Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Winner Check


From: "Dave Squires" <dcsquires1@home.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Winner Check
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:29:09 -0600

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] stacking the odds in my favor-buying before the pivot point "Dave Squires"
Previous Article (by Author): AW: [CANSLIM] stacking the odds in my favor-buying before the pivot point Andreas Himmelreich
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01C18A0A.53694B00
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

For me it is a question of time frame. If I am taking an intermediate =
time frame trade I will use IT time frame stops and trails. So even =
though the stock is showing a light volume breakout I don't want to lose =
any of my position until I get a signal on the daily or maybe 60-min =
time frame (i.e. stock dropping on volume, not moving on volume or =
effortlessly recrossing the pivot). In my experience, many light volume =
breakouts confirm the next day if they are good breakouts. It took 2 =
days with MGAM. I think your rule is just as good for someone that is =
very risk adverse.=20

DSquires
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Dan Forant=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:15 AM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Winner Check


  What about selling an iffy stock 1/3 of the position with gains, then =
if a severe pullback occurs to the stop, the loss is far less.

  DanF
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Katherine Malm=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:38 AM
    Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Winner Check


    Hi Dave,

    Thanks for the great charts...so helpful to see this while working =
through your example. I like that you've shown how you manage the risk =
when there's a low volume breakout, in fact it seems it'd be a great =
guideline to put into every CANSLIMers bag of tricks. I've learned =
through trial by fire that 7-8% is a sucker's number if applied in all =
cases. Eric T has also mentioned this same point in several of his =
discussions. I can remember at the IBD seminars hearing both Bryan and =
Gil mention that they can tell immediately if something is going to work =
or not, that meant that they were often out of the buy long before the =
7-8% rule kicked in. Here, you've given a great way to identify this =
very phenomenon. Thanks.

    Katherine
      ----- Original Message -----=20
      From: Dave Squires=20
      To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
      Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:51 AM
      Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Winner Check


      Hi Katherine,

      I would agree 10/24 was a confirming move but if you were strictly =
applying CS technicals you would not have been in the stock on the BO =
and buying the all time high with the recommended WON stop leaves you as =
a sitting duck. I say this because the handle breakout came at the end =
of the day and it was very clear the volume numbers were not going to be =
met. If I end up in a light volume breakout I view it as high risk and =
immediately pull my stop up to 4% and give the stock 2-3 days to confirm =
price with volume. That's exactly what I would have done in this case IF =
it was an early BO that didn't meet the volume numbers by days end. In =
this case it was clearly not even close so why risk it. So again IBD is =
putting its own self interest ahead of the interest of new CANSLIMers by =
showing clear rule violations and making them fell dumb in the process.=20

      DSquires



        ----- Original Message -----=20
        From: Katherine Malm=20
        To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
        Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:38 AM
        Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Winner Check


        Hi Tom,

        I'd have to disagree on MGAM. It started correcting 7/5 at =
23.10. Began a C&H formation, then started a handle 10/10 at 20.45. Just =
where you'd want to see it, within a certain percent of the old high. =
The handle drifted lower, but volume was a little mixed, I'd attribute =
that to "M." It didn't form a "perfect" B/O, as it drifted up a couple =
of days on low volume (again "M" getting its legs played a part), but =
the B/O on 10/24 on volume was a confirming move. That's a 66% move out =
of the breakout with, so far, good P/V action in the upmove, decent =
fundamentals, and a confirming industry group move.

        Katherine
          ----- Original Message -----=20
          From: Tom Worley=20
          To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
          Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:24 AM
          Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] IBD Winner Check


          Earl, I don't think you need to lower your standards, I thing =
IBD needs to quit telling us about all the missed opportunities after =
the fact!

          Most of these "winners" could not have been bought / caught =
using WON rules for CANSLIM. As just one example, MGAM is a huge gainer, =
but to have achieved the best return on it, you had to buy off the one =
week base at 20, where the breakout that started the run was below ADV. =
That's hardly a "valid" entry point, and it's the best I see since it =
bottomed.

          Your only other choice on most of these was guessing where it =
bottomed, then playing it on a pure momentum aspect. That's not CANSLIM =
either.=20

          I would welcome the day when IBD starts analyzing CURRENT =
chart patterns, and pointing out to us dummies things we should be =
seeing NOW!

          Tom Worley
          stkguru@netside.net
          AIM: TexWorley

            ----- Original Message -----=20
            From: esetser=20
            To: canslim@xmission.com=20
            Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 12:27 AM
            Subject: [CANSLIM] IBD Winner Check


            Did anyone else notice that the IBD called out some winners =
to show that
            this market isn't so bad after all?  This was in Wed Big =
Picture, and I
            took some time to see what I've been missing.  The stocks =
mentioned were
            examples of breakouts that IBD says "a growing contingent =
(of stocks) is
            acting fine."

