RE: [CANSLIM] Tom's Computer

From: esetser <esetser@covad.net>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Tom's Computer
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 09:05:49 -0800

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Tom's Computer esetser
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] TOL - Off topic "rolf hertenstein"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom's Computer esetser
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

As a gamer, I need to clarify something.  At least from the gamer
standpoint, a 466 isn't a computer.  In fact, I would say a Pentium isn't a
computer.  I have a Celeron 300, and it is just barely a computer.  So,
what is a 466 or a Pentium?  Antique is a good description, but I guess I
prefer our normal descriptor, a doorstop.  Yes, that 466 will do a
wonderful job of holding just about any door around very solidly.  

Now my point was really a very small error in your statement.  I think we
should encourage Tom to get a computer.  By my definition the word "new"
was misleading, in that it inferred he has one now!! :-)

Oh, sorry, I just couldn't resist.  I do have a Pentium 100 that one of my
kids has been ignoring that I'm doorstopping out next month.  Are you
interested Tom?  Only problem is shipping would be more than it is worth!!


At 08:36 AM 12/22/01 -0500, you wrote:
>   Hello Tom:   May be it is the right time to buy a new  computer and
>stimulate the economy a little bit. Do you still have the antique  466 or
>moved to Pentium yet?   Regards   Surindra       -----Original Message-----
>From:    owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
>[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]    On Behalf Of Tom Worley
>Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001    12:08 AM
>To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>Subject: Re:    [CANSLIM] TOL
>
>   Hi Katherine,       Watch my comments in WWW this weekend (assuming my
>PC    doesn't fail me again) for some insight on the homebuilders and the  
> economy.       Tom Worley
>stkguru@netside.net
>AIM:    TexWorley
>        ----- Original Message -----      From:      Katherine      Malm   
>  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com           Sent: Thursday, December 20,
>2001 8:10      AM     Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TOL     
>     High Dave,           It looks to me as though TOL broke out on 12/12.
>But in truth, I have a      hard time believing the homebuilders have
>enough oomph left in them to go      much further; TOL, in particular,
>since it specializes in high end homes. If      you look back on the
>industry, the real run is behind them. It started when      the Fed started
>easing, and this is a typical reaction for the group. Also,      it is
>common for interest rate sensitive groups such as homebuilders to lead     
>out of a bear market. They often mark the transition from bear to new bull.
>     It has been a bit confounding, however, as they seemed to have done
>well      *while* the bear was going on. (I suppose a false signal with
>respect to      timing.) I was puzzled when they fell apart earlier this
>summer. But this      current run is corresponding more directly with other
>economic indicators      such as an apparent bottoming in economically
>sensitive commodities, etc.,      and seems to point to a transitional
>period in the market.           All in all, I'd say my conclusion would be
>to keep from taking any      *risky* entries on the homebuilders.          
>Katherine            ----- Original Message -----        From:        J.
>David        Stem        To: canslim@lists.xmission.com               Sent:
>Thursday, December 20, 2001        12:01 AM       Subject: [CANSLIM] TOL
    
>          It's just broken out of a cup on very strong volume, yet, alas,  
>     there's no handle  Anyone have any        thoughts/experience with
>patterns of this sort?               Dave
>
>
> 


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.