Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best?

From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best?
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 07:42:45 -0500
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] TOL "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] TOL "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best? "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C18ABC.3ED95600
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

When DGO first started in beta testing, I was excited. I had used the DG =
books for many years, but this was far better. At least limited data on =
all stocks, and for those in the books, daily updates of data and price =
chart. There were some bugs and glitches in the software, and I and =
others enthusiastically found more. DGO wanted a good system, and with =
our frequent feedback kept it in beta for nearly a year. During that =
time, I made my first run on EPIQ (70% gain), which paid for about five =
years of DGO once it went subscription. While EPIQ was not in the books =
at the time, I am not sure I would have bought it without DGO beta =
information. So I feel like I am still subscribing for free.

The dollar value of my investments does not justify the high cost ($535 =
per annum) of DGO, or some other services that I pay for. But I am =
investing in a very difficult part of the industry, and want tools with =
which I am comfortable and trust. The Custom Screens now being offered =
in beta should considerably enhance the functionality of DGO, altho to =
date that has not contributed significantly to me finding good (new) =
candidates (partially my fault, no time to experiment with it). I still =
do my best mining at CBS Marketwatch (for free!!).

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM: TexWorley

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: SKutney@aol.com=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 7:32 AM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Which software is best?


  Katherine,

     Thanks for your comments. You make a good point about the editors =
of IBD
  and the bad round trip on a stock paying for the cost of the graphing =
package. In Fridays "Investors Corner" they did a real nice analysis of =
RMD's failed breakout and why the stock was flawed based on an analysis =
of a weekly chart. The problem is that they featured RMD in the "Stock =
in the News" section many times in the past several months. In those =
"Stocks in the News" features they commented that the =
accumulation/distribution ranking was "C".  At the time of the failed =
breakout the ranking turned to a "B" which should have made it =
acceptable. I lost about 8% on that this stock.

  Steve Kutney=20

- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C18ABC.3ED95600
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>When DGO first started in beta testing, I was =
excited. I had=20
used the DG books for many years, but this was far better. At least =
limited data=20
on all stocks, and for those in the books, daily updates of data and =
price=20
chart. There were some bugs and glitches in the software, and I and =
others=20
enthusiastically found more. DGO wanted a good system, and with our =
frequent=20
feedback kept it in beta for nearly a year. During that time, I made my =
first=20
run on EPIQ (70% gain), which paid for about five years of DGO once it =
went=20
subscription. While EPIQ was not in the books at the time, I am not sure =
I would=20
have bought it without DGO beta information. So I feel like I am still=20
subscribing for free.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>The dollar value of my investments does not justify =
the high=20
cost ($535 per annum) of DGO, or some other services that I pay for. But =
I am=20
investing in a very difficult part of the industry, and want tools with =
which I=20
am comfortable and trust. The Custom Screens now being offered in beta =
should=20
considerably enhance the functionality of DGO, altho to date that has =
not=20
contributed significantly to me finding good (new) candidates (partially =
my=20
fault, no time to experiment with it). I still do my best mining at CBS=20
Marketwatch (for free!!).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@netside.net">stkguru@netside.net</A><BR>AIM:=20
TexWorley<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A href=3D"mailto:SKutney@aol.com" =
title=3DSKutney@aol.com>SKutney@aol.com</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
  href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com"=20
  title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com</A> =
</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, December 22, =
2001 7:32=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Which =
software is=20
  best?</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT color=3D#000080=20
  size=3D2>Katherine,<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Thanks for your comments. You =
make a=20
  good point about the editors of IBD<BR>and the bad round trip on a =
stock=20
  paying for the cost of the graphing package. In Fridays "Investors =
Corner"=20
  they did a real nice analysis of RMD's failed breakout and why the =
stock was=20
  flawed based on an analysis of a weekly chart. The problem is that =
they=20
  featured RMD in the "Stock in the News" section many times in the past =
several=20
  months. In those "Stocks in the News" features they commented that the =

  accumulation/distribution ranking was "C".&nbsp; At the time of the =
failed=20
  breakout the ranking turned to a "B" which should have made it =
acceptable. I=20
  lost about 8% on that this stock.<BR><BR>Steve Kutney</FONT>=20
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C18ABC.3ED95600--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.