            The list was:

            AZO
            BBI
            BPRX
            CACI
            DYII
            GNSS
            GTK
            ITRI
            JAKK
            KRON
            LOW
            MCAF
            MIKE
            MGAM
            PECS

            I looked through the stocks and found very few that I would =
have purchased.
             Maybe I need to lower my standards?  There were some =
strange
            characteristics: Group Strength D, 4 week base, EPS=3D51, =
several stocks with
            only the last quarter with good earnings growth, one stock =
that gapped from
            the low of it's base to a new 52 week high in one day (nice =
right side of
            the cliff, er CUP?), etc.  Overall, out of these 15 stocks, =
I only saw
            maybe 3 or 4 that I would have considered at the time.  In =
fact, I think
            the stocks we have seen failing would generally look much =
better to me that
            these.  Anyone want to take a look and see if they agree?
            =20

            -
            -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
            -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
            -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01C18A0A.53694B00
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For me it is a question of time frame. =
If I am=20
taking an intermediate time frame trade I will use IT time frame stops =
and=20
trails. So even though the stock is showing a light volume breakout I =
don't want=20
to lose any of my position until I get a signal on the daily or maybe =
60-min=20
time frame (i.e. stock dropping on volume, not moving on volume or =
effortlessly=20
recrossing the pivot). In my experience, many light volume breakouts =
confirm the=20
next day if they are good breakouts. It took 2 days with MGAM. I think =
your rule=20
is just as good for someone that is very risk adverse. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>DSquires</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Ddforant1@nycap.rr.com =
href=3D"mailto:dforant1@nycap.rr.com">Dan=20
  Forant</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, December 21, 2001 =
10:15=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] IBD =
Winner=20
  Check</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>What about selling an iffy stock 1/3 =
of the=20
  position with gains, then if a severe pullback occurs to&nbsp;the =
stop, the=20
  loss is far less.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>DanF</FONT></DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
    Malm</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, December 21, =
2001 10:38=20
    AM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] IBD =
Winner=20
    Check</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV>Hi Dave,</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>Thanks for the great charts...so helpful to see this while =
working=20
    through your example. I like that you've shown how you manage the =
risk when=20
    there's a low volume breakout, in fact it seems it'd be a great =
guideline to=20
    put into every CANSLIMers bag of tricks. I've learned through trial =
by fire=20
    that 7-8% is a sucker's number if applied in all cases. Eric T has =
also=20
    mentioned this same point in several of his discussions. I can =
remember at=20
    the IBD seminars hearing both Bryan and Gil mention that they can =
tell=20
    immediately if something is going to work or not, that meant that =
they were=20
    often out of the buy long before the 7-8% rule kicked in. Here, =
you've given=20
    a great way to identify this very phenomenon. Thanks.</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>Katherine</DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
    style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
      <DIV=20
      style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
      <A title=3Ddcsquires1@home.com =
href=3D"mailto:dcsquires1@home.com">Dave=20
      Squires</A> </DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
      title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
      =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
      </DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, December 21, =
2001 8:51=20
      AM</DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] IBD =
Winner=20
      Check</DIV>
      <DIV><BR></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi Katherine,</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I would agree 10/24 was a =
confirming move but=20
      if you were strictly applying CS technicals you would not have=20
      been&nbsp;in the stock on the BO and buying the all time high with =
the=20
      recommended WON stop leaves you as a sitting duck. I say this =
because the=20
      handle breakout came at the end of the day and it was very clear =
the=20
      volume numbers were not going to be met. If I end up in a light =
volume=20
      breakout I view it as high risk and immediately pull my stop up to =
4% and=20
      give the stock 2-3 days to confirm price with volume. That's =
exactly what=20
      I would have done in this case IF it was an early BO that didn't =
meet the=20
      volume numbers by days end. In this case it was clearly not even =
close so=20
      why risk it. So again IBD is putting its own self interest ahead =
of the=20
      interest of new CANSLIMers by showing clear rule violations and =
making=20
      them fell dumb in the process. </FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>DSquires</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
      style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
        <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
        <DIV=20
        style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
        <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
        Malm</A> </DIV>
        <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
        title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
        =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
        </DIV>
        <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December =
02, 2001=20
        11:38 AM</DIV>
        <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
IBD Winner=20
        Check</DIV>
        <DIV><BR></DIV>
        <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi Tom,</FONT></DIV>
        <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
        <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'd have to disagree on MGAM. =
It started=20
        correcting 7/5 at 23.10. Began a C&amp;H formation, then started =
a=20
        handle 10/10 at 20.45. Just where you'd want to see it, within a =
certain=20
        percent of the old high. The handle drifted lower, but volume =
was a=20
        little mixed, I'd attribute that to "M." It didn't form a =
"perfect" B/O,=20
        as it drifted up a couple of days on low volume (again "M" =
getting its=20
        legs played a part), but the B/O on 10/24 on volume was a =
confirming=20
        move. That's a 66% move out of the breakout with, so far, good =
P/V=20
        action in the upmove, decent fundamentals, and a confirming =
industry=20
        group move.</FONT></DIV>
        <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
        <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine</FONT></DIV>
        <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
        style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
          <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
          <DIV=20
          style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
          <A title=3Dstkguru@netside.net =
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@netside.net">Tom=20
          Worley</A> </DIV>
          <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
          title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
          =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
          </DIV>
          <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, December =
02, 2001=20
          11:24 AM</DIV>
          <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
IBD Winner=20
          Check</DIV>
          <DIV><BR></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Earl, I don't think you need to lower your =

