From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TOL
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 07:10:55 -0600
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] TOL "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] TOL "J. David Stem"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] TOL "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0485_01C18925.77A6CD20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable High Dave, It looks to me as though TOL broke out on 12/12. But in truth, I have a = hard time believing the homebuilders have enough oomph left in them to = go much further; TOL, in particular, since it specializes in high end = homes. If you look back on the industry, the real run is behind them. It = started when the Fed started easing, and this is a typical reaction for = the group. Also, it is common for interest rate sensitive groups such as = homebuilders to lead out of a bear market. They often mark the = transition from bear to new bull. It has been a bit confounding, = however, as they seemed to have done well *while* the bear was going on. = (I suppose a false signal with respect to timing.) I was puzzled when = they fell apart earlier this summer. But this current run is = corresponding more directly with other economic indicators such as an = apparent bottoming in economically sensitive commodities, etc., and = seems to point to a transitional period in the market. All in all, I'd say my conclusion would be to keep from taking any = *risky* entries on the homebuilders. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: J. David Stem=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:01 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] TOL Going through DGO, the stock TOL stood out to me... low PE, 36 M = shares, A's across the board. 97 EPS, 83 RS. It's just broken out of a = cup on very strong volume, yet, alas, there's no handle. Anyone have = any thoughts/experience with patterns of this sort? Dave - ------=_NextPart_000_0485_01C18925.77A6CD20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV>High Dave,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>It looks to me as though TOL broke out on 12/12. But in truth, I = have a=20 hard time believing the homebuilders have enough oomph left in them to = go much=20 further; TOL, in particular, since it specializes in high end homes. If = you look=20 back on the industry, the real run is behind them. It started when the = Fed=20 started easing, and this is a typical reaction for the group. Also, it = is common=20 for interest rate sensitive groups such as homebuilders to lead out of a = bear=20 market. They often mark the transition from bear to new bull. It has = been a bit=20 confounding, however, as they seemed to have done well *while* the bear = was=20 going on. (I suppose a false signal with respect to timing.) I was = puzzled when=20 they fell apart earlier this summer. But this current run is = corresponding more=20 directly with other economic indicators such as an apparent bottoming in = economically sensitive commodities, etc., and seems to point to a = transitional=20 period in the market.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>All in all, I'd say my conclusion would be to keep from taking any = *risky*=20 entries on the homebuilders.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Katherine</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Djdavidstem@msn.com href=3D"mailto:jdavidstem@msn.com">J. = David Stem</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, December 20, = 2001 12:01=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] TOL</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Going through DGO, the stock TOL = stood out to=20 me... low PE, 36 M shares, A's across the board. 97 EPS, 83 = RS. =20 It's just broken out of a cup on very strong volume, yet, alas, = there's no=20 handle</FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>. Anyone have any=20 thoughts/experience with patterns of this sort?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial = size=3D2>Dave</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0485_01C18925.77A6CD20-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] TOL "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] TOL "J. David Stem"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] TOL "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]