Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best?

From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best?
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:07:12 -0600

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best? SKutney@aol.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Industry analysis technique/tools? Was: Point of View: Why bother with fundamentals? "Jerry Sparrow"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best? SKutney@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best? Warren Keuffel
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0170_01C18A28.C91E0FC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>>BAB ranking

Sorry Steve, you lost me on this one!?

Katherine
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: SKutney@aol.com=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:21 PM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best?


  I get IBD delivered to my home. As a subscriber I get to use the =
charts that are found=20
  on investors.com. I've tried QP and Dailygraphs and as a retail =
investor who owns at most about 5 stocks I don't see a reason to spend =
the extra money on QP plus or DG. You do get a few advanages with those =
products but I would like to know if anyone honestly thinks the added =
function is worth the price. When I tried QP I thought that the moving =
average functions were real nice but the volume bars were
  too small. CANSLIM is volume based. I'm not sure  how High Growth =
Stocks establishes their picks but if you  take the newpaper and combine =
the RS and EPS rank plus BAB ranking I think your going to get a =
similiar list.  With DG the big advantage is the condensed information =
that is directly CANSLIM related. That all comes at a price which I =
would think requires that your account be of some size. Mutual fund data =
is real valuable for 401K accounts and you don't get that with just DG. =
It really requires the newspaper plus DG. The bigest advantage that I =
see with these charting packages is the ability to place groups of =
stocks in lists. This way the short term trader can scan large groups of =
stocks in order to establish a buy list.

  Steve Kutney=20



- ------=_NextPart_000_0170_01C18A28.C91E0FC0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>&gt;&gt;<FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2>BAB =
ranking</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Sorry Steve, you lost me on this one!?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Katherine</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3DSKutney@aol.com =
href=3D"mailto:SKutney@aol.com">SKutney@aol.com</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, December 21, 2001 =
1:21=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Which =
software is=20
  best?</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT color=3D#000080 =
size=3D2>I get IBD=20
  delivered to my home. As a subscriber I get to use the charts that are =
found=20
  <BR>on investors.com. I've tried QP and Dailygraphs and as a retail =
investor=20
  who owns at most about 5 stocks I don't see a reason to spend the =
extra money=20
  on QP plus or DG. You do get a few advanages with those products but I =
would=20
  like to know if anyone honestly thinks the added function is worth the =
price.=20
  When I tried QP I thought that the moving average functions were real =
nice but=20
  the volume bars were<BR>too small. CANSLIM is volume based. I'm not =
sure&nbsp;=20
  how High Growth Stocks establishes their picks but if you&nbsp; take =
the=20
  newpaper and combine the RS and EPS rank plus BAB ranking I think your =
going=20
  to get a similiar list.&nbsp; With DG the big advantage is the =
condensed=20
  information that is directly CANSLIM related. That all comes at a =
price which=20
  I would think requires that your account be of some size. Mutual fund =
data is=20
  real valuable for 401K accounts and you don't get that with just DG. =
It really=20
  requires the newspaper plus DG. The bigest advantage that I see with =
these=20
  charting packages is the ability to place groups of stocks in lists. =
This way=20
  the short term trader can scan large groups of stocks in order to =
establish a=20
  buy list.<BR><BR>Steve Kutney =
<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0170_01C18A28.C91E0FC0--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.