alert that once an LLUR changes angles one > should be wary of holding that stock suggests that. As does one of WON's > selling points, when he advises to sell if the stock makes a Very Prominent > one day move (ie, it moves more-percentage wise-in one day than it has in 1 > month). > > What would be interesting would be to see if fund managers are also > caught up in the Greed/Fear dichotomy. And are they actually caught up in > those two emotions, or are they just trying to exploit them? > > jans > > > In a message dated 12/19/2001 11:55:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, > kmalm@earthlink.net writes: > > << My gut feel on this is that technicals are a > proxies for human action and reaction. In *most* cases, we can assume that > people will react a certain way in a given circumstance. For example, when a > stock in an underlying uptrend moves away from the intermediate term trend > and starts to go too far too fast, we assume that there will be some people > who will perceive it as "going too far too fast" and sell it or short it. > That action brings the stock back to the underlying intermediate term trend. > But nothing has changed fundamentally about the company in this short time > period. It's just perception about price and the resulting supply/demand. > > But every once and a while, these things confound us. Just look at INVN > recently. Did it make sense that it went parabolic? I don't think so. Did it > continue to go up in price *despite* the fact that early in that parabolic > rise we thought the probability that it could continue the move for another > week was very low? >> > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Whither EPIQ? "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]