From: "Mike Hofmann" <sfmcanslim@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Opinions on KKD?
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:58:42 -0800
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] (CANSLIM)Our Very Own Tom Worley Makes the Big Time!! "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Opinions on KKD? Mhboatman@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Opinions on KKD? Mhboatman@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Opinions on KKD? Mhboatman@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
JC, I hear there's a Ford plant coming available in about 2004 in Edison, NJ. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]" <cefaloni@pica.army.mil> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:43 AM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Opinions on KKD? > Howard, > > Thanks again for your comments and best of luck in your investments. > > Let me know if you can get me a "CANSLIM Message Board price break" on a > couple of acres in north Jersey for residential development! > > The rest of you wolves STAY AWAY ;) > > JC > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mhboatman@aol.com [mailto:Mhboatman@aol.com] > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:22 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Opinions on KKD? > > > John C. > > First of all I am not a true CANSLIMer. I I have been in the stock market > as > more of a hobby since we first purchased Sagamo Electric in about 1968. > Most > of our money has come from real estate investments -- raw land for > residential development and investments in apartments buildings. In the > past > 25 months I have been paying dues to the market gods to learn trading. I > have not passed the course yet much less graduated. So my opinions are not > necessarily consistent with other posts one finds on this site. > > KKD and CANSLIM; > > Others may feel KKD is a CANSLIM stock. It is not for me mainly because of > S. When I am seeking a CANSLIM investment I generally seek stocks > capitalized between 5 to 20 million shares. When (or if) a stock seeks to > breakout it will be because of demand relative to supply. At 53 million > shares outstanding (38 in float), it would take a substantial institutional > effort to move the stock in a manner generally desired with CONSLIM. Also > look at the pattern. I fail to see the desired clean, smoothly formed cup > which makes me expect any handle formed would be suspect and subsequent > breakout failure prone. In fact, if a cup and handle forms and we see a > quick run up in price I'll be out at the first sign of weakness. I believe > this stock will be a steady growe, maybe tending to became a saw-toothed > LLUR > in the months ahead. > > You mentioned your concern for M at this time. Well, in my opinion we are > already in the very early stages of a new bull market that we expect will be > > generally up as the tech stocks start promising increased earnings. I hope > to be fully invested again before the end of the month. > > Now this all worth what you are paying for it. I can also share with you > that I am correct about half the time -- my desire is to make more money on > the stocks that go up in value than I loose in the picks that go down. > > Good luck! > > Howard > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] (CANSLIM)Our Very Own Tom Worley Makes the Big Time!! "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Opinions on KKD? Mhboatman@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Opinions on KKD? Mhboatman@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Opinions on KKD? Mhboatman@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]