Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?]


From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?]
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:09:35 -0600

Next Article (by Subject): Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?] "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?] "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?] "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0045_01C1A0C0.A1DF1040
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tom, Ian

Just curious...where do you get $.16/Q EPS estimates? I took a *very* =
quick glance at the last 10Q, are you basing this on the acquisition in =
2000?

Katherine
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Tom Worley=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 12:25 AM
  Subject: Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?]


  I agree, Ian. My second trip on this stock has nearly made up the loss =
from the first voyage. Looks more promising now than the first time I =
tried it. Sequential growth particularly impressive.

  Tom Worley
  stkguru@netside.net
  AIM: TexWorley
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Ian=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:01 PM
    Subject: Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?]


    Thanks a lot for the chart analysis. The low volume during the new =
high to $13.50, and the high volume/no progress days on 1/10, 1/11, and =
1/15 were the things that concerned me. I convinced myself that the =
low-volume high was just a case of 'too much, too fast' off the $5 =
October low. The recent high volume/no movement days are what concern =
me.

    There shouldn't be much concern with P/E. The company claimed that =
Q4 2001, and Q1 2002 were already filled with existing backlog, and I =
figure that a minimum of $0.16 per Q is easy - so 4 months from now, the =
ttm EPS will be at least $0.70 if not more, and the P/E at current =
levels would be under 20. Given their industry group and recent growth =
rate, a much higher price could easily be supported. But I would like to =
see more signs of volume accumulation here.=20

    After the next earnings report the IBD EPS ranking should go over =
85, and the RS is over 90 already, so it should start appearing on IBD =
radar screens for the first time - including the weekend review. Perhaps =
it will be a month or so before the next clear direction becomes =
visible.

    Thanks again,

    Ian



    ----- Original Message -----=20
      From: Katherine Malm=20
      To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
      Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:36 PM
      Subject: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?]


      Hi Ian,

      Your question has me wondering whether the sell rules that I =
follow translate perfectly to thinly traded stocks. But I'll tell you =
what I see and the way I would read it if I were to own it:

      -After the B/O at 7.13, stock moves up and consolidates for about =
5 weeks. This is a "valid" consolidation so that makes the previous base =
low 8.01 which was printed on 11/23/01.
      -Just as a quick check for "overextension" that means that the =
stock is 70% above the 200dMA (7.02), 15% above the 50dMA (10.43) and =
49.6% above the base low (8.01). It gets a yellow flag for being 70% =
above the 200dMA according to WON's sell rule #34, but does not get a =
red flag for the Rubberband Sell Rule.
      -After the consolidation and breakout 12/18 the stock has started =
to show signs of stress. This could easily be market related, but no way =
to tell.
      -1/2/02: New high on low volume. Red flag.
      -1/10/02 & 1/11/02- two days with little or no price progress on =
high volume. Red flag.
      -With 1 yellow and 2 red flags I thought it worth doing a PE =
Extension check. I've reconstructed the PE at the time of the B/O in =
October using trailing EPS numbers for the prior quarters. That puts it =
at $7.13/$.29 =3D 24.59. The extension warning would then be a forward =
PE of 24.59*2.21=3D 54.3. Let's see. DGO doesn't have any estimates, =
which means it isn't followed by enough analysts. I checked the internet =
to see if I could find anything and ran across this EPS/Rev snapshot:

      =
http://yahoo.marketguide.com/MGI/mg.asp?target=3D/stocks/companyinformati=
on/highlights&Ticker=3DELTE

      I am alarmed by the essentially flat revenues over the last 4 =
years, so I am going to go with the EPS estimates in my VectorVest =
software which reads a measly $.02. That puts the current forward =
looking PE at $11.98/$0.02 =3D 599! I'll have to mark that Red Flag.

      One note is that its industry is fairly healthy, consolidating =
after rising, not overly extended and currently ranked in the 2nd =
quartile.

      I'll let you take it from there!

      Katherine
        ----- Original Message -----=20
        From: Ian=20
        To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
        Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:40 PM
        Subject: [CANSLIM] Katherine - Opinion please?


        Would tuesdays distribution day for ELTE make you exit the stock =
at this point? Do you have any other insights into the chart?

        I would appreciate your analysis - it is the one big recent =
winner I am wondering what to do with. Based on all of my past =
experiences, and knowing the companies outlook, my gut tells me that it =
needs to consolidate here, but will run into the $20's by mid-year. But =
I'd rather listen to the chart. I fear I've held it long enough that I =
may be complacent.

        Thank you.

