Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base


From: Kent Norman <kent_norman@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 06:25:54 -0800 (PST)

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Industry analysis technique/tools? Was: Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Norman"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] Industry analysis technique/tools? Was: Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "John Adair"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Jans

Thanks for the apologie, but I did not take offense. I
did not even read the reply. My mail box was getting
full and I cleared many messages without reading.

I did intend it to be a complement.

Sorry for any confusion.
Kent Norman

- --- Spencer48@aol.com wrote:
> Kent:  
> 
>      I'd like to blame the E-mail system's recent
> anomolous behavior for my 
> unfortunate reply-but in truth I just didn't read
> your E-mail correctly.   
> 
>      Please accept my apologies for an intemperate
> response.
> 
> jans 
> 
> 
> In a message dated 12/19/2001 4:00:48 PM Eastern
> Standard Time, 
> kmalm@earthlink.net writes:
> 
> << Hah...8 days later, this may well have been
> cleared up. But I think Kent 
> was
>  saying that "the analysis *did* make it more
> meaningful", not "please make
>  your analysis more meaningful."
>  
>  I would blame this sort of thing on email
> communication, but it happens in
>  real life when people are talking one on one!
>  
>  Katherine
>  
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
>  To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
>  Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:29 PM
>  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts - return to base
>  
>  
>  > Kent:
>  >
>  >      This is just my opinion, and perhaps I
> should just let it go, but it
>  > really seems an unfair demand that you ask from
> Katherine.
>  >
>  >     I believe Katherine has already made her MANY
> analyses "meaningful".
>  In
>  > my opinion, if you have a specific query (rather
> than relying on the
>  > all-encompassing "meaningful") then you should
> ask it.
>  >
>  > jans
>  >
>  >
>  > In a message dated 12/10/2001 2:48:19 PM Eastern
> Standard Time,
>  > kent_norman@yahoo.com writes:
>  >
>  > << Thanks Katherine
>  >  You are putting some flesh on the bones. Makes
> it more
>  >  meaningful >>
>  > >>
> 
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email
> "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your
email.


=====
Opportunities always look bigger going than coming.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Industry analysis technique/tools? Was: Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Norman"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] Industry analysis technique/tools? Was: Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "John Adair"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.