Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ...


From: Ian <ianstm@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ...
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:26:49 -0800

Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Acc/Dis Numbers -- Market in Correction Robert
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] ELTE Ian
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ... "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- --Boundary_(ID_A7+pNmZzUjs+hkWoTgXoMA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Walt:

My only interest in TRIN readings is in when it reaches extreme sustained historical highs - which I take to indicate exhaustion selling - meaning it will be followed by a significant upturn. These readings are very rare - so there is no way I would look to TRIN for short-term wiggles.

That being said, I am surprised that you think the extreme panic recently indicated means that "it will probably be followed by a downturn". Why would you think that? My take is that it signals that we are running out of indiscriminate sellers.

I believe that the recent strong volatility in both directions is indicative of the beginnings of a new bull. IMHO, it is needed to separate out the most tired of the last bulls winners - those are the ones that drop in the selloffs, but dont rebound strongly in the surges.

I find it interesting that most on this board are quite bearish, while I find myself with the lowest cash position in well over a year, and a growing supply of buyer-friendly microcaps.

Cheers,

Ian


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tom Worley 
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:37 AM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ...


  Walter,
   
  I would have to disagree with part of your conclusion. While the housing industry did not prevent the start of a recession, it is likely that it significantly helped to make it a shallow recession, and will help end it early. There still seems to be a lot of juice left in the home builders group, and I was adding more to my three positions in my fund today. Adding to Consumer Sentiment, in addition to lower mortgage payments, is lower energy costs. That, plus the tax cuts that started 1/1/02, means a little more money in everyone's paycheck or wallet.

  Tom Worley
  stkguru@netside.net
  AIM: TexWorley
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: walter nusbaum 
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com 
    Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:58 AM
    Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ...


    Ian,
    "Stock Market Cycles" was rated "F" in up markets and A+ in down markets with an annualized gain of 4.6% since 5/31/90(sic), according to Forbes(22 JAN 01); not exactly the kind of numbers that inspire confidence. At any rate, there is nothing in the theory or construction of TRIN that allows for speculation as to the degree of market change. It is a great market reversal indicator and that's all. According to Elder, the market can stay over bought/sold for some time and the time to take action is immediately after TRIN makes a reversal off its high/low reading and re-penetrates the overbought or oversold line.(The Equis link says to buy/sell upon reaching the line, which is a specific number. Elder's recommendation puts you in sync with the new trend. I don't know what TRIN was doing during the debacle of 2000, but I suspect(using the Equis standard) it gave buy signals loooong before their time).
     
    The lines themselves should be revisited, and redrawn if necessary, every three months based upon the interaction of TRIN and the Index that is being used. The lines indicate areas of concern and specific numbers above or below the lines have little meaning. TRIN can not be used mechanically- the same readings mean different things under different market conditions(Bull/Bear). TRIN gives its best buy/sell signals when divergence from the Index being used is observed and when used in combination with the New High-New Low Index. 
     
    Having said all that, 1.5 is a doozy of a number and will probably be followed by a downturn. I know nothing, but have little confidence in a return of the Bull for many moons. The automobile industry with its attendant suppliers such as steel, glass, rubber, plastics, etc., has been trashed; housing has typically propelled the new Bull, but housing has already had its own run with little effect on the overall market. Consumer Confidence would seem to be a bright spot, but it probably is the result of lower mortgage payments due to massive refinancing and bargains picked up by consumers at the expense of the producers, the very folks that we look to for increased earnings. There's more, but this grows lengthy so I'll shut up. Thanks for your note.
    Best wishes,
    Walt
        
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Ian 
      To: canslim@lists.xmission.com 
      Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:32 PM
      Subject: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ...


      Here's a very interesting recent quote from Peter Eliades of Stock Market Cycles: "At the end of todays trading, we noticed that the lowest single day TRIN reading over the past 10 trading days was 1.143. That seemed unusual to us, so we asked the computer to look back over the past 61 years (since 1940) to find out how many other 10 day periods had transpired without one single day reading below 1.14. We were stunned at the answer! The answer is none."

      The 10 day ARMS index (TRIN) got up to 1.5 again last week. It used to have huge historical significance in indicating that a major bottom was to be put in within 20 trading days. It has now happened 4 times in the past year alone.

      I don't pretend to know what it means, but there certainly has been a considerable amount of panic over the last 2 weeks.

      Ian
       

      PS - Here is a quick overview of the ARMS index that someone asked for: http://www.equis.com/free/taaz/armsindex.html