        Ian

- ------=_NextPart_000_0045_01C1A0C0.A1DF1040
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Tom, Ian</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Just curious...where do you get $.16/Q EPS estimates? I took a =
*very* quick=20
glance at the last 10Q, are you basing this on the acquisition in =
2000?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Katherine</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dstkguru@netside.net href=3D"mailto:stkguru@netside.net">Tom =
Worley</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, January 19, =
2002 12:25=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Re:ELTE (was =
[CANSLIM]=20
  Katherine-Opinion please?]</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I agree, Ian. My second trip on this stock has =
nearly=20
  made up the loss from the first voyage. Looks more promising now than =
the=20
  first time I tried it. Sequential growth particularly =
impressive.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20
  href=3D"mailto:stkguru@netside.net">stkguru@netside.net</A><BR>AIM:=20
  TexWorley</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3Dianstm@shaw.ca href=3D"mailto:ianstm@shaw.ca">Ian</A> =
</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 18, =
2002 8:01=20
    PM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Re:ELTE (was =
[CANSLIM]=20
    Katherine-Opinion please?]</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Thanks a lot for the chart analysis. The low =
volume during=20
    the new high to $13.50, and the high volume/no progress days on =
1/10, 1/11,=20
    and 1/15 were the things that concerned me. I convinced myself that =
the=20
    low-volume high was just a case of 'too much, too fast' off the $5 =
October=20
    low. The recent high volume/no movement days&nbsp;are what concern=20
    me.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2>There shouldn't be much concern with P/E. The =
company=20
    claimed that Q4 2001, and Q1 2002 were already filled with existing =
backlog,=20
    and I figure that a minimum of $0.16 per Q is easy - so 4 months =
from now,=20
    the ttm EPS will be at least $0.70 if not more, and the P/E at =
current=20
    levels would be under 20. Given their industry group and recent =
growth rate,=20
    a much higher price could easily be supported. But I would like to =
see more=20
    signs of volume accumulation here. </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2>After the next earnings report the IBD EPS =
ranking should=20
    go over 85, and the RS is over 90 already, so it should start =
appearing on=20
    IBD radar screens for the first time - including the weekend review. =
Perhaps=20
    it will be a month or so before the next clear direction becomes=20
    visible.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Thanks again,</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Ian</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
    style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      <DIV=20
      style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
      <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
      Malm</A> </DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
      title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
      =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
      </DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 18, =
2002 3:36=20
      PM</DIV>
      <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re:ELTE (was =
[CANSLIM]=20
      Katherine-Opinion please?]</DIV>
      <DIV><BR></DIV>
      <DIV>Hi Ian,</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>Your question has me wondering whether the sell rules that I =
follow=20
      translate perfectly to thinly traded stocks. But I'll tell you =
what I see=20
      and the way I would read it if I were to own it:</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>-After the B/O at 7.13, stock moves up and consolidates for =
about 5=20
      weeks. This is a "valid" consolidation so that makes the previous =
base low=20
      8.01 which was printed on 11/23/01.</DIV>
      <DIV>-Just as a quick check for "overextension" that means that =
the stock=20
      is 70% above the 200dMA (7.02), 15% above the 50dMA (10.43) and =
49.6%=20
      above the base low (8.01). It gets a yellow flag for being 70% =
above the=20
      200dMA according to WON's sell rule #34, but does not get a red =
flag for=20
      the Rubberband Sell Rule.</DIV>
      <DIV>-After the consolidation and breakout 12/18 the stock has =
started to=20
      show signs of stress. This could easily be market related, but no =
way to=20
      tell.</DIV>
      <DIV>-1/2/02: New high on low volume. Red flag.</DIV>
      <DIV>-1/10/02 &amp; 1/11/02- two days with little or no price =
progress on=20
      high volume. Red flag.</DIV>
      <DIV>-With 1 yellow and 2 red flags I thought it worth doing a PE=20
      Extension check. I've reconstructed the PE at the time of the B/O =
in=20
      October using trailing EPS numbers for the prior quarters. That =
puts it at=20
      $7.13/$.29 =3D 24.59. The extension warning would then be a =
forward PE of=20
      24.59*2.21=3D 54.3. Let's see. DGO doesn't have any estimates, =
which means=20
      it isn't followed by enough analysts. I checked the internet to =
see if I=20
      could find anything and ran across this EPS/Rev snapshot:</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><A=20
      =
href=3D"http://yahoo.marketguide.com/MGI/mg.asp?target=3D/stocks/companyi=
nformation/highlights&amp;Ticker=3DELTE">http://yahoo.marketguide.com/MGI=
/mg.asp?target=3D/stocks/companyinformation/highlights&amp;Ticker=3DELTE<=
/A></DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>I am alarmed by the essentially flat revenues over the last 4 =
years,=20
      so I am going to go with the EPS estimates in my VectorVest =
software which=20
      reads a measly $.02. That puts the current forward looking PE at=20
      $11.98/$0.02 =3D 599! I'll have to mark that Red Flag.</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>One note is that its industry is fairly healthy, =
consolidating after=20
      rising, not overly extended&nbsp;and currently ranked in the 2nd=20
      quartile.</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>I'll let you take it from there!</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>Katherine</DIV>
      <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
      style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
        <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
        <DIV=20
        style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
        <A title=3Dianstm@shaw.ca href=3D"mailto:ianstm@shaw.ca">Ian</A> =
</DIV>
        <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
        title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
        =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
        </DIV>
        <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 18, =
2002 4:40=20
        PM</DIV>
        <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] =
Katherine -=20
        Opinion please?</DIV>
        <DIV><BR></DIV>
        <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Would tuesdays distribution day for ELTE =
make you exit=20
        the stock at this point? Do you have any other insights into the =

        chart?</FONT></DIV>
        <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
        <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I would appreciate your analysis - it is the =
one big=20
        recent winner I am wondering what to do with. Based on all of my =
past=20
        experiences, and knowing the companies outlook, my gut tells me =
that it=20
        needs to consolidate here,&nbsp;but will run into the $20's by =
mid-year.=20
        But I'd rather listen to the chart. I fear I've held it long =
enough that=20
        I may be complacent.</FONT></DIV>
        <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
        <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Thank you.</FONT></DIV>
        <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
        <DIV><FONT=20
size=3D2>Ian</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQU=
OTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0045_01C1A0C0.A1DF1040--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?] "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?] "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: Re:ELTE (was [CANSLIM] Katherine-Opinion please?] "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.