Re: [CANSLIM] MCAF


From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MCAF
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:40:54 -0500

Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] NMTC down grade. "Bill Triffet"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] MCAF "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] MCAF "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C19F4B.D2791A00
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Katherine,

I took a quick look around, as I was curious about this anomaly. Several =
items I noted:

MCAF notes their tax rate in 2002 expected to jump to 38% from 28%, =
keeping them from guiding earnings guidance even higher.

They are the antivirus of choice for MSN's Hotmail. Wish they would also =
be an antispam for that source. And with Hotmail being free, wonder just =
how much revenues they are taking in from MS for this.

They indicate they are bundled with Windows XP, but my new computer =
(with WIN XP) came with Norton from=20
Symantec.

Both beat expectations by a wide margin, but actual results, fundies, =
and forward looking statements look stronger for SYMC.

Sell on news, MCAF results older than SYMC.

I see little "dumb" about still owning MCAF in light of the past few =
months, especially if you bought it cheap. Maybe I might have cut my =
position some in the past few days, but if I had been smart enough to =
buy it in late Sept or early Oct, likely I would still now have a =
position.

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM: TexWorley
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Katherine Malm=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:31 AM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] MCAF


  Oh...here's the explanation for the SYMC vs. MCAF anomaly....

  Will post a technical post analysis later.

  I should just call this DYII, FIC revisited...

  Katherine

        Jan 17 2002
        11:21 AM In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 24.85 -7.44 (-23%): Robertson =
Stephens is raising several issues following MCAF's earnings report last =
night; believes that the quality of revenue has eroded a bit following =
co's change in license revenue structure; notes that in Q4 subscribers =
grew by only 125K vs 200K sub adds in Q3. While firm remains confident =
that 2002 numbers are beatable, thinks stk remains expensive, and would =
not be constructive on the name until a move to $20 or below.=20
        Jan 16 2002
        5:26 PM In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 -4.11: -- Update -- =
During its conference call, the co guides higher Q1 rev/EPS to $19.1 =
mln/$0.06 (consensus is $18.95 mln/$0.05); FY02 projections are revs of =
$80-$90 mln, 69-72% gross mgn, and EPS should be in the range of =
$0.25-$0.28 (in the mid-point of rev consensus of $85.82 mln, and better =
than EPS consensus of $0.22).=20
        Jan 16 2002
        4:43 PM In Play McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 -4.11: Reports Q4 (Dec) =
earnings of $0.09, four cents better than the Multex consensus of $0.05; =
revenues were $18.6 mln vs the consensus of $17.8 mln.=20


- ------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C19F4B.D2791A00
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Hi Katherine,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I took a quick look around, as I was curious =
about this=20
anomaly. Several items I noted:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>MCAF notes their tax rate in 2002 expected to =
jump to 38%=20
from 28%, keeping them from guiding earnings guidance even =
higher.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>They are the antivirus of choice for MSN's =
Hotmail. Wish=20
they would also be an antispam for that source. And with Hotmail being =
free,=20
wonder just how much revenues they are taking in from MS for =
this.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>They indicate they are bundled with Windows XP, =
but my new=20
computer (with WIN XP) came with Norton from <BR>Symantec.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Both beat expectations by a wide margin, but =
actual=20
results, fundies, and forward looking statements look stronger for=20
SYMC.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Sell on news, MCAF results older than =
SYMC.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I see little "dumb" about still owning MCAF in =
light of=20
the past few months, especially if you bought it cheap. Maybe I might =
have cut=20
my position some in the past few days, but if I had been smart enough to =
buy it=20
in late Sept or early Oct, likely I would still now have a=20
position.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@netside.net">stkguru@netside.net</A><BR>AIM:=20
TexWorley</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
  Malm</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 17, =
2002 11:31=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] MCAF</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV>Oh...here's the explanation for the SYMC vs. MCAF =
anomaly....</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Will post a technical post analysis later.</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>I should just call this DYII, FIC revisited...</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Katherine</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>
  <TABLE cellSpacing=3D1 cellPadding=3D2 width=3D754 border=3D0>
    <TBODY>
    <TR>
      <TD class=3Dtd4g vAlign=3Dtop noWrap width=3D"12%">Jan 17 =
2002<BR>11:21 AM</TD>
      <TD class=3Dtd7g vAlign=3Dtop width=3D"10%" rowSpan=3D2><A =
class=3Dtd7g=20
        =
href=3D"http://www.briefing.com/scripts/ArchCal.asp?ID=3DIN"><FONT=20
        style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #eaf4f1" color=3D#000000>In =
Play</FONT></A></TD>
      <TD class=3Dr2 width=3D"78%" rowSpan=3D2>McAfee.com (MCAF) 24.85 =
- -7.44 (-23%):=20
        Robertson Stephens is&nbsp;raising several&nbsp;issues following =
MCAF's=20
        earnings report last night; believes that the quality of revenue =
has=20
        eroded a bit following co's change in license revenue structure; =
notes=20
        that in Q4 subscribers grew by only 125K vs 200K sub adds in Q3. =
While=20
        firm remains confident that 2002 numbers are beatable, thinks =
stk=20
        remains expensive, and would not be constructive on the name =
until a=20
        move to $20 or below.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
  <TABLE cellSpacing=3D1 cellPadding=3D2 width=3D754 border=3D0>
    <TBODY>
    <TR>
      <TD class=3Dtd4w vAlign=3Dtop noWrap width=3D"12%">Jan 16 =
2002<BR>5:26 PM</TD>
      <TD class=3Dtd7w vAlign=3Dtop width=3D"10%"><A class=3Dtd7w=20
        =
href=3D"http://www.briefing.com/scripts/ArchCal.asp?ID=3DIN"><FONT=20
        color=3D#000000>In Play</FONT></A></TD>
      <TD width=3D"78%">McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 -4.11: -- Update -- =
During its=20
        conference call, the co&nbsp;guides higher&nbsp;Q1 =
rev/EPS&nbsp;to $19.1=20
        mln/$0.06 (consensus&nbsp;is $18.95 mln/$0.05); FY02 projections =
are=20
        revs of $80-$90 mln, 69-72% gross mgn, and EPS should be in the =
range of=20
        $0.25-$0.28 (in the mid-point of rev consensus of $85.82 mln, =
and <FONT=20
        color=3D#228822>better than</FONT> EPS consensus of=20
  $0.22).</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
  <TABLE cellSpacing=3D1 cellPadding=3D2 width=3D754 border=3D0>
    <TBODY>
    <TR>
      <TD class=3Dtd4g vAlign=3Dtop noWrap width=3D"12%">Jan 16 =
2002<BR>4:43 PM</TD>
      <TD class=3Dtd7g vAlign=3Dtop width=3D"10%" rowSpan=3D2><A =
class=3Dtd7g=20
        =
href=3D"http://www.briefing.com/scripts/ArchCal.asp?ID=3DIN"><FONT=20
        style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #eaf4f1" color=3D#000000>In =
Play</FONT></A></TD>
      <TD class=3Dr2 width=3D"78%" rowSpan=3D2>McAfee.com (MCAF) 32.29 =
- -4.11:=20
        Reports Q4 (Dec) earnings of $0.09, four cents better than the =
Multex=20
        consensus of $0.05; revenues were $18.6 mln vs the consensus of =
$17.8=20
        mln.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C19F4B.D2791A00--



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] NMTC down grade. "Bill Triffet"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] MCAF "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] MCAF "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.