          standards, I thing IBD needs to quit telling us about all the =
missed=20
          opportunities after the fact!</FONT></DIV>
          <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
          <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Most of these "winners" could not have =
been bought /=20
          caught using WON rules for CANSLIM. As just one example, MGAM =
is a=20
          huge gainer, but to have achieved the best return on it, you =
had to=20
          buy off the one week base at 20, where the breakout that =
started the=20
          run was below ADV. That's hardly a "valid" entry point, and =
it's the=20
          best I see since it bottomed.</FONT></DIV>
          <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
          <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Your only other choice on most of these =
was guessing=20
          where it bottomed, then playing it on a pure momentum aspect. =
That's=20
          not CANSLIM either. </FONT></DIV>
          <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
          <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I would welcome the day when IBD starts =
analyzing=20
          CURRENT chart patterns, and pointing out to us dummies things =
we=20
          should be seeing NOW!</FONT></DIV>
          <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
          <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20
          =
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@netside.net">stkguru@netside.net</A><BR>AIM:=20
          TexWorley<BR></DIV>
          <BLOCKQUOTE=20
          style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
            <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
            <DIV=20
            style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
            <A title=3Desetser@covad.net=20
            href=3D"mailto:esetser@covad.net">esetser</A> </DIV>
            <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
            title=3Dcanslim@xmission.com=20
            =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@xmission.com">canslim@xmission.com</A> </DIV>
            <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, =
December 01,=20
            2001 12:27 AM</DIV>
            <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] =
IBD Winner=20
            Check</DIV>
            <DIV><BR></DIV>Did anyone else notice that the IBD called =
out some=20
            winners to show that<BR>this market isn't so bad after =
all?&nbsp;=20
            This was in Wed Big Picture, and I<BR>took some time to see =
what=20
            I've been missing.&nbsp; The stocks mentioned =
were<BR>examples of=20
            breakouts that IBD says "a growing contingent (of stocks)=20
            is<BR>acting fine."<BR><BR>The list=20
            =
was:<BR><BR>AZO<BR>BBI<BR>BPRX<BR>CACI<BR>DYII<BR>GNSS<BR>GTK<BR>ITRI<BR>=
JAKK<BR>KRON<BR>LOW<BR>MCAF<BR>MIKE<BR>MGAM<BR>PECS<BR><BR>I=20
            looked through the stocks and found very few that I would =
have=20
            purchased.<BR>&nbsp;Maybe I need to lower my =
standards?&nbsp; There=20
            were some strange<BR>characteristics: Group Strength D, 4 =
week base,=20
            EPS=3D51, several stocks with<BR>only the last quarter with =
good=20
            earnings growth, one stock that gapped from<BR>the low of =
it's base=20
            to a new 52 week high in one day (nice right side of<BR>the =
cliff,=20
            er CUP?), etc.&nbsp; Overall, out of these 15 stocks, I only =

            saw<BR>maybe 3 or 4 that I would have considered at the =
time.&nbsp;=20
            In fact, I think<BR>the stocks we have seen failing would =
generally=20
            look much better to me that<BR>these.&nbsp; Anyone want to =
take a=20
            look and see if they agree?<BR>&nbsp;<BR><BR>-<BR>-To=20
            subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
            =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
=20
            the email body, write "subscribe canslim" =
or<BR>-"unsubscribe=20
            canslim".&nbsp; Do not use quotes in your=20
        =
email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOT=
E></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_00A8_01C18A0A.53694B00--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] stacking the odds in my favor-buying before the pivot point "Dave Squires"
Previous Article (by Author): AW: [CANSLIM] stacking the odds in my favor-buying before the pivot point Andreas Himmelreich
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.