From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 20:16:07 EST
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Whither EPIQ? Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Kent:
I'd like to blame the E-mail system's recent anomolous behavior for my
unfortunate reply-but in truth I just didn't read your E-mail correctly.
Please accept my apologies for an intemperate response.
jans
In a message dated 12/19/2001 4:00:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
kmalm@earthlink.net writes:
<< Hah...8 days later, this may well have been cleared up. But I think Kent
was
saying that "the analysis *did* make it more meaningful", not "please make
your analysis more meaningful."
I would blame this sort of thing on email communication, but it happens in
real life when people are talking one on one!
Katherine
----- Original Message -----
From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
> Kent:
>
> This is just my opinion, and perhaps I should just let it go, but it
> really seems an unfair demand that you ask from Katherine.
>
> I believe Katherine has already made her MANY analyses "meaningful".
In
> my opinion, if you have a specific query (rather than relying on the
> all-encompassing "meaningful") then you should ask it.
>
> jans
>
>
> In a message dated 12/10/2001 2:48:19 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> kent_norman@yahoo.com writes:
>
> << Thanks Katherine
> You are putting some flesh on the bones. Makes it more
> meaningful >>
> >>
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Whither EPIQ? Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]