Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ...


From: "walter nusbaum" <wnusbaum@airmail.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ...
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:58:10 -0600

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] WDFC - Market needs a little lubrication ... "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] KMart vs Enron "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C1A3FC.D8AEB960
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ian,
"Stock Market Cycles" was rated "F" in up markets and A+ in down markets =
with an annualized gain of 4.6% since 5/31/90(sic), according to =
Forbes(22 JAN 01); not exactly the kind of numbers that inspire =
confidence. At any rate, there is nothing in the theory or construction =
of TRIN that allows for speculation as to the degree of market change. =
It is a great market reversal indicator and that's all. According to =
Elder, the market can stay over bought/sold for some time and the time =
to take action is immediately after TRIN makes a reversal off its =
high/low reading and re-penetrates the overbought or oversold line.(The =
Equis link says to buy/sell upon reaching the line, which is a specific =
number. Elder's recommendation puts you in sync with the new trend. I =
don't know what TRIN was doing during the debacle of 2000, but I =
suspect(using the Equis standard) it gave buy signals loooong before =
their time).

The lines themselves should be revisited, and redrawn if necessary, =
every three months based upon the interaction of TRIN and the Index that =
is being used. The lines indicate areas of concern and specific numbers =
above or below the lines have little meaning. TRIN can not be used =
mechanically- the same readings mean different things under different =
market conditions(Bull/Bear). TRIN gives its best buy/sell signals when =
divergence from the Index being used is observed and when used in =
combination with the New High-New Low Index.=20

Having said all that, 1.5 is a doozy of a number and will probably be =
followed by a downturn. I know nothing, but have little confidence in a =
return of the Bull for many moons. The automobile industry with its =
attendant suppliers such as steel, glass, rubber, plastics, etc., has =
been trashed; housing has typically propelled the new Bull, but housing =
has already had its own run with little effect on the overall market. =
Consumer Confidence would seem to be a bright spot, but it probably is =
the result of lower mortgage payments due to massive refinancing and =
bargains picked up by consumers at the expense of the producers, the =
very folks that we look to for increased earnings. There's more, but =
this grows lengthy so I'll shut up. Thanks for your note.
Best wishes,
Walt
   =20
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Ian=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:32 PM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ...


  Here's a very interesting recent quote from Peter Eliades of Stock =
Market Cycles: "At the end of todays trading, we noticed that the lowest =
single day TRIN reading over the past 10 trading days was 1.143. That =
seemed unusual to us, so we asked the computer to look back over the =
past 61 years (since 1940) to find out how many other 10 day periods had =
transpired without one single day reading below 1.14. We were stunned at =
the answer! The answer is none."

  The 10 day ARMS index (TRIN) got up to 1.5 again last week. It used to =
have huge historical significance in indicating that a major bottom was =
to be put in within 20 trading days. It has now happened 4 times in the =
past year alone.

  I don't pretend to know what it means, but there certainly has been a =
considerable amount of panic over the last 2 weeks.

  Ian


  PS - Here is a quick overview of the ARMS index that someone asked =
for: http://www.equis.com/free/taaz/armsindex.html

- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C1A3FC.D8AEB960
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Ian,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>"Stock Market Cycles" was rated "F" in up markets =
and A+ in=20
down markets with an annualized gain of 4.6% since =
5/31/90(sic),&nbsp;according=20
to&nbsp;Forbes(22 JAN 01); not exactly the kind of numbers =
that&nbsp;inspire=20
confidence.&nbsp;At any rate, there is nothing in the theory or =
construction of=20
TRIN that allows for speculation as to the degree of market change. It =
is a=20
great market reversal indicator&nbsp;and that's all. According to Elder, =
the=20
market can stay over bought/sold for some time and the time to take =
action is=20
immediately after TRIN makes a reversal off its high/low reading and=20
re-penetrates the overbought or&nbsp;oversold line.(The Equis link says =
to=20
buy/sell upon reaching the line, which is a specific number. Elder's=20
recommendation puts you in sync with the new trend. I don't know what =
TRIN was=20
doing during the debacle of 2000, but I suspect(using the Equis=20
standard)&nbsp;it gave buy signals loooong before their =
time).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>The lines themselves&nbsp;should be revisited, and =
redrawn if=20
necessary, every three months based upon the interaction of TRIN and the =
Index=20
that is being used. The lines indicate areas of concern =
and&nbsp;specific=20
numbers above or below the lines have little meaning.&nbsp;TRIN can not =
be used=20
mechanically- the same readings mean different things under different =
market=20
conditions(Bull/Bear).</FONT>&nbsp;<FONT size=3D2>TRIN gives its best =
buy/sell=20
signals when divergence from the Index being used is observed and when =
used=20
in&nbsp;combination&nbsp;with the New High-New Low Index. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Having said all that, 1.5 is a doozy of a number =
and&nbsp;will=20
probably be followed by a downturn.&nbsp;I know nothing, but have little =

confidence in a return of the Bull for many moons. The automobile =
industry with=20
its attendant suppliers such as steel, glass, rubber, plastics, etc., =
has been=20
trashed; housing has typically propelled the new Bull, but =
housing&nbsp;has=20
already had its own run with little effect on the overall market. =
Consumer=20
Confidence would seem to be a bright spot, but it probably is the result =
of=20
lower mortgage payments due to massive refinancing and bargains picked =
up by=20
consumers at the expense of the producers, the very folks that we look =
to for=20
increased earnings. There's more, but&nbsp;this grows lengthy so I'll =
shut up.=20
Thanks for your note.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Best wishes,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Walt</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dianstm@shaw.ca href=3D"mailto:ianstm@shaw.ca">Ian</A> =
</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, January 22, 2002 =
12:32=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Panic attack =
...</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Here's a very interesting recent quote from Peter =
Eliades of=20
  Stock Market Cycles: "At the end of todays trading, we noticed that =
the lowest=20
  single day TRIN reading over the past 10 trading days was 1.143. That =
seemed=20
  unusual to us, so we asked the computer to look back over the past 61 =
years=20
  (since 1940) to find out how many other 10 day periods had transpired =
without=20
  one single day reading below 1.14. We were stunned at the answer! The =
answer=20
  is none."</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>The 10 day ARMS index (TRIN) got up to 1.5 again =
last week.=20
  It used to have huge historical significance in indicating that a =
major bottom=20
  was to be put in within 20 trading days. It has now happened 4 times =
in the=20
  past year alone.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I don't pretend to know what it means, but there =
certainly=20
  has been a considerable amount of panic over the last 2 =
weeks.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Ian</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>PS - Here is a quick overview of the ARMS index =
that someone=20
  asked for: <A=20
  =
href=3D"http://www.equis.com/free/taaz/armsindex.html">http://www.equis.c=
om/free/taaz/armsindex.html</A></FONT><FONT=20
  face=3DArial size=3D2></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C1A3FC.D8AEB960--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] WDFC - Market needs a little lubrication ... "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] KMart vs Enron "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.