From: "Dan Forant" <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle?
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:06:18 -0500
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? "Mike Gibbons"
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? "Mike Gibbons"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? "Mike Gibbons"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Is a cup's depth supposed to be no deeper than 35%?? DanF - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Gibbons" <mikegibbons@proactech.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? > I was a little critical of DFXI's handle when Dave brought it to our > attention on 1/8, but appropriately contrite when it surged the following > day. > > For an example of a more classic cwh chart, have a look at JBHT. This stock > has shown 4 stages now of advancing on high volume and then pulling back on > reducing volume before surging again. It may be forming another cup > yesterday and today. (yesterday's reversal was a bit disconcerting but there > is a subtlety in this kind of a reversal that diminishes its significance: > If you think of yesterday and the breakout day before as one long day, i.e. > put the two days atop each other, then the stock closed in the top third of > its (2-day)range on massive volume. That is positive. And all of > yesterday's volume was above the prior high. That was also positive. So > although technically yesterday was a reversal, it was not a sell signal. > > We had this on our "low" handle list (based on Weinstein) when it formed > it's first cup in November and it reappeared on our lists at each subsequent > cup formation. The fundamentals were never sufficiently strong to make it a > CANSLIM stock but as an example of a cup and handle, I think it's a good > one. I'm pleased to be holding it for a nice gain. > > Aloha, > > Mike Gibbons > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Spencer48@aol.com > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:56 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? > > > Katherine: > > To me DFXI does not look even like a nice Cup (much less a cup with a > zig/zag handle. However, I realize analyzing is all in perspective (like > beauty, it's in the eye of the beholder, I guess). Anyway, there was an on > point (at least I think so) article today in IBD. You might find it useful. > It concerns wide and loose bases: > > "Investor's Corner > Friday, January 25, 2002 > > Base Can Be Tight And Loose > BY MONIKA TJIA > > INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY > > > Stocks form a variety of bases. Whether the base is a cup-with-handle or a > double-bottom, in most cases you'll find at least a week or two of wild > price > action. > > That's OK. After all, investors' emotions fuel stock movements. Fear drives > prices sharply down, and greed yanks them back up. > > But if you see this erratic buying and selling throughout the base, watch > out. An excessive number of dizzying price swings indicates institutions are > moving in and out with ease. For every eager buyer, count an anxious seller. > > An occasional shakeout is fine. But you want a base to also have at least > several weeks of tight, quiet price action. This indicates solid support > throughout a base. > > Tight action means small price gaps from a stock's weekly high to its weekly > low. Often you'll see a stock close the week virtually unchanged for several > weeks in a row. This implies a lack of speculators and a load of steady > long-term shareholders. > > >From its October 1998 low to its April 16, 1999, high, Techne (TECH) ran up > 150%. At its April peak (see point 1 in accompanying image), the > fast-growing > maker of cytokine test kits used to find new drugs formed a new base, > correcting 24% from its high. > > As Techne formed its cup-with-handle base, it moved up and down in tiny > steps. At the end of each week in May, the stock finished very close to its > prior weekly close (point 2). > > In the week ended May 21, the stock swung as much as 12%. But it had a > positive reversal. For the week, it finished up 0.13 point vs. the prior > week > (point 3). This price action is exactly what you want to see, because > institutions raced in to support the stock. > > As Techne etched the right side of its base, the weekly spreads grew wider. > But weeks of quiet action far outnumbered its weeks of wild price swings. > > On Aug. 25, 1999, Techne broke out of its 19-week base on triple average > trade (point 4). > > After breaking out, Techne moved sideways for a few weeks. It held above its > 50-day moving average. When the market finally took off in late October, so > did Techne. > > >From its breakout to its July 2000 peak, Techne gained 416%. It then began > to > carve a new three-month base. But in terms of complexion, this one was the > exact opposite of its previous base. > > Instead of making slight price moves, it made extreme ones virtually every > week. The price swings ranged as much as 26%. Techne failed to finish its > base. It's now 56% off its all-time high." > > jans > > > > In a message dated 1/25/2002 9:30:10 AM Eastern Standard Time, > kmalm@earthlink.net writes: > > << Hi stockoper8or, > > When I wrote my note mid-day, DFXI had a tail. Looks like it ended midrange > after dropping a bit more after my note. Interesting action. I suspect in a > stronger market it would have been up and out of here by now. I wonder if > the > zig zag handle that started it all was a sign of market iffiness or a sign > of > stock iffiness. Just one for the "I wonder" pile of thoughts! > >> > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? "Mike Gibbons"
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? "Mike Gibbons"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] DFXI vs. JEC--Faulty handle? "Mike Gibbons"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]