From: "Dave" <drubin@i-2000.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Market
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 13:22:13 -0500
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Market "Dave"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Managing Risk by Position Size Gene Ricci
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Market "Dave"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Market "Dave"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
I own CHKP. In my opinion, when the technology spending returns, security is going to be at the very top of many I.T. managers' lists. CHKP is the clear leader. On a technical basis, CHKP has a quasi-CH pattern beginning in August, is above its 50 DMA and is on the verge of breaking out. I think CANSLIM is great but IMO there is no reason to use it exclusively. My biggest single gain in the market was buying CSCO in 1991 solely because I was in the networking field and knew their technology was superior. At the time I knew nothing about the stock market. Maybe it was dumb luck, but I prefer to think that common sense and personal experience can sometimes lead you to big winners that do not (yet) meet strict CANSLIM criteria. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Andreas > Himmelreich > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 10:34 AM > To: 'canslim@lists.xmission.com' > Subject: AW: [CANSLIM] Market > > > Yep, once in a while I ask my selft if I should stick to CANSLIM. > > I was hot on DFXI, CHKP and a lots of other EPS 99ers 2 months ago, why not go > into them just on a projection point of view? - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Market "Dave"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Managing Risk by Position Size Gene Ricci
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Market "Dave"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Market "Dave"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]