Re: [CANSLIM] KMart vs Enron

From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] KMart vs Enron
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:07:42 -0700

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] WDFC - Market needs a little lubrication ... "Patrick Wahl"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] KMart vs Enron "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] KMart vs Enron "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Yeah but -you can certainly also make an argument for large and mid-cap 
companies.  First, the financial shenanigans are very much the exception, not the 
rule. Also, larger companies are going to have a broader range of companies as 
customers, a broader product line, less dependent on any one company as 
customer or a single product that might go out of favor, less likely to have a 
competitor enter the market and kill their margins.   I would also like to add that a 
larger company is under closer scrutiny, more analysts following it, harder to hide 
things, but I'm afraid I can't.  I think we've seen for at least two years that analysts 
just rubber stamp whatever a company passes along to them, they do very little 
investigative work or original thinking, it appears. 

On 22 Jan 2002 at 11:27, Tom Worley wrote:

> With KM down 54% just for today, and 94% since its last high on 8/8/01, who can you trust anymore in the executive level of corporations. Today makes me glad I stick to my small caps, where a rumored buyout finally official gave me a 10% gain on one stock, and a new contract gave me 13% on 
another. Big caps are just too big and complicated for the likes of me. At least I make money for the day. > > Tom Worley > stkguru@netside.net > AIM: TexWorley >  



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.