- --Boundary_(ID_A7+pNmZzUjs+hkWoTgXoMA)
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.3314.2100" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Walt:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>My only interest in TRIN readings is in when&nbsp;it reaches 
extreme sustained historical highs - which I take to indicate exhaustion selling 
- - meaning it will be followed by a significant upturn. These readings are very 
rare - so there is no way I would look to&nbsp;TRIN for short-term 
wiggles.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>That being said, I am surprised that you think the extreme 
panic recently indicated means that "it will probably be followed by a 
downturn". Why would you think that? My take is that it signals that we are 
running out of indiscriminate sellers.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I believe that the recent strong volatility in both directions 
is indicative of the beginnings of a new bull. IMHO, it is needed to separate 
out the most tired of the last bulls winners - those are the ones that drop in 
the selloffs, but dont rebound strongly in the surges.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I find it interesting that most on this board are quite 
bearish, while I find myself with the lowest cash position in well over a year, 
and a growing supply of buyer-friendly microcaps.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Cheers,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Ian</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> 
  <A href="mailto:stkguru@netside.net" title=stkguru@netside.net>Tom Worley</A> 
  </DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
  href="mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com" 
  title=canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:37 
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack 
  ...</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial>Walter,</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial>I would have to disagree with part of your conclusion. 
  While the housing industry did not prevent the start of a recession, it is 
  likely that it significantly helped to make it a shallow recession, and will 
  help end it early. There still seems to be a lot of juice left in the home 
  builders group, and I was adding more to my three positions in my fund today. 
  Adding to Consumer Sentiment, in addition to lower mortgage payments, is lower 
  energy costs. That, plus the tax cuts that started 1/1/02, means a little more 
  money in everyone's paycheck or wallet.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A 
  href="mailto:stkguru@netside.net">stkguru@netside.net</A><BR>AIM: 
  TexWorley</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> 
    <A href="mailto:wnusbaum@airmail.net" title=wnusbaum@airmail.net>walter 
    nusbaum</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
    href="mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com" 
    title=canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:58 
    AM</DIV>
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack 
    ...</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Ian,</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>"Stock Market Cycles" was rated "F" in up markets and A+ 
    in down markets with an annualized gain of 4.6% since 
    5/31/90(sic),&nbsp;according to&nbsp;Forbes(22 JAN 01); not exactly the kind 
    of numbers that&nbsp;inspire confidence.&nbsp;At any rate, there is nothing 
    in the theory or construction of TRIN that allows for speculation as to the 
    degree of market change. It is a great market reversal indicator&nbsp;and 
    that's all. According to Elder, the market can stay over bought/sold for 
    some time and the time to take action is immediately after TRIN makes a 
    reversal off its high/low reading and re-penetrates the overbought 
    or&nbsp;oversold line.(The Equis link says to buy/sell upon reaching the 
    line, which is a specific number. Elder's recommendation puts you in sync 
    with the new trend. I don't know what TRIN was doing during the debacle of 
    2000, but I suspect(using the Equis standard)&nbsp;it gave buy signals 
    loooong before their time).</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>The lines themselves&nbsp;should be revisited, and redrawn 
    if necessary, every three months based upon the interaction of TRIN and the 
    Index that is being used. The lines indicate areas of concern 
    and&nbsp;specific numbers above or below the lines have little 
    meaning.&nbsp;TRIN can not be used mechanically- the same readings mean 
    different things under different market 
    conditions(Bull/Bear).</FONT>&nbsp;<FONT size=2>TRIN gives its best buy/sell 
    signals when divergence from the Index being used is observed and when used 
    in&nbsp;combination&nbsp;with the New High-New Low Index. </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Having said all that, 1.5 is a doozy of a number 
    and&nbsp;will probably be followed by a downturn.&nbsp;I know nothing, but 
    have little confidence in a return of the Bull for many moons. The 
    automobile industry with its attendant suppliers such as steel, glass, 
    rubber, plastics, etc., has been trashed; housing has typically propelled 
    the new Bull, but housing&nbsp;has already had its own run with little 
    effect on the overall market. Consumer Confidence would seem to be a bright 
    spot, but it probably is the result of lower mortgage payments due to 
    massive refinancing and bargains picked up by consumers at the expense of 
    the producers, the very folks that we look to for increased earnings. 
    There's more, but&nbsp;this grows lengthy so I'll shut up. Thanks for your 
    note.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Best wishes,</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Walt</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
    style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
      <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
      <DIV 
      style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> 
      <A href="mailto:ianstm@shaw.ca" title=ianstm@shaw.ca>Ian</A> </DIV>
      <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
      href="mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com" 
      title=canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com</A> </DIV>
      <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:32 
      PM</DIV>
      <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Panic attack 
      ...</DIV>
      <DIV><BR></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT size=2>Here's a very interesting recent quote from Peter 
      Eliades of Stock Market Cycles: "At the end of todays trading, we noticed 
      that the lowest single day TRIN reading over the past 10 trading days was 
      1.143. That seemed unusual to us, so we asked the computer to look back 
      over the past 61 years (since 1940) to find out how many other 10 day 
      periods had transpired without one single day reading below 1.14. We were 
      stunned at the answer! The answer is none."</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT size=2>The 10 day ARMS index (TRIN) got up to 1.5 again last 
      week. It used to have huge historical significance in indicating that a 
      major bottom was to be put in within 20 trading days. It has now happened 
      4 times in the past year alone.</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT size=2>I don't pretend to know what it means, but there 
      certainly has been a considerable amount of panic over the last 2 
      weeks.</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT size=2>Ian</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT size=2>PS - Here is a quick overview of the ARMS index that 
      someone asked for: <A 
      href="http://www.equis.com/free/taaz/armsindex.html">http://www.equis.com/free/taaz/armsindex.html</A></FONT><FONT 
      face=Arial 
size=2></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>

- --Boundary_(ID_A7+pNmZzUjs+hkWoTgXoMA)--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Acc/Dis Numbers -- Market in Correction Robert
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] ELTE Ian
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Panic attack ... "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.